Entergy Nuclear security breach

(Any security breach at Vermont Yankee merits special attention.   – promoted by Christian Avard)

Susan Smallheer in the Herald got a scoop on a February security failure at ENVY. She also covers other older security breaches there and elsewhere by Wackenhut.

Yankee cited for security violations

May 16, 2008

By Susan Smallheer Herald Staff

BRATTLEBORO – The owners of Vermont Yankee nuclear plant have been cited for security violations by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The nature of the violations is not disclosed to the public because of security concerns, said Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the NRC.

But Sheehan said the violation was serious enough to warrant increased inspections of Entergy Nuclear’s security at the Vernon reactor. The security breach was termed “an escalated enforcement action,” in a letter sent to Entergy Nuclear site vice president Theodore Sullivan.

Sheehan said the security violation occurred in February, and he would only say that it did not involve “an inattentive security officer.”

“We don’t talk about the findings,” Sheehan said. “Whenever it’s related to security it’s serious.”

“As always, our inspectors will not leave the site until a security issue has either been fully addressed or compensatory measures put in place pending the completion of corrective actions,” he added.

To read more click below.

http://rutlandherald.com/apps/…

Making history at the Vermont Obama Delegate Forum

( – promoted by odum)

Last night in Norwich, we took democracy to the next level. For the first time in the Vermont Democratic Party’s history, a group of delegates met in advance of the May 24th state convention – to hear speeches and ask questions of candidates for national delegate.

Nine Obama-pledged delegates gave speeches. They came from the far corners of Vermont – Bennington, Williston, Jeffersonville – as well as the local area. They made well-reasoned and impassioned pleas, on themes ranging from the need to unify the Democratic Party and heal the divisions between Obama and Clinton supporters – to the party’s need to embrace Obama grassroots activists by rewarding them for the many months they’ve spent pounding the pavement for Barack.

Two more forums are scheduled: Monday at 6:30pm at Oakledge Park in Burlington; and Tuesday at 6:30pm at the Mark Skinner Library in Manchester. I’ll be at the Burlington forum and hope to see you there. The forums were organized by Damian Sedney of Underhill, who deserves our thanks for this important step in making the Democratic Party more “small-d” democratic.

This is my first diary – so I’ll keep it brief, and look forward to your comments!

Whenever it’s related to security it’s serious

 What will it take to get Gov.Jim Douglas out of bed with Entergy and  wake up for the safety of Vermonters ?



NRC hits Entergy with security violation



By Susan Smallheer Herald Staff

BRATTLEBORO – The owners of Vermont Yankee nuclear plant have been cited for security violations by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The nature of the violations is not disclosed to the public because of security concerns, said Neil Sheehan, a spokesman for the NRC.

“We don’t talk about the findings,” Sheehan said. “Whenever it’s related to security it’s serious.”

“As always, our inspectors will not leave the site until a security issue has either been fully addressed or compensatory measures put in place pending the completion of corrective actions,” he added.

Jason Gibbs, Gov. James Douglas’ spokesman, didn’t return a call for comment about the security  breach.

further on they note .

..the security violation occurred in February, and he would only say that it did not involve “an inattentive security officer.”

I wonder how this news would have been received during some of the decommissioning hearings. http://www.rutlandherald.com/a…

KnockEmStiff, Ohio: A Truism For the Racist Vote

Donald Ray Pollock was interviewed today on NPR's “On Point” regarding his new book about life in the real-life town, KnockEmStiff, Ohio.  The collection of fictional stories reflects a community at about ten times it's actual level of dysfunction, yet southern men and women calling in seemed very appreciative of Pollock's description of poor, uneducated paper mill folk afflicated by their deviant sexual encounters, alcoholism, violence, and bizarre, bread-sack, “huffing bactine” highs.

The desperate, trapped, self-destructiveness of the narrative sparked a question in my mind as I pulled fabric into an intricate corner of the chair I was busy upholstering.  Interestingly, only moments later (at the 37 minute mark if you listen to the podcast), a caller from Boston verbalized what I was thinking:

“…about the working pattern [sic] of the people:  is the [sic] same people Hillary Clinton is talking about, the people voting for her?”

or, paraphrased by Tom Ashbrook:

“It's a good question.  Is this the white working class that's been talked about so much in the presidential campaign, Don?”

