VT loon watch: Naylor back in bed with the racists

I know, I know, most of you could probably care less about Glenn Beck’s new best friend, Thomas Naylor, the leader of the now-discredited seccesionist group, Second Vermont Republic. But like the teabaggers, there’s that “gotta-stare-at-a-car-wreck” thing that unhinged lunatics just make me get.

It was a big story on here a few years ago when we publicized his organization’s ties to racist groups like the League of the South. This got the anti-hate organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center interested, and they did a big report about them a while ago, which Naylor dismissed, but soon after, he supposedly broke ties with the LoS, decrying their racism.

But Naylor, when it comes down to it, is “obviously a good Confederate”, as he was once told when appearing on a white-supremacist’s radio talk show last year, obviously an unreconstructed one, as, yes, he’s back in bed with the LoS, as this new report from the SPLC reveals:

The divorce didn’t last long, however. Naylor and a close ally, prominent New York leftist writer and editor Kirkpatrick Sale, are now scheduled to speak at a conference on secession being organized by the Abbeville Institute. They will share the stage at the Charleston, S.C., conference in February with neo-Confederate scholars such as Thomas DiLorenzo, Clyde Wilson and Livingston, the Abbeville Institute founder. All three have current or past links with the League of the South. (Go here for profiles of DiLorenzo, Livingston and Wilson.)

Defiant as ever, Naylor, echoing the same sentiments about the SPLC that one would usually read on white supremacist sites such as Stormfront and VNN (no links, if you want it, look for it), had this to say:

Reached by telephone at his home in Vermont, Naylor declined to discuss the state of his relations with the neo-Confederates. “This has nothing to do with race,” he said. “It’s the SPLC that’s the hate group. Why don’t you go fuck yourself?

Class act, that Naylor. No word yet from his cohort at VT Commons, Rob Williams. He’d probably say he doesn’t care, as he’s said in the past, all in support of the lost cause.

On the matter of Daniel Freilich…

You know, I’m a big fan of democracy. I generally tend to encourage people to run for things. I generally like to see candidates from the left, I generally encourage such challenges to come in the Democratic primary, and I generally find myself concerned about the entrenched power of incumbency. So more power to Daniel Freilich, the announced primary challenger to Patrick Leahy who has garnered attention already in the national online media, right?

Okay, but I can’t help but feel annoyed reading Mike Eldred’s write-up of the guy.

Freilich recently returned to Vermont after 13 years on active duty in the Navy. After he left active duty for the Navy Reserves, he and his partner Donna Wilder searched Vermont looking for a place to relocate from Washington, DC, where they live now. “We found Wilmington and just fell in love with the area,” he says. “We liked the people we met and the area is just physically beautiful.”

So he moves to Vermont from New York in 1992 for his medical residency. He’s been gone for 13 years, has decided to “relocate” from Washington DC, so I infer from the piece that he was only a Vermont resident from 1992-1996. All of four years. He does seem to be registered to vote in Westford, but under a Rockville, MD address. I’m not sure how that works, but at least he has retained a connection to the state.

But it still feels a little too Jack-McMulleny to me. Maybe it’d be a little more appropriate to re-acquaint yourself with the state and become part of a local community before asking people to vote out Patrick Leahy on your behalf. If you really think Leahy should go, maybe it’d be a better idea for you to find others who feel similarly and see if you can work together to find a more suitable candidate?

C’mon, man. I know jobs are tight, but there are better ways…

Sure I hoped Obama would win the Nobel some day, but… are you freaking kidding me!?

UPDATE: Obama walks what is a bit of a rhetorical tightrope in accepting this nomination, very well. His appropriately toned remarks are up at TPM. One kind of gets the feeling that he was as weirded out at the news as everyone else.


WTF?

President Barack Obama made history again Friday, winning the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

[…] This year’s Peace Prize nominees included 172 people — among them three Chinese dissidents, an Afghan activist and a controversial Colombian lawmaker — and 33 organizations, the highest number of nominations ever.

Seriously? How… weird. I’m not knocking it, it just is… weird.

On the one hand, I remember the decades it took Jimmy Carter to be honored after his historic and hugely impactful contributions. On the other hand I think of how many causes and activists – such as former Nobel Prize Winner Jody Williams and the international effort to ban land mines she speaks for – who deserve such an honor and whose cause could use the boost that Williams and the land mine effort received after her victory.

And on the third hand, I think of how self-evidently weird this award is and how it will open the door to yet another round of everyone from letters-to-the-editor-writers to TV pundits verbally beating the crap out of Obama for no apparent reason beyond either his political persuasion or as an expression of stealth racism.

And all three of those hands are scratching my head as I wonder WTF?

