Richardson in Playboy

Yea, but not in the centerfold.  You can read all about his interview in Hef's glossy.

Also, on Nov 1, the Governor rec'd a nod from Lee Iacoca: 

Unlike others on the stump, he's offering bold plans, not just pandering talk. I like his jobs plan, his healthcare and energy plan, education plan and his plan to get us out of Iraq.

He's putting out a new effort to aid Veterans, and he's receiving new money support from lobbyists in his home state.

His numbers in Iowa and NH are once again below the double-digit threshold, but look for a possible southern bump for Richardson as his campaign makes bold strides.

The Playboy interview?  Hey, he may as well go for the male audience in an overt way, seeing how Clinton is the first one to play the gender card.

 

Because everyone can use a break, Sunday Puzzle Blogging

So… this is a basic algebra problem.  Solve for the variables and you can come up with the answer.  Once again, this is from my puzzle archive at Julie’s Puzzle Corner:

29A + x = 29D
AB + 2 = AD
5 + 7 = y
A + 1 = B
x + y = ?

Can you tell me what goes in the “?”

A couple notes:

  • this is a simple algebra problem;
  • there is a unique solution;the unique solution consists of a single number;
  • simple is not the same as easy.

Another mouth to feed

A big welcome to Earth to Hayden Avery Baxter Avard, who arrived yesterday (Friday November 2nd). Brattlerouser says: “He's healthy, 21 inches and weighs seven pounds, 11 ounces (that's  right, 7-Eleven!!!!).”

Ah, kids these days. Congrats to Mom and Dad. We expect to see the kid online by the age of 4, since it's clearly in his blood.

Bye-Bye, Reddy Kilowatt!

 

Board votes 3-2 to fire Brattleboro police chief

November 2, 2007
 

    BRATTLEBORO — Brattleboro Police Chief John Martin was fired Wednesday night after the Brattleboro Select Board voted 3-2.

The controversial Tasering of two peaceful protesters in July for trespassing on a vacant lot appeared to play a significant but not deciding role in Martin's firing, according to a 19-page findings of fact the town released to support the Select Board's decision.

More corruption in Bush’s Washington

I just posted the other day about the crook who is running the Consumer Products Safety Commission.  Actually, it wasn't that clear that she's crooked, it was just clear at the time that she is opposed to the very mission of the agency she heads, and she demonstrates that by opposing legislation that would make her agency more effective, expand its budget and staff, and thereby make American consumers safer.
Just a day later, and what do we find out? Of course she's crooked, we just didn't know it yet. Now we do. A story in today's Post shows that the CPSC people have been going crazy taking junkets paid for by the industries they're supposed to be regulating:

The chief of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and her predecessor have taken dozens of trips at the expense of the toy, appliance and children's furniture industries and others they regulate, according to internal records obtained by The Washington Post. Some of the trips were sponsored by lobbying groups and lawyers representing the makers of products linked to consumer hazards.

The records document nearly 30 trips since 2002 by the agency's acting chairman, Nancy Nord, and the previous chairman, Hal Stratton, that were paid for in full or in part by trade associations or manufacturers of products ranging from space heaters to disinfectants. The airfares, hotels and meals totaled nearly $60,000, and the destinations included China, Spain, San Francisco, New Orleans and a golf resort on Hilton Head Island, S.C.

How can you justify this? Obviously, you can't, which isn't to say she doesn't try. Nancy Nord was on McNeil-Lehrer tonight, and they interviewed her about this scandal, and she tried to justify it, partly because it's entirely within the proper realm of the agency to be communicating with the industry they regulate, and these junkets were the way to do that. Naturally, one giant hole in that argument is that she's also arguing against giving her agency more money, and if she thinks there are things the agency should be doing, that somebody else needs to be paying for it, then maybe they should really be getting an adequate budget.

Of course, it's worse than that. With these guys it's always worse than it looks at first, right?

Take a look at what she said about addressing industry groups: But at this point, our agency needs to be talking to our constituencies to make sure that they understand their obligations under the law.


“Our constituencies.”

The people the CPSC works for, at least in the eyes of Nancy Nord, are the people who make dangerous products, toys made with lead, and other products that poison or kill American consumers.

She's right, of course, but this is just one more sign of what's so vicious about the Republicans.

Vermont Governor Poll

Who do you like so far?

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Leahy Will Oppose Mukasey

Boo-yah!

