Who is Lurleen? Lurleen Wallace was the wife of George Wallace. When George was term limited out of running for re-election as Governor of Alabama, he ran his wife.
There are two very different models of women in politics. One I like to call the Great Man can’t so the little woman steps in. Term limits or death or, in the case of Ma Ferguson in Texas, the great man was removed from office and was disqualified from running again. Sometimes, it’s the great man’s daughter. In the case of Indira Gandhi, it could be argued that politics is the family business.
The other model is the real move toward equality. Golda Meir. Helen Clark. God help us, Maggie Thatcher. Here at home: Madeleine Kunin. Gay Symington. Carolyn Partridge.
Gay Symington and her federal counterpart are both from political families. Nancy Pelosi’s father was a Maryland pol, but she made her home and career in San Francisco. Gay is the niece or grandniece of Stuart Symington, the Mo. Senator.
Let’s have real equality. In short,
LURLEEN, go home and sit down.
Permissible not optimal
This is an interesting twist to appear at this point,after the decommissioning bill passed and while Gov.Douglas sits with his veto pen.Just a small detail arriving quietly Saturday morning on little cat feet.I have a distinct feeling that Entergy will/can find a way to do whatever they want.When dealing with aging nuclear power plants always do what is optimal not just permissible.
Vermont Yankee wants to raid decommission fund
Vermont Press Bureau
MONTPELIER – A new twist has hit the contentious debate over how to force the owners of Vermont Yankee to assure there’s enough money required for decommissioning the nuclear plant in Vernon.Documents show the owner of the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant has asked for federal permission to use the plant’s decommissioning fund to pay for storage of waste rather than for taking the plant apart.
………Part of Entergy’s proposal for managing its spent fuel – some of which is now stored on the Vernon site in metal and concrete “dry casks” or a water-filled pool – is to use $157 million from the decommissioning trust fund to pay for storage.
Steve Wark of the Vermont Department of Public Service said that it is not ideal for the Yankee plant to use money from the decommissioning fund to build dry casks for storage of spent fuel.
“It is permissible” under federal rules, he said. “I don’t think it is optimal.“
http://www.timesargus.com/apps…
more Entergy news http://www.forbes.com/markets/…
Not so fast: Shumlin now reportedly leaning AWAY from Lt. Governor run
Aw, geez. Who knows…
But the fact is, I’ve now heard from enough sources that it can’t be ignored – the scuttlebutt is now that Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin will likely not run for Lieutenant Governor after all. I kid you not. Head spinning yet?
The session is likely to end at the end of next week, so we’ll have all our answers shortly thereafter. I’m gonna make it my personal mission in life to find out who the candidate is going to be before then, though… stay tuned.
Holding Fast to Dreams
In a true Great Race
There’d be two candidates.
Opposing “parties” even, maybe,
But whose only motives were
That our nation be the best it can be and
That they would give their life’s effort to that goal.
These people would shun everything but that goal,
Wouldn’t be bowed by money and fake “allegiances”,
Wouldn’t owe anyone anything because they never saw the reason in doing that.
And wouldn’t compromise themselves because they couldn’t live with themselves if they did.
Human still, they’d have their faults-
Sometimes putting their family above service to the people,
Sometimes just unable to be on their game.
But honest, uncorrupted, caring servants of the Greater Good.
I suppose that will always be the dream I have;
Two candidates that are difficult to choose between,
Because each is such a damned good person.
Anyone know how secure Vermont Yankee’s computers are?
Per Beta News:
A team of experts headed by security guru Ira Winkler was hired by an anonymous power company to test the security of a power grid’s network. The door was practically held open for them.
In a matter of hours, the team infiltrated the grid’s supervisory, control and data acquisition (SCADA) networks using simple phishing tools: social engineering and browser exploits.
