Today was the deadline to file independent ballot petitions, so it’s worth checking to see if there’s any fallout from this week’s primary upsets:



UPDATED 9/13/08 9:00 A.M.

Washington-Chittenden 1: Gordon Miller, defeated in the primary by Sue Minter and Tom Stevens, has filed as an independent.

No other filings of note.

Franklin 2–“Moose” Christie defeated Ron Allard in the Democratic primary. Now, as expected, Allard has filed to run as an Independent, setting up a five-way race for two seats.

Washington 5–Longtime Montpelier City Councilman Jim Sheridan has filed as an Independent. This was expected, as he had already announced he would do so to give the voters a choice, but he is not expected to be a significant impediment to the election of the two Democrats, Warren Kitzmiller and Mary Hooper.

Possibly more interesting is the fact that so far Jon Anderson has not filed Independent petitions. He has not made any public statements about his intentions since his defeat Tuesday, and his signs are still up, so observers are wondering if he will give it another shot. The smart money is against it, but we don’t know for sure.

Chittenden 3-5: Longtime Representative and Burlington City Councilman Bill Keogh was defeated Tuesday by Suzi Wizowaty, and there was speculation that he might file as an Independent. No sign of that yet (As per vtbuzz, Keogh has indicated he is not running as an I  -odum).

Windham 5–Steve Darrow lost in a write-in campaign, but no sign of petitions for the general.

The Elections Division will be posting a final report around noon tomorrow, so there is still time for some surprises. As of 3:00 this afternoon, however, this is pretty much the story.

I was able to listen in on today’s (09/12/08) gubernatorial debate held at the Tunbridge Fair and hosted by WDEV/Mark Johnson Show. I wasn’t able to listen from start to finish, but I did hear enough to know I’m going to keep supporting Pollina.

What I heard told me that with a Douglas or Symington administration there will be no fundamental change in the philosophy that guides our state government. Both, it seems, will be happy to continue working with the same institutions and the same rules with Symington at best offering the same old incremental change that has resulted in no change.

On the other hand Pollina offers ideas that will result in a fundamental change in how our state government views itself and we view the same. This is true even if only one, or a substantial portion of only one, of Pollina’s proposals on economics, housing, roads and bridges, health care or energy were to come to fruition.

For example in the area of renewable energy development Pollina talked about providing resources, assistance and guidance from the state level while leaving the actual specific decisions to more local levels. In health care Pollina was the only one to draw a distinction between our insurance driven health care industry and a health care system. On roads and bridges Pollina was the only one who talked about ways to raise more money to do what we all seem to acknowledge needs to be done.

I gave the Pollina campaign some cash way back at the beginning, and after hitting the ‘save’ button here I’m off to another donation for the general campaign.

Simple fact: a vote for Douglas or Symington is a vote for more of the same with only a few specifics being different. A vote for Pollina is, in my opinion, a vote for fundamental change.

And it CAN be Governor Pollina if enough people vote for him.

Metaphor time. What you’re looking at is a standard configuration for connecting a Local Access Network to the Internet. See all the happy servers on one end, the internet on the other, and a firewall in between. The firewall, of course, prevents unwanted intrusion by acting as gatekeeper for the “ports” that allow information to flow back and forth between the two. Generally, they are programmed to block virtually any passage through these ports, except for a few key services delivering “safe” sorts of information, and allowing for “safe” interaction. In this analogy, the firewall is the traditional media, the servers are all us happy voters sitting at home, and the internet is the Symington campaign – or for that matter, the Parker campaign or the Clavelle campaign. Unlike internet firewalls, though, we don’t have access to the filters, so we’re stuck with it as is. And the result is a skewed picture of what’s really going on. Many weeks back, I was among those wondering where the Symington campaign was. They started late, but the realities of the election make no accommodations for such inconveniences. Nowadays, I haven’t been joining in those calls because I check their website every day and I know what they’re doing. And it would surprise a lot of people, I suspect, to see just how much is going on.

From the Symington website:

9-11  Education Focus of Debate (Free Press)

read more »

9-11  Symington Unveils New Education Plan (VT Press Bureau)

read more »

9-10 Symington Program will Send More Kids to College

<!– no full story–>

9-9  Democratic Governors Association Congratulates Symington

read more »

9-9  Douglas More Concerned with PR than Truth (Reformer)

read more »

9-8 Symington Calls on Douglas to Pull His Ads (VPR)

read more »

Burlington-DFA Endorses Symington!

