Wise Man of Wall Street vs. Green Mountain Hayseeds

Oh, here we go. Larry Elkin, financial adviser to the wealthy and all-around embodiment of Wall Street excess, is going to tell us Vermonters exactly how clueless we are.

Vermonters Buy Into A Constitutional Mess Of Pottage

…is the title of an opinion piece on “Wall Street Pit,” a financial website. In it, Mr. Elkin gets all shouty over the dozens of Vermont towns that voted for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United ruling. Don’t they know their place? They should be tendin’ to the fields, maple sugarin’, milkin’ their spotty cows, and playin’ checkers down by the General Store, not worryin’ their picturesquely bucolic heads with Big National Issues beyond their feeble comprehension.

Larry Elkin is a CPA and CFP, worked for six years at Arthur Andersen, the scandal-ridden accounting firm. He now runs his own firm, Palisades Hudson Financial Group, which provides investment services, estate planning, and tax counseling “to a sophisticated client base.” In English: helping One Percenters amass even greater wealth and evade their tax responsibilities.

His firm is based in Scarsdale, NY. Coincidentally, there’s an article in the March 19 New Yorker by financial journalist James Stewart entitled “Tax Me If You Can” (full article paywalled but good summary here) about the lengths to which wealthy New Yorkers will go, to avoid paying New York taxes. Scarsdale’s a tax haven — from City taxes, if not State.

Elkin, of course, doesn’t “live” in New York — city or state. His official residence is in Florida, which has no state income tax. And he also, mirabile dictu, has a summer place in Quechee. (If you see him at the General Store, give him a dope-slap for me.)

After the jump, we dismantle his unpleasant little screed. Pardon me while I adjust my Oshkoshes and get a fresh sprig of hay to clench in my teeth.  

The trouble began when Mr. Elkin was up here on safari, taking a break from Ruling the Universe (TM) and observing the quaint folkways of the natives.

I happened to be in Vermont last week on Town Meeting Day, that New England democratic tradition in which neighbors gather to decide public business.

I didn’t attend because Vermont is just a part-time residence for me; my home and my vote are in Florida. But I was pleased that my neighbors in the Town of Hartford voted to rebuild the Quechee covered bridge, just down the hill from my house, which was destroyed last fall by floodwaters from Tropical Storm Irene.

He couldn’t be bothered rubbing elbows with the natives, but he is gratified that they ponied up to restore his (summer) neighborhood to its pre-Irene spendor.

Quechee is just one of five villages in the town, and there has been some concern that more distant residents would turn their backs on the $1.1 million bond issue needed to pay for the rebuilding. But everyone understood the bridge’s importance to Quechee, a village which also happens to attract a lot of tourists to the area. They come to enjoy our scenic gorge on the Ottauquechee River, which is still easily accessible, and to admire Simon Pearce’s fine blown glass and dine at his excellent restaurant, which is alongside the ravaged bridge and now requires a lengthy detour.

Awww, Larry. You have to spend an extra ten minutes in your Land Rover to get a nice dinner. We feel your pain, really we do. Thankfully those “more distant residents,” i.e. country dirt farmers, saw fit to support their betters.

People know their own neighborhoods, and they usually make good decisions when they get together to hash things out. We don’t have town meetings in Florida. We have homeowners associations and condo boards, and the better ones among them – the ones that invite everyone in the community to participate – work pretty much the same way.

Oh yeah, gated communities and small Vermont towns, peas in a pod. After all, America is a not divided by class; we’re all one and the same. Sure thing, Larry.

So it was disheartening but not entirely surprising to learn that at last week’s meetings, at least 58 Vermont towns voted to endorse a constitutional amendment that would exchange our most precious democratic birthright, the protections afforded by the Bill of Rights and the rest of the U.S. Constitution, in return for a mess of pottage – the overturning of a much-criticized but fundamentally sound Supreme Court decision. In reality, the proposal would exchange valuable rights in return for nothing at all.

Bumpkins! Know-nothings! How dare they?

