Closing VSH Canteen “Last Straw” for Mental Health Advocates

(cross-posted from Beyond VSH blog, here)

vtdigger: Closing the Vermont State Hospital’s Canteen the “last straw” for mental health advocates (here)

Advocates hold press conference


Advocates, employees and former patients are outraged by Douglas administration’s decision to close the Canteen at the Vermont State Hospital. They say it’s the only place left for patients to get a break from the hospital’s locked down wards.

In order of appearance: Malcolm Sawyer, former VSH patient; Joe Yoder, a psychiatric technician for VSH; Sarah Lunderville, executive director of the Vermont Center for Independent Living; Curtis Sinclair, Canteen coordinator; and Michael Sabourin, a patient advocate.

(via YouTube, here; posted by anneegalloway (November 7, 2009); length: 10:31 minutes/seconds)

Check out the blog post where the video was originally blogged up and also to read comments that have been posted concerning it (including mine, which is posted below), here (via vtdigger).

My Reply to the vtdigger video post:


Although I am among those who have long been working to have VSH closed down as well as at the same time working to have built and putting into place a very different system of providing for the actual needs of those either currently or previously as well as in the future who could be incarcerated there and, will not shy away from continuing to do so at all; while it does remain open, I have come down on the side of opposing the closure of the VSH canteen out of respect for each and every one of those currently as well as formerly incarcerated at VSH who it is reported have indicated the canteen is needed for the time being as their one small bright light at the end of the tunnel, even if only a glimmer of hope is provided by such.

These needs include real, safe, decent and affordable housing, income, training, employment, transportation and other such supports and services that allow one to live independently where and how they may choose to reside.

This is of course versus what has basically been the sole focus of the commissioner and his supporters to chiefly replace the role of VSH and merely moving what is done there in the form of institutionalization elsewhere in one form or another, while mostly providing poor lip service to providing truly community-based opportunities and real inclusion for people that too many within our society would rather keep out of sight out of mind, unless the plan is to allow them to rot on the street or in jails and prisons, etc., which already happens often enough already.

The fact is that dumping people without their being offered basic housing as well as independent living opportunities and supports or services they can freely choose from when they are without such is no solution either. Not everyone has the means to provide for and support themselves after being released from such incarceration, particularly right away or so easily.

The current administration in office and the commissioner of mental health and his supporters have their priorities mixed up and have been headed in the wrong direction for quite some time.

Even though closing VSH and, not merely moving its functions elsewhere, is highly desirable and sorely needed in order to move ahead with what will be required, the closure of the canteen while the facility remains open is not, certainly not by those who are incarcerated there, nor those of us who stand in solidarity with them anyway.

That is my opinion, what is yours?

AFT attempting to organize child care workers in Vermont

(I’m promoting this back to the top again because I think it’s an important enough issue that it warrants further discussion. – promoted by JulieWaters)

I want to start this with a disclaimer.  Some time ago, I was part of a union drive that was organized by AFT that was a bit of an unmitigated disaster.  It is difficult for me to be objective, but I didn’t want to just post this without acknowledging prior involvement with the group.

With that in mind, I’ve just heard that they are attempting to organize child care workers in Vermont and want to wholeheartedly endorse this effort.  As some of you know, I spent several years doing training and technology support for early childhood educators, and working with their resource and referral agencies throughout the state of Vermont.  During that time, I worked with hundreds of people and learned a lot about how valuable their services are to the people of Vermont and how important it is that people go into the field, despite the long hours, low wages and generally being treated not particularly well.  

With budget cuts and layoffs at the state level (as well as with some of the local support agencies), resources are being stretched thin.  Many Early Childhood Educators have local network groups which can help provide support for one another, but the power of an organized, unionized, front is of immense value.

Having an organized entity looking out for the interest of child care providers in Vermont has potential to:


  1. allow them to respond with force to attempts on the part of the state of Vermont to limit their benefits without due process;

  2. give them access to group rates for multiple forms of insurance;

  3. give them a solid voice to address concerns with a system which may not be looking out for their interest;

  4. give them access to lobby legislators for stronger support of their work and clients.