<!– no full story–>

9-5 Dems Hit Douglas on Job Cuts (VPR)

read more »

9-5  Bridge Closure More Proof of Douglas’ Failures

read more »

9-5  Debate Rages on Deceptive E-Mails (AP)

read more »

9-4  Symington on Deceptive Douglas E-Mails

read more »

9-3  Telecom Goals Stir Debate (VT Press Bureau)

read more »

9-2 Symington Stresses Importance of Labor Day (Politicker)

read more »

9-1  Symington on Importance of Labor Day

read more »

8-29  Democrats Rally for Obama and Symington (WCAX)

read more »

8-28  Budget Cuts Approved; Symington Criticizes Douglas for Preserving PR Jobs (AP)

read more »

8-27  Douglas Wrong to Choose Public Relations Over Public Services

read more »

8-26 “She’s for Symington” Will Help Campaign Spread Message of Change

read more »

8-25 Symington Maintains Strong Fundraising Pace

read more »

8-24 Symington in Denver for Convention (WCAX)

read more »

8-22  Symington Warns of Worsening Budget Problem; Says Douglas Must Offer Long Term Plan (AP)

read more »

8-21 Symington Says Douglas Must Level with Vermonters on Potential $100 million Deficit

read more »

8-21 Symington Challenges Accuracy of Douglas Ads (Free Press)

read more »

8-20 Symington Launches “Fact Check” Project; Calls on Douglas to Cease making False Claims

read more »

8-19  Wind Energy Proposal Should Be Addressed (Free Press)

read more »

8-18  Symington Praised for Determination (Free Press)

read more »

8-14  Symington Offers Offender Plan (Vermont Press Bureau)

read more »

8-13  Symington Releases Five-Point Plan on Sex Crimes

read more »

8-11  Douglas Tricks Press and Public with Distractions (Reformer)

read more »

8-10 Symington Makes Strong Case for Wind (Rutland Herald)

read more »

8-7  Symington Says Wind is Energy Answer (Rutland Herald)

read more »

8-6  Symington Calls for 20% Wind Power in Ten Years

read more »

8-5 Symington Says Douglas Has Power to Staff Sex Crimes Units and Should Do So Immediately

read more »

8-4 Symington Releases Radio Ad on New Energy Ideas

read more »

7-31  Symington Sets Strong Fundraising Pace

read more »

7-29 Douglas Uses Outrageous Tactics (Free Press)

read more »

7-29  Douglas’ Motives Are Questionable (Free Press)

read more »

7-28  Douglas Wrong to Saddle Vermonters with More Debt

read more »

7-28  Douglas Shuts “Eyes and Ears” of Vermonters Out Of Vermont Yankee (Brattleboro Reformer)

read more »

7-24  Symington on the Issues (Manchester Journal)

read more »

7-21  Symington Petitions Show Broad Support

read more »

7-21  Governors Race Kickoff Debate Proves Feisty (VT Press Bureau)

read more »

7-18  Politicking A Tragedy (Brattleboro Reformer)

read more »

7-17  Tough Questions From Symington (The Valley News)

read more »

7-15  Symington Calls Douglas to Task in Bennett Case (VPR/AP)

read more »

7-14 Symington Calls For Investigation of Jacques Early Release

read more »

7-13 Douglas Not Realistic About Job Cuts

read more »

7-11  Symington on Leak in VT Yankee Cooling System

read more »

7-10 Symington Announces Roadmap To Energy Independence

read more »

7-8  Symington Says Douglas Moving Slowly on Weatherization (VPR)

read more »

7-7  Jim Does NOT Equal Jobs (Free Press)

read more »

7/6  Douglas Takes Credit He Doesn’t Deserve (Free Press)

read more »

7/3 Symington Works for Positive Social Change (Politicker)

read more »

7/2 Symington Slams Douglas at Forum (Brattleboro Reformer)

read more »

6/30 Symington Calls for Debates in All 14 Counties

read more »

6/27 Strike Three for Douglas on Lake Clean-up

read more »

