Some slick budget manuevering

Democratic legislative leadership continues to impress by staying more or less in the driver’s seat of the budget debate. At a press conference today, Speaker Smith and Senator Shumlin indicated they would indeed hold an override vote on June 2nd, rather than adjourn to another date, and that they would propose a concurrent package of adjustments to the budget, designed to address concerns around the original bill – concerns expressed by the Governor as well as legislators of every stripe.

Now, the package includes a laundry list of several items, none of which really adds up to significant changes. The bill addresses the Unemployment Insurance Fund shortfall (which needed to be done regardless), there’s an exemption to farmers and logging interests from the ballyhooed closing of the capital gains tax loophole. All in all, not significant stuff. While reporters rightly pushed to determine if this companion package was designed to entice vacillating override votes, the truth is that it probably wasn’t. More likely that its simply an attempt to maintain the pro-active high ground both in the days leading up to the vote, as well as in the coverage on the day of.

A sense of how effective the leadership has been in keeping Douglas off his stride (and against all odds with a traditionally Douglas-friendly media that – at best – likes to cast battles into two polarized, equally out of touch sides): I was told that Douglas, when asked to respond to Democrats proposals, cited many of the very things addressed in this companion bill, and had to be told by reporters that his talking points (such as the impact of the cap gains change to farmers) were already obsolete. Woops.

Also of note is the fact that the budget hasn’t hadn’t actually been sent to the Governor yet (it arrived yesterday, expect a veto Monday). It may seem like a detail (and an odd one), but it will serve to maximize the drama of the June 2 session by tying the veto more closely to it. Heightened drama in this process means heightened attention and a leveling of the playing field (Douglas uses lulls and breaks in the narrative to work the media and public opinion very effectively).

On a side note: also present was Auditor Tom Salmon. Salmon, of course, recently grated with ill-timed and ill-considered grandstanding, “offering” his services as a budget mediator between the Legislature and the Governor (a transparently self-serving show he’s been roundly criticized for by most, Tim Newcomb notwithstanding). Maybe he was hoping to catch some camera time himself, as his continued media push for his “plan” has increased since the initial Reformer piece, and is bordering on buffoonery. Hopefully he’s gotten it out of his system.

Funny business incentive story

Governor Douglas’s team is in the BFP today bemoaning the lack of business tax incentives in the budget .The poster child used is BioTek a Vermont based international company with offices in Singapore, China, India, Germany and the UK.

As he considers expanding, though, Chief Executive Officer Briar Alpert is wondering if he can justify doing it here.BioTek, a manufacturer of high-tech science tools that employs 230 people in Winooski, is working on the acquisition of a California company. That state’s research and development tax credits could lure BioTek to locate any expansion there instead of in Vermont, Alpert said.” The rational decision would be to do the expansion out in California,” Alpert said. That decision might be different if Vermont had the same offer, he said, but Vermont is one of only nine states without research and development tax credits.

However no mention is made in the article of how in January 06, 2009 approval of up to $692,854 for job creation incentives was given by the Vermont Economic Progress Council to BioTek Instruments. Inc. in order to support jobs in the knowledge based economy.

Also left  missing was  mention of  the nomination of BioTek for the Dean C. Davis Outstanding Business of the Year on May 11 ,2009 .The annual award named for the former Governor of Vermont, honors a Vermont business that shows an outstanding history of sustained growth while displaying an acute awareness of what makes Vermont unique. It was noted less than three weeks ago that, the company already has plans to expand the Winooski headquarters by 7000 square feet to include a state-of-the-art laboratory.  This expansion will secure BioTek’s brand in the industry and reputation for producing cutting-edge, innovative instrumentation and techniques.

http://burlingtonfreepress.com…

http://www.vermont.gov/portal/…

http://www.vermontbiz.com/news…

A little bully pulpit ..Updated below

“The choices, I think, have been poor,” Douglas told the clearly like-minded gathering.

