Shellac attack…

It's a caveor another cave?

How quickly the climate changed for Obama’s EPA after his shellacking. Amid threatened budget curbs and aggressive investigation of the EPA by incoming congressional Republicans, but before they have even taken charge certain sets of rules governing ozone smog and toxic emissions from industrial boilers that were set to take effect in a matter of weeks are now under further study and may wait years.

The move to delay the rules, announced this week by the Environmental Protection Agency, will leave in place policies set by President George W. Bush. President Obama ran for office promising tougher standards, and the new rules were set to take effect over the next several weeks.    

Now, the agency says, it needs until July 2011 to further analyze scientific and health studies of the smog rules and until April 2012 on the boiler regulation.NYTimes

The smog rules according to the EPA would have saved thousands of lives per year however with costs to business and municipalities estimated to be $90 billion annually The boiler rule would have limited industrial boiler, heater and solid waste incinerator emissions of mercury and other dangerous pollutants by half.

Groups including the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Petroleum Institute have called the proposed range of ozone standards too aggressive. Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the incoming chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has listed the rules among “job-killing” EPA policies that he said he will seek to turn back.

 

However as recently as this past September EPA administrator Lisa Jackson  was saying this about industry scare tactics

Industry lobbyists have a long and storied history of doomsday scenarios about what EPA actions would mean across the countryside. They have never proven true

 

3 thoughts on “Shellac attack…

  1. We’ve been netflicking Season One of West Wing, and I wish the O Admin had time to do the same.

    I was thoroughly snookered in the 2008 race–my first favorite was Edwards. When Obama got elected, there was a great feeling, even tho’ I didn’t expect more than another Clinton or Carter.

    But the Os seem to step in every trap the Repubs place before them. To take up the Repub offer to cut back Social Security funding, the same week the debt commission pushes for benefit cutbacks?

    To me, the taxes are a big problem. They’re the main cause of the deficit, after all.

    But the biggest, strangest item for Dems to accept, is to make Social Security a program funded by the will of the Congress, instead of by payroll tax. Of course it’s regressive. Eliminate the income cap to fix that.

    To accept the Repub offer to cut the income for Social Security, seeing it as a (way too small) stimulus. Seriously wacky.

    And according to this report,

    http://news.firedoglake.com/20

    anyone making less than $20k/year will pay more than currently, as the “Making Work Pay” tax credit expires. (The credit is $400, 2% of $20k. Make less than $20k, your new tax cut is less than your old tax credit.)

    Did the White House neglect to do the math, or decide to throw over minimum wage workers and part time workers? For a stimulus that will expire before the 2012 election year.

    Thanks, Peter and Bernie, for leading the opposition, from your strong base in VT.

Comments are closed.