Legalization? Don’t Go There (4-20 edition)

New User Ned Nate Flanders wants you to light up. How preciously timely of him. Go back to where you came from buddy.

It’s 4-20 and I expect the stoners will be out in force, once they wake up this afternoon.  Well, it’s reality check time.

There is too much to lose by legalizing marijuana, so just don’t go there.  Where to begin?  

LEGALIZING marijuana will force money launderers to find honest work.

LEGALIZATION will break up crime syndicates.

LEGALIZATION will drastically reduce violence. Killings, maimings, mayhem, shootings, stabbings. It will end all that violent crime the State and Federal Governments generate for citizens to have a piece of the U.S. Government’s statutorily mandated super profitable crime monopoly. This.Will.Just.END!

LEGALIZATION will seriously dent police corruption and abuse of civil rights.

LEGALIZATION will turn unlicensed farmers who are engaged in crimes of economic advancement, into plain ole’ tax-paying entrepreneurs. Do you really want that?

— you want more?  

LEGALIZATION will save billion$ (TRILLION$$ even) in prison building and by recapturing all those wasted and completely unnecessary judicial and law enforcement resources we spend weeding America.  Overnight, we will be FORCED to spend billions of dollars for public protection that stops violent crime and real criminals, we be subjected to unclogged courts handling genuine disputes in need of serious attention.  We’ll be forced to witness full frontal break-outs of societal prosperity as we return non-violent merchants to an expanding economy. We spend billion$ of our income taxeS to keep non-threatening stoners, and their farmers, in prison.  Next thing you know, these non-threatening criminals (or neighbors as we frequently call them) will be paying taxes instead of taking them, they’ll be outvoting us at PTA meetings and eating shitloads of Ben & Jerry’s Chunky Monkey. The Horror!

LEGALIZATION will reunite families, preserve family values, protect two-parent homes. Kids will visit with their dads at night while playing catch instead of between a glass partition on bring-your-kid-to-the-slammer-day.

LEGALIZATION will end the obscene military practice of using poisonous and deadly carcinogenic chemicals on pristine Central and South American farmland. The U.S. is successfully destroying otherwise healthy, productive soils, while generating contempt for our arrogant drug policies as we punish foreign farmers for to satiate our domestic hysteria over substance use.

LEGALIZATION will force our political leaders to be honest and brave and admit they’ve been fucking-the-dog for a generation by treating a health and education issue as a war on Americans who use substances.  Our current substance abuse policies are a demonstrated menace to public health.  Our current substance abuse polices are counter productive and have been overwhelmingly successful is boosting crime, corrupting law enforcement and stunting our economy. Why would we ever want to change that?

LEGALIZATION?  You Have Got To Be Kidding Me!

I could go on and on, but the fact is, legalizing otherwise market driven unlicensed agriculture WILL END LIFE AS WE KNOW IT.

We can’t handle the public health benefits.

We can’t handle the Trillion$$ is savings and/or expansion of our economy.

We can’t handle turning our backs on being world-class hypocrites.  

We would be unrecognizable. Is that the kind of change you really want?  

Happy 4-20. Now pick up your bong, don’t bother voting vote, don’t bitch, don’t become active in politics, don’t demand accountability from our elected officials and, for the love of all that is holy, keep on giving aid and comfort to the narrowest and most spineless leaders; the ones who promise to continue a never-ending & always expanding war on substance users, no matter what the costs in coin and blood. You know it’s what’s truly best for you and all of us.  

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Church Street is safe once again–UPDATED

UPDATE AGAIN:

GMD learned from T.J. Donovan this afternoon that he has declined to prosecute the Pillow Bandit. This has since been confirmed on WCAX:

“There is no crime. Nobody was injured. It appears that all the participants were willing participants. No damage was done to any of the property, the businesses downtown. No pedestrian traffic was impeded. It lasted about 90 seconds. It was truly a pillow fight,”

Great decision, T.J.!

UPDATE:

It appears that sanity reigns at the office of the Chittenden County State's Attorney.