Business people did not have to encourage Governor Douglas to use the bully pulpit to make his case for vetoing the Vermont state budget, but they did it anyway.

Vermont Business magazine has the run down on part of the Gov.’s campaign to build support for his veto,but the accompanying poll shows a closer state than might be expected . At least as far as an online readers poll on a business friendly site can measure.

The Poll

If Douglas vetoes the state budget, it would be the first time in VT a governor has done so. If he does should the legislature

Override the veto to keep the budget as is ——–52%

Sustain the veto and work with Douglas to rewrite it ——–48%

Total votes: 44

http://www.vermontbiz.com/news…

Douglas loses ,Override wins in business magazine poll ! Meaning of win open to interpretation.………

If Douglas vetoes the state budget, it would be the first time in VT a governor has done so. If he does should the legislature

Override the veto to keep the budget as is………60%

Sustain the veto and work with Douglas to rewrite it…..40%

Total votes: 75

VT Renewable Energy Bill is Now Law

Apparently, Douglas is kind of a coward when the legislature actually fights back.  Per today’s Rutland Herald, via Daniel Barlow, he…

…allowed a major renewable energy bill to become law Wednesday without his signature after raising concerns earlier this year that it would lead to increased electrical costs for Vermonters.

Douglas… said… while he supports renewable energy and efficiency projects, he believes it will lead to residents and businesses paying too much for green and clean energy.

Still, he said he does not believe “the process will be well served by my veto…”

Full statement from Douglas is here (pdf file).

Maybe someone should have thought of standing in serious opposition to him sooner but I’m glad it finally seems to be happening.

UPDATE

And speaking of opposition, apparently (reported in Today’s Reformer, by Dave Gram for the AP), the opposition is kind of whiny:

Conspicuously absent from Wednesday’s session were Douglas’ top budget officers, Administration Secretary Neale Lunderville and Finance and Management Commissioner Jim Reardon. Reardon had a statement read into the record saying he feared the hearing was “designed to disparage the governor’s alternative budget approach.”

Wow.  

Guv’s PR machine goes to new depths

In case anyone missed this press release yesterday.  It pertains to a lunch meeting with workers and employers “during the middle of the work week during the middle of the day.”

——-

State of Vermont

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

For Immediate Release:

May 26, 2009

Contact: Dennise R. Casey

(802) 828-3333

**MEDIA ADVISORY**

Governor Douglas to Host Lunch Meeting with Workers & Employers to Discuss Legislative Budget

Montpelier, Vt. – As lawmakers begin their Montpelier hearings, Governor Douglas tomorrow will attend his third budget meeting with working Vermonters and small business owners in Williston at DEW Construction Corp.  The meetings, which are scheduled at convenient times for working Vermonters, are designed to give workers and employers the opportunity to weigh in on the troubling effects of the Legislature’s recent tax increases.

“Vermonters are really hurting and we are not immune to the effects of the national economic recession.  That is why we have to do all we can to pass a balanced, responsible and sustainable budget that invests in economic development,” said Governor Douglas.  “Legislative leaders have failed to do so by passing a budget that raises taxes on small businesses and farmers and leaves a staggering shortfall of over $200 million over the next two years. These deficits cannot be pushed off to the future when the economy could be worse and economic stimulus dollars more scarce.”

While Legislative leaders sit in Montpelier and hear from special interest groups and lobbyists about a budget proposal that isn’t even up for consideration, Governor Douglas is out meeting with working Vermonters, farmers and employers in their communities about the budget proposal that will be taken up at next Tuesday’s special session. Governor Douglas participated in two meetings today, one in St. Albans early this morning and another in Colchester. The Governor also visited the Northeast Kingdom.

“As I travel around the state, and today was no exception, I hear from struggling families, small business owners, and farmers that they are concerned that Montpelier just isn’t listening to them,” said Governor Douglas.  “I want Vermonters to know that I am listening.  Even if you don’t have special interest representation in Montpelier, you have me and I will continue to oppose these unfair income tax increases,” the Governor continued.