I don’t know if AFT can pull this off in Vermont.  They need to use organizers who know the population and respect the work they do.  It’s not the same as organizing in other regions or with other professions.  Many child care workers work in isolation from one another and those who work with networks may perceive this as an attempt to undermine their own organizing efforts.  If this drive, however, uses the right approaches, finding good and productive ways to work with the local networks, focuses on local organizing (as opposed to relying on people from out of state to do their organizing work), it’s got real potential to turn into something of great value.

Impacts of the House Health Care Bill on Vermont

Cool widgets and info from the House Democrats on the Affordable Health Care for America Act – H.R. 3962 – otherwise known as the House’s version of Health Care Reform. According to the House’s projections, the impact of this bill on Vermont would be to:

• Improve employer-based coverage for 381,000 residents.

• Provide credits to help pay for coverage for up to 156,000 households.

• Improve Medicare for 106,000 beneficiaries, including closing the prescription drug donut hole

for 7,600 seniors.

• Allow 21,900 small businesses to obtain affordable health care coverage and provide tax credits

to help reduce health insurance costs for up to 20,800 small businesses.

• Provide coverage for 24,000 uninsured residents.

• Protect up to 600 families from bankruptcy due to unaffordable health care costs.

• Reduce the cost of uncompensated care for hospitals and health care providers by $84 million.

Doubtless these projections are optimistic, but its equally doubtless that this bill – imperfect as it is – could have a strong positive impact. Here’s the “how will reform effect me” widget (remember – this is all in the context of the House bill, which is yet to be voted on – and which will have to be reconciled with an ultimate Senate bill. This is still a moving target, but we’re a lot closer to something positive, if far from ideal, than we were):

Udall’s nuclear “silver buckshot”

 

Senator Mark Udall and other lawmakers this week introduced a bill that would authorize research and development of small-scale, modular nuclear power plants to help meet energy needs. Unlike coal and gas power plants, nuclear plants don’t emit greenhouse gases.

The Colorado School of Mines could be well-positioned to receive new federal research funds, Udall said.

http://www.denverpost.com/news…

Still with out a  national plan accepted for long-term storage the nuclear power industry  is slipping back into vogue on little modular sized feet. A sleeping uranium industry in Colorado may be awakened by a Senator’s “silver buckshot” approach to energy resourcing.  Claiming that we need nuclear power included for the widest possible range of energy solutions to meet our needs Senator Mark Udall  says of his bill “In other words there is no silver bullet that can solve all of our energy challenges; we are going to need silver buckshot.”

This silver buckshot  may be aimed more to wooing votes as he also says political reality dictates  that energy legislation capping carbon emissions “will not pass” unless it also includes strong provisions for nuclear power .

“The first wave of nuclear power plants will go a long way towards telling us whether new plants can be built on budget and on schedule in the United States,” Udall said.

He suggests  “working out the costs ” of electricity from small scale modular nuclear plants while studying how to store the waste long term is a practical approach.

He does acknowledge though that the National Academy of Sciences puts the cost of electricity from new nuclear plants at between 8 to 13 cents per kilowatt-hour, a big range given the average national price of electricity from all types of energy was 10.42 cents in July of 2009, according to the DOE Energy Information Administration.

Currently there is 60,000 metric tons of spent fuel awaiting permanent disposal, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry association, and the nation’s power plants produce  2,000 tons more each year . According to  csmonitor.com even if work on Yucca Mountain had continued, it wouldn’t have solved the problem: By the early 2020s, when it would have been completed, the nation’s nuclear waste would have already exceeded the repository’s 70,000-ton capacity.

“If you don’t have a credible endpoint for spent fuel that deals with the long-term safety and security issues, you really have to wonder if nuclear power is a reasonable choice,” says physicist Edwin Lyman, a senior staff scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) in Washington.

http://features.csmonitor.com/…

http://coloradoindependent.com…

http://www.denverpost.com/news…

Cold-calling

I just  received the most offensive phone solicitation from the NRA on this of all days!  Even as the FBI was attempting to secure the site of today’s mass shooting in Orlando, and the victims and families touched by yesterday’s horrific armed rampage in Texas mourn their dead and struggle with a world that will never be the same for them,  the NRA’s first instinct was to aggressively promote their anti-gun-control agenda.  That’s cold; really cold, and put me in mind of their Columbine strategy.