 “As of right now I’m not overly concerned,” Chittenden County State’s Attorney T.J. Donovan said Monday afternoon, though he promised to review the disorderly conduct charge police are recommending he file against Cassler. “If it is as it sounds, and it was some sophomoric hijinks, and some kids were having a pillow fight, it sounds like it’s much to do about nothing.”

 We've been critical of T.J. Donovan in the past for his handling of antiwar protesters. Let's hope he stays on track here and declines to prosecute.

From pillow fighters, that is.

The short version: there was a flash mob on Church Street last Friday afternoon, the activity being a big pillow fight.

For the rest of the story, take a look at Blazing Indiscretions.

Or follow this link for video.

There's also a Stuck in Vermont video here.

For me, though, it's pretty hard to see why the organizer had to be arrested.

Legalize Marijuana Yes or No

Should Marijuana be legal or not

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

MN-Sen: Make Norm Coleman Go Away for Just One Dollar a Day

{First, a cheap plug for my blog Senate Guru.}

Even in Vermont, I’m sure you’ve heard plenty about what’s going on with the still-unsettled Senate race in Minnesota.

While Republican Norm Coleman prolongs his endless and pointless appeals, cementing his admission into the Sore Losers Hall of Fame, progressive organizations Democracy for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee have introduced a new effort: NormDollar.com, “A Dollar a Day to Make Norm Go Away.”  Very simply put, commit to contributing just one dollar per day for every day that sore loser Norm Coleman refuses to concede.

NormDollar.com

This is exactly the correct approach to take in order to provide Republican leadership in Washington with adequate disincentive from continuing to fund Coleman’s endless appeals.  The GOP bigwigs funding Coleman’s appeals see value in putting their money toward keeping progressive Senator-elect Al Franken from being seated.  This grassroots-powered effort will make them think twice by generating many thousands of dollars for progressive candidates for every single day that they fund the Coleman circus.

If you feel so inclined, you can certainly chip in a bit of change directly to the Franken Recount Fund, as well.

Open Thread (update)

Is the end of the session coming into sight? Depends on how all the budget battles go, but in the meantime:

  • Good news! S.117 – the bill to move the Primary election to the second Tuesday in August – should see Senate action on Tuesday. House Gov Ops Chair Sweaney is reportedly eager to move on it.
  • Terrific stuff from Rep. Bob South of St. Johnsbury. He, “along with other Representatives and Senators from Caledonia County will hold a press conference Monday, April 20 at 12 noon at the Northeast Regional Correctional Facility in St. Johnsbury.  Rep. South will discuss a bill he is introducing in the House of Representatives next week to protect the St. Johnsbury facility from closure.  He will be joined by workers at the facility, local law enforcement and members of the community.” (from a Press release). Regardless of the feelings of folks on this particular facility, I’d love to see more of this kind of local, aggressively district-focused legislating and media engagement/messaging. This is being a good representative and a smart politician. Hope to see other Reps following suit with this sort of thing.
  • Take a listen. Anybody know this guy?:


*** Update by Christian***

  • Activism gone bad. Not sure if you heard about this “up north” but Sally Shaw of the New England Coalition (a Brattleboro anti-nuke advocacy group) threw compost at Vermont Yankee VP Michael Colomb. Bob Audette of the Brattleboro Reformer.

    ” It wasn’t just invectives that flew from mouths of the anti-nuclear activists at Thursday’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission meeting in Brattleboro.

    One activist also threw compost at Vermont Yankee’s site vice president Michael Colomb.

    “You folks have no idea what to do with spent fuel or radioactive waste,” said Sally Shaw, of Gill, Mass.

    Carrying a bag to the front of the conference room, she threw a handful of “spent food” at Colomb and other Entergy executives before depositing handfuls of compost on a table where NRC officials sat.

    “That’s really good quality compost,” she said.

    The NRC was in Brattleboro to discuss Yankee’s 2008 annual assessment, in which the agency stated the nuclear power plant was operated “in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives.”


    Shaw is the former executive director of the NEC. This was unprofessional and in poor taste. I heard some Windham County legislators are NOT happy about Shaw’s actions. To read more of the story click here.