Today in St. Albans, a local CPA informed the group that due to high taxes in Vermont, his firm alone will lose more than $250 thousand in tax revenue to the state due to individuals leaving.  That prompted a businessman to announce that he and his wife had just returned from Florida where they purchased a home.

Another Franklin County resident told the group, which included both Republican and Democrat lawmakers that he worked 7 days a week in his small business and was unable to make the trip to Montpelier to weigh in on budget discussions.

A Colchester businesswoman told their group that they had to make very difficult budget choices to keep their company afloat during this difficult time, like adjustments to salaries and benefits for employees, and they expect Montpelier to do the same.

A northeast kingdom businessman told Governor Douglas that he recently reduced his employees’ salaries by 5% in order to prevent layoffs.

Another northeast kingdom worker wrote to his representative and said “Democrats love to plan their hearings during the middle of the work week during the middle of the day!  I would love to attend, but I need to earn a living to pay my taxes and to provide a home.”

Governor Douglas also believes that the Legislature’s budget does not adequately invest in job creation to provide opportunities for unemployed Vermonters and enourage a robust economic recovery.  That is why Governor Douglas has advanced an initative called SmartVermont which will leverage millions in ARRA funds to provide up to $185 in direct support for economic development to assist existing Vermont businesses and enourage new companies to locate and grow here.

In addition to community meetings, Governor Douglas is also meeting with several legislative Democrats who have reached out with ideas, comments and concerns about our current budget situation.

Tomorrow’s meeting begins at 12 noon and runs through the lunch hour.  

WHAT:  Lunch meeting with workers and employers  

WHEN:  Wednesday, May 27, 2009 – 12 p.m.      

WHERE: DEW Construction Corp.

      227 Blair Park Road, Suite 130

      Williston, VT      

###

BREAKING–POIRIER DECLARES AS AN INDEPENDENT

UPDATE–See County Committee update below.

Green Mountain Daily has learned that Barre Representative and long-time Democrat Paul Poirier has announced his intention to become an Independent. He made the announcement to a statewide labor group this morning and confirmed it in an e-mail to Tommy Walz,  Chair of the Barre Democratic Committee. Poirier confirmed his decision in a conversation with GMD earlier this evening. He said that he has also discussed his decision with House Democratic Leadership. 

According to Poirier, the decision is not motivated by any desire to break with the Democratic Party on policy issues. He intends no change in his positions, and specifically said that he would be voting to override Gov. Douglas’s veto of the FY 2010 budget. Poirier flatly stated, “People aren’t going to see any change in my voting pattern.”

Poirier said that the change is motivated by a desire to push a more strongly pro-labor platform in the Legislature, citing as an example the fact that H-382, a labor backed bill to require paid sick leave for all employers with at least ten employees, could not even get a hearing in committee this session. He added that this isn’t one of those, “the party left me” things, but he thought he could more effectively push the labor agenda from outside the party.

On the budget, Poirier was one of the sponsors of the bill to enact the income tax surcharge, colloquially known as the Snelling surcharge. He had his differences with the bill as passed, including the state's reliance on regressive taxes like the increase in the cigarette tax, favoring a more progressive approach, but intends to vote to override the governor’s veto in next week’s override session. “Anyone who thinks I'm going to leave the positions I've taken all my life doesn't know me very well,” Poirier said.

UPDATE

Paul came to the Wasington County Democratic Committee meeting tonight to explain his reasons for this move. It was much as reported above. He specifically cited problems with getting the labor agenda moving, including the sick leave and mandatory overtime bills, and getting true progress on health care. He said that he intends to continue to work closely with the Democrats, including voting to override the Douglas veto.

On timing Paul said that he did it this week because he didn't want to go into the veto session next week knowing that he had made this decision, but not being open to the other members of the caucus about it.

