an appeal to reason

(Very well said – promoted by JulieWaters)

I originally intended to send this directly (and privately) to Deb Markowitz but have decided instead to do so through GMD because I think the subject warrants discussion.

Deb

In your Nov. 18 Free Press op-ed, you said “As governor I will work tirelessly to bring good jobs to Vermont.” (emphasis added)

To some extent, this is standard campaign speak that merits no special comment.  However, it is a phrase with a literal meaning that has found its way into common parlance through repeated use by (almost) all candidates and elected officials.  

It is used to justify certain policies that are ineffective and wasteful.  And as a result, it diverts attention and resources from more sensible approaches to economic development.

The notion that the state can “bring good jobs to Vermont” is predicated on the assumption that a significant number of businesses are moving from state to state based on favorable tax treatment (among other things).  Unfortunately, this received wisdom is not supported by the evidence.  Indeed, the number of net jobs gained or lost from interstate moves is negligible as a percentage of all jobs created or destroyed.  

Suggesting (even indirectly) that VT should use tax policy to encourage more businesses to locate here reflects and feeds the Trickle Down mantra we’ve been fed for a quarter century.  Advocates of this failed approach have succeeded in poisoning the discourse about economic development because no elected official wants to be branded as anti-business.  

But one can be pro-jobs without buying into this calculated and misleading tripe.  

So while I’m projecting a bit because I don’t know exactly how you meant it, I hope that you will not reinforce the idea that jobs are to be purchased with tax breaks and incentives.  Voters need to be told the truth and those who perpetuate such myths for their own self-interest need to be exposed.  

In my view, the campaign for governor is an opportunity to break with the past and speak honestly with Vermonters.  I hope you (and the other Dem candidates) will do just that.

Republicans in disarray ?

Will the life of Brian get complicated ? Has Douglas’s not running for re-election left a leadership void in the Republican Party that Dubie can’t fill ? A second challenge is floated to Lt.Gov.Dubie’s nomination to run for gov. after what has been called a less than impressive opening to his gubernatorial campaign .Vallee says Dubie not “anointed”

Former US Ambassador,heavy hitting Republican businessman and Bush fund raiser Rodolphe”Skip” Vallee may enter race for governor.

“I know Brian Dubie, I like Brian Dubie, I respect Brian Dubie,” Vallee said. But, he added, “I learned a long time ago that elections are not anointments.

http://www.timesargus.com/arti…

This is why we need to get rid of DOMA

There’s a bit of history about this story, but here’s the quick and simple version (in quote format to separate it, but I wrote it):

Vermont lesbian couple gets a civil union, has a kid through artificial insemination, and then divorces in 2003.  Biological mother renounces homosexuality, moves to Virginia to keep the kid from the other mom.  Custody battles ensue for the next six years.

The biological mom (Lisa Miller) has constantly blocked her ex-partner (Janet Jenkins) from seeing the kid, using the law in Virginia as a bit of a shield to hide behind.  Yesterday, however, things took an interesting turn.  As Brent Curtis writes in the Rutand Herald:

In a 21-page order, Judge William Cohen granted sole custody of 7-year-old Isabella Miller to her nonbiological but court-recognized parent, Janet Jenkins.

[…]

“In the long term, the change in custody will be in (Isabella’s) best interests as she will have the opportunity for maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents,” he said, adding that both parents were equal in terms of stability, financial resources, emotional availability and other considerations required for child rearing.

Where they weren’t equal, he said, was in their willingness to work together. While Miller has repeatedly and consistently blocked Jenkins’ access to Isabella, the judge said Jenkins has agreed to allow Miller access and would allow Isabella to continue to attend church events with her other parent.

This isn’t the end of the story.  This problem with the jurisdictions here, and the back and forth between Virginia and Vermont– it creates a bit of legal chaos, and has real life consequences that are fairly serious.  The lack of legal clarity here, the fact that DOMA does an end-run around the constitution in order to circumnavigate full faith and credit… this is why we are in this mess in the first place.