  • Big story that flew under the radar. Not sure if you heard but the Public Service Board approved the Deerfield Wind Project. Seventeen new windmills will be built in Searsburg and Readsboro and each of them will be 409 feet high and generate approximately 36 MW of electricity. The 17 new windmills will join the other 12 windmills on-site owned by Green Mountain Power. Once complete, it will be Vermont’s largest wind facility. To read more click here.

   

Suggestion by Julie

As much as I never expected myself to say this, we may be able to learn something from Texas (h/t Daily Kos):

House members virtually wiped out Gov. Rick Perry’s office budget Friday in order to help veterans and the mentally ill.

With little debate, the House on a voice vote approved erasing 96 percent of the nearly $24 million that budget writers had recommended for Perry’s office operation over the next two years.

Oh, and this is incredibly cool.

Birds of Spring: Let’s Get it On

It’s been quite the week for birding.  Almost every bird I’ve photographed below is doing something related to mating, courting, etc.  A prime example of this is from Bird #7, below:


I’ve seen this a few times now, and it’s always wonderful to watch.  The two males will sort of point their beaks at one another, making a kind of repeated poking motion (more of a dance than anything violent) and then fan their tails out in a bright yellow display.  The female, on a nearby branch, will just stand there, sometimes watching, sometimes pretending not to pay attention at all, and then, eventually (I’ve seen this go on for two days in a row) one of the males will fly off with the female, and the other will just fly off in another direction.

All these photos were taken in Southern Vermont and/or New Hampshire, near the Connecticut River.

So this particular year is kind of fun for me– lots of opportunity to photograph birds while they’re really distracted by other matters.  Plus, the leaves have yet to grow out, so the birds that are around tend to be more visible.  Combine that with lots of sounds that alert you to birds that tend to go quiet once they have offspring (many birds need noise to find the mate, but don’t want that noise to attract predators hunting for vulnerable babies), it’s a cool time of year to be birding.  So, below, I have once again presented a bit of a quiz.  For any of these, if you want to spoil yourself, just click on the image to get to a larger one with details about the bird.  Or just ask questions in the comments.  

Bird #1: one kind of swallow

                               

Bird #2: another kinds of swallow

                               

Bird #3: One of the truly amazing looking ugly birds

                               


                               

                               


                               

Bird #4: The earliest flycatcher to return in the Northeast

                               


                               

Bird #5: One kind of woodpecker

                               

Bird #6: Another kind of woodpecker

                               


                               

Bird #7: One more kind of woodpecker

                               


                               


                               

Bird #8: Yet another kind of woodpecker

                               

Bird #9: And now, the smallest woodpecker we get in the Northeast

                               

Bird #10: Not a sparrow, but easy to mistake for one

                               

Bird #11: One kind of sparrow

                               

Bird #12: Another kind of sparrow

                               

Bird #13: Another kind of sparrow

                               

Bird #14: One of my favorite sparrows

                               

Bird #15: A beautiful water bird

                               

Bird #16: An amazing hunter, first I’ve seen this year

                               

Bird #17: An adorable yardbird

                               

Bird #18: Okay, not a bird, but still cute

                               

Bird #19: A fun bird to watch hunt

                               

Bird #20: A common Northeast bird, in its nesting hole

                               

Bird #21: These are normally winter birds for us, but these two were exhibiting mating behavior this week

                               

Bird #22: These guys are fun to watch on the side of the road

                               

Bird #23: A common yard bird

                               

Bird #24: One of my favorite ducks

                               

Good GOD. This Governor…

Sometimes I’m just flabbergasted. Y’know, I’m not one of these folks who think that simply being a Republican is a sign of poor character. I know plenty of very decent people with beliefs I find abhorrent – they’re just misguided. You can tell through their words and deeds that there’s more to them then screwed-up perspectives or unfortunate Gramscian hegemony.