6/27  Douglas, Symington Spar Over Property Taxes

read more »

6/26  Douglas Blame Shift on Property Taxes Won’t Work

read more »

6/25 Gubernatorial Candidates See Different Reasons for Layoffs – Free Press

read more »

6/24 Symington on IBM Job Cuts

read more »

6/20  Symington Statement on Taylor Street Bridge, Montpelier

read more »

6/19 Symington Statement on Douglas Re-election Campaign

read more »

6/12 Symington Counters Douglas on Efficiency Plan – VPR

read more »

6/18 Douglas Launches Campaign –  Associated Press

read more »

6/13  Symington on the stump – Times Argus

read more »

6/12 RELEASE: Symington Calls for Emergency Meeting of Joint Fiscal Committee

read more »

6/12 Statement from House Speaker Gaye Symington

read more »

6/12  Symington’s “Shift Vermont Into Gear” Campaign Comes to Thunder Road

read more »

6/5  Symington Supports Obama

read more »

6/4   After Six Years Lake Champlain Clean-Up is Stuck in Neutral

read more »

5/31  Democrat Gaye Symington Wraps Up Tour WCAX

read more »

Three-way race raises prospect of lawmakers picking governor

read more »

Speaker Symington emphasizes jobs, energy in her run for governor

read more »

Gubernatorial frontrunners making rounds

read more »

Frustrations make way to campaign trail

read more »

Symington campaign strategy: Hold Douglas accountable for his record

read more »

Press releases almost every day, and a variety of them. From reactive tidbits to proactive policy announcements. Yet, even others on the left are oft heard to refer to Pollina as the “only candidate talking about issues,” which is nonsense. Like them or hate them, Symington has more specific programmatic proposals than any of the candidates.

The problem is what the problem always is – the information is not breaching the media firewall.

And when something does get through, you never know what it’ll be. Barely a mention of Symington’s energy plan proposals, but plenty of ink this week on her plan to help more kids afford college. Mainly, though, it’s that very little gets through.

Why? Part of its simple personpower. Again, the ranks of the political press corps are depleted. Also, as we know, the press has in the past been inclined to protect Jim Douglas, and although they’ve come a long way from the dark days of AP’s Chris Graff, the Freeps editorial, and Marselis Parsons setting the bar for the whole lot of them, we’re not completely beyond that.

Also, a lot of the political reporters respond to what they find interesting – and a lot of times, as with a lot of us, dry policy stuff kind of bounces off.

The thing is, when the reporters just let themselves give in to that impulse and allow things to bounce off that they find boring, it feeds a narrative – an impression – that Symington isn’t doing anything.

As I said, this is nothing new. And as I said two years ago, the most comprehensive way to confront it is to start the campaign early and build a movement-style, self-sufficent ground game community by community. That’s been our strength in the past, and we’ve forgotten that, even as we’ve seen it in rather dramatic play with the Obama campaign and Dean’s amazing surge-from-nowhere before that. Building a grassroots movement does two things: it makes the movement the story, rather than the policy checklist (reporters dig that), but it also builds the candidate into a credible threat – and the press loves a horserace. A lot of the lack of coverage reflects the fact that the press decided a long time ago that Symington can’t win (again, something they do every year) so they find her boring. A self-fulfilling prophecy if ever there was one.

But by starting so late, Symington had no chance of that. Which means the way she can break the logjam in the coming weeks is to keep doing what they’re doing (just to break even and keep from losing ground) and try to break into the news cycles in creative ways. I agree with the poster who said there should have been a press conference AT the closed Richmond bridge right away. Supportive groups can also make news (news that the press will find more intersting than campaign press releases), and when they do, Symington should be right there. VSEA’s recent Douglas-administration email disclosures, for example.

And new media can help – but only so much (and not that much in Vermont – at least not yet). The problem is, blogs and new media are still largely dependent on that firewall. Oh, sure – we do our own amateur “journalism” sometimes (Nate’s bridge video, for example), but for the most part, we’re stuck with what gets through that filter as well. To continue the analogy, here’s another image:

Consider GMD to be in “Server A” in the DMZ.