By “protections afforded by the Bill of Rights,” I think he means corporate personhood. By “fundamentally sound Supreme Court decision,” he means Holy Writ from Pope Scalia. And by “nothing at all,” he means “some semblance of citizen control over our own political process.”

The chief backer of the amendment is Sen. Bernard Sanders, an independent (he calls himself a socialist) from Vermont and self-appointed scourge of the rich and powerful, a persona that appeals to modern Vermonters. His professed goal is to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, which is a misguided objective in itself. However, the language of Sanders’ proposal would go vastly further – much further, I’m sure, than his fellow Vermont citizens took the time to explore before they gave Sanders their thumbs-up.

Bernard? Does anyone actually call Bernie Sanders “Bernard”? Not since he was six years old and his momma was calling him in for dinner. Which is Mr. Elkin’s intent here: belittling Sen. Sanders through obviously false aggrandizement.

Too bad us Green Mountain Yokels are too clueless to see through Bernard’s act.

Elkin then spends a couple of tedious paragraphs explaining why Bernie’s amendment would turn the Bill of Rights into toilet paper, before getting on to the “myth” of corporate personhood:

Corporations are merely aggregations of people. To insist that corporations lack the same rights as the people who own them, manage them or work for them is to argue that we forfeit some of our rights when we combine our efforts to accomplish things we could never accomplish individually.

Or, as Mitt Romney so trenchantly put it, “Corporations are people, my friend!” Yeah, corporations are “merely” gatherings of people. With the combined financial, social, and political power to run roughshod over the interests of actual people.

Corporations aren’t people, Larry, any more than a rampaging colony of army ants is simply an aggregation of individual ants. There’s a huge difference in mass and destructive power.

Without corporations and similar entities, an enterprise like Apple would merely have been Steve & Steve’s Computer Company, destined to expire when the collaboration between Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak ended, or when Steve Jobs died. Without corporations we could not have car companies, or medical centers, or cellphones, or electricity delivered to our homes. No enterprise could grow larger than the efforts of a handful of people could make it, or last longer than the lifetime of its founders.

Which is completely irrelevant because nobody — not even Socialist Bernard Sanders — is calling for an end to corporations. We’d just prefer that corporations not be able to purchase our political system lock, stock and barrel.

Sanders’ proposal would not stop at stripping free speech rights from corporations and their shareholders. It would strip all constitutional protections. Corporations would not be entitled to due process, or to be free of state interference in interstate commerce, or to be protected from seizure of their property or from illegal searches. Any sort of Gestapo-like tactic would be fair game when directed by the federal government against a business enterprise.

Yep, there’s the inevitable Nazi comparison. Must be almost done with the column.

Did residents of 58 Vermont towns give any thought to this? I very much doubt it.

No, because we’re so easily duped. Say, Larry, I was thinking about buying a bridge. I hear you got a nice one down in Brooklyn.

They may be willing to elect an avowed socialist to the U.S. Senate, and they may have an unreasonably strong sense of persecution by what they perceive as moneyed interests from faraway places (the same moneyed interests to whom they happily sell second homes, ski lift tickets and bed-and-breakfast lodgings), but Vermonters are neither stupid nor antidemocratic.

Gee, thanks, Larry. We’re commie pinko dupes, we hate rich people who helicopter in and act in a condescending manner (maybe he’s already gotten dope-slapped at the General Store), but we’re not stupid.

I feel so validated, now that Larry Elkin, CPA, CFP, member of the cabal that came thisclose to crashing the global economy and that had to be bailed out by America’s rubes and dupes, has formally told me I’m not stupid.

They just allowed themselves to be led by an ideologue who spends most of his time in Washington, D.C., fighting a class war that has not been relevant for generations.

Say, maybe Bo Muller-Moore can print a bumper sticker that says “Brainwashed By Bernie.” It’d look purty on the bumper of my Subaru.

Town meetings work really well on matters that town residents know something about, like the importance of our covered bridge in Quechee.

Stick to small-town stuff, you peasants! Get to work and fix my goddamn bridge! Chop-chop!

