Yankee Prognostication

(Issue recap: The legislature passed a bill requiring Entergy to guarantee that the decommissioning fund will be sufficient to shut down VY when the time comes – if not through its actual balance sheet, at least through a line of credit guaranteeing Entergy can’t just disappear outright, or through the sneaky corporate shell game its currently pursuing, leaving Vermont taxpayers with a staggering bill. The corporate community aggressively rallied behind Entergy to keep any and all precedents for meaningful corporate accountability off the books.)

Got an email last night from a Vermont Yankee activist making, what strikes me, as a very sound prediction on what’s around the corner for the issue of the decommissioning fund:

I predict that the Guv will veto the decommissioning bill ….  here is how I think it will happen.

ENVY (Entergy Vermont Yankee) and the Guv will agree to some written document “committing” ENVY in an Infomercial sense.  It will be legally meaningless, but none the less, the Guv can use that document as a fig leaf to veto the Decommissioning bill.  The Guv can claim the bill is unnecessary as a result of the “agreement” his administration reached with ENVY.

I don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t want to bet against that prediction.

Mosquito Vac or It’s been a tough Month but we are taking the fight to the enemy

Albany Times Union

HUDSON, N.Y. – Workers at the Kaz Inc. factory here will be watching this summer to see whether their latest product sends mosquitoes to their doom.

Kaz, which employs 400 people in this upstate New York town, is busy making and shipping its latest product – the Mosquito Vacuum, a high-tech trap designed to reduce backyard mosquito populations.

The Mosquito Vacuum is designed to run around the clock. It requires a standard 20-pound propane tank, access to an outdoor electrical outlet, and a bait cartridge that’s inserted into the machine. For those worried about global warming, company officials say the carbon dioxide generated is equal to what a small dog would create.

And while the Mosquito Vacuum might be considered a “guy” product because it requires a propane hook-up like a gas grill, Kaz executives believe it will also be a huge hit with mothers who want to keep their kids free of mosquito-borne diseases like West Nile virus.

It will be sold at Home Depot and Lowe’s home-improvement stores nationwide at a price of $279.

You may ask “Why single out the Mosquito Vac.?” Because it’s there,and given the state of the Nation and the VDP it is easy to get peevish about vacuums .

The mosquito vacuum: a symbol .How many current policy problems can you find that relate to this product? This is produced in the USA by a multi-national company. 400 manufacturing jobs here in the North East are riding in this vacuum’s sales .Rust belt, regional jobs,hard to find jobs,check to check jobs, ,jobs that people need .Jobs in potential jeopardy.

This item uses propane and electricity so add fuel prices and electric rates to the mix,maybe take a quick pass at Global warming.They will be sold this summer in Big box stores at a  sprawl mall near you, development issues,maybe zoning laws/environmental regs. are tied in too. Who knows what mosquito bait cartridges might contain?

Lastly what does it really do ? It protects,provides peace of mind for dad ,mom and the family .It fills the newest American need ,takes the fear from our back yards.Fear of mosquitoes carrying disease ,not just a homegrown disease ,but foreign (terrorist?) disease carriers.West Nile virus . Also notice the price. You may have some money left from your federal tax stimulus check to pay off some interest on that troublesome credit card debt.

Have a great Summer, fear free ,while enjoying both the “Gas Tax Holiday” and “Vt.Sales Tax Holiday”. Are they good to us or what ? Always thinking about the future .Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow.

Dear Droppings,

I write this letter with some pangs of guilt. After all it was us Vermonters as a group who introduced you to Doug Jimless, and apparently that was not to your benefit.

Droppings, remember when Jimless told you there were no jobs up here in Vermont? Well, as it turns out he was the worst possible candidate for a jobs coach we could have set you up with.

This morning in the Barre/Montpelier Times Argus I read the following (I added my own hiliting):

A St. Johnsbury company has closed, putting 80 people out of work.

W.T. Solutions, a sewing contractor, closed Wednesday afternoon and plans to move to Newark, N.J.