The main point of the discussion, and not only from Poirier, is that there is a gap between the Democratic Party and organized labor, and that while efforts are being made to bridge that gap, it is essential that we bridge that gap in order to serve Vermonters, including the 40,000 dues-paying union members in the state, and to run a strong, unified statewide candidate next year.

The reception was not at all hostile, and he did say clearly that if the Barre Democrats nominate him he will accept that nomination, although he did use the unfortunate phrase “Independent Democrat”, which he would do well to drop like a bad habit.

Nobody at the meeting bought the theory that he's doing this to head off a Prog challenge. Nobody, including the Barre members, thinks the Progs have much strength in his district, so even if they wanted to recruit a challenger they would be on very weak ground.

 

And our next stimulus project benefits company from…New Hampshire.

( – promoted by odum)

http://www.burlingtonfreepress…

Today’s Free Press reported that work will soon begin on our next federal stimulus road project, a summer-long resurfacing of Vermont Route 15.  The general contractor, Frank W. Whitcomb, is from New Hampshire.  GMD readers will recall Vermont’s first stimulus job – the Richmond Bridge repair – was awarded to Maine-based T. Buck Construction.

(See: http://greenmountaindaily.com/…

On the bright side, at least we’re geographically getting closer to supporting a Vermont contractor.  On the other hand, most data I’ve seen – from those who have been by the job site to statements from the Administration – suggests out-of-state workers still outnumber Vermonters on the Richmond Bridge.  Will it be the same story for Whitcomb on Route 15?

To make matters even more depressing, here are the Davis-Bacon highway wage rates for this job (fringes are the second number, where applicable):

Carpenter – $10.33/.73

Ironworkers:

    Reinforcing – $11.10/.24

    Structural – $10.24

Laborers:

    Asphalt Raker – $9.52                

    Flag Person – $7.00                

    General – $8.33/.24

    Guard Rail Installer – $7.50                

    Pipelayers – $9.00                

    Screedmen – $9.55

Power equipment operators:

    Backhoe – $14.00                

    Bulldozer – $13.10                

    Crane – $12.83/.24

    Excavator – $13.33/.67

    Grader – $12.70                

    Paver – $11.15/.38

    Roller – $11.02

Truck drivers:

    2 Axle Dump Truck – $9.00    

MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Are you awake?        

A Simple Question of Semantics?

(Good stuff in here – promoted by JulieWaters)

On this Memorial Day Sunday, as “Rolling Thunder” aggressed upon the peace and quiet of my little town, my thoughts turned inevitably to a peeve I’ve nursed since September 11, 2001.

Why did the Cheney administration immediately characterize those attacks as “acts of war” rather than horrendous criminal activity?  And, of course, the rhetoric didn’t change even after it was learned that they  were masterminded not by a sovereign state, but by a syndicate of wealthy thugs operating out of Saudi Arabia.

To this day, even though most people now agree that the war in Iraq was a mistake,  few say the same of the war in Afghanistan.  But there it is, nonetheless; plain as day.  Instead of organizing an international  manhunt for Osama Bin Laden under the auspices of the FBI, the CIA and Interpol,  Cheney and company ratcheted-up the war rhetoric and called out the army.  And we, the people, bought it, hook line and sinker, as if it truly was a “holy” war.    Of course, as is always the case, we were fed a sympathetic subtext about the repression of women.  We were going to “liberate” them, as we forcibly democratized a country most of us could barely find on the map.

Somehow, we are still buying the line that the war in Afghanistan was a “just” war.  Even Obama seems to think the only problem with that war was Bush’s short-attention span.  I suppose, if I were in Obama’s position, I might be tempted to view things this way, too.  After all, there doesn’t seem to be any way to avoid escalation there, other than to simply throw up our hands, admit that (with the best of intentions) we did a VERY bad thing; and then go home and try to explain to a lot of grieving families why their sons and daughters were needlessly sacrificed.  There is no happy ending here.