Which is why things like this just leave be babbling like an idiot. I just can’t believe it. I saw a roundabout reference in the comments in kestrel’s heartfelt post below. I got a bad feeling and went searching…

So anyway, I found this in the coverage:

“I want to respect their privacy, their wishes as to how to structure an opportunity for Vermonters to properly thank Capt. Phillips,” Douglas said Thursday at his weekly news conference in Montpelier. “But I also made it clear to them that there has to be some opportunity because so many people across this state are excited about having him as a fellow Vermonter. They’re so proud of what he accomplished and the example that he set.”

OMG! WTF? I just… what can you… I mean…. holy crap…

Is he just badly socialized? Is he really that self-centered? He “want(s) to respect their privacy” but only to the point that it doesn’t interfere with his own PR???? Vermonters of all people aren’t going to demand an opportunity for a photo-op public event if the family doesn’t want it. Who does he think he is to “make it clear” to this man and his family that they have to put on a publicity show whether they like it or not?

Just how – by any definition or understanding of the term – is that “respecting” this man and his family????

“Why Do You Kill?”: A former German Parliament Member Speaks on the Iraqi Resistance

Crossposted at Huffington Post.

Photobucket                       Photobucket

In one of his final interviews, former president George W. Bush told ABC News Martha Raddatz that the war in Iraq was justified because of al-Qaeda.  But Raddatz said that wasn’t “until the U.S. invaded.”  Then Bush responded with “So what?  The point is that al-Qaeda said they’re going to take a stand… we have denied al-Qaeda a safe haven because a young democracy is beginning to grow, which will be an important sign for people in the Middle East.”  

But how much of a presence does al-Qaeda really have?  Very small according to Jurgen Todenhofer, author of the new book, Why Do You Kill? The Untold Story of the Iraqi Resistance.  Todenhofer was a member of the German parliament for 18 years and spokesman for the Christian Democratic Union of Germany and the Christian Social Union of Bavaria political parties on development aid and arms control.  He has visited the Middle East several times over the last 50 years and has written two best sellers about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  

In his latest book, Todenhofer travels to Iraq as an unembedded journalist and gives an inside look at what is the Iraqi resistance.  His firsthand observations reveal the myths and realities behind the resistance fighters and the terrorists and Todenhofer tries to set the record straight by talking directly with those who fight the occupation.  

Todenhofer is currently on an American speaking tour and I caught up with him in Washington, DC where he was giving a talk.                  

Begin reading below the fold!

What are the major myths associated with the Iraqi resistance?

When you read about Iraq, 99% of the articles you read are written by embedded journalists.  If I went to Iraq as a professional journalist, I would also be embedded.  As a private man, I tried to show the other side.  We always see the side of how the Pentagon wants to show Iraq because they will never bring a journalist to Fallujah, Ramadi, Mosul, or other places the Pentagon doesn’t want to show.  You always see what the Pentagon shows you.  Which is OK.  I don’t criticized that.  This has always been the way reporters write about a war.  I try to show the other side.  

I went to Iraq a year and a half ago and met with the resistance.  They told me all they wanted because there were no machine guns, officers, or U.S. soldiers around.  I think it’s important to listen to the other side. When I was there, I felt ashamed.  I had the impression that because we don’t see the other side, we don’t know enough about the misery of the Iraqi people.  We have no idea what the resistance is.  It’s difficult to give a figure because nobody knows for sure how many they are.  I would compare the Iraqi resistance with that of the French resistance during the German occupation.  It’s composed of everyone: bakers, students, teachers, workers, farmers, etc.

Many ordinary people suffered under the Iraqi occupation.  People told me their mother was shot because she asked the U.S. soldiers who searched the house, not to break the furniture.  Another story was a boy who lost two of his brothers. His name is Zaid.  He is a 22-year old student who likes America, admires America, and doesn’t want to participate [in the resistance.]  Then in summer of 2006, his brother Haroun was killed by a U.S. sniper.  Then in winter 2007, their house in Ramadi is bombed.  When it was bombed, the family ran went to a relative’s house.  When they arrived, they realized they forgot something.  His youngest, Karim, says “I’ll do it.”  After that, he’s shot by American forces.  Zaid wants to save Karim, but everyone is preventing him since there’s shooting in the streets.  The whole family is forced to see the Karin die.  That night, he decides to fight.  Fighting for Zaid is to attack tanks, Humvees, and not civilians.  That’s the difference between the resistance and al-Qaeda.