But the big way you break through the conversation at this point is paid media – which also buys some limited earned media as well. There’s probably still time for targeted media buys, but the problem here is money – they cost a lot, and Symington isn’t raising any. Honestly, I’m not sure why I haven’t been receiving an email ask every week from Symington. I’m not even sure if I’ve received one, frankly.

One thing (and again, its getting kind of late for this) that can be effective is a menu-based fundraising strategy. If you need a commercial, crank out the web ads (which can be done in house) on a regular basis to get people coming to your website. Then, if you need money for a media buy – put the professionally developed ad on the web (and linked via email) and ask people to contribute specifically to get the ad up and on the air. It’s a good way to involve your supporters in a tangible way and it can excite your supporters, as well as give them some reassurance that things are happening at the HQ.

Clearly, there’s a need for creativity, as – at this point – the odds are still long, but its far from a done deal (especially – especially – when you remember that legislative option if Douglas doesn’t reach that 50% threshold…).

The following comes from something I received from a regular reader; a forwarded email from a former business associate of his wife’s who moved to Alaska with his family from Vermont about two years ago. Apparently a lot of folks back here in Vermont have been asking this ex-Vermonter-current-Alaskan his opinion of Sarah Palin, and this is his response.

It’s not what you’d expect. Much of it is very positive (and he’s clearly not a GMD style progressive, especially given his “PS” at the bottom), but the writer leaves no question as to how he stands on the ticket (I’ve removed all but the first name of the author).

Most of the letter is below the fold. Interesting stuff.

Greetings from Palin Country, where all the women are pro-life, the men wear

goatees and all the teenagers are above birth control.

I’ve received quite a few emails asking about Gov. Palin. Some of the below

you may have already read but here’s my local take.

Sarah is a smart, tough gal.  She’s not to be underestimated and will do

very well staying on message.   She’s not afraid to buck convention, has had

famous battles with the AK GOP chair and has come out against Sen. Stevens

(more on this later) and Rep. Young, telling them to come clean with the

public.  I believe she is focused on putting people first and is fairly

pragmatic in getting the job done.   Her approval ratings are in the

nineties.  The Anchorage Daily News has a term for it: Sarah-Love.

I thought she would be a terrible governor, would cave to the oil industry

and be out of her element.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  She

has done a terrific job and will probably do very well on the campaign

trail.

The media reports that she is a reformer and in many ways she is.  But one

must put this in context: Almost a quarter of our 2006-2007 legislative body

is in jail, under FBI investigation or waiting for trial under various

corruption schemes revolving around the oil services company, Veco.  Two

thirds of our Congressional delegation will soon by convicted felons.  Under

these circumstances, anyone would be considered a reformer. But to her

credit, she’s cleaned up Juneau (but not Juno as evidenced by her daughter)

and socked it to the oil companies for locking up the natural gas reserves

and bringing in TransCanada to build a pipeline.  She’s probably the first

governor in 25 years that truly understands urban and rural Alaska.  Let’s

hope she finishes her term.

She has clearly energized the Christian Right and if she pulls in any

disaffected Hillary voters, then those voters get what they deserve.  If

politics has become about voting for a pretty, useful product then McCain

should have considered picking the iPhone as his running mate.

In so many ways, she is America and in that sense this is a brilliant move

by McBush, er, I mean McCain.   As an Alaskan, I am simply stunned by the

decision and find it surreal that I’m now reading about Wasilla, the

culturally devoid, redneck capital of the world, in the New York Times.  I

am truly blown away by this series of events and where it may lead this

country.

Does any of this qualify her to be VP or President? Absolutely not. Only a

disillusioned, hate-radio listening, GOP-loving, Jerry Falwell worshipping

person would think otherwise.   I am getting a huge kick out of the

experience by association qualifications:  She’s head of the AK National

Guard, her son is in the Army and Alaska is close to Russia, therefore she’s

nearly the next George Marshall.   Feel free to use this stupid logic in

your life.   Want to be a surgeon but didn’t go to medical school?  No

problem.  If you have ever been to a hospital, know how to spell ‘virus’ and

have experienced any illness, proceed straight to your local medical

facility and start treating patients.

Let’s hope during the VP debates or on Meet the Press, she is asked to point

out on a map the Republic of Georgia, to name and pronounce correctly Iran’s

President and to outline a Russian containment policy (and you thought the

Cold War was over, didn’t you?).   Or perhaps explain how she’s going to

work with the Chinese to help disarm North Korea, pressure Pakistan about

the tribal lands and to name the new Japanese Prime Minister.

