YEAR-END SPECIAL — The ‘Skeeter Bites Awards for the Worst People of 2009

In the Tradition of the Razzie Awards for the Worst Films of the Year, The ‘Skeeter Bites Report Presents its Third Annual ‘Dishonors’ for the People Who Have Had the Worst Impact on Politics, Society and Culture in America — and the World — in 2009

mosquitos.jpg

To say that 2009 was a year of transition would be an understatement, with a new president in the White House and an opposition more fierce than ever before. But who would have thought there the year would see a number of characters who would resort to blatant appeals to racist and religious hatreds? Some of this year’s ‘Skeeter Bites Award winners for inflicting the worst damage on humanity are such no-brainers that it’s difficult to classify who’s the worst among them. But here goes . . . (Image courtesy Google Images)

(Posted 5:00 a.m EST Monday, December 28, 2009)

HOLIDAY PUBLISHING SCHEDULE: This is the final ‘Skeeter Bites Report article for 2009 — appropriately enough, our year-end “dishonors” for the worst people who have had the most negative impact on society in the past 12 months.  The Thursday edition of The ‘Skeeter Bites Report will resume on January 7. Happy New Year!

By SKEETER SANDERS

As the first decade of the 21st century draws to a close — wow, has it really been  ten years since we all rang in the new millennium? — it’s that time again to take a look back at some of what’s transpired over the past 12 months, make resolutions for 2010 — geez, we finally get to say “twenty-something” instead of “two-thousand-something” when referring to the year — and, of course, cast an eye on the crystal ball and predict who’ll win what in the upcoming awards season.

From time immemorial, it seems, we mark the early months of each new year by bestowing awards to honor the best among us, such as the Golden Globes, the Grammys, the Oscars, the Tonys and the Emmys — and to dishonor the worst among us as well, such as Mr. Blackwell’s annual “Worst-Dressed Women” list and the Razzie Awards for the worst movies of the year.

(Richard Blackwell, the former fashion designer who became Hollywood’s most famous fashion critic, died in October 2008 at the age of 86. More than 14 months later,  It’s still not known who, if anyone, will continue his annual list of the “Ten Worst-Dressed Women” in Hollywood.)

In 2007, this writer chose to join in the awards-giving parade, but unlike the “Big Five” best-of entertainment awards and more in the tradition of Mr. Blackwell and the Razzies, I chose to join in the bestowment of “dishonors” to the most richly deserving crooks, liars, power-mad despots and just plain weirdos who’ve made life a lot more complicated for Americans and the world at large in the previous 12 months.

It seems that choosing the “winners” for the ‘Skeeter Bites Awards is getting more and more difficult, even though this is only the third year of the SBAs’ existence.  Almost like the Energizer bunny, the list of nominees richly deserving these dishonors just keeps growing and growing and growing.

But, here goes . . .

THE MACHIAVELLI ‘ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS’ AWARD: ORLY TAITZ

This year’s winner of the Machivelli Award is also the first multiple-category nominee in the ‘Skeeter Bites Awards’ brief history. Orly Taitz, the undisputed queen of the “Birther Movement” that still doggedly seeks to remove President Obama from office with trumped-up — and, I dare say, racially-motivated — charges that the president is not a native-born U.S. citizen, could just as easily also have won the David Duke Bigot of the Year Award or the Hunter S. Thompson Fear-and-Loathing Award.

But under the rules of the SBAs, you can only win one award per year — and in Taitz’s case, the Machivelli Award is most appropriate for her, for Taitz has proven beyond doubt that she is absolutely determined and will do just about anything to get Obama tossed out of office — no matter how many times her lawsuits get thrown out of court or she gets slapped with warnings and fines from judges against her repeated filings of frivolous suits.

But then again, what else can you expect from a person who’s a virulently Islamophobic bigot tied to a group of radical Jewish extremists who insist that Obama is a Muslim and a “danger to Israel,” despite all evidence to the contrary that the president is a Christian — as The ‘Skeeter Bites Report revealed in a September 7 expose?