And it’s no good dressing it up as an act of chivalry on behalf of the women of Afghanistan.  Look at how briefly the inroads to female empowerment lasted after the U.S. turned its attention elsewhere.  That’s because no genuine cultural change had occurred.  Those cultural changes have to happen from within; and I firmly believe that we have only succeeded by our interference in setting back the cultural evolution that would have inevitably, if slowly, led to female empowerment in Afghanistan and throughout the Middle East.  Cultural evolution is a product of sustained peace and prosperity, neither of which has been furthered by American intervention.  In a peaceful world, with advancing technologies drawing everyone closer together, women would have chosen their own time to seize the reins of self-determination.  But with our big clown shoes, we marched in and made a hash of things.

So, this Memorial Day, when CNN crows about their interactive global map of American dead in Iraq and Afghanistan, as if it’s election night in the afterlife; I can’t help wondering what would have happened if Bush had just called 9/11 a crime, without all the flag-waving and hyperbole.

Don’t even get me started on the first Gulf War!  

This week in warblers / Open Thread

Pretty quiet day here today, so I’m going to do a bird post.  This is a piece I originally posted on Daily Kos Saturday as part of the “Dawn Chorus” series.  

This is a photo of a magnolia warbler (there’s a larger version after the fold.  Magnolia warblers are about 5″ tall, and has quite the range.  Per Cornell:

Though it has very specific habitat preferences in the breeding season, the Magnolia Warbler occupies a very broad range of habitats in winter:  from sea level to 1,500 meters elevation, and most landscape types, except cleared fields.

This diary is a summary of the warblers I’ve encountered in the last month.  I know it says “this week” but that’s just ’cause I like the alliteration.  I promise that the title is the only lie I will tell in this post.

All the warblers below were potographed in either Vermont, New Hampshire or Massachusetts, and none more than 100 miles from the borders of the other two.  

All the photos below are clickable, leading you to larger versions with more detail about location.  They were all taken with a Sigma 50-500mm lens, taken either with my Pentax K20d or the backup camera I used temporarily, a Pentax K10d, when I dropped (!) the K20d last week.

Warbler #1: American redstart (5″)

This photo is from Hinsdale, NH.  There’s a particular stretch of land that has gotten me great looks at quite a few warblers, and last weekend was no exception:

Cornell’s facts about the Redstart include the following:

The male American Redstart occasionally is polygynous, having two mates at the same time. Unlike many other polygynous species of birds that have two females nesting in the same territory, the redstart holds two separate territories up to 500 m (1,640 ft) apart. The male starts to attract a second female after the first has completed her clutch and is incubating the eggs.

Draw your own conclusions.

Warbler #2: bay-breasted warbler (5.5″)


I’d never seen a Bay-Breasted warbler before this day, so it was a real treat to get this good a look at one.  It reminds me why Parker River Wildlife Refuge is, by far, one of my favorite places to look for birds.  



Here’s what Cornell tells us about the Bay-breasted warbler:

… the Bay-breasted Warbler benefits from spruce budworm outbreaks when the caterpillars provide abundant food. Spraying to control the destructive outbreaks may have reduced populations of this warbler.

Warbler #3: black-and-white warbler (5.25″)


These used to be birds I worked hard to find.  Then one showed up in my yard, and now I just seem to find them everywhere.  This one showed up near my office at work:

And this one was another great Parker River sighting:

I can vouch for this characterization from Cornell:

Unusually aggressive for a warbler, the Black-and-white Warbler sometimes attacks and fights Red-breasted Nuthatch, Black-capped Chickadee, Tennessee Warbler, and other species.

I have, in fact, been dive bombed by these guys.

Warbler #4: black-throated green warbler (5″)

This was part of our Hinsdale walk:

Here’s what I want to know about this entry:

The male Black-throated Green Warbler sings persistently during the breeding season. One individual was observed singing 466 songs in one hour.

Who did the counting?