McCain doubled down with Palin but it’s hard to imagine a more reckless

choice.  I find it incredible that GOP operatives are now saying she is just

as qualified as some of the other governors McCain was considering.   That

may be true but why was he even considering other non-qualified candidates?

Are they saying that the GOP has no qualified VP candidates?   Gee, maybe

look to the Senate, or the House or even some of the Bush leftovers.  Isn’t

there anyone in the GOP qualified to take over when Johnny misses a few

heartbeats?   But this is a classic GOP move: Create false choices and then

call us unpatriotic for questioning their ideology.  It worked a charm for

Iraq.

Let the games begin. This might be the most interesting 60+ days in politics

my generation will experience. Here’s hoping sanity prevails and Alaska

remains off the map.

-Jim

P.S. Prediction:  Stevens gets convicted but still wins the Senate seat.

The recent charges against him has only increased his visibility and

recognized worth to the State of AK.   I swear, I may even vote for the guy.

If so, I’ll turn in my Democratic card to Chairman Wooster.

Despite the primary outcome, our campaign is not over.  It is time to face brutal reality here on GMD that, if we do nothing significant prior to the general election, we may have Jim Douglas as our governor for another two years.

What can you do about it?  Why should you do anything about it?  

Because if there is only one thing we all agree on, it is that Jim Douglas has given us nothing more than something to complain about.  

Do you want Jim Douglas to be in office another two years?  This is not a question about our candidate or any other candidate on the left nor the dynamic between them.  However, we simply do not further the liberal cause by nit-picking the most likely candidate to beat Jim Douglas this close to the general election.

Do you want Jim Douglas to be in office another two years?  If not, start hammering as hard as you can on him.  After all, this is our job as the grassroots/netroots of the Democratic party.

If you cannot muster your energy to generate a loud rebellion against the Douglas incumbency in the waning days of this election cycle, you must want Jim Douglas to hold us back another two years.  

With your help, I have just concluded a campaign I am very, very proud to have run.  But so long as we are facing the possibility of another Douglas administration, my campaign to call out Douglas/Dubie is far from over.  I will not quit my campaign to speak clearly and loudly against Jim Douglas, and I hope my commitment will help inspire yours. 

We are vigorous in our debates against each other.  We need to turn that energy outward today.  If there is one thing we can all agree on, its that another two years of a Douglas/Dubie administration is not acceptable.  Whining on November 5th will not create the change we need.

Let's get to work.  Write a letter to the editor.  Produce a video and post it.  Hold your friends and colleagues accountable to voting for change.  If you need an idea, inspiration or organizational direction, contact me.  Any time, day or night.  

Let's ge to work.

Nate Freeman

888-244-2401

NateFreeman@gmail.com

( – promoted by gnome)

Shay’s article this week in Seven Day’s brings up a couple of new questions about Douglas’ PR team and his campaign but no one mentions Jason Gibbs “other role”.

Douglas could really save Vermont some money if he spoke for himself more often.  But if Vermonters are going to continue to foot the $1,000,000 (million) bill for his public relations team they should at least expect them to stick to official government business.

So my question is, after tax payers pay $1 million for “official” spin-doctors, should they also be paying Jason Gibbs for “political campaign” spin that should be paid for by Douglas’ campaign?

Jason Gibbs, Gov. Douglas’ official spokesman, is quoted in all kinds of articles in ways that are simply not appropriate. It is interesting to see the increase of Gibbs’ quotes on political matters since James Barnett left as head of the Vermont Republicans.

If you remember, Gibbs and Barnett were part of the campaign team that got Douglas elected to begin with. After Douglas’ election they both had roles; Gibbs spun everything legislative and Barnett attacked everything political.

Since Barnett left, however, the press continually asks Gibbs to comment on political matters and Gibbs is a very good political attack dog in his own right.

Gibbs in the past has taken vacation days near the ends of campaigns to work on Douglas’ campaign, which I suppose is OK, but what about the rest of the year? The campaign finance reports show Douglas has plenty of money to pay for a “campaign spokesman” from his huge out-of-state corporate donors.