And the fact that Taitz and other “birthers” of her ilk continue to present trumped-up, immediately-exposed-as-fraudulent “evidence” that Obama was born in Kenya shows just how racially bigoted against the nation’s first black president they really are.

More on this year’s David Duke Bigot of the Year Award winner later.

THE PINK FLOYD ‘BRICK WALL’ AWARD: MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD

That the hard-line president of Iran wins this year’s Brick Wall Award for the world’s most obstinate head of state is a no-brainer — Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has proven to be even more stubborn and bullheaded than either George W. Bush or the late Saddam Hussein.

His re-election to a second term as Iran’s president last June remains controversial, but his regime’s brutal repression of its critics in Tehran puts Iran right up there with China’s even more cold-blooded mass murder of pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing’s Tienanmen Square almost exactly 20 years earlier.

The only difference between Beijing and Tehran is that the reins of power in China have passed on to a new generation of Communist Party leaders in the two decades since Tienanmen and the leaders directly responsible for the massacre are no longer in charge (Although Beijing’s current leadership remains steadfast in not tolerating political dissent and refuses to re-examine the Tienanmen crackdown).

But nowhere has Ahmadinejad proven to be more stubborn and bullheaded than over Iran’s nuclear development program, one that the United States, the European Union, Israel and — increasingly — Arab countries believe is aimed at building a stockpile of nuclear weapons.

The Islamic Republic adamantly insists that its nuclear program is strictly for peaceful purposes — but has refused to furnish any evidence to back up its claims. Iran is under three sets of United Nations sanctions for refusing to suspend enrichment and risks a further round after rejecting a UN-brokered deal to send its low-enriched uranium abroad to be further refined into fuel for the reactor.

Although Tehran allowed inspectors from the UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access in October to a second, previously top-secret uranium enrichment facility near the Shiite holy city of Qom, the agency’s newly-retired director-general, Mohamed Elbaradei, declared in late November that the IAEA’s cooperation with Tehran had reached a “dead end.”

Ahmadinejad’s words and actions have done little to bolster his country’s credibility on the nuclear issue. Only last week, in an interview with new “ABC World News” anchor Diane Sawyer, the Iranian president stunned the world when he steadfastly refused to state flatly that his country would never develop nuclear weapons.

When pressed point-blank by Sawyer for a yes-or-no answer to whether Iran would weaponize its nuclear material and turn it into a bomb, Ahmadinejad refused to answer the question directly. Instead, he shook his head and said, “We have got a saying in Iran which says, ‘How many times shall I repeat the same thing?’ You should say something only once. We have said once that we don’t want nuclear bomb. We don’t accept it.”

But it’s clear that the U.S. and much of the world doesn’t believe him — nor should they.

THE DARTH VADER ‘DARK SIDE’ AWARD: RUSH LIMBAUGH

Former Vice President Dick Cheney had won this prize two years in a row for having been the chief enforcer of former President George W. Bush’s policies — much as Luke Skywalker’s father was brutal enforcer of the Galactic Empire’s rule across the galaxy — the right-hand man of the evil Emperor Palpatine.

Emperor Dubyah and his regime are no longer in power, but one of its staunchest allies is still the undisputed “boss of bosses” when it comes to keeping the former emperor’s party in line.

Of course, I’m referring to right-wing radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh.

Much like the fictional New Jersey crime-family boss Tony Soprano, Limbaugh and his “Dittohead Mafia” of angry, mostly white-male listeners have “whacked,” at least rhetorically, one Republican after another — from party chairman Michael Steele on down — for daring to publicly “cross the boss.” Each and every one of them ended up apologetically bowing down to Boss Limbaugh within 24 hours after they got “whacked” on his show.

It should be noted that Limbaugh was the first runner-up for the David Duke Bigot of the Year Award for his deliberate and repeated race-baiting on the air (I’ll tell who the winner of that award is later on).

His disgusting remark in September that school buses should be segregated in the wake of a violent incident aboard a school bus in Illinois went too far — it was an open call to deliberately violate more than a half-century of federal and state laws outlawing segregation and discrimination by race.