Owner Marie Bouchard of Conway, N.H., says she has been losing money every year for five years.

She says the problem is there are not enough qualified people to hire in St. Johnsbury, so she did not have enough workers to fill large contracts.

The company makes garments for the military and other outlets.

(St. Johnsbury company closes; 80 lose jobs, Times Argus, 05/03/08)

My dear, dear Droppings … I am so sorry I told you to take a left towards Montpelier that day instead of a right towards St. J. You never would have been taken in by that shyster jobs coach Doug Jimless, you would have had a decent job in St. Johnsbury, and you would still be near your family and friends.

My mom, Venis, wants to say hi too.

With a heavy heart,

Venis’ Son.

One small bright spot

Sometimes a bad idea just keeps coming back.

For instance, early in the session the Department of Corrections tried to get the right to charge prisoners a $5.00 copay to go to the doctor.

That's right: we've got you locked up, we control where you go, who you see, what you do, and if you're unlucky enough to get sick you go to our doctor, and we're charging you for it. 

This was early times, and by January 17 the Ways & Means Committee voted to ditch the copay, but the idea got stuck back in the fee bill earlier this week.

Late this afternoon we confirmed that the copay is out, and will not be resurfacing.

Anyone who is concerned about health care, decent treatment of prisoners, or logical public policy should thank Rep. Carolyn Branagan (R, Georgia) for her help in squelching this bad idea once again.

They heard you on industrial hemp

Lawmakers give broad support to bill that would allow growing hemp

May 2, 2008

<!– PHOTOS AND EXTRAS –><!– END EXTRAS –> MONTPELIER – The calls came into the Statehouse at a furious pace Thursday morning, inundating the Senate Judiciary pane's voicemail with ardent support for a bill stuck in committee.

The groundswell wasn't about the state budget, transportation, economic stimulus or other big-ticket must-haves this legislative session. Vermonters, it seems, want their hemp.

“I had 73 calls this morning,” said Sen. Dick Sears, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Anti War Protesters Arrested in Burlington

(Good story. It’s the Vermont connection that gets the promotion from me. – promoted by Jack McCullough)

According to the Burlington Free Press, 10 people were arrested today (May Day) inside the Lakeside Ave headquarters of military contractor General Dynamics.  The protesters had “locked down” in the building’s main reception area, a tactic whereby they chain themselves together in a manner that requires heavy duty equipment, including bolt cutters and sometimes industrial saws, to remove individuals.  Several dozen supporters demonstrated outside.

In all, it took almost six hours for police, firefighters, and other rescue personel to unchain the protesters.  They were brought to the BPD and cited for criminal trespassing.

According to a statement released by the protesters, they were there demanding General Dynamics “stop giving campaign contributions to the politicians responsible for regulating it, stop making Gatling guns, missiles and other weapons of mass destruction and give back the 3.6 million dollars in Vermont tax breaks General Dynamics  

received in 2007″.  I don’t know about you, but that last line sure caught my attention: $3.6 million in State subsidies and tax breaks?

“This corporate welfare in the form of tax breaks belongs to working Vermonters, not a war profiteer which made $27 billion last year, and who’s stocks have tripled while the Vermont economy has tanked,” said demonstrator Jonathan Leavitt. “While our state struggles with Jim Douglas’ budget cuts and layoffs, gas prices, affordable housing and lack of health coverage, war profiteers like General Dynamics steal tax breaks from working  

families. We’re here today as Vermonters to say no more handouts for war profiteers.”

For more info, check out:

http://stopgeneraldynamics.blo…

Uhhh… Yay, Gaye…?

Resolution, of a sort, on the Governor’s “proposal” (read: subject-changing, electorally-minded impulse) to create a 2-day “sales tax holiday” as economic stimulus. As economists have been saying all week, it’s a pretty lame gimmick – even by Douglas standards. From VPR:

(Symington) “I don’t think it’s the best use of taxpayer resources. I do agree with our economist, who has stated this would have very little stimulative effect on the economy.