Warbler #5: blackburnian warbler (5″)

I want to say something about this: we showed up on Parker River last Saturday and didn’t know it was birdathon day.  There were birders everywhere doing their little competitive birding thing (I don’t do the competitive stuff as a rule, but I get how it can be fun).  I mentioned to someone that I had been looking to get a decent photo of a blackburnian (I had one from a few years ago) and he made a point of taking time out of his birdathon to help me find one.  

I really like birders.  Even when we’re in competition, we help one another out:

Warbler #6: blue-winged warbler (4.5-5″)

Even though it was close to home (we found this bird at Herrick’s Cove, a Vermont Important Bird Area I check out early in the morning on my way to work), this guy was work.  We heard this and I thought it was a Northern Parula.  Hoping to get a decent shot of it, we spent about 20 minutes looking for it, and quickly saw it hop up a few times, only to go down again, but those brief looks made it really clear that it was not a parula.  It took 20 minutes of hanging out looking for it, and almost giving up, before we finally were getting ready to move on when it flew out into a tree and landed right above me.  Viola.  Instant life bird.

Warbler #7: chestnut-sided warbler (5″)

One morning at Herrick’s Cove, I saw a bunch of these guys just flitting about like crazy.  One landed right by my head:

This shot was at Parker River:

Here’s something I did not know about these birds:

On the wintering grounds in Central America the Chestnut-sided Warbler joins in mixed-species foraging flocks with the resident antwrens and tropical warblers. An individual warbler will return to the same area in subsequent years, joining back up with the same foraging flock it associated with the year before.

Warbler #8: common yellowthroat (5″)

As their name implies, common yellowthroats are fairly common.  They are, however, still pretty neat and can present some fun ID challenges.  This first one is from Parker River:

These others are from Herrick’s Cove, on two different days.  Notice the marking on these two birds.  It would be very easy to mistake them for the much less common Nashville Warbler, which looks extremely similar, but can have a red mark on the tip of its head, and has distinctly black legs:



Cornell again:

The Common Yellowthroat is apparently monogamous within a breeding season and only infrequently will males be seen with two mates in their territory. Females, however, show no fidelity to their mates and often attract other males with their calls. The true genetic mating system of this species remains to be worked out.

I’ll just leave that as is.

Warbler #9: magnolia warbler (5″)

These are both photos of the same bird, taken at Parker River.  We first found it a bit distant, as in this view:

Then as I traced it, it kept getting closer:

Warbler #10: northern parula (4.5″)

Also at Parker River, another birder pointed this Northern Parula out to me.  I’ve had photos of Parula’s before, but never this close or with this much detail:

Parulas tend to hang out high in the tree canopy, which is one reason I rarely get photographs of one.  Seeing one this close, and nearly at eye level was great.

Warbler #11: northern waterthrush (6″)

This bird from Herrick’s Cove was a real treat.  I’d been looking to get a photo of a Northern Waterthrush for a few years now, but I never managed to pull it off.  The day before I got these photos, I heard two of them calling back and forth, but could only get a quick look at one, not quick enough to get a photo.  I even tried playing its call to coax it out.  No luck.  The next morning I went back to the same spot to see if they were still around.  Didn’t even need to try the call.  One was singing from a nearby tree and eventually moved into perfect view.  



Warbler #12: ovenbird (6″)

Now this ovenbird was not easy.  It was hidden by leaves and just sort of singing down low, but I did manage to find it and photograph it, despite all expectation to the contrary.

The ovenbird is named, by the way, because its nest resembles a dutch oven.

Warbler #13: palm warbler (5.5″)

Palm Warblers are among the earliest new warblers, so I’m always looking for them (and Yellow Rumped) before anything else is even on my radar.  These were both at Herrick’s Cove one morning:



I don’t know why it’s called the Palm warbler.  It’s a northern bird.