I have a lot better things to talk about than Tom Salmon but…

…I don’t think I can ignore this.

Salmon gave a very strange, long, and convoluted speech the other day.  It covered his personal history, the fact that he thinks he had five drinks before getting behind the wheel the other night and talks a lot about his military service.  It even included product placement for The Ethan Allen Institute.

There were also some interesting responses to questions:

Salmon defended the pay raises Friday, saying four jobs in the auditor’s office were compressed into three, leaving those employees with more duties but still with salaries less than their predecessors. Salaries and benefits for next year are expected to be 26 percent, or $76,000, less than last year, he said.

How is this different from other state employees?  Lots of positions are being left unfilled and people are just expected to do more work.  Most of these people are not getting raises.  But apparently, Salmon’s office still gets them.  

I’m pretty sure I have a problem with that.

Toilet Water Tix for X-mas

Oh, um, I mean John Waters. Tickets, that is. Once I heard him in an interview relate that the Japanese loved him early in his career when Americans weren’t sure what to make of him. They thought even his name was an ironic commentary on American obsession with toilets, or something.

So, a good Democrat donated a pair of tickets to John Waters’ upcoming show at the Flynn on December 10 at 7:30. Face value is $40 each, and the seats are pretty good (5th row, left section on the main floor). Proceeds will benefit the Franklin County Democratic Committee.

For a description of the show, go here.

Highest bidder by Dec. 4 gets the tix.

I’m a tree hugger

Use to be a “tree hugger” could only mean one thing: a person supportive of protecting our only source of food, water, air and shelter (aka the physical environment).

But now?

The Conservative Party candidate in a closely-watched upstate New York congressional election has accused the activist group ACORN of trying to steal the election for his Democratic Party opponent — a claim that even Republican election officials are denying.

(

NY conservative blames ACORN ‘tampering’ for loss to Democrat
, Raw Story, 11/19/09
)

Guess we can add an ACORN supporter to that “tree hugger” label … oh, and count me in!

But there’s more to this story.

The above quoted post points to this news story, VIRUS in the VOTING MACHINES: Tainted Results in NY-23 from The Gouverneur Times that discusses (as the title says) a problem with the computerized voting machines.

These types of problems have been hi-lighted by (primarily progressive minded) folks for over a decade now, and I agree these issues present concerns of an extremely high magnitude.

It’s time to go back to hand counting ballots.

When a mistake is made in a hand counting it is a localized event. One or two vote counters, either through honest oversight or malfeance, return counts that don’t reflect the actual ballots.

The important point here is that any systemic attempt at stealing an election requires a conspiracy of such size that it would never stand a chance of being kept secret.

Computerized voting is quite different. Through simple computer code manipulation many or all voting machines can, either through honest mistake or malfeance, return bad counts WITHOUT the need for more than a few people being involved! Much more difficult to trace and highly unlikely to see a conspiracy collapse.

Call me a tree hugger … I like our only source of food, water, air and shelter (aka the physical environment) and ACORN (weasel Welch not-withstanding … good to swap spit with Hoffman, ain’t it?). I also like open, honest and fair elections.

Investigate the machines. We know there was a problem there!

Big Burlington Telecom Thursday: Dockets, Dialogues, Ultimatums, Investigations

(NOTE: 2 of the 3 pieces cited/printed below seem to have been made public by Haik at BurlingtonPol many hours before I caught wind of them. You should visit his site if you haven’t been. Good stuff.

NOTE 2: Briggs had the two emails as well earlier in the day. I really fell down on the linky/hat-tipping job.)

A lot of news in the increasingly fluid Burlington Telecom issue today, as several things have happened to raise the temperature even more.

First is a letter from the 16th (Monday) that has surfaced from the Vermont Department of Public Service on behalf of Commissioner David O’Brien sent to Burlington Mayor Bob Kiss and City Council President Bill Keogh. Against the backdrop of a Burlington Telecom-focused docket pending at the Public Service Board (Docket 7044, which includes as parties DPS, Burlington, and Comcast), the letter suggests that all those involved (including the City Council) begin a dialogue on BT’s survival, cautioning:

Steps now being taken and considered by the City, such as refinancing BT’s debt and

changing its governance structure, could easily become points of contention before the PSB. Providing more fodder for litigation is not in anyone’s interest. Unilateral actions by the City are more likely to become contentious if they fail to recognize the interests and concerns of the DPS.