How big of a presence does al-Qaeda have in Iraq?

The importance of al-Qaeda is marginal, but the Pentagon says all the attacks are because of al-Qaeda. I’ve had several discussions with resistance leaders and one could say there are 100,000 resistance fighters and 1,000 to 2,000 al-Qaeda right now.  Now with the recent attacks in Mosul, there’s a big chance the Pentagon will say al-Qaeda is responsible because they need to justify their war.  I try to tell the story about Zaid, his family, and all the other Iraqis.  I don’t say I’m the only one who knows the truth, but I know how it feels on the Iraqi side to be occupied by a western country.

Another difference is that many people within al-Qaeda are not part of the real al-Qaeda. The real al-Qaeda are is a very small group. The ones who conducted the brutal and unacceptable attacks on September 11, are the real al-Qaeda. Afghans and Pakistanis know they’ve lost all their capabilities. One part of it is killed, one part of it is captured, and the other part is hiding and trying not to be discovered. They’d be crazy to stay in touch with the young terrorists in the U.S., Europe or elsewhere.  The al Qaeda in Iraq are copy cats. They call themselves al-Qaeda because it’s the most famous terror brand name.  Unfortunately and the western countries call them al-Qaeda to justify their war.

Months ago I was in Afghanistan.  I met with Hamid Karzai, Afghani foreign minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta, and ex-Taliban leaders.  They all told me there’s up to 200 al-Qaeda and 30,000 Taliban in their country and they have no contact with Osama bin Laden.  Otherwise it would be very easy to catch bin Laden, if they had contact with him.

Terrorism and al-Qaeda are ideologies. Ideologies can’t be shot down.  Now that bin Laden and al-Qaeda lost their operational capabilities, they can still give hate speeches on Al Jazeera and such, but they have reached their goal because their ideology is now globalized and decentralized.  These new terrorists communicate via Internet.  They train by the Internet.  They can make suicide bombs and all kinds of things.  We have to learn to fight against an ideology.   How do you do that?   You can’t shoot it down.  With our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, we’ve strengthen their global terrorism.  The only reason to defeat global terrorism is peace.  A just and fair peace in Iraq, Afghanistan, the most difficult one, a fair and just peace in Palestine.

What can the media do to improve coverage on the occupation?

I think almost all the journalists are doing a great job. because they have to write articles every week. The only chance they have to survive and write articles every week is to be embedded with the U.S. military.  You have that problem in all wars.  You only get to see it from one side. Therefore, I can’t give any suggestions.  I went to Iraq three times as an unembedded journalist and I always felt I was in danger and those who were with me. If you a real journalist or editor, you cannot allow your people to risk their lives like that.

Where would journalists need to go in terms of reporting accurately of what’s going on in Iraq?

There are two things I believe.  Western journalists should talk with the resistance. It’s not difficult to know where they are.  I spoke with the leader of the resistance and it’s possible for other journalists to do so.  They also have to go to the neighboring countries where they can meet many of these people.  I think that’s an obligation.  You will never meet al-Qaeda, but it’s probably more likely to talk with the Iraqi resistance.  You’ll get incredible stories from these people because they know what’s going on in Iraq.

The second thing I’d suggest is American politicians need to talk with the resistance, not just Nouri al-Maliki.  When the Americans left Vietnam, they spoke to the Viet Cong resistance.  When the French left Algeria, they spoke to the National Liberation Front.  The Americans have to speak with the Iraqi resistance for many reasons.  al-Maliki is part of a collaboration government and all collaboration governments are kicked out once the occupation troops are gone.  It was the case in France, Vietnam, and Algeria.  This government wants at least 50,000 troops. Americans should speak with (and for) the resistance.   It’s in their hands and they are ready to make open a new chapter without hate.

Douglas and the tub

( – promoted by odum)

Sorry for this overworked quote but here it fits.“My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.” (Grover Norquist).