What sort of special technology did these people use to get the necessary information? They got employees to hand it to them. Per Switched:
They relied on human nature to get initial access, finding the e-mail addresses of many of the plant’s employees and sending them a supposedly corporate e-mail that indicated their worker benefits were being cut. They were directed to a URL to get more information. That URL was, of course, bogus and simply resulted in the installation of malicious software.
On the plus side, many of these security vulnerabilities are relatively easy to fix. If only companies were willing to take the scheduled downtime to fix them. Once again, per Beta News:
Winkler says that these SCADA systems suffer the same vulnerabilities any system does that runs on the same standard operating system and server hardware. Companies have perpetuated the weakness of these systems by not performing important software upgrades because they would force downtime.
And lest you think that the worst thing that can happen is a minor power outage, I will add this one more passage from Beta News:
What could be done given the level of access these white hats obtained would not be limited to simply shutting down a grid, like a group of hackers managed to do for 17 days to a “practice network” in California in 2001. In comments to CNN last year regarding a leaked video of a staged hack that resulted in the self-destruction of a power generator, Joe Weiss of Applied Control Solutions said, “What people had assumed in the past is the worst thing you can do is shut things down. And that’s not necessarily the case. A lot of times the worst thing you can do, for example, is open a valve — have bad things spew out of a valve.”
Just when I was thinking there weren’t enough things to worry about…
Scalia On Bush v. Gore: Get Over It!
Scalia denies that the controversial decision was political and discusses other aspects of his public and private life in a interview with 60 Minutes Sunday, April 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.
“I say nonsense,” Scalia responds to Stahl’s observation that people say the Supreme Court’s decision in Gore v. Bush was based on politics and not justice. “Get over it. It’s so old by now. The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close. The vote was seven to two,” he says, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision that the Supreme Court of Florida’s method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.
Furthermore, says the outspoken conservative justice, it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. “It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question…. We didn’t go looking for trouble. It was he who said, ‘I want this to be decided by the courts,'” says Scalia. “What are we supposed to say — ‘Not important enough?'” he jokes.
Doesn’t bother me at all,over it totally ….ah ..vaffanculo ,Nino See over it,let’s move on .
Pillsbury to Vermonters: Screw You, I Want My Money
The latest attempt at campaign finance reform just went down in defeat, after yet another failure to override a gubernatorial veto. The bill may have been destined to run up against the same Supreme Court wall as the last one, given the Bushco court’s arbitrary, subjective gobbledegook about what sort of limits are and aren’t acceptable, but the Legislature decided to be incremental in their accommodations of the unfavorable ruling hoping for maximum benefit, and they had the support of campaign finance activists, so I sez more power to ’em. Douglas, of course, was foursquare against it, as it would’ve turned off the national party mega-spigot that floods in to support his re-election at the end of the campaign season every cycle. No surprise there.
No, the reason Douglas’s veto was upheld was because of one lone defection: Rep. Darryl Pillsbury, Independent of Windham County, who is hoping voters will promote him to Senator this November. Why the change of heart? Was it philosophical? Ethical? Technical?
Pillsbury voted in favor of the override last year.
That was before he announced his campaign to run for senator in the upcoming election.
Pillsbury admits that he is basing his decision on his own need to raise money for his Senate run and he is siding with the governor because he said he cannot support a bill that would put him at a disadvantage during the election.
“I’ve never had to raise money before,” Pillsbury said, adding that he has won his past House races with a $300 budget. “I am being selfish now. For independents, this campaign law stinks.”
There it is: pure self-interest. Dollar signs. Can you think of any statement that should make someone less qualified to be in a position to write our state’s laws? Exactly what is so much better for independents under the current campaign finance regime?
A lot of Windham County voters have been idealizing this guy because of his stance on impeachment (funny, I’ve never heard them comment on his endorsement of the far left’s favorite Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton). But this is the danger of single-issue myopia. Votes like this can’t be ignored. Nor should it be ignored that he continues to find himself AWOL when Vermont Yankee issues come up for a vote.
Windham County can do better than this guy.