Since this is a work of fiction, it's not surprising to hear the immediate response, “Well, I don't know about that.”  But the anecdote that follows about voters who live in the “hollers” around KnockEmStiff, the town where the author lives, seems to confirm what the MSM still won't touch, even after Obama's historic speech on race in America.

Pollack continues, below the fold.

 

Pollack:  I do know that in Southern Ohio, at least down where I live, there are a lot of Hillary Clinton supporters, and, I'm a liberal, and what I'm afraid is going to happen… it seems to me that a lot of these people who are for Hillary are … you know, probably going to switch to McCain.

Ashbrook:  Because of race issues?

Pollack:  You know I hate to say it, but I think it is, I wish people could get past the color of a man's skin, but it seems like that with people that I run into and we start to talk about politics a bit … even if they won't come out and admit it, yea, I can't think of any other reason than that.  Like I say, Hillary's got a lot of support down there, and maybe that's the people she's talking about.

The fact of American racism isn't surprising news, but still it's interesting to hear it acknowledged by anyone when they don't necessarily have to discuss it.  Maybe we should even acknowledge the reality of Clinton's “hard working white voters” comment.  It's easy for those of us in the whitest state in the country to be shocked, agog and aghast that such a phrase actually be said out loud.  The taboo surrounding the subject is a visceral reaction against bringing such a profane subject into the sacred realm of public discourse. 

But there is nothing sacred about sublimating or repressing the facts of who we are as Americans and how black people and white people are different.  In fact, talking about the reality of racism is a healthy departure from the politically correct, emotionally dysfunctional process of not talking about one of the fundamental social issues in America throughout it's ongoing history.

The fountain of power Obama drew from in his speech on race in Philedelphia came from breaking the presumed taboo and speaking out loud, using concrete examples how America still suffers from the ugly reality of racism.  Obama's speech on racism rose beyond the brand of eloquence because it broke the myth of this American taboo.  Weeks later, as if following in the dual wakes of Obama's speech and Clinton's “hard working white voter” comment, Pollack's confirmation of the reality of racism was as if a first ray of light shining into racism's dark, quiet closet.

Hearing the acknowledgement that Pollack's fictional description of KnockEmStiff, Ohio as a complicated truism of what Clinton meant by “hard working white voters” was, in a weird way, reassuring.  Acknowledging the fact that people in Southern Ohio refuse to vote for a black man for no other reason than the color of his skin was perhaps the first time I have heard a truthful, honest extension of the conversation Obama started in the wake of the Pastor Wright controversy. 

To hear a white, southern author being interviewed by a white, Yale-trained journalist having a frank conversation about the unspeakable reality of white people voting against Obama because he is a black man seemed as if to calm the growling dogs of fear.  It was as if Pollack was saying, “Easy boy.  It's ok.  Easy, there.”  There's no need to be afraid.  We can talk about this.

Fear of black skin.  Distaste of black smell.  White fright, rising to anger, in the face of black confidence.  Americans make a choice to not discuss the truth of how so many of us vote from the belly of repressed emotion and the misery of KnockEmStiff-like lives.

Send Mary to Denver! [w/Poll]

I can only echo John's solid suggestions for Denver.  If anybody should be there, it is two “more and better Democrats” blogger types such as Neil and Philip.

There is one more person I want to put on the list.

Mary Sullivan.

In fact, I want to put her right at the top of the list.

Several months ago, I said to myself: “Self, if we don't send John Edwards to Denver as the nominee, sending Mary Sullivan and Barack Obama will be the next best thing” (or so the story goes…). Well, it did not quite pan out for Senator Edwards. Now I am ready to go to the mat for Senator Obama, and I can't think of anyone better to be a delegate representing Vermont Democrats than Mary Sullivan.

For those of you who do not know Mary already, she is a walking, talking, living, breathing made-to-order Democratic convention on two legs. As Philip Baruth describes – from the Club Obama night

It was the sort of event that money can’t buy. You can’t pay people to sweat the details the way Neil did in the weeks prior to last night. You can’t pay people to gently encourage public endorsements the way that Mary Sullivan — a quiet force of nature in her own right — has for the last six months

Mary was one of the Obama campaign's “Vermont Women for Obama” established last winter. (Free Press 26 February 2008).