But unless everyone guards against being manipulated and bullied into going along with the crowd, town meetings can also degenerate into mobs.

Ooooohhhh, manipulated, bullied mobs!  Well I remember the appalling TV news reports about the Reign of Terror on Town Meeting Day. Such horror, such senseless bloodshed. To me, the worst of it all was the mass guillotinings in Stowe.

Last week’s votes in Vermont are an object lesson in what can go wrong in small-town democracy. It is one that, fortunately, won’t do any harm in the long run.

…because, after all, we are still the Masters of the Universe. Suck on that, you rubes!

p.s. Vermont Tiger posted an excerpt from this piece and gave it their imprimatur. I, for one, am shocked that our Internet neighbors think so poorly of their fellow Vermonters.

The PSB Does a Public Service

Entergy might be careful what it wishes for in future.  After badgering the Public Service Board for months to take action on the issue of a Certificate of Public Good for Vermont Yankee, they are getting their wish; but it isn’t working out for them quite as they had envisioned.

Yesterday, PSB Commissioner Elisabeth Miller  wrote to the regional head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to express concern over the

pattern of human errors at the Vernon reactor during the past 15 months.

Miller lists five errors, ranging from failure to remove a plastic cover from a pump before it was installed to inaccurately measuring the dose rate from a shipment of radioactive waste.

Weighing in on the probable outcome of the Public Service Board’s decision regarding continued operation of Vermont Yankee, Governor Shumlin says he is optimistic that the Board will refuse to sign-off on the twenty year extension of VY’s permit to operate.

“I want to shut the plant down on schedule and I’m disappointed that it’s not going to be shut down next week but I’m hoping that we can get a decision from the Public Service Board that will bring that about as quickly as we can. I think it’s in Vermonters best interests – look, we’re not even buying power from the plant anymore.”

If the Public Service Board denies Entergy a Certificate of Public Good and the issue of relicensing is appealed to the US Supreme Court, it is still unclear whether or not Vermont Yankee could continue to operate in defiance of the PSB until a final ruling comes from the Supremes…which would probably mean years more of progressive decrepitude and consequences at the geriatric facility.

Entergy Louisiana: Twisting in the wind

( – promoted by JulieWaters)

I’m beginning to feel like a slack-jawed teen from all of this smirking (emphasis added):

Entergy asks court for OK to continue operating Vermont Yankee, as it waits for license approval from Public Service Board

by Alan Panebaker | March 16, 2012

http://vtdigger.org/2012/03/16…

Entergy again asks judge to prevent state from shutting down VY

By BOB AUDETTE, Reformer Staffreformer.com

Updated:   03/15/2012 05:46:54 PM EDT

BRATTLEBORO-“In documents filed in federal district court in Brattleboro on March 14, Entergy again asked a judge to issue an order forbidding the Vermont Public Service Board from shutting down Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon.”

http://www.reformer.com/localn…

“Again”? Yep. My my, seems to be a tone of desperation coming from the ivory towers at Entergy Louisiana corporate, amongst the piles of emptied champagne bottles still waiting to be carted out to make room for more.

Oh, puleeze! Pretty, pretty pleeze…don’t shut our nuclear waste-leaking dirty bomb down!

Double whammy:

“At the same time[..]submitted a request to the PSB that it go along with a conclusion reached by both the Vermont Attorney General and the Vermont Department of Public Service that under state statutes Yankee can continue to operate while Entergy’s application for a certificate for public good for continued operation is pending.”

Appears AG & a few others jumped the gun:

“In hearings held earlier this week, members of the PSB stated they don’t necessarily agree with the AG’s conclusion.”

No problem, they might just have to defy the State of VT:

“The PSB thus raised the very specter this Court sought clearly to avoid in its Decision: namely, that Vermont would require VY to cease operation on March 21, 2012, causing the shutdown of VY…” wrote Entergy’s attorneys in the documents filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont. “If Federal District Court Judge J. Garvan Murtha doesn’t grant Entergy’s request by March 21, when the current CPG expires, Entergy will be forced to either cease operations “or to operate in defiance of the PSB’s opinion,” they wrote.

