Monthly Archives: July 2012

Converge on the Conference!

This coming Sunday, July 29 through Tuesday July 31 Governor Peter Shumlin and Quebec Premier Jean Charest will be hosting the 36th Conference of New England Governors and Eastern Premiers in Burlington.  While the political and economic elite of the Northeast sit down behind closed doors to map-out secret, profit-driven, greenwashed resolutions for trade, energy, climate change, transportation, and infastructure issues, hundreds or possibly thousands of people from across the region will be taking to the streets in Burlington to voice their opposition to the very nature of the Conference, as well as its neoliberal profit over people approach.

An ad hoc group of local activists and organizers, the Governor’s Conference Welcoming Committee, has set up a useful website with a schedule of events, some basic background information, resource guide, and more.

Beginning Saturday and lasting through Monday, a Welcome Center with more information about events, resources and the like will be set up from 9am to 9pm in a back building of the UU Church at the top of Church St.  The main actions begin Sunday with a rally at noon in City Hall Park that will take to the streets on a spirited march to the Conference Center on the Burlington waterfront.

Untold numbers of people from #OWS, the indigenous Innu communities of Quebec, the Quebec student strike, and dozens of other social justice movements and organizations from throughout Vermont, New England and the Eastern Provinces will be descending on Burlington.  A human oil spill, regional gathering of Occupy New England, and student bloc are just some of the displays of resistance being planned.

See you in the streets!

Vermont Yankee springs a leak

Entergy and the NRC are downplaying yet another radioactive leak at Vermont Yankee that occurred last weekend but is only now reaching the press>

The loss of 2,700 gallons of “mildly ” radioactive waste water Sunday from the pool, which holds thousands of Yankee’s old, highly radioactive fuel rods, was caught in a radioactive waste tank, according to Entergy Nuclear spokesman Robert Williams.

The incident is being blamed on procedural error on the part of an employee.  Though Williams would not say if the employee is new to the job, the procedural error, which involved the misalignment of valves, suggests that the employee who made the error may have been lacking in experience and supervision.  

Water drained from the pool for thirty minutes before the problem was discovered.  What might have happened had the leak remained undetected and the 300,000-gallon tank continued to drain for hours is very troubling indeed!

That Entergy does not seem to fully appreciate this potential is betrayed by Mr. Williams characterization of the water as “mildly” radioactive.  Is that anything like being a little bit pregnant?

Susan Smallheer of the Rutland Herald quotes Fairewinds Assoc. Arnie Gundersen as saying the mistake was not insignificant.

“That’s a gross procedural breakdown,” said Gundersen, who said the Public Oversight Panel had been very concerned about similar employee errors as the experienced staff at Yankee leave or retire.

And, while we’re on the subject, I took a look at Meredith Angwyn’s fanpage for Vermont Yankee, Yes VY,  and besides a rather personal screed against Mr. Gundersen, I found her complaining about the very nerve of the Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel to be asking Entergy whether it was making changes in light of lessons learned at Fukushima.  

She seems to be under the impression that, even though Vermont Yankee continues to operate on Vermont soil, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s preemption on safety issues extends so far as to mean the state can’t even ask questions about safety.  

What is the concern here?  That the people of Vermont might actually learn something about how prepared or unprepared VY is for an emergency?

Ms. Angwyn’s railing that the State Nuclear Advisory Panel should not even discuss safety issues is reminiscent of the idiot legislature of North Carolina which is considering  prohibiting government agencies from even considering the potential three-foot rise in sea level, due to climate change, over the remainder of the century.  

Does she think that just by talking about safety concerns, the Advisory Panel is affecting VY’s operating license?

If she is suggesting that the state doesn’t even have the right to think about evacuation concerns and other possible collateral safety issues in the event of a disaster at VY,  she has lost all grip on reality.

NO TAR SANDS IN VERMONT! JOIN THE HUMAN OIL SPILL IN BURLINGTON ON SUNDAY!

Green Mountain Daily Community,

    This Sunday, July 29th in Burlington, the Vermont Sierra Club is calling on all Vermonters to take a stand against the New England tar sands pipeline that is slated to run through the Northeast Kingdom.  Together we will shut this project down before it begins, and we will realize a clean, renewable energy future for the Green Mountain State and beyond!

Sunday, July 29

Burlington, VT

12:00 noon, City Hall Park, join the march

2:00 gather at Battery Park

2:00  Human Oil Spill (*see below)

[*Below is a message from our friends and allies in 350.0rg Vermont*]

Dear Friends

    Ever since the mass arrests protesting the Keystone pipeline last summer (the largest civil disobedience action in the U.S. in 30 years) there’s been renewed interest in confronting the fossil fuel industry and its political enablers.