And best of all, she is a terrific writer who sent us dispatches from the 2004 Democratic Convention.  I'm sure we can talk her into a guest post or two from Denver as well. As described in grist.org from her 2004 dispatches,

Mary Sullivan is one of 22 Vermont delegates to the Democratic National Convention, and one of nine state delegates originally pledged to former Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean. She was a 10-year member of the Vermont House of Representatives and chair of its natural resources committee. In the 1980s, she wrote for The Washington Post. Currently, she is communications coordinator at the Burlington Electric Department, part of the Alliance for Climate Action.”

There is an excellent list of liberal Democrats vying for the chance to be national delegates for Senator Obama at the Vermont State Convention. Please consider Mary Sullivan, she's extra cool! AND you can see her campaigning in the cold for Senator Obama RIGHT HERE (http://my.barackobama.com).  

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Who I’m gonna vote for at the State Dem Convention – plus, who you CAN ‘T vote for…) UPDATED

Although he started the game as my fourth or fifth choice from the crowd of ten, by the time the primary came to Vermont, it was a no-brainer. I voted for Obama as well as doing some volunteer grunt work out of his Montpelier campaign office. I’m also an Obama delegate to the Vermont Democratic Party’s state convention coming up in a matter of days, which means I’ll be able to vote on which 3 men and which 3 women should comprise the 6 National Delegates we’ll be choosing at that point in the process (more will be chosen later, by the group chosen at the convention. It’s weird.) I’ve avoided making endorsements because I know a lot of the candidates, and I don’t wanna have to choose…. also, I want to be open minded for the people I don’t know. Who should get the nod from the assembled throngs? The people who did the most work? The people who give the best speech? Bright-eyed bushy-tailed newcomers who should get a cool opportunity?

But I’m kidding everybody if I don’t acknowledge two people I will definitely vote for. First is Vermont’s premiere political blogger and number 1 Obama booster in the local media – you know him, you love him, and you may have had him for a class once – Philip Baruth (I mean, c’mon – do I really have to tell you guys I’m supporting Philip?). Sure it would mean there’ll be competition from the convention for blogging coverage, but I’ll just have to make certain that he stays too drunk to type.

Also, I’ll be voting for Carolyn Dwyer. Yeah, Carolyn already has all the fun with all things Democratic in Vermont, but the fact is she busted her butt volunteering for the Obama campaign and really put her skills and contacts to work, so she has seriously earned it. And our kids are friends. Gotta make sure the kids are happy. (Also, I’m just informed that Neil Jensen, aka “Vermonter” on the sidebar, is on the candidate list… it’d be freakin’ criminal if he doesn’t get in, with all the work he’s done… I’ll be voting for him, too)

And that leaves me 3 more votes for other candidates, and I aint sayin no more.

…except to mention that there is one person you won’t be able to vote for for anything: me. Regular readers will recall that I was thinking very seriously about running for the position of Democratic National Committeeman, to take the whole gate-crashing blog-schtick straight into the DNC itself, but I’ve decided against it – simply because I may have an opportunity to implement a project very near and dear to my heart, and taking on something else under those circumstances would just be nuts. Maybe next time… thanks to all the folks who have been encouraging me (and I don’t mean to let anybody down – honest).

(UPDATE: Oh! Selene Hofer-Shall is on that list. I gotta vote for Selene. Uh-oh… now I’m just down to 2. Ack!)

I did Clinic Defense for three years

Crossposted to Daily Kos

Clinic defense: it’s getting up very early on Friday and Saturday mornings and driving to a clinic which performs abortions in order to help the women who are coming to them from medical care get into the clinic without having to deal with the harassment of anti-abortion protesters.

It’s challenging work.  It requires you learn to focus on the clients and not react personally to anything the protesters say to you (gay-baiting, race-baiting, threats on your person, etc.).  

When you do clinic defense, you don’t even refer to one another by name where it can be overheard because if they have your name, they make the attacks much more personal.

It was difficult work, but it was well worth it.  It taught me a lot about myself, about responding to personal attacks, and it taught me a bit about courage, too.

The job itself was simple: when someone pulls into the parking lot, do your best to help them into the clinic and distract them from the protesters to ease their way in.

Sometimes, the protesters would play games, like having one of their people pull up and then drive away as they convince the person not to have an abortion.  Like we don’t recognize their cars that are parked along the road every week and don’t recognize the drivers in them as well?  But, I digress…

I’m talking about this because despite my occasional differences with NARAL (I’m not fond of groups which endorse incumbents over challengers just because the incumbents have acceptable voting records, even if the incumbent can do a lot better, so I’ve clashed with NARAL a few times over this), I think they’re a good organization that does good work.