The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Friday he won't support Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey, potentially derailing his confirmation over complaints that he hasn't taken a full enough stand against torture.

“No American should need a classified briefing to determine whether waterboarding is torture,” said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vermont. He planned an afternoon news conference to make the announcement in Burlington.

TPM is tracking the yeas and nays here. Right on, Pat & Bernie (and major  thanks to Kagro X for continuing to be a national leader on this).

WCAX Poll: Big Trouble for Douglas (and Douglas’s damage control, with a little help from WCAX)

Okay, okay… sheesh, I figured everybody'd be all over this poll. Guess it's up to me (for the record, over the last 24 hours, I have finished this post twice only to have the app crash on me and lose all my work… ARRRRG!!)

No two ways about it: the recent WCAX gubernatorial poll is huge. Here are Jim Douglas's re-elect numbers:

42 percent said they'd vote to re-elect Jim Douglas.

33 percent said they'd replace him.

25 percent said they were not sure.

Roper & company are trying to be blase about it, but this is a dramatic sea change. At this point in the last two cycles, Douglas's re-elect numbers were in the 60's. What's more ominous for the GOP is the significance of that number, which they no doubt recognize: 42%. It's roughly the mean, historical, hardcore GOP voting block that their statewides can depend on cycle after cycle. That's what he's down to, in terms of firm support.

To prop up his undefeatable image, Douglas has countered the bad news by touting the alternate job-approval poll

16% percent of Vermonters say Governor Douglas is doing an excellent job. 38% a good job, with only 5% of people not sure how he's doing.

But when you put these numbers together, you've got a clear picture; the “nice guy” Douglas image is still intact, but moderates and independents are no longer confident that he's the right man for the job. It's probably not helping him that he's been using his so-called “listening tour” to TELL voters (through the media) what's important to them, rather than – y'know – listening. That only widens the perception that he's out-of-touch.

And if you think they're not scared, consider this: The original title of the WCAX web piece on the poll was  “Questionable fourth term for Douglas.” If you'll notice, it now reads2008 Governor's Race Starts To Shape Up“. The station reportedly responded to a reader's question about the change, saying they had received “internal and external complaints” about the original headline.

Now come on. Do you think if you or I had complaints about the message sent by a news headline that the Douglas communication offi- er, I mean WCAX – would give us the time of day? No freaking way. That was political damage control, pure and simple.

This race is winnable – and they know it.

Also of interest in the poll were the numbers for other potential contenders. The Dems who've made it clear they're not interested predictable polled in the crapper (and Campbell and Galbraith were not included). Among the two remaining names who actually are considered possible contenders: 

Of the eight choices, Democrat Matt Dunne and Progressive Anthony Pollina were the only ones with more than 10 percent — Dunne with 22 percent, Pollina with 12 percent.

Interesting.

The selling point of a Pollina candidacy from his supporters is largely that his name recognition and grassroots support start him off with the strongest base and make him the most credible alternative, but Dunne starts off at almost double his numbers.

Which means, once again, all eyes are going to be on Dunne. If he has been leaning away from a run for the top job, prefering for round 2 against Dubie, he's got to be reconsidering the question. And those pushing for a Dunne/Pollina ticket, might want to consider the reciprocal.

The game's afoot!

New Obama TV spot in New Hampshire: “Need”

Senator Obama’s New Hampshire campaign will begin airing its fifth television ad tomorrow in New Hampshire.  In the thirty-second spot, entitled “Need,” Obama describes American workers as the “bedrock” of our economy and offers his plan to reverse the widening gap between the middle class and the wealthy.

For more than two decades–as a community organizer, a civil rights attorney, a State Senator, and a United States Senator–Obama has been fighting to improve the lives of working Americans.  In September, he unveiled his Middle Class Tax Fairness plan, which would restore balance to our tax code by closing corporate loopholes, providing tax relief for the middle class–including more than 800,000 working people in New Hampshire–and eliminating income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000 per year.

Tim Foley
Proud to be a NH staff member for Barack Obama’s movement for change.

America, Open For Business, Closed To Freedom

Is there any area of our government, over the span of the last seven years, any area, in domestic or foreign policy, national defense, public welfare, the economy, name it, where the average, reasonably informed American might point to success, to signs of progress, of improvement, something, anything, to point to with satisfaction, with pride?