So, they really think Judge Murtha was merely trying to prevent VT from shuttering VY? I thought he ruled primarily that the legislature could not inject itself into decisions solely within the purview of the NRC, namely safety. However preserving the role of the PSB for consideration of the CPG. Looks like they expected a mere NRC-like rubberstamp before the photo-op. I’m surprised they didn’t include the PR & photo team which may lose jobs along w/the “More than 600 plant employees.”

More frantic freaking:

“Entergy is also asking for all the parties to meet with Murtha on Monday “because of the urgent circumstances created by the rapidly approaching (deadline), together with the (PSB’s) continued questioning of Vermont Yankee’s ability to operate past (March 21) …”

Monday? Wow, that’s two days hence. Quite alot to ask, they basically said ‘It needs to be done NOW.

Hopefully they’ll be told to suck this one up too.

PSB chair sure doesn’t seem to be cottoning to these criminals or their thuggish legal team:

Any (CPG) issued by the Board shall limit the cumulative total amount of spent fuel stored at Vermont Yankee to the amount derived in the operation of the facility up to but not beyond March 21, 2012,”said Chairman James Volz, reading from the statute.

“That language was not struck by the (federal) Court,” added Voltz.

The Public Service Board took the arguments under advisement and the parties have until Friday, March 16, to file supporting documents.

Stay tuned!

US Upper Crust Rebound

Not much can be added to tag along with this chart that shows so dramatically who the winners and losers have been in the recovery to date. The chart is an analysis of recent IRS data by economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty illustrates directions in US incomes after the Great Recession and the Great Depression. Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and tax code expert David Clay Johnson suggests this shows plenty about our tax and economic policy direction.

 

The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.

National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent.

Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.

Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.

The different results in 1934 and 2010 show how a major shift in federal policy hurts the vast majority and benefits the super-rich.

A big case of mass transit hypocrisy

For years, Congressional Republicans have sought to eliminate government subsidies for Amtrak. Wasteful! Unnecessary! Harrumph! Let it die if it can’t pay its own way!

This year, the Republican majority passed a highway bill that would strip out all funding for mass transit. Wasteful! Unnecessary! Harrumph!

But there’s one kind of mass transit the Republicans don’t mind subsidizing at all: the air travel system. “Airports inherently lose money,” an airport manager once told me. Kinda like Amtrak? And local transit agencies? Huh.

Huge quantities of public money are poured into our air travel system every year.  Some of it supports essential service. But a lot of it benefits business passengers and “general aviation,” i.e. private planes.  

Yep, public transit for the rich. Now that deserves a subsidy! Not like those dirty buses, trains, and subways.

After the jump, a case in point: Lebanon, NH.

The Lebanon Municipal Airport is in the news again. The Airport’s been losing money for years, and things aren’t looking up. So city and airport officials have called an “Airport Summit” for Tuesday, March 20.

Last year, the airport brought in $728,000 in revenues. Expenses totaled just under $1 million, leaving a deficit of $270,000. Almost 33%. But when you factor in hefty federal subsidies, the airport’s numbers look a lot worse than that.

Lebanon Airport offers passenger service through Cape Air: four daily flights to Boston and two to New York City. Those are small planes, and the average one is less than half full. For providing this service, Cape Air gets a big fat government check through a program called “Essential Air Service” — $2.3 million in 2009.  The vast majority of Lebanon’s passengers were business travelers; most civilians prefer to use Manchester or Burlington, where flights are more frequent, destinations more numerous, and tickets far cheaper.

Without that EAS funding, Cape Air would almost certainly pull out of Lebanon Airport. That, in turn, would have a domino effect on the Airport’s traffic and revenue numbers, and on its other big source of government money: the Airport Improvement Program, or AIP.  

Lebanon gets about a million dollars a year from AIP. (Not included in its budget, because AIP can only be spent on improvement projects, not general operations.) It would lose that money if passenger loads fall below a certain limit. Even with Cape Air’s massively subsidized service, the Airport is in danger of suffering an 85% cut in AIP funds. And if Cape Air were to pull out entirely, the AIP money would disappear. Without AIP, the airport’s facilities would deteriorate in short order.