The caller said they wanted a response to a single “survey” question.  Curious, I told her to go ahead and she played the recorded pitch which went something like this:  The UN is trying to eliminate worldwide gun-rights with the specific intention of harming the U.S.  There was a lot of hyperbole and invocation against Nancy Pelosi  and Congress and I don’t remember what all else.  Then a male NRA member cut in live and posed the survey question to me which was something like, ” Do you think that foreign dictators should be allowed to take away your guns, etc., etc.?”

I told him how inappropriate I found his phone call to be; what an oddly warped effort at damage-control.  He thanked me for my time and hung-up.

Duh?

When I got past my indignation and thought about it, it was funny that, in my case,  they had so completely missed their “target.”  That reminded me of a letter my husband recently received from the Republican Party. It must have been generated by the same misguided engine that identified our household for the NRA.   I saved it because it was absolutely priceless:  

“Dear Mr. Prent,”

it read,

” Strengthening our Party for the 2010 elections is going to take a massive grassroots effort all across America…Enclosed is your official 2009 Congressional District Census registered Code #…in your name as a representative of your area…Because of your high level of political involvement and commitment to the Republican Party, your personal input on the questions presented in your Census Document is critical to our Party’s future.”

 It goes on in that manner to solicit a donation from this presumably staunch Republican, and is signed by Michael Steele.  Naturally, the enclosed “Census Document” is full of leading questions about trusting Obama and the Democrats and all of the favorite Republican soapbox standards…a regular right-wing stem-winder. The only problem is that my husband is neither Republican, nor a right wing sympathizer.  In fact, my husband is not even a citizen!  He’s one of those horrible people known as “immigrants;” and even worse, he’s from that dangerously progressive neighbor to the north, CANADA!

Did GMD Pay Him or Plant a Chip in His Head?

I know I’m not the only person thinking this. How did GMD convince Patrick Cashman to kneel at the alter of the liberal juggernaut?

One thing is certain, General Cashman is definitely wearing his GMD kneepads on the pages of the Times Argus as he publicly gargles the precious bodily fluids of GMD’s muscular political influence. What did you guys pay him for servicing you so well?

Let’s take the good soldier’s awestruck laments and full-throated bell ringers from the top shall we:

To quote Patrick “Major Mouthful” Cashman:

The listing of Green Mountain Daily by The Times Argus as Best Political Web site raises an important question

what everyone reads is:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . . “best political web site”  

Thank you sir, may I have another!

And he is just getting warmed up……..

Next

GMD is stridently left of center

Message everyone:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . . GMD is “strident.” It sticks to its convictions.

Thank you sir may I have another!

If this were merely individual citizens having an online discussion…

Message everyone:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . .  GMD is not just “individual citizens having an online discussion,” no way baby, these folks are the BOMB!

Thank you sir, may I have another!

Look at those elected officials donating the one currency that really matters, access. Sen. Sanders provided a one-on-one interview, so has Senator Patrick Leahy as has Congressman Peter Welch. Burlington representative and possible lieutenant governor candidate David Zuckerman frequently posts and other Democratic, Progressive and even Republican leaders are registered members of GMD and submit content

Message everyone:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . .  Wanna see my picture on the cover — Wanna buy five copies for my mother — Wanna see my smilin’ face — On the cover of the Rollin’ Stone.  

Step right up, who’s next and

Thank you sir, may I have another!

GMD appears to have unfettered access to numerous state employees

Message everyone:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . .   Several of GMD’s writers live in the Montpelier area and they know their way around state government like every other civic minded citizen.

Ooooooo, thank you sir, may I have another!

With a critical governor’s campaign ahead, please contact your representatives, and those who seek to be your representatives, and demand they avert their gaze from GMD.