As a matter of fact, most gubernatorial campaigns have dedicated spokespeople paid for by the campaign (separate from the campaign manger). Douglas has NOT since his first governor’s race. Wonder why… because the taxpayers are picking up the bill.

Recently, a Republican congressmen from Idaho got in trouble for something very similar: “The dual employ of Hoffman as an official spokesman for Sali’s congressional office and as his campaign spokesman is unusual and inappropriate.” Idaho Press-Tribune

Just because Gibbs doesn’t have the title of “campaign spokesman” doesn’t mean he isn’t…

How long, and how much money, will Gibbs and Douglas get away with this “double dipping” of taxpayer money for his campaign?

A VERY quick Google search shows these examples:

“There's a real possibility he may decide to support one of those individuals,” Gibbs said. (Reference to who Douglas may support for Republican President)

Douglas isn't committing to McCain, at least not yet, spokesman Jason Gibbs said today, but he has “great admiration and respect” for him.

Douglas spokesman Jason Gibbs confirmed a report in the Valley News of Lebanon, N.H., that said Douglas would announce his support of McCain at an event on Monday in Hanover.

“We are seeing the Republican Party unite around McCain because he is the most prepared to lead the nation on day one,” Gibbs said.

“I honestly believe Senator Shumlin is going to have a race on his hands,” Gibbs said. (Reference to Rep. Pillsbury thinking about running for Senate)  

But Douglas' spokesman, Jason Gibbs, said Pollina's plan to eliminate the loophole and then spend the money saved in doing so was, in effect, a tax increase. (In response to a political attack from a political opponent)

 Loading ...

As you probably know by now, ABC's Charles Gibson, the hack/anchorman whose performance at the ABC Clinton/Obama debate was so pathetic that he was actually booed by the audience, is getting the first interview with Palin. One can more than likely expect nothing but fluffy, softball questions with no follow-ups, delivered with that serious “I'm a real journalist” face that Gibson puts on that is usually enough to convince the clueless that it's a “hard-hitting” interview.

It really seems like the Alaskan media seems to be doing the actual hardest-hitting journalism when it comes to the idiocy/corruption/incompetence of Sarah Palin. Why not? They know her better than anyone, aren't trying to fulfill some pundit-psychological need, and the “hockey mom” nonsense probably isn't as alluring in a state where every other mom is probably a hockey mom.  The Anchorage Daily News put out a tough op-ed yesterday listing off the questions that should be asked of Palin (but probably never will, as they are both relevant and complex, something she more than likely can't handle). Jump below the fold for more, as well as a question for you, dear readers, about “issues”.

Two of the questions from the ADN:

• As governor of Alaska, you have not pushed for laws or regulations that put your personal views on abortion, same-sex marriage and creationism into public policy. As vice president, will you push to outlaw abortion, restrict same-sex marriage and require the teaching of creationism?

• You present yourself as a Republican maverick who took on your own party's corrupt political establishment. In November's election, your party is running an indicted U.S. Senator, Ted Stevens, who is awaiting trial on charges he accepted more than $250,000 of unreported gifts from the state's most powerful lobbyist. Will you vote for his opponent? Will you urge Alaskans to help you change Washington and vote him out of office? If not, why not?

These are the kinds of questions we need asked (and the questions of this depth should bE asked of all of the candidates – in the meantime we're going to have to settle for “Does your preacher love America? Do you like donuts?“) Don't hold your breath, because any journalist that would ask them wouldn't be able to get within 100 feet of Smilin' Sarah.

And that brings me to my other notion: why Americans continue to fall for the fluff instead of the substance. By and large, we're a pretty ignorant lot, even many who feel they are well-informed. And, no, it's not just the conservatives, even though they've done a masterful job of elevating anti-intellectualism as a form of personal virtue. 

Yesterday at Five Before Chaos, I did a “Dumb American Voter Linkdump”, as there are several new books out upon the matter. Voting really is an emotional, not intellectual excercise for most Americans. And my friend Scherpschutter, who lives in Belgium, summed up the problem nicely:

In the US (and Italy) this general conscience seems to have imploded: both the left and the right have their own set of values, completely different from each other. We are good, They are bad. In such a situation an accusation of fraud, corruption or whatever isn’t harmful: it comes from a bad person, who is trying to hurt me, a good person. That is a dangerous, very harmful situation.