Its own manager says that if Lebanon Airport lost passenger service, its deficit would increase by about $400,000 a year. That would be catastrophic for a facility that many in Lebanon are already tired of underwriting with their own tax money.  

(Also, it must be noted, the Airport sits on a piece of extremely valuable real estate: on a plateau just above the busy Route 120 shopping strip, with an incredible view of the Connecticut River Valley. If Lebanon shut the airport and sold the land, it’s get a windfall profit and a sustained addition to its tax base.)

The EAS money is supposedly intended to support passenger travel at rural airports that would lose service if left to the tender mercies of the free market. (EAS was established after airlines were deregulated in 1978, because the carriers were fleeing small and medium-sized airports.) But in truth, certainly at Lebanon, the money’s real purpose is to make airports more attractive for general aviation.

There are places where it makes sense to subsidize travel. Places where the next-nearest airport is hours away. But Lebanon is a 90-minutes drive from two airports with much better passenger service, and a little over two hours away from Boston. You can make the drive in less time than it takes a passenger plane to take off, fly, and land. There’s already bus service linking Lebanon to Manchester and Boston, which could be significantly beefed up with a relatively tiny federal subsidy.

But this isn’t really about passengers. It’s about subsidizing business passengers (who are also subsidized by tax deductions for business travel), and it’s especially about maintaining facilities for private and corporate planes.

The federal government is considering a user fee of up to $100 for private planes. The revenues would much more fairly and directly pay for the costs of general aviation. But pilots and plane owners are up in arms. Private planes, especially corporate planes, are job creators, after all! Promoting business activity, boosting the economy.

That’s the kind of welfare Republicans can believe in.

Look, I’m not necessarily saying we should eliminate all the subsidies for aviation. There are arguments to be made for the system. I’m just pointing out a big and obvious inconsistency. In reality, there is no form of transportation that can fully pay its own costs. If we can afford to underwrite business travel through massive subsidy programs, we can spend an equivalent amount of money on trains, buses and subways.

And if we can’t do that, then we shouldn’t spend government funds on air travel for the One Percent.  

Updated: Reliability Issues? How ’bout this?

The push is on to get a Cerificate of Public Good from the Public Service Board before there is a ruling on the appeal of Vermont Yankee/Entergy vs. the State of Vermont, and, in the interim, to block the PSB from acting to close the plant on schedule.   Entergy’s pulling out all the stops to court flagging public support for continued operation.

I don’t know if other local papers carried it, but last night the Messenger boasted a full-page ad from Vermont Yankee telling us why, on the one-year anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster,  we shouldn’t give the safety of VY another thought because they are on the case!

Was this deliberately timed to distract the public from that elephant in the corner, the plant’s poor prognosis for reliability, so that the conversation visibly revolves around an issue over which the State has no jurisdiction? Maybe that’s giving them more credit than they are due.

In any case, as Stardust alerted us several days ago, that old black magic “reliability” recently reared its ugly head again when a system failure forced a down-scaling of service.

Now that we have a better idea of what was involved, we thought it was time to revisit the incident on GMD’s front page.  VTdigger yesterday reported on the technical issue, involving a key component, that forced Vermont Yankee to begin operating at reduced capacity.  Explaining that the role of the condenser is to act somewhat like a radiator, Digger reports that its functionality was compromised in the following way:

Last November, during a planned refueling outage, plant workers applied a protective coating – an epoxy or plastic – to the tubing in the condenser… At the beginning of February, nuclear engineers at the plant discovered that the the thermal heat exchange efficiency of the condenser was greatly reduced. Last week, the plant had to lower its power production by 50 percent because back pressure was building up in the condenser.

Apparently, the coating applied to extend the life of the condenser, which dates to the plant’s start-up 40 years ago, compromised the “efficiency” of the system.  In this case “efficiency” refers to its ability to operate without a pressure build-up.

…And in the very competitive category of “I Told You So,” the winner is…Arnie Gundersen.  