Ominous, yes, but nearly as ominous as what follows:

I must also be clear, however, that this Department has a responsibility to fully investigate violations and potential violations of Public Service Board orders and other legal

provisions relating to BT. We intend to do so.

Sounds ugly. O’Brien may feel he can be magnanimous with talks of a “dialogue” because he clearly knows he’s been handed Burlington Telecom by the short hairs (and is likely loving every minute of it). The DPS threats may also give context not simply to the recent City Council vote on the proposed refinancing, but today’s ante-upping moves by two City Council Democrats that further distinguish themselves and at least some in the Council from the actions of the Kiss administration.  

First was an email from Councilor Joan Shannon to Mayor Kiss:

On November 11, 2009 the Ad Hoc Committee on BT Governance requested certain information in order to better understand the current operations of BT and its governance and oversight structure.

[…]Ken Schatz has informed me that BT management and the administration are willing to share this information in Executive Session and then collect all materials at the end of the Executive session.  This is not acceptable to the Committee.

[…]In order for the Committee to have time to review this information prior to our next meeting on Tuesday November 24, they need to have this information in their possession before the weekend.  Please let me and the other Committee members know when this information will be available for us to pick up at City Hall by the end of today.  I know that this may seem like short notice, but really we have been asking for this since November 11 and can no longer wait.

In addition, the Council, as the ultimate governing body is entitled to any information we request in order to make fully informed decisions.  The Council also needs all the above information in order to either approve or disapprove of the concept of borrowing $60 million dollars.  We also need the ability to consult with independent experts who can advise us on these issues.  Certainly anyone who receives this information should be willing to sign a non-disclosure agreement and I would not object to that requirement.  I do object to the administration holding information hostage.

It’s clear that the relationship between the Mayor’s office and many on the City Council has soured so badly that some Councilors are no longer willing to accept anything whatsoever from the administration simply on good faith. Good faith is no longer an operative concept here.

As if to carve that point in stone, Councilor Ed Adrian threw down the gauntlet once and for all with an email of his own:

We have, over a period of time, been asking as individual Councilors for many of the documents that were requested of the Administration at the Council’s November 16, 2009 meeting.  Some of these requests have been for weeks, some for months and in some instances years.

[…]Bob, without getting all of the documentation that we have requested and without having a third party expert interpret this information for us, I will simply not be able to vote to continue the enterprise of Burlington Telecom in its current construction.  If this condition is not met, I will also do my very best to convince others to do the same.

Bob, at the Ad Hoc Committee on Governance for Burlington Telecom, Joe McNeil said that if after asking we were not getting the information that we needed as Councilors from the Administration to make decisions, then we needed to demand that information.

Based on that advice Bob, I am demanding that you provide us with the information requested and that you provide us with the moneys to obtain the resources necessary to make that information relevant.

It’s amazing to read this while considering how different the whole situation would now be if Kiss and Leopold had simply had a tried-and-true “mistakes were made,” mea culpa-ridden press conference and pledged to work with the council when this all broke in the first place.

Maybe (er) next time?

The complete documents excerpted above follow:





Dear Mayor Kiss,

On November 11, 2009 the Ad Hoc Committee on BT Governance requested certain information in order to better understand the current operations of BT and its governance and oversight structure.  Among the requested information is the Shanahan report and Business Plan.  Chris Burns explained that it is really the Pro Formas that currently serve as a business plan.  