Yes! Standing up to the Governor – and with the same, newfound tone of confidence and authority on display during her proto-stump speech at the Curtis Awards!

(Symington) “It’s very clear to me that Governor Douglas is looking to make this the focus of the end of the session, and to turn our good work into an argument over the sales tax holiday. I will not let that happen…

Terrific! Refreshing! Calling it like it is without hesitation! Take us home, Madame Speaker!

…I will not stand in a way of a sales tax holiday.”

Uhhh….ahhhh… huh?

(Pausing for a moment while I put my face in my hands). Okay… so I’m clear. We have a strong statement on why a Douglas proposal is bad policy, followed by a statement that presents it (correctly) as cynical, election-year pandering… followed by a firm statement that we should not let this kind of nonsense stand… so, uh… so…

…so therefore, we’re just gonna hop up in record time and give him exactly what he wants.

Yeah, that’ll show him.

Shudder. So is the likely gubernatorial candidate’s assumption here that Douglas will just win any electoral argument he starts, so the only way to win is to avoid the argument by caving in as soon as possible? Maybe in the hopes that he’ll…uhh… run out of cheap electoral gimmicks? Cause you know, Jim Douglas has such a hard time coming up with such nonsense… right?

Oy. Y’know, it’s possible that this wasn’t a crazy move… I’m open to the argument. But even if that’s true, you’ll never be able to convince me that getting up and pronouncing it in this way, drawing maximum attention, wasn’t at best bizarre. If this was never about policy from the Governor – and you’ve just made a clear statement that your response isn’t about policy either – we’re supposed to be pleased that the Democratic response to a cynical election stunt, is their own cynical election stunt?

Does anybody in this discussion care about the merits of the… you know… the public policy?

Well, at least Anthony Pollina will be pleased.

Wrong Lessons Learned = Relearning the Hard Way

This started as a comment inWhere have all the flowers gone?, but veered off into a bit of macro-economics, so it seemed diary-worthy.

I continue to be stunned at how easy it is to learn the wrong lessons from history. One of those lessons appears to be the lesson that the US was brought out of the depression in the 1930s by WWII.  This is ONLY true to the extent that weapons manufacture led to good paying manufacturing jobs here in the US (working in a weapons factory is how my grandfather managed to support his family).

However, giving all the credit to the war industry bypasses the primary impetuses for the recovery: the creation of a middle class through the policies of the New Deal; and fiscal policies that prevented bubble-style economic frenzies and crashes (formerly known as panics). Such panics were a regular element of the economy until the New Deal changed the rules, reducing the risks presented by market speculation.

Sadly, the clever folks elected since roughly 1980 have learned the incorrect “war is good for the economy” lesson (remember: it took most of the 1970s to climb out of the Vietnam debt hole), and unlearned the New Deal controls on speculation lesson. As a result, all of the growth that occurred since the policy reversals were implemented is in the process of unwinding.

Because of this wrong lesson, the “no taxes, no regulation” mantra’s success has essentially wiped out all segments of the economy.

The little bit of the economy that was propping everything else up, disguising the recession, was residential construction, which has now gone kerflooey. And, while the bobbleheads on TV try to claim we’ve hit bottom, don’t drink the Kool-aid. Look at all the other lies they’ve tried to sell us for the last decade and consider the following graph:

See what this chart means below the fold…

We are just about to hit the peak of subprime mortgage resets (paler green bars – the peak is in the next month or two – just in time for the spring market), THEN we get a reprieve in which the reset level drops to the same level as last summer (you know, when all this doo-doo started to hit the fan), from which we then slide into the Alt-A and Option ARM resets (orange and pale orange bars).

These Alt-A and Option ARM mortgages were packaged up and marketed as PRIME mortgages to bond funds and other supposedly “safe” “low-risk” investment options – the kinds of things our elderly parents’ IRAs and municipalities have invested in. (Think about that for a minute.)

Here’s the kicker: the majority of Alt-A and Option ARM loans are “stated income” loans, also known as “liar loans.”