When asked in his 2003 testimony to the Public Service Board to name

a component likely to have an adverse effect on reliability under extended power uprate conditions

Mr. Gundersen responded that the condenser was likely to present exactly the scenario of improper repair and subsequent failure that has now occurred.

Gundersen, of Fairewinds Associates, now predicts that this thermal issue is likely to worsen in summer:

when the water temperature of the Connecticut River rises from springtime temperatures of 50 degrees to 70 degrees.

The upshot is that further power reductions will be likely so long as the plant continues to operate with the affected condenser in the system.

Sounds like a reliability issue to me.

On a different front, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is challenging the NRC to explain how they could go ahead and extend the Vermont Yankee operating license within just days of the unprecedented disaster at Fukushima which involved reactors of exactly the same generation as the one at Vermont Yankee.

Sanders, who, a year ago called for a moratorium on relicensing aging nuclear power plants in the U.S. until there had been an opportunity to draw lessons from the Fukushima chain of collapse, today chastised the agency for its unwillingness to alter its relicensing initiatives, and the federal government as a whole for policy that heavily subsidizes the nuclear industry and does not respect the right of a state like Vermont to phase out aging nuclear facilities in favor of sustainable energy built on other platforms.

“In my state there is a strong feeling that we want to go forward with energy efficiency and sustainable energy. I believe that we have that right. I believe that every other state in the country has that right,” Sanders said. “If we want to move to sustainable energy and not maintain an aging, trouble-plagued nuclear power plant, I think we should be allowed to do that.”

Hearts And Minds

Hey GI, you got cigarettes, candy?

Come on GI, I got sister.

What the fuck was that?

Some kid from Italy I think.

Italy.  Fuckin’ Italy!

Yeah.

Like in A Walk In The Sun

Fightin’ the Battle of Tibet.

Never saw that one.

Shithole country.

I wouldn’t mind fightin’

the Battle of Tibet.

I heard the LT went off again.

Did you hear about last night?

Yeah.  He shot some old man

who was just walkin’ down the road.

The LT’s pushin’ for the good ole Section 8.

Ain’t gonna happen.

He’s an officer.

That stuff’s for us nobodies.

Well, there’s a bird colonel

come down this morning.

I think he’s here

to look all of us over.

Hey GI, you got gum, C-rats?

Get lost kid.

You goddamn German brat.

Yeah, I remember.

Fuckin’ Aachen!

Fuckin’ Krauts!

I lost my watch there.

So, how long ya think

we’re gonna sit here?

I don’t know.

Depends on Colonel Hotshit.

I don’t mind.

I can sit.

Yeah.  Hey, butt me.

You’re fuckin’ worse

than those little bastards

back at Seoul.

Fuckin’ Korea!

You said it.

Tibet will be better though.

Why?

All that kama sutra pussy.

Or whatever they call it.

Hey GI, you want to buy sticks?

Got Big O Chinese tobacco too.

Like GI say, heap good shit!

Get lost.  But here. (points rifle)

Leave all that heap good shit

on the ground there.

Fuck Shit!  GI, you a fucker!

Now beat it!

Fuckin’ gook slope shits.

And here we are tryin’

to help them hold on

to their fuckin’ country.

Fuckin’ Nam!

Hey you two!

Get off your asses!

We’re movin’ out North.

Hope it’s fuckin’ Tibet.

Yeah.

Fuckin’ Afghanistan!

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, Vt.

Hope shines on the VTGOP horizon

So the inexplicably popular IslamoSocialist Sen. Bernie Sanders is up for re-election this year, and the Republicans are looking for their David to take on this Goliath. Last week, it seemed like they’d found their man. But maybe not. Vermont Press Bureau:

Windsor Republican John MacGovern announced his bid against Sanders earlier this month. But his launch got a decidedly tepid response from GOP leaders, who hinted that a name-brand Republican might be waiting in the wings.

So they aren’t satisfied with a former Massachusetts State Representative and two-time losing candidate for Vermont State Senate who’s spent the last decade sponging off rich Dartmouth alumni with his bogus nonprofit The Hanover Institute.