    The Alberta tar sands are one of North America’s most dangerous fossil fuel projects, and New England is now set to become the next battleground in big oil’s relentless attempt to expand them. Thus far the climate movement and local organizing has blocked the oil industry’s attempts to ship tar sands oil through other routes, forcing them now to begin charting a path East through our communities by converting an old gas pipeline to ship heavy corrosive tar sands.

    The Tar Sands Free Northeast campaign is making a plan to block big oil’s tar sands route east, and keep dirty oil in the ground where it belongs. When coming up against the power of the richest industry on earth, there is only one thing that’s really worked so far to stop them: powerful citizen actions.

We have a big one planned for this Sunday that we hope you will join:

Human Oil Spill Action at the Governors’ Conference — July 29

    Hundreds of citizens will be gathering in Burlington this Sunday to send a message to the region’s political leaders that we don’t want tar sands oil in our region. New England’s Governors and Canadian Premiers will be meeting in Burlington, Vermont to discuss our region’s economic and political future. Citizens aren’t invited to attend, which means that our concerns about tar sands pipelines won’t be on their agenda. So we’ll do the next best thing to being inside: we’re staging a giant action that will put tar sands on the agenda for the media and anyone else watching.

    We’re planning a massive human oil spill that will show the real risks of tar sands oil and send a simple message to our leaders: we will stand united to keep our land and water tar sands free. If you are ready to be part of a peaceful action and stand for tar sands free communities, please join us in sending this critical message. Here are the details:

Note: The human oil spill action follows a mass march that’s part of a weekend Convergence on the Conference. The march begins at 12:00 noon at City Hall Park and will end at the Hilton Hotel.

What:  Speak-out: Bill Mckibben joins First Nation and front line speakers–followed by a Human Oil Spill

When: Sunday July 29, 2:00 PM

Where: Gather at Battery Park in Burlington, Vermont and then we’ll convergence on the conference march.

Click on the below link to arrange car share to the action:

https://docs.google.com/a/sier…

How to prepare:  Wear or bring black oil spill solidarity clothing or outer shell with living Earth colors underneath (life will rise again after our oil spill).

    From the looks of things this may be the largest direct action ever staged in New England to resist tar sands expansion. Though there may need to be many more actions before our job is done, at least one message won’t need to repeated after this Sunday: New England is definitely not the path of least resistance for tar sands expansion.

Until Sunday, in Burlington

Team 350Vermont

The Innocent Victims

(Whether Colorado, the Twin Towers, Afghanistan, Waco, Oklahoma City, or the hometown teacher, the psychosis has yet to be defined, let alone treated. Because THEY do not want it defined nor treated.)

Oh pity pity the latest of the innocent victims

and do not say out loud what they mean

because that would leave us without

our pity; how we bond in fright at the thought

that one day we surely will join them all;

a pity for a dead Pashtun child and a pity

for the homeless man killed for the recreation

of killing, and a great big pity for ourselves

who have to endure the utter hopelessness

of pity as the victims pile up and block all respite;

yes let us moan and groan again for some escape

from all this pity; seek answers from those authorities

on fear and hopelessness, for they always have

sexy answers to explain how it was someone not

like us who was responsible for our latest pity;

so tomorrow there will be a slight pause and a sigh;

then the next innocent victims will be targeted

and dispatched with the ease of a fingertip’s touch,

like a lover’s hand turned into a weapon and the answer

to a pity lewdly caressing the trigger of a desire;

well it is all part of this life and death that pushes us on,

with a gun to our backs that shoots bullets of pity

through the wall of those victims who have made

us victims, with no one to pity us as we move through

the dead on tiptoes, and do absolutely not look into their eyes.

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, VT.

who have  

Rival Friendships

When is it okay in Vermont politics to befriend the enemy? asks VtBuzz.

Until last week, Campbell was there with a quote [on Scott’s webpage] praising Scott’s non-partisan approach, and it caused a furor. […] What was wrong with Campbell saying nice things about his friend? Campbell is a Democrat, Scott a Republican. We’re in an election. Apparently, this is no time for cross-party niceties.

“Befriend an enemy?” Aw, come-on!

No one should fault Campbell for his friendship with Phil Scott and Vince Illuzzi or want them to be enemies (Phil Scott is a part of Shumlin’s cabinet after all). However for those voters not familiar with the ins and outs of Montpelier’s good ol’ friendship network, Campbell’s significant presence on Scott’s campaign page and by candidate Illuzzis’ side could have appeared to be an endorsement of sorts beyond “cross-party niceties”.