Yesterday I read an article by Steve Benin on the resignation of Karen Hughes from her post as Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, a mouthful there, and a job for which she was as ill suited and unqualified as the man who appointed her and in which, during her two year tenure, she accomplished little, if anything.

In truth, she accomplished nothing, unless you want to count convincing large portions of the world that all Americans must be as out of touch with reality, as clueless and unthinking as their current Commander in Chief, and at that she excelled, as anyone might, having been dispatched to the Middle East with the rank of Ambassador, but without knowledge of the language, culture, history, religions, and general pet peeves of the various states and peoples of the region.

But Karen Hughes was tapped for her office for the same reasons as all Bush appointees are chosen, not for expertise or experience, not for performance or integrity in public service but for loyalty, for unwavering belief in the Messianic delusions of neo conservatism, and a willingness to march in lockstep, nah, goose step, against all who might disagree or dissent.

As I read Benin’s article I had the thought that he might have written a very similar piece about nearly any federal department and the Bush appointees thereto in the last seven years. Which of the various cabinet level branches of the executive department of this country have not suffered greatly under the politically connected cronyism of the Bush/ Cheney administration?

We witnessed it at Justice, the politicization of the office of the Attorney General, the perversion of law and the resulting descent into the barbarity of denial of human rights and torture.

We saw it at Defense, where the best military minds of a generation were ignored in favor of the views of sychophantic careerists who allowed a lying Vice President and a comic opera Commander in Chief and their apparatchiks to lead them over the cliff and into the abyss of an endless and disastrous war.

We have seen time and again the incompetence, indifference and criminal neglect at “Homeland” Security and FEMA.

We have seen heads of federal departments turned into agents of electioneering, where party politics takes precedence over public welfare and the machinery and energy of the state is turned to the furtherance of private goals.

Agriculture, Interior, Commerce, Treasury and the rest are now run by the industries that they are legally bound to restrain, regulate and control in the public interest.

Executive branch departments have been stripped of many of their most dedicated, long serving professionals and replaced with Bush loyalists from business and industry, or, in many cases directly from the most favored campuses, the ivy leagues of Christian evangelism. Regulatory functions have been curtailed, enforcement budgets slashed, and inspection schedules diminished to a laughable degree in nearly every regulatory corner of the federal system.

But this, after all, was the intent, to create central government that would gladly do the bidding of the corporate structure, throw aside all restraints, all regulation and increase its profits and its power.

Nearly every day I encounter a story in the media, a story of illness, injury, death or disaster befalling unsuspecting citizens due to the inattention, incompetence, lack of inspection and failures of enforcement of existing federal laws regulating consumer products, work place safety, environmental prohibitions or other areas where purity, safety and security were once almost taken for granted.

During the last seven years we have devolved into a country whose livestock, produce and other foodstuffs are ridden with bacteria and other contaminants, whose drugs and medical services are becoming untrustworthy, whose ports and borders are dangerously porous, whose bridges and highways are collapsing, whose military is being misused and abused in continuous illegal and futile adventures on behalf of corporate America, whose jobs have largely been moved to other countries and continents, whose pensions have collapsed and whose Barbie Dolls contain enough lead to write a novella. (Or, perhaps, the last paragraph)

The real problem however, the crux of the matter and what may finally deliver us stumbling and stuttering, quavering with dread at the terminus of the road to Fascist hell is the incredible damage that has been inflicted on the American spirit, the American soul, the American psyche. I may be accused of naivete’ but in my world, in my mind and in my memory there was a time when the eyes of America contained a great measure of compassion, of kindness, of simple good will.

Those days are gone. Under the current regime the eyes of America, official America, the America of the ruling oligarchy are now filled with hunger, with avarice, with an insatiable lust for resources and power, for wealth and influence. America’s eyes are no longer the warm welcoming eyes of Lady Liberty but the cold calculating gaze of the largest and most dangerous predator to ever stalk the planet, a predator to be feared and distrusted, to be resisted at all costs.

The eyes of Americans, our citizens, our electorate are filled with a mixture of apathy and fear, of meekness, a cowering attitude and a shuffling posture which is all too heavily reflected in their parliament.

America, in the brief span of my lifetime and largely in the span of a single decade has devolved into a killer of humanity, a dream slayer, despoiler of freedom, a destroyer, the destroyer of America.

Bob Higgins
Worldwide Sawdust