Message everyone:  blahblahblahblahblahblah . . . . . . .  Don’t look back and cast your gaze upon GMD.  You’ll turn into a pillar of salt!  Shit, just last week, Mark Shepard failed to avert his gaze, caught a glimpse of GMD and BOOOM, he was turned into a gay newt.  (he got better, of course).

Thank you GMD, may Pat have another!

There you have it folks. Direct from Major Mouthful General Pat take.that.hill Cashman. GMD is strident, influential, left of center, over-accessed and, worst best of all, gubernatorial candidates are powerless in the face of GMD’s Black Hole like gravitational pull.  

Quite an endorsement.

A You Tube Campaign Launch

(As always, we’ll be front paging diaries from officeholders and officehopefuls who want to address the community. – promoted by odum)

I know many people were not able to take time out of work to attend my announcement that I'll be a candidate for Governor on Tuesday.

A bunch of you have asked if there's video of the announcement. It's up at www.MattDunne.com and many thanks to the work of an incredible group of campaign volunteers who put together the entire informal launch from top to bottom. I'm also happy to share it here.

Soon, I hope to have a two minute “highlights” video. I’ll keep you posted.

As always, I welcome your thoughts and feedback. This campaign is going to be about the ideas and energy of Vermonters and there's no time like the present to get started sharing yours at www.VermontFuture.org

Thank you so much for all you are doing to keep democracy alive and well. – Matt

Bad GMD …

(This is just too damned funny to not highlight. – promoted by JulieWaters)

GMD is stridently left of center, to such an extent that its “editors” and commentators expend great effort trying to outdo each other in demonizing, denigrating or marginalizing those Vermonters who disagree with or question their opinions. If this were merely individual citizens having an online discussion about people they revile, it would be just another easily ignored extremist hate site.

(Be mindful of who’s writing, Letter to the editor, Times Argus, 11/06/09)

Advocacy Coalition Holding Press Conference & Protest re: VSH Canteen Closure

( – promoted by odum)

(cross-posted from Beyond VSH blog, here)

From an advocate’s e-mail concerning a press conference, followed by a protest, planned for Friday, November 6, 2009 at the Vermont State House beginning at 12:15 PM:


On Friday, Nov. 6 at 12:15, a coalition of organizations opposed to the closing of the Vermont State Hospital canteen will hold a press conference at the Statehouse in the Cedar Creek room, after which there will be a demonstration outside the Statehouse. Advocates, former patients and VSH workers will speak out about the impact of losing the canteen and why it should be saved.

The co-sponsors of this event have endorsed the following:

Joint Statement by Vermont Psychiatric Survivors; Disability Rights Vermont (formerly Vt. P & A); Vermont Center For Independent Living;

Vermont Association for Mental Health; Vermont State Hospital Workers;

Vermont Coalition for Disability Rights; Another Way, Inc.; National Alliance on Mental Illness-VT; National Association of Social Workers-VT

The Vermont State Hospital canteen has been serving patients, visitors and staff for over four decades. Last month the Department of Mental Health announced that as part of planned budget cuts, the canteen would close on December 5. We oppose the planned closing of the canteen and ask that this decision be revisited.

The canteen is integral to the quality of life for patients and significant to the quality of care they receive. It is also vital in reducing the pressures on the hospital wards by providing a positive incentive and a humanizing and integrated setting where patients can get away from the crowded, volatile ward environment. It is a place where patients can meet with visitors off the ward, and for some patients, the canteen has also provided vocational training.

In the past seven years, the hospital has become an increasingly restrictive setting as patients have lost access to the gym, the library, the Hideaway (an off ward social space) and Father Logue’s camp in Duxbury. Now the State is taking away the only place patients have left outside the confines of the secure area.

Cutting costs is the stated reason for closing the canteen. But at one time it was reportedly breaking even, and it might do so again. Just how much would be saved is open to question; what would be lost is clearer. Regardless of whether the canteen is considered directly connected with patient care, its loss would have a serious negative impact on that care, and on the living and work environment at the State Hospital . We urge the administration to reconsider the planned closing and to maintain this unique and invaluable service.