Ken Schatz has informed me that BT management and the administration are willing to share this information in Executive Session and then collect all materials at the end of the Executive session.  This is not acceptable to the Committee.  The Committee does not want to spend our valuable meeting time getting familiar with these items.  The Committee would like to receive copies of the Shanahan report for their review in preparation for the meeting.  I fully understand the confidentiality is of the utmost importance to the operations of BT.  If the administration and BT management would like Committee members to sign Non Disclosure Agreements I am amenable to that stipulation so long as the Agreement is reasonable and appropriate in scope.  

In order for the Committee to have time to review this information prior to our next meeting on Tuesday November 24, they need to have this information in their possession before the weekend.  Please let me and the other Committee members know when this information will be available for us to pick up at City Hall by the end of today.  I know that this may seem like short notice, but really we have been asking for this since November 11 and can no longer wait.

In addition, the Council, as the ultimate governing body is entitled to any information we request in order to make fully informed decisions.  The Council also needs all the above information in order to either approve or disapprove of the concept of borrowing $60 million dollars.  We also need the ability to consult with independent experts who can advise us on these issues.  Certainly anyone who receives this information should be willing to sign a non-disclosure agreement and I would not object to that requirement.  I do object to the administration holding information hostage.

Again, I ask that you please respond to this email by the end of the day so that we can move forward in getting the information that we need.

Sincerely,

Joan Shannon

City Councilor

Ad Hoc Committee on Governance, Chair

November 19, 2009

Dear Bob:

I would like to follow-up on Karen Paul’s letter of the other day and Joan Shannon’s letter of today.  We have, over a period of time, been asking as individual Councilors for many of the documents that were requested of the Administration at the Council’s November 16, 2009 meeting.  Some of these requests have been for weeks, some for months and in some instances years.  The information contained in these documents will likely range from the mundane to the esoteric.  Many of us will need help interpreting and understanding them to do our jobs.  In addition, the audit and its off-shoots will require money.

Bob, my understanding is that the Administration will soon be requesting a budget amendment to rectify an “overpayment” of PILOT monies made to the City by BT .  The overpayment amount is in the 100s of thousands of dollars.  My understanding is that most of this payback will come from the  DPW for this fiscal year.  I am requesting that since you were able to come up with these monies out of the budget of another Department, that you look hard, and that on or before November 25, 2009, you find another $250,000.00 to be put into a special account, to be distributed by a majority of the Council in obtaining independent and expert review of the many working parts that BT contains.  

Bob, without getting all of the documentation that we have requested and without having a third party expert interpret this information for us, I will simply not be able to vote to continue the enterprise of Burlington Telecom in its current construction.  If this condition is not met, I will also do my very best to convince others to do the same.

Bob, at the Ad Hoc Committee on Governance for Burlington Telecom , Joe McNeil said that if after asking we were not getting the information that we needed as Councilors from the Administration to make decisions, then we needed to demand that information.

Based on that advice Bob, I am demanding that you provide us with the information requested and that you provide us with the moneys to obtain the resources necessary to make that information relevant.

The City and the people that populate it deserve no less from their elected officials.

Heading in to the Thanksgiving holiday, I am thankful for the fact that although we vehemently disagree on how to proceed in this instance, I know that we are all trying to do what we think is best for the City.  Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.  For now, I remain,

Very truly yours,

Ed Adrian

Right-Wing Local Talk-Radio Host in N.H. Loses Show Over Blatantly Anti-Gay Slur

Laconia Radio Station Fires Host Doug Lambert for Hurling the Six-Letter F-Bomb at Chairman of Granite State’s Democratic Party — Who is Gay — and Denouncing Him as a ‘Reprobate;’ Conservative Also Loses His Newspaper Column

PLUS: After 40 Years, The Washington Blade — ‘The New York Times of the Gay Media’ — Suddenly Stops the Presses

(Posted 5:00 a.m. EST Thursday, November 19, 2009)

By SKEETER SANDERS

Nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh has long been the bete noir of liberals and of Democrats; of feminists and of gays; and in recent months has become anathema to nonwhites.

But a local right-wing radio talk-show host in New Hampshire did something to a local politician last week that even Limbaugh would not have dared to do to Representative Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) — certainly not while his microphone was still turned on:

Hurl an F-bomb at him.