At any rate, congratulations are in order for our President – I hope. Weird as it all seems, it is awfully fun to think about the people who must be going nuts at this news (here’s looking at you Bibi…).

(And sure enough, conservative heads are exploding from coast to coast. Heh. This is turning into seriously big fun…)

Good morning …

The Douglas administration has decided that Enron Entergy Louisiana can give birth to a new corporate entity that will take ownership of Entergy Yankee. Entergy says they need to do this because apparently their current business model doesn’t allow them to tend to the proper running of Entergy Yankee (State reaches deal with Yankee, Times Argus, 10/09/09) I’m absolutely positive the new spin off built on borrowed money will be sooooo different … maybe the new name can be Fairpoint? Oh, right, that’s already taken.

Down in our nation’s capitol the DC Dems of Senate Judiciary Committee (you know … Leahy) have helped keep us under constant police surveillance by passing on to the floor a “no changes” set of changes to the UNPATRIOTIC Act. The Dems claim to victory? The same weasel Dems who kowtowed away the cheney/bush years when it came to protecting the American people from a police state wannabe will be … well … protecting us. (Committee approves Patriot Act changes, Times Argus, 10/09/09)

On the front page of today’s Times Argus is a story about a young bear being hit on the interstate, and on the “Local & State” front page is a picture of a (apparently formerly imprisoned) goat standing on a rocky ledge overlooking route 2 in Berlin. Kind of a sad juxtaposition of modern man rushing ahead without concern for what we do to our fellow Earth travelers and what must have been a Papillon like escape from the clutches of this very same humanity.

Thankfully a judge agrees that Barre Town’s select board and police department violated Kathy Rubalcaba, her property and most senses of decency. The Barre Town military showed up at her property the other day to steal several hens (miss-identified as roosters by Barre Town’s chicken expert) along with one juvenile (really a) rooster. Yesterday Judge Geoffrey Crawford said uh-uh … give ’em back, do some arbitration and come back to me with the results. (Judge sends roosters back to coop, scolds town officials, Times Argus, 10/09/09)

And in closing I’m sure Vermont’s education commissioner Armando Vilaseca is a really nice guy dedicated to doing his job with a high level of informed professionalism. But he’s missing the point again: while it is absolutely true that some reasons for wanting to rid a district of a teacher or administrator should not under any circumstances be kept a secret; Vilaseca’s whole push to strangle our local education system with centralized command and control will only aggravate the situations he seeks to address. (Restoring trust after the Bryer case, Times Argus, 10/09/09) One of the reasons to push for continued local and empowered school boards is local accountability … folks want to know they can have concerns regarding their kids addressed by people known to them … and easily accessible … and responsive. Make sure we on the school boards have the information to act on and the authority to act on that information.

[Added as an after thought]

Talk about premature acclamation! Seems President Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize. ‘The Nobel Committee said he was awarded it for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples”.’ Me? I think I’ll wait on that sort of rhetorical ejaculate. Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran are still right where the cheney/bush administration put ’em … on the war list. Obama could prove himself up to this award, but he hasn’t yet … let’s let time help us make a sober judgement.

David Walker at Norwich University

David M. Walker, former Head of the Governmental Accountability Office, now President and CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation will be at Norwich University next Tuesday the 13th at 7pm. The event is being held, Free of Charge, at Plumley Armory. For reservations, call Jackie Barnett  at 802 485 2633   or email   jbarnett@norwich.edu.

For an introduction to Mr. Walker, this is his appearance on 60 minutes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…

Obama Taking It On the Chin From Both the Right and the Left

As the President Fights Off Conservatives on Health-Care Reform and the Economy, Liberals Complaining More and More Loudly About His Lack of Action on Ending the War in Afghanistan, Closing Guantanamo Bay and Expanding Gay Rights — But the Slow Pace of Change Is Also Frustrating Right-Wing Critics Who Claim That Obama Is ‘Taking the Country Down the Path Toward Socialism’

Obama: Obama administration seeks to reassure Pakistan and Afghanistan over Taliban

A lot on his plate: President Obama, who will hold a third meeting on U.S. strategy in Afghanistan with principal advisers next week, is on the spot after General Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, presented a grim public assessment of the war. The president’s dilemma over Afghanistan, combined with the rough going that he and his Democratic allies in Congress are experiencing in getting a comprehensive health-care reform bill passed is becoming a cause of growing concern among the liberals who enthusiastically supported his run for the White House. (Photo: Reuters)

(Posted 5:00 a.m. EDT Thursday, October 8, 2009)

==============

SPECIAL REPORT

==============

By ELI CLIFTON

Inter-Press Service

Since before taking office, President Obama has been no stranger to being in the cross-hairs of conservative pundits who have accused him of everything from bring a “secret communist” to a “tax-and-spend liberal” who would oversee huge expansions in the federal government.