These are loans made to people who said:

 “Um, yup, I earn, $x.”

And the bank said,

 “Ok, here’s a really big check.”

Unlike the subprimes, which are mostly non-investment loans to primary homeowners with less-than-stellar financial records, the Alt-A and Option ARM loans were largely taken out by investors – people who don’t live in the houses they bought.  These folks have far less incentive to try to keep the house, and are thus far more likely to “walk away,” leaving the properties to foreclosure.

As the Fed in Boston describes in “Subprime Outcomes: Risky Mortgages, Homeownership

Experiences, and Foreclosures,” a primary predictor of homes going to foreclosure is a drop in price:

… homeowners who have suffered a 20 percent or greater fall in house prices are about fourteen times more likely to default on a mortgage compared to homeowners who have enjoyed a 20 percent increase.

Due to the massive number of defaults already, the inventory in the market is also massive. In the law of supply and demand, extra supply leads to decreasing prices. Oddly enough, that’s what’s happening – prices are dropping.

The sub-prime mess will get worse, but the Alt-A and Option ARM mess will make the current crisis look like the “good old days.” Housing inventory is likely to skyrocket in just over a year, further yanking down prices in a market that will not yet have recovered from the sub-prime tumble.

The catastrophic house price bubble was possible because (a) New Deal regulatory policies on banks were rolled back, and because (b) the Bush administration has intentionally allowed the bubble to build (even encouraged it) by keeping interest rates artificially low – it was the only way they could think of to hide (in the economic statistics, but not from the people who are losing ground) the economic devastation brought about by their absurd economic policies.

In the mean time, the amount of $$ held in cash by US banks has slipped again. We’re now looking at something well into the negative billions. This is after the fed has pumped over $40 billion into the banks via the “discount window” and the idiotic Bear Stearns deal.

What this means is that, when you go to the bank and take money out of your checking account, you’re taking it out of the bank’s own virtual credit card, because there’s no actual money there. They had to borrow it to give it to you, because they pumped all the actual money into loans that are defaulting.

The implications of this for the economy as a whole are dire. And the band-aids being proposed legislatively will do nothing in the face of the republican train-wreck economy.

First L3C’s in Vermont and US are Incorporated

Before we get to the exciting news below the fold, here's a quick follow up on an unaswered question by SPS yesterday. 

In the comment section in my prior L3C diary, Steve asked a great question about the investment structure.  After some research, here is a powerpoint slide showing a good example.  The full powerpoint is available at AmericansForCommunityDevelopment.com

Below the fold:  Announcing First Two L3Cs incorporated in Vermont and the United States!

First in line with L3C corporate filing forms is Robert Lang, L3C Advisors, L3C.  No surprise there.  He's the guy backed by the Manweiller Foundation who brought L3C bills to Vermont and North Carolina legislatures.  After all of his hard work, he's the leading L3C consultant in the country.

Second At Bat is none other than yours truly, Nate Freeman, Non-Profit Investors, L3C.

And the URL race is on!  Janice Lang, presumably Robert Lang's wife, now owns L3Cadvisors.com

For my part, I picked up the following:

NonProfitInvestors.com and .org

VermontL3C.com and .org

…as well of variations of the same.

Ok, I guess I'm bragging — my apology.  What I have been sending out to GMD readers in the last two days is a message of hope and opportunity in the creation of the L3C model.  Hope, because these are mission-driven businesses that can fulfill needs in between the non-profit and for-profit sectors.  Opportunity because we are the very beginning of a new era in a national economy which can now benefit from the financial resources and good will of investors, foundations, and corporations.

My hope is that here in Vermont, professional, legal, and financial advisors will quickly grow and brand our state as the home base for L3C consulting.  It's a clean, knowledge-driven business with minimal impact.

Since we are at the very beginning of the L3C movement, the first area of consulting will be in educating prospective business owners and investors in the capabilities and flexibilities of Low-Income Limited Liability Corporations.

Game on!

Nate