The America We See

( – promoted by odum)

The LA Times has an overview of how the rest of the world is reacting to Obama’s victory:

http://www.latimes.com/news/na…

It is hard to overstate how intrigued the rest of the world is with Obama’s rise.  It simply doesn’t fit the narrative that has been formed of America over the last decade.  America isn’t just about entrenched elites and political dynasties.  

I was in Qatar last week on an overnight stay on my way back from Sri Lanka.  At passport control instead of asking me about the purpose of my visit, the official asked “McCain or Obama?”  When I replied Obama, he smiled, stamped my passport and gave me the thumb’s up.

It is nice that the rest of the world is seeing the America we see.

Entergy web

Vermont Yankee low rate aging nuclear power plant is in the news again.The Times Argus has the story.

Press releases early on said one thing regarding responsibility for the decommissioning fund when the reality was slightly different .

Entergy of New Orleans and Entergy of Vermont confuse each other’s areas of responsibility .Wait until the new shell Enexus is added to the tangled corporate web of liabilties.

The real gem and credibility builder is this from David O’Brien DPS regarding press releases . “Press releases aren’t binding in law,” O’Brien said. “What’s binding in law is the Public Service Board order” approving the sale. “What difference does it make what a press release says at the end of the day?” ….Gov.Douglas’s man all the way

This is of course true but perceptions from press releases matter also as well as binding legal power

Today the responsibility for decommissioning Vermont Yankee is with its owner,” Entergy Nuclear vice president and chief financial officer Wanda Curry told the House Commerce Committee on April 16. “You can think about it in numerous ways, but its owner is Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee. Its owner is not Entergy.”

That would appear to run counter to three Entergy press releases issued in 2001 and 2002. The first, dated Aug. 15, 2001, announcing Entergy’s plan to buy Vermont Yankee, said, “Entergy will also assume decommissioning liability for the plant and the plant’s decommissioning trust fund, which is required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.”

David O’Brien, commissioner of the Department of Public Service, agreed with Williams that the key 2002 legal documents leave Entergy’s parent company off the hook for decommissioning costs at Vermont Yankee.

“Press releases aren’t binding in law,” O’Brien said. “What’s binding in law is the Public Service Board order” approving the sale. “What difference does it make what a press release says at the end of the day?”

http://www.timesargus.com/apps…

The worst mistake that could be made.

The delegate counting reached an extraordinary point last night – we’ve created a new and lasting paradigm!  This election season will be a model for future campaigns – ideas, strategies and relationships.

 As for myself, I shed a few tears of joy in the midst of the euphoria and jubilation…

With all of the positives flowing out of this milestone, some of our Party leaders have begun to speak up and show some leadership. Ed Rendell said that Sen. Clinton should concede soon and throw her full support behind Barack Obama. From the Democratic Party website:  “Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, DGA Chairman Joe Manchin and DNC Chairman Howard Dean today issued the following statement: “Democrats must now turn our full attention to the general election. To that end, we are urging all remaining uncommitted super delegates to make their decisions known by Friday of this week so that our party can stand united and begin our march toward reversing the eight years of failed Bush/McCain policies that have weakened our country.” (1)

At last report Al Gore remained uncommitted…

A less encumbered Party leader, former President Jimmy Carter, in an interview published today in the Guardian/Co.UK., advised Senator Obama, Carter said “I think it would be the worst mistake that could be made”  for Obama to choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate. (2)

It’s time to begin our march toward November now.  We cannot have this cloud of uncertainty hanging over us for the next 3 months.  That would put a knife through the heart of the Democratic Party, potentially detrimentally effecting State and local campaigns, as well the Presidential race.  Obama could and should have long coattails.

 

(1)http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/06/a_statement_by.php

(2)http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/04/uselections2008

VY clean up

This from a brief article in the Free Press.The reporter needs a to do an awful lot more,this is just not enough.

MONTPELIER – State officials said they offered a compromise late in the legislative session that would have allowed for decommissioning of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant to start in 2032.

Legislative leaders say the proposal never reached their ears, though they aren’t sure they would have gone for it anyway.

The compromise might have resolved concerns about waiting 60 years for the plant to be cleaned up, as is possible under the state’s 2002 agreement with Vermont Yankee’s owner, Entergy Corp.