What could this be called, an inadvertent endorsement or collateral campaigning?  Couple this no publically discernable effort by Campbell for his own party’s candidate (and Scott’s Democratic opponent) Cassandra Gekas, or Illuzzi’s Democratic challenger for Auditor, Doug Hoffer – have you seen any? I sure haven’t! – and a raised eyebrow or two isn’t out of line over the behavior but not over the friendship itself.

It is a little surprising that the Free Press seems almost shocked Apparently, this is no time for cross-party niceties by this hubbub because back in June Vt Buzz happily buzzed the news Campbell joins arms with Illuzzi (at a spay/neuter clinic benefit no less).

Lest you think this is just a couple of senators highlighting a program they support, consider that the news release announcing the event is titled: “President Pro Tem John Campbell and Auditor Candidate Vince Illuzzi Celebrate VSNIP Program.”

Somebody was thinking of Illuzzi as an auditor candidate, not a state senator, when this event came together.

Well true friends don’t let friends betray their principles … if they have any beyond patting each other on the back and shoring up their (eh) bully pulpits.

The Road to Oligarchy

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights held a hearing Tuesday on “Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs” Here is Sen. Bernie Sanders’ testimony:

(sub folda -k9k)

“Mr. Chairman, thank you for convening a hearing on the monumentally important issue of “Taking Back Our Democracy.” Unfortunately, that title exactly describes the challenge facing us today.

    The history of this country has been the drive toward a more and more inclusive democracy-a democracy which would fulfill Abraham Lincoln’s beautiful phraseology at Gettysburg in which he described America as a nation “of the people by the people for the people.”

    We all know American democracy has not always lived up to this ideal. When this country was founded, only white male property owners over age 21 could vote. But people fought to change that and we became a more inclusive democracy.  After the Civil War, we amended the Constitution to allow non-white men to vote. We became a more inclusive democracy.  In 1920, after years of struggle and against enormous opposition, we finally ratified the 19th Amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote. We became a more inclusive democracy.

    In 1965, under the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr. and others, the great civil rights movement finally succeeded in outlawing racism at the ballot box and LBJ signed the Voting Rights Act. We became a more inclusive democracy.  

   One year after that, the Supreme Court ruled that the poll tax was unconstitutional, that people could not be denied the right to vote because they were low-income. We became a more inclusive democracy. In 1971, young people throughout the country said; “we are being drafted to go to Vietnam and get killed, but we don’t even have the right to vote.”  The voting age was lowered to 18.  We became a more inclusive democracy.

        The democratic foundations of our country and this movement toward a more inclusive democracy are now facing the most severe attacks, both economically and politically, that we have seen in the modern history of our country.  Tragically, as I say this advisedly, we are well on our way to seeing our great country  move toward an oligarchic form of government – where virtually all economic and political power rest with a handful of very wealthy families. This is a trend we must reverse.

Economically, the United States today has, by far, the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth and that inequality is worse today in America than at any time since the late 1920s.  

         Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America – 150 million people.  

Today, one family, the Walton family of Wal-Mart fame, with  $89 billion, own more wealth than the bottom 40 percent of America.  One family owns more wealth than the bottom 40 percent.    

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent.  Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10 of one percent of the wealth of the country.

         That is what is going on economically in this country. A handful of billionaires own a significant part of the wealth of America and have enormous control over our economy. What the Supreme Court did in Citizens United is to say to these same billionaires: “You own and control the economy, you own Wall Street, you own the coal companies, you own the oil companies. Now, for a very small percentage of your wealth, we’re going to give you the opportunity to own the United States government.” That is the essence of what Citizens United is all about – and that’s why it must be overturned.

         Let’s be clear. Why should we be surprised that one family, worth $50 billion, is prepared to spend $400 million in this election to protect their interests? That’s a small investment for them and a good investment. But it is not only the Koch brothers.

        There are at least 23 billionaire families who have contributed a minimum of $250,000 each into the political process up to now during this campaign; my guess is that number is really much greater because many of these contributions are made in secret.  In other words, not content to own our economy, the one percent want to own our government as well.

The constitutional amendment that Congressman Ted Deutch and I have introduced states the following:

• For-profit corporations are not people, and are not entitled to any rights under the Constitution.

• For-profit corporations are entities of the states, and are subject to regulation by the legislatures of the states, so long as the regulations do not limit the freedom of the press.

• For-profit corporations are prohibited from making contributions or expenditures in political campaigns.

• Congress and the states have the right to regulate and limit all political expenditures and contributions, including those made by a candidate.

I’m proud to say the American people are making their voices heard on this issue-they are telling us loud and clear it is time to reverse the trend. Six states, including my home state of Vermont, have passed resolutions asking us to pass a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. More than 200 local governments have done the same, including many in Vermont. I’m proud to sponsor one such amendment.  My colleagues here, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Udall, and Ms. Edwards, all have good amendments, and I thank them for their hard work on this issue.

