False equivalency

I think we’ve now had a pretty fair demonstration of the kind of false equivalency that is routinely accepted and perpetrated by the media.

Organized labor does not equate to big money in the aftermath of Citizens’s United.

If ever there was a test for this frustratingly frequent misrepresentation of the resources of the left vs. the resources of the right, the Wisconsin recall election was certainly it.

Despite every effort of labor-backed Democrats to finance the campaign of Walker’s opponent,  Republicans were able to bring in much more than twice the Democratic cash for their own campaign.  Walker was carried back into office almost literally on a sea of money.

If this is the shape of things to come in the general election, hang on to your hats…because they may be all that Democrats have left, come January.  (Coincidentally, while I was writing that sentence I received a robo-fright-call from the NRA.)

We’ll get no help in correcting the perspective from national media, because they are committed to the Republican meme that “Big Labor” is a rich and powerful counterpoint to big business (aka Republican) interests.  To abandon that meme would be to bring into question all of the other false equivalencies that shape what they have come to regard as the meaning of “fair and balanced news.’

There’s the one about Democrats and Republicans in Congress being equally guilty of obstructionism; and the one that holds that Democratic criticism of George W Bush is somehow equivalent to the blatant racism and scattergun hate that has been directed at President Obama.  I could go on, but we’re all familiar with the expanded list.

What will the media’s position be when the “99%” finally get it together to demand that Citizen’s United be overturned…or else?  Will they play to their comfort zone and try to strike an equivalent with Roe vs. Wade?

‘Wouldn’t surprise me a bit.

About Sue Prent

Artist/Writer/Activist living in St. Albans, Vermont with my husband since 1983. I was born in Chicago; moved to Montreal in 1969; lived there and in Berlin, W. Germany until we finally settled in St. Albans.

3 thoughts on “False equivalency

  1. Why are the D’s crying in their beer?  When you pick a fight, you have to also figure out ahead of time how to win it!  It may not be about the money.

    The D’s chose this fight and then lost it!  I think the D’s need to look at their choice of candidate for the battle they chose to fight.  This was a rematch election, and they lost worse this time than they did two years ago.  Did the D’s choose this battle, and then field a weak candidate?  When the D’s chose this battle, they had to expect that big money would be against them.  

  2. My focus was on the significance of the discrepancy between fund-raising by the two parties.

    As this funding was not primarily coming from within the state, it gives us some idea of the capacity of each party to compete nationally on a monetary basis.

    And, since this was an election of great importance to labor, it is further indicative of labor’s inequality with the high rollers when their ability to buy free speech is compared.

Comments are closed.