Legislators tried to require the guarantee of more money for a speedier cleanup if Entergy’s corporate restructuring plan goes through, but Gov. Jim Douglas vetoed the bill. As that bill was in its final stages in the Legislature, Public Service Commissioner David O’Brien said he offered the 2032 compromise.

“I think there was a lot of angst, I think on all sides of this bill,” Deputy Commissioner Smith said. “It had become very political.”

You think ? Who is trying to clean up the record?

http://www.burlingtonfreepress…

The meaning of ‘is’ is pretty damned clear in this case …

I just don’t know the date H.267 (the hemp bill) was presented to the governor and what date Vermont’s General Assembly adjourned.

From Vermont’s Constitution (Chapter 2 and my emphasis):

§ 11. [Governor to approve bills; veto proceedings thereon; nonaction]

Every bill which shall have passed the Senate and House of Representatives shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the Governor; if the Governor approve, the Governor shall sign it; if not, the Governor shall return it, with objections in writing, to the House in which it shall have originated; which shall proceed to reconsider it. If, upon such reconsideration, two-thirds of the members present of that House shall pass the bill, it shall, together with the objections, be sent to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of the members present of that House, it shall become a law.

But, in all such cases, the votes of both Houses shall be taken by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for or against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House, respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the Governor, as aforesaid, within five days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to the Governor, the same shall become a law in like manner as if the Governor had signed it; unless the two Houses by their adjournment, within three days after the presentation of such bill shall prevent its return; in which case it shall not become a law.

(state legislature’s version of the Constitution)

Oh, hold on … the controversy at hand:

A bill that was poised to legalize the cultivation of industrial hemp in Vermont is now the subject of a constitutional dispute over whether the legislation can become law without the governor’s signature.

(Vermont a hemp state? Not so fast, Times Argus, 06/04/08)

Here’s my thoughts:

1) There is no interpretation controversy here. The Constitution’s language is clear … unambiguous. The dates of the bill’s presentation and legislative adjournment decide the issue of whether Douglas could sign the bill without signing it or not.

2) Of course it is all a Democrat’s fault … in this case Howard Dean back in 1994:

But Gibbs said there’s a recent precedent for Douglas’ interpretation.

“In 1994, under Gov. Howard Dean, the Legislature passed a bill changing fish and game laws in the state. Dean didn’t sign the bill, according to Gibbs, but sent it to the Secretary of State who proceeded to enact the bill into law. of the law.”

3) Signing and not signing are very different acts … Douglas and Gibbs, please read the constitution in a public venue and then re-try your lame excuses with a straight face.

4) “out-of-the-mainstream majority”??????? Silly me, I thought the mainstream was defined by where most of something is. But then again I’m not a Republican politician … in the minority.

5) I really hope Markowitz is correct in her apprehensions. As noted elsewhere I think H.267 was a disaster, and going back for an umpteenth and cleaner bill is a much better proposition.

Primaries completed, Obama has clinched nomination, Convention awaits

Despite an unexpected Clinton victory in South Dakota, all the networks are announcing that the primaries are over. Obama has clinched the nomination. He’s kept slim-to-decent leads in pledged delegates, superdelegates, and an honest read of the popular vote (to the extent its readable, given the caucuses and the lack of a tally of Obama voters in Michigan).

So, although he wasn’t my first choice by a long shot, I am content with him as the nominee, and he has certainly earned the Spongebob victory moment that I’ve traditionally posted for election-night victories for the success of his hard-fought and historic (in many ways) primary campaign. Here ya go:

Big exposé on Second Vermont Republic by SPLC (UPDATED)

It's BAAACK… Almost two years after the Vermont secession group Second Vermont Republic's cozy ties to racist neo-Confederate groups were publicized here, VT Secession, and Five Before Chaos, the premier organization for tracking hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center, has finally released its much-anticipated report about the group and its “sister organization,” the Vermont Commons newspaper.

Now, those of you who have been reading GMD for a while don't need a rehash of this fiasco, in which it got to the point where SVR's crazy guru Thomas Naylor engaged in a smear campaign which almost cost GMD founder John Odum his job. For the initial post, go here. There's also a ton of info at VT Secession, the blog that broke the story. To make a long story short, they dug in their heels, people involved with a conscience were either dismissed or left (that would not include VT Commons' Rob Williams, who up until then seemed like a genuine progressive), and SVR's pretty much a one man show now, where when not talking to his Neo-Confederate buddies about the good 'ol days, Thomas Naylor probably wanders his hallways at night in his fuzzy slippers and bathrobe speaking to the ghost of Ethan Allen about the coming revolution. Right.

