Republicans focus on shiny things (Updated)

Uncategorized

UPDATE:Upton and Barton’s BULB Act fails. The vote on the bill was 233-193 with five Democrats voting for the bill and 10 Republicans against it.One Republican voted present.

Conservative groups say they will continue to fight the light bulb law.

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wi…

Call it the freedom to choose the light bulb you want or even the right to bare bulbs.

This week House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton will introduce legislation watering down a 2007 law aimed at phasing out incandescent light bulbs and establishing efficiency standards for light bulbs. The bill Upton will bring to the floor is built around Texas Oil Rep. Joe Barton’s  cleverly named retrograde effort called Barton’s Better Use of Light Bulbs (BULB) Act.

BULB Act repeals a provision in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 that requires traditional incandescent light bulbs to be 30 percent more energy efficient beginning in 2012.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has a fact sheet (PDF) that shows what the present law if un-modified by the BULB Act would save rate payers in individual states. By their estimate Vermont households annually would save $105.00 in electric costs. These savings collectively, nationwide, would eliminate the need for 30 new power plants.  

First he was for it, now he’s against it. For Congressman Upton this is an ongoing effort to live down the fit of reason he suffered back in 2007 when he actually co-sponsored this law and supported bills aimed at phasing out incandescent light bulbs and establishing efficiency standards. Upton – a 24 year house veteran and wealthy heir to the Whirlpool manufacturing fortune, and once considered a Republican moderate – is rapidly phasing out that personality feature.

“It was never my goal for Washington to decide what type of light bulbs Americans should use," Upton said in a statement to The Hill. " The public response on this issue is a clear signal that markets – not governments – should be driving technological advancements. I will join my colleagues to vote yes on a bill to protect consumer choice and guard against federal overreach.”  

Perhaps Upton is afraid the burned-out incandescent bulb over his head will be replaced by a nice, efficient, lower-heat, more-light, longer-lasting, compact fluorescent. No new ideas.

7 thoughts on “Republicans focus on shiny things (Updated)”

  1. It doesn’t matter what common sense dictates, if the Democrats are for it, he’s ag’in it.

    The earth is flat, the moon is made of green cheese, frogs are born from spontaneous generation and progressives all have tiny tails.  I’m twirling mine as I write this.

  3. “It was never my goal for Washington to decide what type of light bulbs Americans should use, but it is important for me that government can tell a woman what to do with her body” Upton said in a statement to The Hill. “The public response on this issue is a clear signal that senators and congressmen and woman – should be driving private decisions between a woman, her partner, her doctor, and her family.

    You are clearly a pro-choicer now, Mr. Upton.

  4. Conservative groups say they will continue to fight the light bulb law.

    I say it’s time to take away the tag “conservative” from references to the right.  There is nothing “conservative” about anything they advocate these days.  Even their fiscal agenda is anything but conservative.

  5. Thanks for avoiding the obvious punch line: Rep. Upton, the epitome of the GOP’s dim bulbs.

    NanuqFC

    Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness. ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Comments are closed.