Governor Jim Douglas has now targeted positions for elimination which cost the state no money. Its part of a “merger and consolidation” plan of some kind.The Public Safety Commissioner claims the latest elimination of nuclear safety personnel will not harm public safety but provides no prove other than his assurance of  trust me. With Entergy’s aging Vermont Yankee plant sitting in the Southern part of state leaking and rusting this seems the height of foolishness.

No explanation is offered about how a no-cost-to-the-state job’s elimination will save the state money. The positions are funded by the owners of Vermont Yankee. Once again a zig, a zag, an artful smoke and mirrors flourish followed by the elimination of some state jobs and a favor to Entergy in the mix. Douglas is in the tub.

Gov. James Douglas says the layoffs are needed to save $17 million in General Fund expenses. However, the radiological-preparedness position held by Jaclyn Harman – one of two state workers identified for potential elimination at the Department of Public Safety’s 21-person Vermont Emergency Management division – is paid for entirely from a special reserve funded by the owners of the nuclear plant.

Public Safety Commissioner Thomas Tremblay confirmed that no General Fund dollars are used for Harman’s job. However, he said the elimination of Harman’s position would be part of a larger “merger and consolidation” plan that might save General Fund money

http://www.timesargus.com/arti…

Mental Health Advocates to State Legislature: We Need a New Look at the “Futures Project”!

(cross-posted from Beyond VSH blog, here)

Jointly Signed Letter from Members of Vermont Mental Health Advocacy Community to Legislators re: Relooking at Mental Health ‘Futures’ Project:

Vermont Protection & Advocacy, Inc.

141 Main Street, Suite 7

Montpelier, VT  05602

VP&A is the Protection & Advocacy System for Vermont

(800) 834-7890 (Toll-Free)

(802) 229-1355 (Voice)

(802) 229-2603 (TTY)

(802) 229-1359 (Fax)

[… (e-mail address omitted)]

Date:  April 15, 2009

To:   Members of the Vermont General Assembly

From:   Vermonters concerned with mental health services.

Regarding:  We need a new look at the “Futures Project”!

A number of advocates for mental health issues have expressed very serious reservations about certain parts of the “Futures” project proposal to replace the various services that are currently delivered at the Vermont State Hospital, with the ultimate goal of closing the facility.

Doubts have been expressed about the expense involved in the proposal to build a new facility as part of Rutland Regional Medical Center because of its complex financing scheme that replaces capacity for VSH and replaces their current unit for RRMC. There is also concern that making it, in effect, the initial ‘triage’ point of the system is not consistent with progress towards a community-based system and will also discourage deeper participation by other community hospitals, making the closure of VSH a more distant possibility. This is especially true since the other local hospitals will still need to serve patients NOT served at Rutland when the beds there are filled – and they need to be filled to make the financing package viable. We will be left needing VSH for the foreseeable future!

There has been considerable support for the development of community residential recovery resources and peer-run alternatives as well as support for the development of secure residential capacity, though without consensus on location and the final form a facility might take. There is also considerable concern that current planning has not accounted for such factors as the stress that the community mental health system is under and the particular need for housing options for people with mental health issues.

Yet most would agree that the state hospital should close sooner rather than later and ask what is the answer or answers to the replacement of its functions! Here are some thoughts that may be of some use.

The Futures project started with a large number of interested individuals with a broad range of interests and experience being brought together to devise a solution. Five years later VSH is still operating with a 54 bed capacity.

With all that has happened since the process began it seems clear that if we are to close the facility several things need to occur:

  • Whatever plan is adopted needs to have the clear goal of closing VSH, with a target date!
  • There needs to be leadership that is willing to put together a plan based on the values expressed in the early “Futures” legislation that include being community based, Recovery oriented, and trauma informed,
  • That plan should be presented to and discussed with a broad range of “interests” and leadership should be willing to work WITH the community to refine and modify when appropriate,
  • Under-served areas and a reasonable geographic distribution of services should be considered,
  • The mental health needs of inmates who currently lack meaningful access to inpatient services require greater consideration,
  • The plan should not hinge on diminishing civil rights or due process for people facing involuntary treatment.