No, not the four-letter F-bomb — the X-rated version that no radio or television personality can legally say on the air. Rather, it was the six-letter F-bomb — the homophobic version that is as highly derogatory to gays as the six-letter N-bomb is to African-Americans.

But that’s exactly what a Laconia, New Hampshire talk-show host did. But while his radio microphone was turned off, an in-studio camera with its own mic was still on — and beaming live pictures and sound onto the Internet.

His tirade not only cost the host his show — the radio station promptly fired him — but he also lost his weekly newspaper column.

A TIRADE OF HOMOPHOBIC INSULTS AT N.H. DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHAIRMAN

Doug Lambert, a conservative activist, had just finished his weekly Saturday-morning radio program, “Meet the New Press,” on station WEMJ in Laconia with his co-host, David “Skip” Murphy. Although Lambert was off the WEMJ airwaves, a live Internet simulcast of his show was still streaming to his Web site, GraniteGrok.com.

Told by Murphy that the Web stream was about to be shut down, Lambert looked into the in-studio camera and let fly with a blistering tirade of anti-gay invectives against Raymond Buckley, chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

Buckley, who is gay, was being feted by the Human Rights Campaign, a national gay rights organization, for his role in the passage of New Hampshire’s same-gender marriage law, which takes effect on New Year’s Day.

It was also Buckley’s 50th birthday.

“Speaking of gays, Happy Birthday, Ray Buckley,” Lambert began, before performing a stereotypically effeminate dance that gay men are alleged to be known for. Afterward, Lambert turned back to the camera and — directly addressing Buckley — said, “Yeah, you faggot! That’s right, I said it and I meant it! You’re a reprobate!”

Lambert continued, “How the people, the Democrats — I think of some of the gray-haired ladies and older people from the old party — would stand behind you is beyond me! You’re a disgrace to yourself, to humanity, to mankind and to your party! Other than that, Happy Birthday, Ray and many more — Not!

TIRADE DRAWS SWIFT — AND BIPARTISAN — CONDEMNATION

James Pindell, a New Hampshire blogger, watched a video of Lambert’s tirade — which was subsequently pulled from GraniteGrok.com — and posted a transcript on his own Web site, NHPoliticalReport.com. From there, news of Lambert’s remarks spread like wildfire — and drew swift condemnation from across the political spectrum.

Mo Baxley, executive director of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition, blasted Lambert and called on former Governor  John Sununu, the state’s Republican Party chairman, to “denounce his despicable comments, pledge never to go on the show, and vow never again to use the issue of equal rights as a weapon to gain political advantage.”

For his part, Sununu issued a statement that branded Lambert’s rant “disgusting, inappropriate, and offensive.” He went on to note that the state GOP, through its communications director, Ryan Williams, denounced the talk-show host’s tirade as “completely inappropriate, offensive and hurtful.

“We strongly condemn the use of such vulgar language and outrageous personal attacks,” Williams said in a statement.

U.S. Representative Paul Hodes (D-New Hampshire) issued his own condemnation of Lambert’s remarks, saying they were “hateful” and “have no place in our public dialogue . . . This isn’t a matter of ‘political correctness.’ This is hate speech and it can incite violence.”

Interestingly, the target of Lambert’s attack has maintained a steadfast public silence. As this editon of The ‘Skeeter Bites Report went to post on Thursday morning, Buckley had made no public comment about Lambert’s remarks.

LAMBERT DUMPED BY WEMJ, LACONIA DAILY SUN, QUITS OWN BLOG

Just hours after making  his anti-gay rant agaisnt Buckley, Lambert posted a statement on GraniteGrok.com in which he apologized to the state Democratic Party chairman. “To be blunt, what I said is something that never should have been said in any kind of a public setting, or, quite frankly, in a private one either,” Lambert wrote. “Being human, and an honest person that is used to freely speaking my mind, my passion got the best of me . . . There is no excuse for the tone or language I used to characterize Ray or anyone for that matter.”