[…]

*Update*: After blogging this post up I was sent the following information as a follow-up by the same advocate who had sent the above item:


the latest list of endorsers, below. […]

Vermont Psychiatric Survivors; Disability Rights Vermont (formerly Vt. P&A); Vermont Center For Independent Living; Vermont Association for Mental Health; Vermont State Hospital Workers; Vermont Coalition for Disability Rights; Another Way, Inc.; National Alliance on Mental Illness-VT; National Association of Social Workers-VT; Mental Health Law Project of Vermont Legal Aid; Vermont Psychological Association; Rep. Warren Kitzmiller; Rep. Anne Donahue

Back to original post content:

From Vermont Coalition for Disability Rights (VCDR) on the subject:


To: VCDR Alert List

From: Deborah Lisi-Baker, President VCDR

Coalition to Save the VSH Canteen Holds Press Conference Friday

A coalition of individuals and organizations are working to save the VSH canteen, a key resource for patients and visitors at the state hospital and for state employees. A press conference has been scheduled for  Friday at 12:15 in the Cedar Creek room at the Statehouse. Afterwards people will gathering on the street outside for a demonstration. Coalition members include Vermont Psychiatric Survivors, Disability Rights Vermont, Vermont Center for Independent Living, Vermont Coalition for Disability Rights, VSH Workers, Vermont Association for Mental Health, Another Way.

Background Information:

The Vermont State Hospital canteen has been serving patients, visitors and staff for over four decades. Last month the Department of Mental Health announced that as part of planned budget cuts, the canteen would close on December 5. We oppose the planned closing of the canteen and ask that this decision be revisited.

The canteen is integral to the quality of life for patients and significant to the quality of care they receive. It is also vital in reducing the pressures on the hospital wards by providing a positive incentive and a humanizing and integrated setting where patients can get away from the crowded, volatile ward environment. It is a place where patients can meet with visitors off the ward, and for some patients, the canteen has also provided vocational training.

In the past seven years, the hospital has become an increasingly restrictive setting as patients have lost access to the gym, the library, the Hideaway (an off ward social space) and Father Logue’s camp in Duxbury. Now the State is taking away the only place patients have left outside the confines of the secure area.

This blogger will be on scene for the event as well.

If you are concerned by the pending closure of the VSH canteen, please consider attending as a public show of support. Keep in mind that protest signs or banners are not allowed within the state house, so please save them for use outside during the protest after the press conference. Buttons are permitted however.

N.Y. Voters to Out-of-State Activists: ‘Mind Your Own Business and Stay the Hell Out!’

‘Teabaggers’ Aggressively Pushing Hoffman’s Candidacy Prompt Poll Workers in Two Towns in 23rd Congressional District to Call the Cops to Stop Them From Violating State Law Against Campaigning Within 100 Feet of Voting Stations; Backlash Against $2 Million Ad Blitz By Outsiders May Have Cost Hoffman the Race

The conservative Club for Growth is taking aim at both the Democratic and Republican candidates running in the special election.

A blizzard of campaign TV ads by out-of-state political groups, such as this one by the right-wing Club for Growth that attacked both Republican Dede Scozzafava and Democrat Bill Owens as “too liberal,” — combined with aggressive “robocalls” supporting Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman — proved to be a major turn-off to many voters in New York’s 23rd Congressional District. Resentment toward the “outsiders” boiled over on Election Day, when poll workers in at least two towns called police to keep supporters of Hoffman from violating a state law that bans campaigning within 100 feet of voting stations. (Photo courtesy CNN)

(Posted 5:00 a.m. EST Thursday, November 5, 2009)

By SKEETER SANDERS

Right-wing groups and conservative Republican leaders — having forced out the official GOP nominee in a special election for an upstate New York congressional seat because they considered her “too liberal” — thought they had the election in the bag with their $2 million advertising campaign on behalf of the Conservative Party candidate.