Is such a course of action possible? We believe it is if there is an understanding of the goals and if it is clear that solutions rely on the broad community and not just the willingness of one particular player to participate. All of the designated hospitals, and in all likelihood some other community hospitals, need to be involved in meeting the needs of their local areas. We need to rethink the idea of responsibility at the local level. This means that some new version of a “no-reject” policy needs to be worked out so that evaluation and clinically appropriate services can be delivered without the VSH as a “safety-valve”. And solutions need to be developed for individuals with long term needs.

There are a number of possibilities for partnerships that ought to be considered, that could lead to closing VSH and that may, together, create a more promising system in Vermont. Some of these have been discussed and cursorily rejected; some of them have not received serious consideration. All of them present challenges, but none should be rejected without further consideration with a problem-solving orientation:

  • St. Johnsbury – in an area of the state underserved in psychiatric inpatient services a unit could be developed either by the hospital or the state that could serve up to 16 patients,
  • St. Albans – the Northwest Medical Center has potential for developing 3-4 beds within their facility, if they could do so with support of the state,
  • Bennington – the Southwest Medical Center used to have a facility that could serve 12, perhaps that could be redeveloped without great capital expense,
  • Springfield – the beds closed at the Windham Center could be re-opened adding 6-10 new beds, again without capital expense,
  • Burlington – could FAHC develop a small, specialized unit within its current footprint to serve medically complex patients, adding 6-12 beds of capacity to the system?
  • Rutland – could the Medical Center utilize some of their current licensed capacity or develop a unit less reliant on the state than the current plan and serve 6-12 new patients?
  • Berlin – locating a state facility near the Central Vermont Medical Center has been proposed. This could be a potentially better choice than the VSH “campus” for a secure residential facility serving 15 clients,
  • Brattleboro – The Retreat is likely a willing partner with the state and could possibly increase capacity by 6 beds without great capital expense.

This list has the potential for 70 or 80 beds to assist in the closure of the 54 bed VSH and, in the case of units that may be developed by the state, meet the needs of people with serious mental illness who are currently spending shameful amounts of time in segregation in our correctional institutions.

No one of these possibilities is the be all and end all solution.

No one of these could happen without a real consideration of obstacles like corporate structures, IMD rules, staffing challenges, and re-imbursement hurdles.

None of these suggestions will occur without active engagement with community players, respecting their financial challenges and their view of the local community’s needs.

No one community should provide such a significant part of the solution that the state concentrates so much of its resources that other parts of the plan becomes impractical.

What is “the community” and who needs to be part of the solution?

  • Individuals who have lived with mental health issues,
  • their families,
  • local hospital leaders,
  • designated mental health agencies,
  • advocates,
  • the state administration,
  • experts in Medicaid and Medicare,
  • the medical profession, and
  • the public at large!

Vermont is capable of developing services that respond to our citizens’ needs. We would never have closed Brandon without the imagination to build a community based system different from what went before.

We have developed Second Spring and are in the process of developing Meadowview in Brattleboro, as well as a peer run respite center. We now need to look at our larger institutional partners, the community hospitals, across the whole of the state, as part of a coherent delivery system. Our system for physical health has evolved in that way and we should consider no less for individuals with mental health issues.

Respectfully Yours,

Laura Ziegler, Plainfield

Morgan W. Brown, Montpelier

David Fassler, M.D., Charlotte

Michael Sabourin, Marshfield

Ed Paquin, Executive Director,

Vermont Protection & Advocacy, Inc.

Sally Parrish, South Burlington

Bethany G. Knight, Northern Knights Consulting, Glover

Xenia Williams, Barre Town

Marty Roberts, Montpelier, Vermont Psychiatric Survivors,

Adult State Mental Health Standing Committee

Larry Lewack, Executive Director,

National Alliance on Mental Illness of Vermont

Gwen Budd, Montpelier

Jack McCullough, Project Director,

Mental Health Law Project, Vermont Legal Aid

fyi: Vermont Protection and Advocacy, Inc.