Kudos to John for earning us a place at the Democratic Convention; and as Jack already posted, you can hear a podcast from his whirlwind plublicity tour here.
So much for sucking up to the boss, here is where I go out on a limb, attack and publicly critique him by saying that I agree with everything said in the interview except the opening premise as quoted in the podcast.
Brace yourselves.
At the beginning of the podcast, John is quoted as saying bloggers are not going to be “objective” in sending posts from the Convention. I understand the meaning of that statement, but I believe the point is that bloggers such as John who are posting from the Convention will not be “neutral.”
For a long time now, I have been attacking the mainstream press for not covering this administration properly, for being intimidated and cowered into a submissive neutrality. They are so wrong they have forgotten who they are.
The job of the press is not to be neutral, it is to be objective. There is an enormous difference.
Here's neutral: The Jedi rebels say the Death Star is a peril to the universe, but Darth Vader assures the universe that the empire is trying to protect us from the insurgent terrorists that seek to do us harm.
Here's objective: It's called the Death Star. Its objective is complete control. Darth Vader's tactics are brutal and dictatorial.
But, of course, it's even worse. The headline today would read: Vader Says He Will Keep Us Safe.
That's no joke. Watch me flipping out over a USA Today headline that says almost exactly that here.
He also makes a brilliant argument here, which should be journalism 101 for any reporter (and “Understanding The Press 101” for every consumer of information). His observation demonstrates what has become the complete flip-side to the diet served by each of the major networks and virtually every national broadcaster.
If the media reports on a story objectively and it does damage to the Republicans, that is not a bias. That is a sad day for the Republican Party. The truth hurts. Of course, the same is true of the Democratic Party.
So, if people weren't rescued for five days in New Orleans, it is not biased to report the Bush administration didn't show up. They didn't. It would be folly to report that some say the administration did a terrific job in rescuing people in an effort to appear neutral. . .
It is not biased to say that Iraq is undergoing tremendous civil strife. It is not biased to say the administration claimed the Iraqis would throw roses at our feet. . . . Though reporting these facts might not be neutral to the administration, it certainly is objective.
Conservatives often complain that liberals want equality of results rather than equality of opportunity in social programs. They say . . . the best we can do is equality of opportunity for everyone in society [but] when it comes to the press, they don't want equality of opportunity, they want equality of results. They don't want fair coverage, they want coverage which shows two equal sides no matter what actually happened.
I fully trust that GMD's Denver posts will be “objective.” I fully expect that they will also be partisan and that there will be no pretense of neutrality in anything coming down from on mile-high Denver.