Where have all the good men gone and where are all the gods ?

Where’s the street-wise Hercules to fight the rising odds ?

Isn’t there a white knight upon a fiery steed ?

Late at night I toss and I turn and I dream of what I need

Ever-louder rumblings about the emergence of another Republican challenger to Bernie Sanders have centered on one man: Kevin Dorn.

I  need a hero, I’m holding out for a hero ’till the morning light

He’s gotta be sure and it’s gotta be soon

And he’s gotta be larger than life, larger than life

Yes, the Man of Our Conservative Dreams, our Champion, our Hero: Kevin Dorn!

Kevin Dorn???

Yep, Kevin Dorn.

Er, ahem, you know, Secretary of Commerce under Jim Douglas? And before that, a lobbyist for the Home Builders and the Realtors?

Yeah, that guy.

We talked to Dorn today, and he confirmed he’s pondering a foray into electoral politics.

He won’t say right now whether he’s eying the U.S. Senate, a statewide office, or perhaps a seat in the Vermont Legislature.

I think Bonnie Tyler just walked offstage.

Kevin freakin’ Dorn.

Is this the Vermont GOP’s idea of “a name-brand Republican”? Sheesh. Much as I’d like to see the Republican Party become the Washington Generals of politics, that’s just sad.

Nothing against Kevin Dorn. I’m sure, in his own way, he’s a competent, accomplished guy. But y’know, it’s hard to see how Kevin Dorn is any bigger a name than John MacGovern, who has run multiple political campaigns and even won a few of ’em. And who has a whole bunch of rich Dartmouth alumni bankrolling his phony nonprofit, and might be able to dupe them into bankrolling a Senate candidacy.

The only real advantage Dorn has over MacGovern is that, in the minds of the VTGOP, he’s “one of us.” MacGovern is an interloper from the Upper Valley who’s done most of his work across the Connecticut, in Hanover. Dorn is our guy, a Douglas Administration insider and, according to the VPB, “a very close friend” of Brian Dubie. Yeah, that’s the stuff.

Now, in a big-picture sense, there ain’t a dime’s worth of difference between the two. Both are auditioning for a lead role — not in “David vs. Goliath,” but in “Bambi vs. Godzilla.”

But it says something about the cluelessness of today’s Vermont Republicans that they’d view Kevin Dorn as a big name. And it says something about the state of the party, that their only choices for U.S. Senate might be John MacGovern or Kevin Dorn.  

Floating Island

When I was little there was a “company” dessert, consisting of lumps of meringue adrift on a sea of custard.  It was fancifully named “Floating Island,” and belonged to the confectionary  landscape that included “Baked Alaska” and “Rocky Road.” But this isn’t about dessert.

As a great continent of potentially hot garbage travels slowly across the Pacific toward points west on the America shores, we have a little time to ready ourselves for delivery of the motherload.  

The leading edge of floating debris from the tsunami that swept Japan just about a year ago is expected to begin making landfall in Hawaii any day now, and NOAA’s Marine Debris Program wants to know when, and what, it turns up.

It is estimated that roughly twenty tons of the stuff is headed east, and the entire delivery phase may take a couple of years.

Some  of the debris seems likely to be swept into a giant slow-moving circle,  heading back toward the Hawaiian Islands and then cycling round for a second delivery on the mainland. Computer animation of this effect calls to mind the eddies of water in a flushing toilet.  

Some of it may even ultimately reach the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch,” that doughty landmark of our addiction to plastic that festers and chokes a vast reach of the South Pacific.

NOAA dismisses the possibility that the floating debris field may be carrying radioactive waste to American shores, reassuring denizens of Oregon and California that most of the debris was launched and resolutely moving away before the nuclear accidents began to unfold; but the behavior of floating materials, even in NOAA’s simulations, raises the specter that some material may have been “re-delivered” at Fukushima, only to be contaminated in the aftermath on the radioactive shores before washing once again out to sea.  

NOAA seems to be the first to admit that they don’t really know much about the path of the debris.