Warbler #14: wilson’s warbler (4.75″)

This Wilson’s was a real treat.  We spotted it and I just did my best to get photos of it.  Most of them came out poorly but a few worked out well.  This was at Parker River as well:



Warbler #15: yellow warbler (5″)

Yellow Warblers tend to get fairly ubiquitous.  These were taken all over:

Allen Brothers Marsh in Westminster, VT:

The boat launch in Springfield, VT:

Parker River:

Herrick’s Cove:

When I listen for them, I have trouble sometimes.  I didn’t realize why until I read this:

Recent DNA-based studies indicate that the Chestnut-sided Warbler is the closest relative of the Yellow Warbler. Both sing similarly phrased songs, and Yellow Warblers regularly sing songs nearly identical to those of the Chestnut-sided Warbler.

Warbler #16: yellow-rumped warbler (5.5″)

Finally, another of the most prevalent warblers, the yellow-rumped warblers are among the first to arrive in the Spring and the last to leave.  I haven’t done great with photos of them this year, but this shot from Herrick’s Cove does the trick:

Something else I didn’t know is that one reason they are so prevalent is because of their eating habits:


Yellow-rumped Warblers are perhaps the most versatile foragers of all warblers. They’re the warbler you’re most likely to see fluttering out from a tree to catch a flying insect, and they’re also quick to switch over to eating berries in fall. Other places Yellow-rumped Warblers have been spotted foraging include picking at insects on washed-up seaweed at the beach, skimming insects from the surface of rivers and the ocean, picking them out of spiderwebs, and grabbing them off piles of manure.

A few other warbler tips.  For telling them apart (in the Spring– in the Fall it’s murder) I tend to group them into “yellow”, “colorful,” “stripey,” “black throated” and “misc.”  This tends to be based on their head color, but isn’t exclusively.  

Yellow ones include yellow, palm, wilson’s, common yellowthroat, nashville & blue winged.

I use yellow warbler as the “base” for this group and distinguish the others based on how they differ from it.  Palm is like yellow but with red cap.  Wilson’s has a black cap.  Nashville has a white eye ring and some grey on its head.  Blue-winged has blue wings.  Common yellowthroat has a black mask for males and, for females, looks like a pink-legged nashville.

The colorful ones include parula, chestnut-sided, redstart and yellow-rumped

I don’t have a base for those– but once I realize it’s a very colorful bird it’s not that hard to separate them out.

The stripey ones include the ovenbird, the waterthrushes, the magnolia and the black and white.  Mangolia is the only yellow one with stripes in our region.  The ovenbird has a bright orange streak on the head.  The waterthrushes are harder to tell apart but Louisiana tends to be much less colorful than northern.  I’ve never seen a Louisiana, so when I start seeing one, I’ll figure out more 🙂

The black throated warblers are sort of their own category (black throated green, which isn’t really green, and black-throated blue, which is very dark blue, and black-throated gray, which I’ve never seen), but if you see a warbler with a black throat, it’s easy to tell which is which.

The others I usually just sort out on their own.  

I never really thought I’d be into warblers this much, but it’s kind of like the way I’m into puzzles: there’s something really fun and immediate about seeing such a small bird and figuring out what it is.  Figuring out how to photograph it is even more interesting because it can be extremely challenging, but sometimes I do okay.

Finally, a couple administrative items:

  1. I take a lot of photos, and I don’t post them all here.  If you’d like to get a weekly (or daily) e-mail summarizing new photos, there’s a form you can fill out here to get regular updates.  I do not even look at the e-mail addresses subscribed and don’t send solicitations; it is a strictly announcement only e-mail group that sends out an automated e-mail once per day, but the default setting is for a weekly archive;
  2. Personal self promotion: I do sell prints, including a print of that Magnolia Warbler photo.

Okay, that’s it for this week’s Dawn Chorus.  I hope you enjoyed all the warbler photos and factoids.  As usual with all my birding posts, feel free to treat this as an open birds and birding thread, and see everyone in the comments.