But in the end, the voters of the sprawling district, the largest in the Northeast, had other ideas — and in the process, made a bit of history.

Not since before the Civil War, more than 140 years ago, has New York’s 23rd Congressional District been represented by a Democrat — until now.

In a hotly-contested election that saw as many twists and turns as a soap opera, Democrat Bill Owens — with the dramatic, 11th-hour backing of the ousted Republican candidate, Dede Scozzafava — defeated Conservative Doug Hoffman to serve the unfinished term of moderate Republican John McHugh, who resigned in June to serve as secretary of the Army in the Obama administration.

With all the ballots in the nationally-watched contest counted, Owens garnered 49 percent of the vote to Hoffman’s 45 percent. Scozzafava, who threw the race into uncertainty with her stunning withdrawal on Saturday and her equally dramatic endorsement of Owens on Sunday, still managed to draw six percent of the vote.

The race was touted as a test of strength of the right-wing “Tea Party” movement — whose members are referred to, with some derision, as “Teabaggers” — which made headlines this past summer with their noisy protests at town-hall forums on health-care reform and which has declared an all-out jihad against Republicans whom they see as too liberal.

But in the end, at least for this year, the “Teabaggers” — nearly all of whom came from outside the state — lost. They lost because they simply didn’t know the district. In fact, they ruffled more than a few feathers with their overly aggressive campaign against Owens and Scozzafava and in favor of Hoffman.

HOFFMAN SUPPORTERS VIOLATE ‘NO-ELECTIONEERING’ ZONES AT POLLING STATIONS

In turns out that some of Hoffman’s supporters weren’t following the rules — and ended up getting the cops called on them. According to the Watertown Daily Times, elections officials in at least two towns in the district called police to get members of an anti-abortion group supporting Hoffman to move beyond the 100-foot perimeter of the voting stations.

State law prohibits overt campaigning — or, as the law defines it, “electioneering” — within 100 feet of a voting station. Members of the anti-abortion group were distributing pamphlets urging voters to cast their ballot for Hoffman, a hard-line social conservative who declares on his campaign Web site that “I am pro-life, period” and that he strongly opposes same-gender marriage.

Joy Yearout, a spokeswoman for the group, the Susan B. Anthony List, disputed the elections officials’ reasoning for calling the police, telling the Daily Times one of her volunteers in Fowler encountered police officers without incident. “The police came and said he was fine,” she said.

Yearout accused elections officials of being “overzealous” and of “using the only tool they have, and that’s intimidation.”

OTHER VIOLATIONS BY HOFFMAN PARTISANS REPORTED IN DISTRICT

The 23rd Congressional District in the northeastern portion of the state, is a sprawling area that includes all or parts of Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Oswego and St. Lawrence counties. It includes the cities of Ogdensburg, Oswego, Plattsburgh (part of the Greater Burlington, Vermont metropolitan area) and Watertown. The district includes most of the Adirondack Mountains and the Thousand Islands region, and borders Canada to the north.

In Watertown, the county seat of Jefferson County, the two county commissioners in charge of elections personally responded to complaints of violations of the 100-foot rule by Hoffman partisans at three voting stations. Noting that the pro-Hoffman volunteers were from out-of-state, the commissioners informed them of the 100-foot rule, set up signs marking the voting station boundary and politely told the Hoffman partisans to stay outside the boundary lines.

In Lewis County, elections officials ordered the removal of Hoffman campaign signs that were placed within the 100-foot perimeter of a Lowville voting station.

Elaine McLear, a Lewis County elections commissioner, was unhappy with what she saw as a lack of discipline by the Hoffman campaign. “I just feel like the candidate should have their workers under control,” McLear told the Daily Times. “There are ways to handle things, and we had to do what we thought was proper.”

BLIZZARD OF TV ATTACK ADS, ‘ROBOCALLS’ A HUGE TURN-OFF TO VOTERS

The apparent overzealousness of Hoffman campaign workers on election day may have had an  adverse effect on the final outcome. Although there were no exit polls conducted in the district, local newspapers were filled with editorials and letters to the editor complaining bitterly about what many in the district said was a level of campaign nastiness they had never seen before in a local election.