There's a lot of wisdom to be had there, and it does indeed explain it to an extent.

Another angle: LeftField's diary “It's the Issues, Stupid”, brought up some valid points, about how Obama's losing ground because he's not taking a bolder stand on the issues. I can agree with that sentiment, but on another level, it's not working for me, simply because it's assuming we have an informed electorate that is voting based on “the issues”. We don't. But they sure are flocking to get those Kawaski eyeglasses that Palin wears. Good to know we're paying attention to the things that matter.

It was said at the GOP convention that “this campaign isn't about the issues, it's about character”.  I suspect, given the tendencies of the electorate, that it really wouldn't matter if it was. 

So, there is indeed a huge challenge for the Obama team. Calling McCain's lies out as they occur is only going to go so far, as huge swaths of the public fall for that “if you repeat a lie enough it becomes true”. So, putting aside Dem capitulation, similar positions on some things, and all those other factors, how do we proceed?  What does one do when “talking about the issues” doesn’t matter?

So, readers, there's the big question I'd like you to answer. Also, I'd be interested in reading your questions for Sarah Palin, as well.

I had heard a lot about Cindy McCain’s difficulties with prescription drugs, but never realized that she was the subject of an investigation that looks like it was squashed by John McCain:

http://openleft.com/showDiary….

Addiction is a horrible thing and I never held it against Cindy that she has struggled with it.  However, the allegations of a cover up here are pretty serious, potentially  criminal.  

Crossposted to Daily Kos

Seven years ago, I watched in horror as the events of September 11, 2001 unfold from the comfort of my home.

The horror I experienced had a little to do with the planes themselves.  The deaths were tragic, horrendous and inhuman.  

But through that directly personal and human horror, I had a much worse feeling down in the pit of my stomach, one that unfortunately came true in so many ways.

The deaths were tragic, but I feared more for the loss of my country, my rights and the sense of security I felt here.

I’m not talking about physical security.  That’s a relative concept.  Living in Southeastern Vermont, I felt no less in danger from external violent forces than I had the day before.

I’m talking about the security that comes with living in a free and civil society.  I’m talking about the security that comes with having the rights of habeus corpus, due process and the right to an attorney.

Our country has failed us on these fronts, and in doing so may have achieved a goal which terrorists would have been unable to accomplish on their own, to destroy us from within.

They’d done this under the auspices of a single phrase, repeated again and again:

911.

911.

911.

This is not a day of memorial.  It is not a day of reckoning.  

911 has been transformed from a day of tragedy to a crass political marketing tool.  It has been bled dry of meaning.  It has been stolen from those of us who respect and mourn for the loss involved and its meaning has been twisted into a single simple statement:

Republicans will protect you.  Democrats will throw you to the wolves

Or, more succinctly:

Four more years!

Four more years!

Four more years!

And, of course:

Oceana has always been at war with Eurasia.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but today is a day I want to reclaim.  

I watched in horror from the comfort of my home, but the horror was real.  I’ve watched in horror for the last seven years as we’ve capitulated, time and time again, on FISA, on Iraq, on patriotism, on honesty, on truth and on justice.  

This.  

Can.

Not.  

Stand.

So today is a day that has no meaning for me any longer, but I desperately want to reclaim its meaning.  I want it to be a day when we remember what we lost, not just on the front of death and despair, but on the fronts of wisdom, common sense and personal freedom.

September 11th, 2001, was a day that everything changed for us.  It’s the day that Republicans were given a green light to pull out every underhanded, fear mongering trick in the book, and too many of us let them do so.

September 11th, 2001, was a day that everything changed for us.  It’s the day that we started down the path of allowing ourselves to justify torture, to detain people indefinitely for questioning, to give any right-wing politician the excuse for any anti-immigrant agenda they saw fit to enact.

September 11th, 2001, was a day that everything changed for us.

Let’s make September 11th, 2008 a day that we start to change it all back.

John McCain is a serious man who promised to wage a serious campaign. Win or lose, will he be able to look back on this one with pride? Right now, it's hard to see how.

CORRECTION: Initially credited to the Wall Street Journal