The SPLC report is quite well-documented, from the nefarious ties, the relationships and trust that were broken, and most importantly, Thomas Naylor's crazy-man, unrepentant demeanor. It's really amazing how a person who repeated ad nauseum how he has fought and opposed racism his whole life (which of course, does not preclude going on a white-supremacist radio show recently, where he was called “obviously a good Confederate”) can compartmentalize his mind so masterfully:

“Naylor also is down on desegregation. In a 2007 essay, “Minority States NOT Minority Rights,” Naylor criticizes segregation but also “forced racial integration,” complaining that the federal government was in the 1950s and 1960s “ordering me to associate with minorities whether I like it or not.” Overall, Naylor can't abide by the idea that since civil rights legislation was passed in the 1960s, “minority rights always trump states' rights.” “

That's a pretty bold anti-segregationist statement, eh? And VT Commons (whose editor is Naylor's buddy Rob “I-don't know-if-they're-racist-and-frankly-don't-care'” Williams) as recently as Feb. 5th had this quote about freedom and unity from fringe-bat Carol Moore:

“Those “identity groups” of whatever identity who desire separation to preserve their culture or live out a vision or lifestyle should not have to waste time and resources in defending or fighting discrimination lawsuits and onerous zoning laws and can focus it on building community.”

But Naylor, in all his zany glory, is a unreconstructed rebel to the end: 

In the face of these criticisms, Naylor remains defiant. “I don't give a shit what you write,” he told the Report. “If someone tells me that I shouldn't associate with the League of the South, it guarantees that I will associate with the League of the South.”

That really says it all, doesn't it? A rebel to the bitter end in the truest sense. Heh.

UPDATE: VT Commons editor Rob Willams bobs and weaves around the issue in an interview with the SPLC here, including his “don't know, don't care” comment. Just to let me refresh your memory, here is the exact quote we allegedly took out of context:

 “some of our secession scholars – Don Livingston, for example – happen to be southerners. Anyone who has met and talked with Don knows the man is thoughtful and well-studied. Is he a racist? I don’t know. And frankly, it is none of my damn business, at a personal level.”

If you're curious about Livingston, this is a good place to start. And if you like him, you'll love his fellow SVR advisory board member, Thomas DiLorenzo.

Clinton’s Final Act?

Bill Clinton didn’t surprise many people with his (hopefully parting) words yesterday.  Bill demonstrated his “style”, when he described Dee Dee Myers husband and his recently penned Vanity Fair article (1).

Of more interest are the comments of Dee Dee Myers.  She tells us what might be on the Clinton’s political horizon in the next few days and weeks (2).

Here are Bill Clinton’s (hopefully) parting words to us all:  (loosely misquoted from page 8 of Todd Purdum’s Vanity Fair article) (1).

“So much of my life is characterized by stories of self-indulgence and self-destruction,” Clinton writes near the end of Giving, from which he earned $6.3 million and gave away $1 million (or 16 percent) to charity. “So much of my life is focused not on honest differences of policy but on personal attacks. So much of my life is dominated by people who earn fortunes by demeaning others, defining them by their worst moments, exploiting their agonies. Who’s happier? The uniters or the dividers? The builders or the breakers? The givers or the takers? I think you know the answer.”

Lastly, here is an amazing audio/video of Clinton’s remarks about Purdum and Obama (3)!  He actually says the article is part of an Obama campaign conspiracy to smear Hillary.

Good Night Bill…

(1)http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/07/clinton200807?currentPage=8

(2)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlrWnz8ALNw

(3)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/bill-clinton-purdhum-a-sl_b_104771.html

The End?

Last night, MSNBC and CNN were reporting (at length) that Hillary Clinton has a scheduled speaking event in her (adoptive) home state of New York following today’s final two State primaries.  She has reportedly gone out of her way to invite all of her major donors and supporters, and there is nothing on her official schedule for the days or even weeks afterwards.  The reasonable speculation, of course, is that she’s done with.  This is countered, however, by the fact that all the cable news channels were still swarming with representative’s from her campaign who continue to insist “she’s in this race to win”.  It would seems though that the end is finally near.  Having nothing on her campaign schedule pretty well shows her hand.