Wee Hours Open Thread Strikes Back
A GMD tip of the hat to Lawrence Auclaire, who is retiring and shutting down evacuationplans.org at the end of April. Originally created in 2003 to “improve evacuation plans for senior citizens and the disabled”, the site became a clearinghouse for Vermont Yankee activism. The site will stay up for an indefinite period as an archive.
Curtis Awards tomorrow! Looks like I’ll be going after all. The show is at the Hilton in Burlington at 6:30, and features Chris Dodd as a keynote for the event that will honor Dottie Deans and Doug Racine. If you still want to go, but the $60/head price tag is too steep, check with the VDP to see if there’s still space, as they don’t want to turn anybody away. Just give what you can.
Please join us in some eye-rolling: Jack wrote an annoyed letter to 7 Days, which an unnamed editor couldn’t contain themselves from responding to. Aside from the minor chuckle I got from their reference to an online archive that doesn’t seem to exist, I wasn’t inclined to express any more annoyance than I had already, but in response to our frustration that Shay Totten’s introductory column chose to use the needlessly (and inappropriately) self-aggrandizing phrase “Seven Days has learned” to report a “scoop” that had already been reported at this site two days previously (before their publication deadline) – and one day previously in both the St. Albans Messenger and Vermont Tiger (specifically, Peter Shumlin’s eyeing of the Lieutenant Governor’s race), Seven Days had to add a little more insult to injury:
Shay’s reporting also allowed him to say Shumlin will run for lieutenant governor, as opposed to merely thinking about it, which is what the GMD reported.
LOL! Sorry, there – I guess the GMD headline “Looking like a Symington-Shumlin Ticket for the top two ballot spots” was a little too… uhhhh… non-committal? Heh.
Sorry, folks. Lots of people knew that rumor – which is why the St. Albans Messenger and Vermont Tiger didn’t credit GMD – but the point is, they didn’t try to use language that passed it off as some sort of exclusive, either – especially given that the story had already been put out there by another media outlet (or three). As I said before – tacky, tacky, tacky…. only now it’s spiced with a touch of pathetic as well.
Grand Isle Drawbridge Part II
This is the letter I submitted to the local Islander paper, but was turned down because it was “more than one letter on the same topic”.
Dear Editor,
I’m very thankful to VTran’s Secretary Neale Lunderville and Senator Dick Mazza for answering the questions I posed. It was refreshing to see government officials take time to inform the Grand Isle County community about what is going on with their drawbridge. I sincerely hope this openness and dialogue continue into the future.
I was glad to hear “there are no plans at this time, so there is nothing as of yet to report.” This means with things in the early stages, there is plenty of opportunity to involve the islands community in the planning process. After all, who knows their bridge better than the residents of Grand Isle County? County residents see beyond the structure of the bridge, to all that it represents and could be.
I personally feel that if there is to be a reconstruction, some sort of handicapped fishing access would be a good addition. With the little access road on the north side this would not be a far stretch, and surely help some good folks out. I’m sure Island residents have other insightful ideas of what could be done to the drawbridge during reconstruction. That’s why VTrans needs to have their engineers and planners hear Islanders speak before planning begins. Then good ideas can be incorporated into the plans from the start, not worked out as revisions, or worse too late.
The next ten to twenty years leave plenty of time to involve the residents of Grand Isle County in the future of their bridge. Engaging communities is what democracy is all about. I implore all members of the Grand Isle County community to contact VTrans immediately, and ask them to sponsor meetings for public input prior to planning. Talk to your governor, neighbors, selectboard members, and state representatives. Contact Secretary Lunderville and Senator Mazza, and hold them to their pledge that “as engineers concept what might be next for this bridge, Islanders and their local government officials will certainly be involved.”
Best regards,
Jason M. Brisson
North Hero, VT
Dems: Jim Douglas’ election-year “plan” fails working Vermonters
The VT Democratic Party released this video today slamming Whinin’ Jim’s stimulus plan… Has he stimulated you yet?