But Lambert’s apology could not save his radio show — or his newspaper column. On Monday, WEMJ announced that it was immediately canceling Lambert’s program. In a statement posted on its Web site, WEMJ, owned by Nassau Broadcasting, “terminated the show based on highly offensive and unacceptable comments made by Mr. Lambert . . .

“Although the comments by Mr. Lambert were not aired [directly] on our station, we find the comments by him to be completely out of line and unacceptable and we will not allow Mr. Lambert the opportunity to continue to air his show on our radio station” said Rob Fulmer, Nassau Broadcasting’s New Hampshire regional manager.

In quick succession, the Laconia Daily Sun, where Lambert wrote a weekly column on Thursdays, announced that it would no longer publish it. Ed Engler, the newspaper’s editor and publisher, said he told Lambert on Monday that he was halting the column, which had been running for more than six years.

By Tuesday, Lambert had given up even on his own blog, announcing on GraniteGrok.com that he was quitting to devote his time “in prayer and reflection, looking inward to the unhealthy malice in my heart, for which I will ultimately have to face my Maker, begging for His undeserved mercy.”

Lambert asked his readers “for peace and privacy in this matter.”

* * *

THE WASHINGTON BLADE, NATION’S OLDEST GAY NEWSPAPER, SUDDENLY FOLDS AFTER 40 YEARS OF PUBLICATION

For 40 years, The Washington Blade was the newspaper of record if you wanted to know the latest news of the gay and lesbian community in the nation’s capital and around the world.

With its straightforward, no-nonsense, in-depth style of reporting, the Blade built a reputation as “The New York Times of the gay media” — the one gay newspaper that the mainstream media — and much of Washington’s heterosexual society — took seriously.

On Monday, without warning and just weeks after it celebrated its 40th anniversary in October, the Blade abruptly ceased publication — the latest casualty in the worsening economic malaise gripping newspapers, large and small, daily and weekly, all across the nation.

The suddenness of the paper’s demise came as a shock to its nearly two-dozen employees. As they arrived at the Blade’s offices in the National Press Building in downtown Washington Monday morning, they were stunned to be told by an executive of parent company Window Media that the company had filed for liquidation under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Act and was shutting down all of its publications — and that staffers had until 3 p.m. to clear out their desks.

NEWSPAPER ITSELF WAS FINANCIALLY HEALTHY, BUT ITS PARENT COMPANY WAS MIRED IN DEBT

Window Media, based in Atlanta, was also closing the Southern Voice of Atlanta, the Houston Voice, the South Florida Blade of Miami and several magazines.

The Blade’s Web site, washingtonblade.com, was also shutting down.

A Window Media spokesman did not disclose a reason for the sudden shutdown, but it had been known for months that the company was saddled with major debts. Ironically, the Blade itself was financially healthy, with a weekly circulation reported at about 25,000 and its average 80- to 100-page issues thick with advertising. Its Web site was even more successful, drawing about a million visitors a month.

“It’s a shock. I’m almost speechless, really,” Lou Chibbaro Jr., a veteran Blade reporter who had worked for the newspaper for more than 30 years, told The Washington Post as he cleared out his desk.

In the course of his long career, Chibbaro covered everything from the early days of what was originally known as the gay liberation movement, to the first gay rights march on Washington in 1979, to the onset of the AIDS crisis, to the current battles over gays in the military and same-gender marriage.

In a reflection of the Blade’s status as a news organization in the nation’s capital, Chibbaro earlier this year became the first reporter for a gay-oriented publication to be given a front-row seat at a White House news conference when President Obama met with reporters on health-care reform.

Founded in October 1969, just four months after the Stonewall Riots in New York’s Greenwich Village that is credited as the beginning of the modern gay rights movement, the Blade — originally named The Gay Blade — first rolled off a mimeograph machine as a four-page newsletter.

BLADE EDITOR VOWS TO LAUNCH NEW PAPER WITH BLADE’S STAFF

After 31 years as an independent, locally-owned newspaper, the Blade was purchased by Window Media in 2001. Although the Blade, like many other newspapers across the country, has seen advertising revenues decline in the current recession, it remained profitable, according to publisher Lynn Brown, in an interview that was published in the paper’s 40th anniversary issue in October.

