( – promoted by Sue Prent)
I don’t know about you, but I’ve been ‘curious’ to hear what Arnie has to say about the most recent turn of events. The caption says it all-there is nothing more to add:
Fukushima Accident Severity Level Raised to ‘7’: Gundersen Discusses Lack of US Radiation Monitoring Data from Fairewinds Associates on Vimeo.
Nuclear Engineer, Arnie Gundersen, discusses why TEPCO’s announcement of an increased accident severity level should not be a surprise. He also discusses similarities among the Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima nuclear accidents and how Governments are once again limiting public access to accurate radiation dose information. Lastly, Gundersen responds to the overwhelming number of email inquires regarding the Fukushima accident.
Epidemiologist Steve Wing discusses increases in cancer rates after the Three Mile Island Accident
Two parts:
http://www.fairewinds.com/cont…
Nuclear Engineer Arnie Gundersen discusses radiation releases from the TMI Accident:
http://www.fairewinds.com/cont…
Is that Japanese officials and other nuke apologists keep saying, “yeah, it’s a 7 just like Chernobyl, but it’s only released 10% of the radiation so far!”
Um…that’s still wicked bad, even if the leaking stopped today. And it’s expected to go on at least for months. Jeebus.
Having built all these nuclear reactors so close to shore was totally irresponsible.
It was known 600 years ago how far the waters of a tsunami could reach.
6oo years ago people put hundreds of stone markers to warn future generations.
And one would think that the Japanese know their history.
http://www.good.is/post/ancien…