To read the list of billionaire families donating at least $250,000 to campaigns, click here: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/…

To read more about Sanders’ Saving American Democracy Amendment, click here: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/…

John Walters: “There’s all this stuff that’s out there that shows you what’s really going on”

(As always Mike Abadi gets to the heart of the scene, here in an interview with GMD front pager John Walters. Enjoy! – promoted by NanuqFC)

John Walters has been a GMD Frontpager since December, and he has been incisive and prolific. Oh what the hell, I’ll also call him “two-fisted” in case he ever seeks higher office. But seriously, his background in print, radio, and as an author have immeasurably enriched the GMD reading experience.

We spent a fair amount of time discussing the keeps getting more interesting Attorney General’s race. In an odd convergence, The AG quoted John at his campaign kick off event as John was documenting the burnishing of Bill Sorrell’s wikipedia entry.

Our focus moved to some other stories John’s followed: Paul LePage’s visit to Vermont, Randy Brock’s campaign, and “Lismania,” the Campaign for Vermont fever that is (was) sweeping the state. John approaches his work with such care and wit that the result is nutritious and delicious.

We took some time to discuss John’s book Roads Less Traveled: Visionary New England Lives. This collection of life stories is tied together by the idea that “the pursuit, the vision, is more important than the reward.” So if you pick up the book, you may be “encouraged to pursue your own Road Less Traveled.”

As we enter campaign season, John’s work will be indispensable in helping sort out the truth, the lies, the half-truths, the white lies and the hypocrisy.

The NRA was right.

(This is a conversation whose time has come.  We would be remiss not to front page it. – promoted by Sue Prent)

Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. And we all have blood on our hands.

When will we have the courage to stand up to the ‘gun’ lobby? When will we have an honest conversation about the limits to ‘freedom’ when it comes to personal firepower?

In a country where it is legal to buy thousands of rounds of ammunition online, (just wait for Amazon’s sameday delivery!), order up near(ly) assault weapons at will, couple them with large magazines, and Fed Ex deliver enough explosives and gear to outfit a small security detail, why are we shocked that these events happen over and over again?

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. All of those things dear to any patriot were stolen from those killed and injured in Colorado.

When will we work to guarantee those three things for all? And in that order?

A glimpse behind the veil

There is really nothing new about the latest scandal emanating from Fukushima.

Industry manipulation of radiation data has been a recurrent theme throughout the history of nuclear energy; but this story gives us some idea of one of the ways in which it can be done.

media reports have confirmed that subcontractors were told to cover their dosimeters with lead shields in order to manipulate or underreport their radiation exposures.

Previously in the region surrounding Fukushima, we have seen radiation data to determine evacuation zones deliberately hamstrung in its accuracy and completeness.

At each house the inspectors measured two spots-in the yard and at the front door-at heights of about 20 inches and one yard (one meter). In choosing the spots, the inspectors were warned to stay away from areas such as drains, shrubbery and rainspouts, where radioactive elements tend to gather, potentially skewing results.

In the astronomically costly aftermath of Fukushima, the nuclear industry is desperate to maintain the illusion that it’s product can be cost effective.  It therefore is vital that something be done  to eliminate the “inconvenient truth” that, in the event of accident, vast areas of habitation must be evacuated and lost from productive use. Consequently, the dose of radiation deemed “acceptable” was raised in Japan, and industry bedmate, MIT helpfully produced an extremely flawed study that would seem to support the hypothesis that evacuation might not even be necessary!

Doesn’t that just make you feel a whole lot safer?

Auditing Mr. Illuzzi

What’s this I see about perennial butterfly, Vince Illuzzi?

Now that he has finally settled upon an office to seek, it unfortunately highlights some of his own self-auditing issues:

Democratic candidate for State Auditor Doug Hoffer today said the July 16 campaign finance report of Vince Illuzzi is at odds with his July 2011 filing and that an amended report may be required to clear up the confusion.

According to documents available on the Secretary of State’s website, the report filed by Mr. Illuzzi in July 2011 reported a carry-forward of $30,923 from his Senate Campaign account.[1]

Mr. Illuzzi’s July 16, 2012 finance report shows a contribution of $13,105 from his Senate Campaign Account.[2]  It is characterized as “surplus” which suggests that it is all that remains from that account.  Since there has been no election for Senator Illuzzi since July 2011, there remains a question about what happened to the other $17,818 from his Senate campaign account.  Mr. Illuzzi did not file a finance report for his Senate campaign.

“There may well be a good explanation for the inconsistency but it is for Mr. Illuzzi to clear it up.”

OUCH!  One more strike against the feisty senator’s credibility.

Why’d you ever give up the safety of your senate seat, Vince?