Local TV and radio stations across the district — from Syracuse to Burlington — were saturated during the final two weeks of the campaign with campaign attack ads in a frenzied blitzkrieg by right-wing out-of-state groups to the prevent the House seat from going to either Owens or Scozzafava — concentrating their fire most heavily on Scozzafava.

Some of the nastiest ads were by the right-wing Club for Growth, which saturated the airwaves with ads attacking both Owens and Scozzafava as “too liberal.”

But by far the single most controversial ad of the campaign was one that, at first glance, appeared to be an endorsement of Scozzafava by a liberal group — but turned out instead to be a “dirty trick” ad by conservative billionaire Arkansas businessman Jackson T. (Steve) Stephens, Jr., member of the board of directors of the Club for Growth — which heavily backed Hoffman.

Stephens, president and CEO of the Little Rock, Arkansas-based pharmaceutical company ExOxEmis, Inc. and a longtime contributor to conservative Republican candidates, personally donated $4,800  — the legal maximum under New York state election law — to Hoffman’s campaign, and is one of the Club for Growth’s leading donors, according to records on file with the Federal Election Commission.

Also annoying to voters was a massive blitz of automated telephone calls — known as “robocalls” — featuring the recorded voices of former Alaska Governor and GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin and former Senator Fred Thompson (R-Tennessee), who urged voters to cast their votes for Hoffman.

The right-wing activists tried their best to scare voters by bringing up House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as a liberal bogeyman. But although the 23rd Congressional district has been a solidly Republican district for more than 140 years, it’s not a solidly conservative one — as evidenced by President Obama carrying the district in last year’s election and Owens’ victory on Tuesday.

Moreover, McHugh, the wildly popular Republican who vacated the seat — he won re-election last year by a 65 percent landslide — is a moderate.

HOFFMAN IS NO JAMES BUCKLEY — OR BARRY GOLDWATER

Conservatives were hoping to repeat the feat of James L. Buckley, the older brother of  the late conservative commentator and National Review magazine publisher William F. Buckley, who in 1970 was elected to the U.S. Senate on the Conservative Party line with 38 percent of the vote, defeating a liberal Republican incumbent, Charles Goodell and a liberal Democrat, Richard Ottinger, to become the first — and to date, the only — third-party candidate to win a statewide election in New York.

Buckley was ousted six years later by Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

Ironically, Buckley, now 86 and a retired federal judge, would be considered a “squishy moderate” or even a “liberal” by the hard-line conservatives of today — as was the late former Senator Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona), the 1964 Republican presidential nominee considered “the godfather of the conservative movement.”

Although considered a right-wing extremist in the 1960s for his strident opposition to nuclear arms control and civil-rights legislation, Goldwater was really an old-fashioned libertarian conservative — whose libertarian views on social issues in his later years outraged many social conservatives. He endorsed Democrat Karan English in an Arizona congressional race in 1994, urged Republicans to lay off President Bill Clinton over the Whitewater scandal and criticized the military’s ban on gays.

“Everyone knows that gays have served honorably in the military since at least the time of Julius Caesar,” he said. “You don’t have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight.” He further angered social conservatives by testifying before the city council of his hometown of Phoenix in favor of an ordinance to ban discrimination against gays and backing a statewide voter initiative to legalize medical marijuana.

In a 1994 interview with the Washington Post the retired senator said, “When you say ‘radical right’ today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.”

Goldwater finally broke outright from social conservatives — particularly the Religious Right — a few months before his death in 1996 when he bluntly warned them: “Do not associate my name with anything you do. You are extremists, and you’ve hurt the Republican Party much more than the Democrats have.” He told Bob Dole, whose own presidential campaign that year received lukewarm support from social conservatives, “We’re the new liberals of the Republican Party. Can you imagine that?”

The ideological rigidity of today’s conservatives — as embodied in the “Tebagger” movement — may prove fatal to the Republican Party in the long run.

# # #

Volume IV, Number 84

Copyright 2009, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...