The Blade’s sudden demise came just weeks after The Advocate, the nation’s oldest and largest national gay newsmagazine, also ceased publication. Founded in 1967, the Los Angeles-based magazine was the last surviving publication of its kind that predated the Stonewall Riots.

The Blade’s executive editor, Kevin Naff, said Monday that he hopes to keep its staff together and launch a new weekly newspaper under a different name.  “It will be employee-owned,” Naff told the Post, just as the Blade was for most of its history before its purchase by Window Media.

“We’re not going away.”

# # #

Copyright 2009, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.

Rights? What are you talking about?

Cross posted from Rational Resistance:

Last week I posted a link to a debate about whether the Catholic Church is a force for good in the world. To me it's not a close call, but possibly the strongest argument in favor of the Catholic Church is the work it does for social justice: opposing war and the death penalty, supporting orphaned children, feeding the hungry, and the like. Why, they're so committed to social justice that they're pushing the health care reform bill in Congress, right?

Yes, with a big “but”. They have supported health care legislation, but as we now know, they were willing to pull the plug on the whole thing without the Stupak amendment: no abortion for anyone who gets subsidized health insurance or health insurance through the public option or purchased through the insurance exchanges. And if the Congress wouldn't knuckle under to the bishops, no health care for anybody.

Now, an analysis by the George Washington University School of Public Health predicts that if the Stupak amendment becomes law it will affect not only women who receive insurance under the new law, but it will lead all insurance companies to drop abortion coverage.


“Under national health reform, millions of women, including women who are covered by small employers (as employees or spouses or dependents of employees) as well as those who are currently uninsured, will receive their coverage through health insurance exchanges. By barring the sale of subsidized products that cover medically indicated abortions as part of a broader package of benefits, the Amendment can be expected to cause the industry to re-design its offerings in order to avoid violating the legal restrictions on abortion applicable to exchange products that receive subsidies,” said Professor Sara Rosenbaum, JD, lead author and Chair of the Department of Health Policy. “The Amendment also can be expected to chill efforts to develop supplemental coverage for medically indicated abortions, because it appears to prohibit the joint administration of both a basic and supplemental product,” Rosenbaum noted.

Jeffry Toobin has an editorial about this issue in this week's New Yorker, and he has it exactly right. In a point that is often overlooked, he points out that the right to abortion is not simply a question of health care. “But, as Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg observed not long ago, abortion rights “center on a woman’s autonomy to determine her life’s course, and thus to enjoy equal citizenship stature.” Every diminishment of that right diminishes women. With stakes of such magnitude, it is wise to weigh carefully the difference between compromise and surrender.”

Who else is supporting rights for women? Cosmopolitan. Yes, the “17 Tricks to Keep Your Man Begging for More” Cosmopolitan. In their current online version they are providing a link to a petition to support abortion rights for all women.

Don't think you're going to need an abortion, or don't think you're going to be relying on subsidized insurance? It still affects you, so sign the petition and push your legislators to get on board with this. The game is now in the Senate. 35% of all women are likely to need an abortion at some point in their lives. This issue is of vital importance for everyone.

Too much Salmon or arrested development ?

 

Tom Salmon has called a Friday press conference according to The Rutland Herald reporter’s blog Vermont View.

After his recent interview on VPR with Jane Lindeholm and airing his “fiddler’s fart” comment perhaps he hopes to strike another note at this press opportunity or just clear the air.

His press release notes that he “respectfully invites all perfect and imperfect people” to the presser.

No note on what the presser is about, but a wild guess is that it might involve Salmon’s DUI arrest last week.

In the spirit of the invitation here are two helpful and germane quotes from my favorite self help writer

The easiest way to save face is to keep the lower half shut.

Even a fish wouldn’t get into trouble if he kept his mouth shut. ~Author Unknown

http://rutlandherald.typepad.c…