So, if you’re angry about their endorsement, please be sure to let them know what your preference would have been, and if you’re happy about it, let them know that, too.

But whatever you may think about their decision, NARAL is no traitor and if it weren’t for them, some of these clinics I volunteered at wouldn’t even exist today.  They’ve been a major force supporting abortion rights for decades and they deserve some respect for that.

I’m going to close this with two quick stories:

The women who owned the clinic I volunteered at developed a brain tumor which eventually killed her.  While she was still alive, one of the protesters found out about the illness and they started mocking her for it.  

They would shout to her, telling her that this was God’s punishment for her sins.

These are the people who should be our common enemy here.

Once, one of the protesters herself came to the clinic to get an abortion.  She asked for special permission to come around through the back entrance so her friends protesting outside wouldn’t see her.  

The clinic complied.  

We didn’t challenge her on this.  That would have been unacceptable.  She had every right to get an abortion and she had every right to protest.  The contradiction between the two was her issue to deal with, and it wasn’t our place to make her feel terrible for it.

The next week, she was out there protesting again.

We never said a thing.

Odds even given….

Legislative showdown ………

The reasoning would be similar to the logic behind IRV, which the public has already been somewhat primed with.

With a two way race or a stronger candidate this wouldn’t be needed and in some ways is making lemonade out of a structurally difficult situation. There is a certain elegance to having the Progressive candidate Pollina argue against a kind of IRV voting variant…hoisted on his own petard IRV.We have two leftist candidates and with the recent acknowledged 180 degree shift from some Democrats on this strategy it sounds like an idea whose time has come according to powers that be.  

This is YOUR chance …

why don’t you make good use of it?

Each and every one of us have three things to offer any office holder wannabe: time, money and vote. Those items are our bargaining chips, so how you use them does have meaning. You have to decide for yourself whether you’re making good use of your power.


The U.S. government has injected hundreds of foreigners it has deported with dangerous psychotropic drugs against their will to keep them sedated during the trip back to their home country, according to medical records, internal documents and interviews with people who have been drugged.

. . .

Involuntary chemical restraint of detainees, unless there is a medical justification, is a violation of some international human rights codes. The practice is banned by several countries where, confidential documents make clear, U.S. escorts have been unable to inject deportees with extra doses of drugs during layovers en route to faraway places.

Federal officials have seldom acknowledged publicly that they sedate people for deportation. The few times officials have spoken of the practice, they have understated it, portraying sedation as rare and “an act of last resort.” Neither is true, records and interviews indicate.

(Some Detainees Are Drugged For Deportation, Washington Post, 05/14/08)

Here’s a thought:

Sanders, Leahy, Welch and Symington have all stood squarely in the way of holding the bush administration, and in particular bush & cheney, accountable for being the most corrupt, dishonest and incompetent government in our nation’s history.

If Sanders, Leahy, Welch and Symington will stand to protect the likes of bush and cheney … who else and what else will they be willing to protect?

And if you’re not willing to use your powers of time, money and vote to force these “representatives of the people” to act in a time like now, when our constitution is in obvious peril, what else are YOU willing to accept just to vote for a Democrat or against a Republican?

It is not okay that the Catholic Church aided and abetted and looked away regarding horrendous child abuse no matter how many self professed Catholics there are in the U.S. Equally it is not okay that those carrying the mantles of “leadership” in the Democratic Party have actively aided, abetted or looked away as bush administration has dragged us down in manners not dreamed of eight years ago.

This is YOUR chance to force a change in our governments. But blind acquiescence to party labels is certainly not the way to do this … you should be looking at results.

John Edwards Smells the Coffee

From Politico.com

http://www.politico.com/news/s…

In Michigan, Edwards endorses Obama

By: Ben Smith and Carrie Budoff Brown

May 14, 2008 08:44 PM EST

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. – Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards announced his support for Barack Obama Wednesday, giving the Illinois senator a key endorsement prize and signaling that party leaders may be ready to coalesce around his candidacy.

The endorsement followed Obama’s 41-point defeat in the West Virginia primary to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, when he was overwhelmingly rejected by a core Edwards constituency: lower income workers. Edwards even received seven percent of the vote Tuesday despite dropping out of the race in late January.