… there is still a large amount of uncertainty over exactly what is still floating, where it’s located, where it will go, and when it will arrive

They don’t even know how much of it will actually make it to points along the West Coast, observing cheerfully that much of it may sink to the bottom of the ocean during its journey.  Their prognosis of low radioactivity in the debris field relies rather heavily on the beneficent ability of the ocean to dilute all the badness away.

In fact, NOAA’s FAQ page has a rather odd way of allaying fears (emphasis mine):

Why isn’t this considered an emergency yet?

It’s hard to take emergency actions when there’s so little information about what we’re responding to – remember: it’s possible that most of the debris will break up, sink, or get caught up in existing garbage patches. We’re working on creating contingency plans that will address scenarios ranging from no debris to high levels of debris.

If I were a tuna or a whale I might find that of damn little comfort.

Extending the Invitation – SNAP PAC in Essex

Hey everyone,

I know many of you have already had this invitation passed on in some variety, but I wanted to extend it to the whole Green Mountain Daily community. Tomorrow (Thursday) evening in Essex Junction, Rep. Kesha Ram and I are hosting a reception for Students for a New American Politics, the political action committee where I currently serve as Executive Director. I’d love to get the chance to see some of you all in person while I am still in state.

While I’ve talked about SNAP briefly with some of you, I wanted to take a little time to talk about to explain exactly what it is that I’ve been putting all my political energy into for now just over a year, and why now is the time to invest in shaping the direction of our party – if you’ll join me below the fold.

There are major problems with the ways that we engage young people in politics. Campaigns depend on them – young people knock on doors, they work jobs the make up for what they lack in pay with ridiculously long hours. It’s not all bad work though – the people who get into the game when they’re young are more likely to stick with it. They become the activists, organizers, even politicians themselves of the next generation.

If that’s the reality we live in – and my experience both here in Vermont and elsewhere in the country as I’ve travelled with SNAP tells me that it is – then it is not just in our interests, but it’s our responsibility to make sure that those young people reflect the same diversity of our movement.

Unfortunately, campaigns aren’t always the most meritocratic organizations. I was fortunate enough to find people that trusted me when I was way too young to be working on campaigns – but I think I’m an exception rather than the rule – usually it takes connections to get your foot in the door, and even if you have an opportunity, you can only take it if you have the financial security to work full time for almost nothing.

At SNAP, we care about electing progressive leaders to Congress. We’re proud to have helped great candidates win in some of the closest races in the country – Al Franken, Tom Periello, and Joe Courtney by less than 100 votes in 2006. But we also want to make sure that we are making a last impact on the future of the Democratic Party. That is why we spend our money through our fellowship program.

Rather than make donations to our candidates, we pay college students to work as full time field organizers on their campaigns for 10-12 weeks during the spring, summer, or fall. Our fellows are incredible campus organizers who have never gotten the door opened for them into professional politics, and the 55 fellows who have came through our program have now gone on to tremendous success as professional campaign staff, local government officials, union organizers, and professional advocates and activists.

We’ve found such great success with the program that this year we plan to fun 40 fellowships. We’ve received hundreds of applications for these positions, and have had to make incredibly difficult choices about hiring our organizers, but the people we have are truly some of the best the nation has to offer. 70% of our applicants attend state universities, and a similar number are eligible for federal financial aide. They each have incredible stories of how they got their start in politics, and it is those stories and more that I hope to share with some of you tomorrow evening.

The event will run from 8-9:30pm at my house (9 Wilkinson Drive, Essex Junction), though of course if you have other time constraints you are free to arrive and exit as you please. I’m just tremendously excited to share these stories with the people that helped give me my start, because there is nothing that makes me feel better about our politics today than being able to give the same opportunity I was granted to another wave of incredibly talented young people. Our program offers a unique opportunity, and it excites me that the best organizers in country aren’t just getting opportunities to work in politics, they are getting those opportunities solely on incredibly progressive campaigns, working for people who will be actual leaders in Washington.

Please don’t hesitate to bother me with questions!