But a growing chorus of criticism here in Washington is coming from liberals who feel the president has failed to deliver on a large number of the campaign promises he made during the run-up to the November election.

This sentiment of disappointment and frustration with Obama’s lack of progress on his agenda — topped by his seeming inability to build a consensus in his own party on health-care reform, concern that he may be in the process of committing the U.S. to an unwinnable war in Afghanistan, inaction on closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and repealing the ban on gays in the military — was put on striking display on Saturday night when NBC’s “Saturday Night Live” led off with a satirical skit portraying Obama listing his two major accomplishments since taking office as “Jack and Squat”.

The SNL skit came on the heels of last week’s announcement that the president’s adopted hometown of Chicago had lost its bid for the 2016 Olympics for which the president and first lady had made a last-minute trip to Copenhagen to personally lobby the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

The IOC’s decision to award the Games to Rio de Janeiro — the first South American city ever to host the quadrennial sports spectacular and the first city ever to host both the World Cup soccer tournament (in 2014) and the Olympics back to back — left the Obama administration with the political equivalent of egg on their faces.

SLOW GOING IS ALSO FRUSTRATING OBAMA’S RIGHT-WING CRITICS

Indeed the White House’s seeming inability to accomplish its major public initiatives (with the notable exception of the $700-billion-plus economic-stimulus package) comes as a surprise to members of both parties as the Democrats have a majority in both the House and Senate and — at least in theory — should be in an ideal position to push an agenda of their choosing.

Obama’s difficulties with building a coalition within his own party have come largely as a result of conservative Democrats, known as “Blue Dogs,” whose election played a large part in building a Democratic majority in the House.

However, the lack of progress from a president who ran with a campaign slogan of “Yes We Can” also casts serious doubts about the credibility of his right-wing critics who claim he is a radical reformer with a secret left-wing agenda.

“There are those on the right who are angry. They think that I’m turning this great country into something that resembles the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, but that’s just not the case,” said SNL actor Fred Armisen, as Obama. “When you look at my record it’s very clear what I’ve done so far and that is — nothing. Nada. Almost one year and nothing to show for it.”

While the list of accomplishments which “SNL” claims the president has failed to make progress on is — as has been pointed out by a number of fact-checking journalists — overstated, the number of initiatives on the administration’s agenda which are “in progress” but haven’t yielded discernible results is growing.

AFGHANISTAN: ‘DAMNED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON’T’

Frustration in Washington foreign policy circles has centered on the willingness with which the administration seems to be committing the U.S. to a long-term involvement in Afghanistan — a country with a long history of repelling outside powers — and a failure to make measurable headway in bringing about a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Foreign-policy realists have largely agreed that an outright withdrawal from Afghanistan could be catastrophic and potentially destabilize an already chaotic region, but concern has been growing about the administration’s “mission creep” in Afghanistan away from the original objectives of combating terrorism and denying al-Qaida a safe haven.

Obama will be making a difficult decision — probably next week — about how to respond to General Stanley McChrystal’s request for 30,000 to 40,000 additional troops to support U.S. operations in Afghanistan.

The decision facing the president is politically loaded:

A decision to deploy the number of troops requested by McChrystal will garner attacks from liberals within his own party and longtime anti-war activists that he is committing U.S. soldiers to an unwinnable war.

A decision to deploy a fewer number of troops than requested will undoubtedly bring cries from Republicans and Democratic hawks accusing the president of not listening to his generals and denying the military the manpower and resources required to be victorious in Afghanistan.

Foreign policy heavyweight Brent Scowcroft, who served as national security adviser to presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush, generally praised Obama’s foreign policy moves overall, but he sharply criticized the administration’s strategy toward the Arab-Israeli conflict in a newspaper interview published Tuesday.

“I think it’s time for different role; the focus on settlements on the Israeli side and improving contacts on the Arab side, over-flight rights and so on, is going for the capillaries at a time when that cannot produce good results,” he told The Washington Times. “I have felt for some time that the two sides are unlikely in the foreseeable future to be able on their own to make the compromises necessary.”

Scowcroft advocates an alternative strategy in which the United States, Europe and Russia would table a plan to create a Palestinian state.

NINE MONTHS AFTER INAUGURATION, A GROWING IMPATIENCE ON THE LEFT WITH OBAMA

Part of the increasing frustration from the left seems to be with the lack of dramatic progress on policy initiatives from an administration that is nine months into a four-year term.

The important initiatives promised by Obama have included health-care reform, closure of the Guantanamo bay prison, introduction of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emissions, and a repeal of the ban on gays in the military — but it is too early to say that the president has outright failed to deliver on these promises just yet.

Health-care reform has been held up by both intra-party and partisan wrangling, the closure of Guantanamo Bay prison still seems likely but not on the time frame originally promised; cap-and-trade legislation has been introduced in the Senate and there is hope that serious progress will be made on the bill — although a vote this year is doubtful before the December Climate Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark ; and a repeal of the ban on gays in the military is being “pushed down the road a little bit,” according to Defense Secretary of Robert Gates.

REAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS BEING OVERLOOKED

Real accomplishments have been made with the removal of $1.75 billion in funding to order seven more F-22 “Raptor” jet fighters — a follow through on Obama’s commitment to end pork-barrel government contracts — and the administration appears to be making progress in changing the nature of the debate on environmental legislation.

The past two weeks have seen a wave of large public utilities and well known U.S. companies resign from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in opposition to the Chamber’s determined efforts to block cap-and-trade legislation.

While progress may still be coming in a wide range of the president’s policy initiatives, the slowness of serious movement on health-care reform and difficulties in defining the U.S. mission in Afghanistan have become the chief domestic and foreign policy tests in which the president’s supporters would like to see real progress.

The first year of the Obama presidency is far from over and the president’s poll numbers remain high — an Associated Press/GfK Poll released Tuesday found his job-approval numbers rose slightly to 56 percent — but a growing sense of unease has started to spread amongst his supporters that his persuasive and moving speeches might not be followed by successful policy initiatives.

OBAMA WHITE HOUSE LESS DISCIPLINED THAN CAMPAIGN

Obama and his campaign managers were seen as running one of the most well-disciplined and carefully planned presidential campaigns in modern U.S. political history.

Unfortunately, the discipline and coordination displayed by his near-flawless campaign seem to have gone missing in recent months as supporters are left concerned that the candidate they supported — and who in many ways proved his capability as a bipartisan, “big tent” builder — seems increasingly unwilling or unable to overcome conflicts within his own party or push back against a disorganized and increasingly marginalized Republican opposition.

Armisen’s satirical portrayal of Obama may have been over-the-top in its depiction of him as a president who has accomplished nothing, but the skit spoke to the fears of Obama supporters that the charismatic candidate they helped elect might not be a cure-all for the increasingly difficult and intertwined domestic and foreign policy challenges facing the U.S.

“So all of you frothing Glenn Beck supporters, put away those tricorner hats and those Photoshop pictures of me as the Joker,” said Armisen as Obama, “because if I see any more of this hateful rhetoric, I’m going to have to take drastic action… no, not really.”

# # #

Special Report Copyright 2009, Inter-Press Service. Re-posted by permission.

The ‘Skeeter Bites Report Copyright 2009, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.

bits ‘n’ pieces

Things n’ links:

  • Scuttlebutt: Rep. Joe Acinapura (R-Brandon) is not running for re-election. Or so I hear. Sometimes I also hear voices, though, so you never know.
  • Hallenbeck reports that Adam Howard of Cambridge has been appointed by the Governor to fill Richard Westman’s seat. Westman was recently appointed Tax Commisioner.
  • Have you been to vtdigger.org yet? For heaven’s sake, go. Here’s a link even. Geez, why haven’t I put it in the link list yet?
  • Hmm. Dunno.
  • Bernie makes inroads with the anarchist caucus.

Off topic post: Hollywood Classroom

This is Tucker. He’s my 10 year old kid.

Tucker wanted more freedom during after school time. His mother and I chatted and I came up with a scheme to sneak more learning in on him. Heh.

It’s hard not to notice how so many kids seem to know less about the world in general than we did at their age. Not that we were geniuses, but, well, you probably know what I mean. A lot of that information about who we are, where we came from and what the world is like was kind of seeping in there around the age of 10, and I’m worried that I aint seeing it. But how to get it in there without more classes, without too much pushback from the kid, and in a way that might be interesting?

Hollywood, baby.

So here was my deal. Once a week, Tucker will be watching one movie – a historical film or a biopic or somesuch. Not to present it as real history, but to get him acquainted with dates/times/names that he oughta know. We then talk about what he thought of the film, including what was “real” and what parts were made up Hollywood silliness. Hopefully enough of the reality “takes” to make a difference – and maybe to get him interested in learning more.

Oh, and he’s got a blog going, where he will review the films and give his impressions. What will the movies be? Well… you’ll have to read the site, no? Each week will be a surprise, although they’ll progress in “chronological” order.

So check out his site here and send some encouraging comments