Then there is Limbaugh’s questioning of Obama’s ethnicity — going so far as to claim that the nation’s foirst black president isn’t an African-American at all, but a foreign-born Arab.

This prompted The ‘Skeeter Bites Report to editorially call for an advertiser boycott of Limbaugh’s show — just as there is one of the Fox News TV show of our next award winner.

THE HUNTER S. THOMPSON MEMORIAL ‘FEAR AND LOATHING’ AWARD: GLENN BECK

This award is also a no-brainer. Who’s more deserving of it this year than Fox News talk-show host Glenn Beck, named by the liberal media watchdog organization Media Matters as its 2009 “Misinformer of the Year.”

Beck is the real-life version of Howard Beale — the “mad prophet of the airwaves” played by the late Oscar-winning actor Peter Finch in “Network,” Paddy Cheyefsky’s uncannily prophetic 1976 commentary on the state of American television in general and television news in particular.

The “mad prophet” image fits Beck to a T. As Media Matters points out, “Beck’s well of ridiculous was deep and poisonous before he launched his Fox News show, but the inauguration of the 44th president of the United States — and the permissive cheerleading of his Fox News honchos — uncorked the former “Morning Zoo” shock jock’s unique brand of vitriol, stage theatrics, and hyperbolic fright.”

Who else but Beck would dare call the nation’s first black president — who carefully avoided racial issues as much as he could during his successful campaign for the White House and in the year since he took office — a “racist” with “a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture” on national television — without a shred of evidence to back him up?

Who else but Beck would call Obama’s proposal to expand the foreign service, AmeriCorps, and the Peace Corps “what Hitler did with the SS?”

Who else but Beck would claim that the 2008 election was a coup d’etat conducted “through the guise of an election” and allow a guest on his show to boldly state that the “only chance we have as a country right now is” for Osama bin Laden to “detonate a major weapon” on American soil?

There are a lot more “Beckisms” — far too many to retell here. Suffice it to say that there is no one who is more deserving of the Hunter S. Thompson Memorial Fear and Loathing Award this year than Glenn Beck.

THE DAVID DUKE ‘BIGOT OF THE YEAR’ AWARD: KEITH BARDWELL

This year’s David Duke Bigot of the Year Award could have been won by Orly Taitz for her relentless, Islamophobic drive to kick President Obama out of office. It could have been won by Glenn Beck, for having the gall to call the president a “racist” on national television without producing a single scrap of evidence to back him up. It could even have been won by Rush Limbaugh, for his repeated race-baiting on his daily radio show.

But nope. The three of them were outdone by a Louisiana man who until two months ago had been totally obscure — Keith Bardwell.

Keith Who?

The aforementioned Bardwell wins the David Duke Bigot of the Year Award hands down for doing something that has been illegal under federal law for more than 40 years. Bardwell, a justice of the peace in Louisiana’s Tangipahoa Parish, refused to issue a marriage license to Beth Humphrey, 30, and her fiance, Terence McKay, 32.

Humphrey is white. McKay is black.

Why did Bardwell refuse to issue a marriage license to this interracial couple more than four decades after the U.S. Supreme Court declared unanimously that such refusal violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution?

Bardwell says he couldn’t personally endorse the marriage out of concern for any children that would result from it. In an interview with CBS News, Bardwell says that he had seen “countless” interracial couples where the children were rejected by family members, and he didn’t want to see that happen again.

Oh, really? Isn’t that one of the reasons the Ku Klux Klan was founded — to prevent interracial unions, particularly between black men and white women?

And yet this man denies that he’s a racist. “I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house,” he told Baton Rouge television station WAFB-TV. “My main concern is for the children [of interracial unions].”

Ironically, McKay is himself the son of black-white interracial parents. He and Humphrey were eventually married by another justice of the peace. Bardwell said he does not believe that interracial marriages last and it is not his place to perform them. “I stand by my decision and it is my right not to marry an interracial couple,” he said.

Bardwell’s decision sparked nationwide outrage. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal declared flatly that Bardwell’s refusal to issue the license “is a clear violation of constitutional rights and of federal and state law.” The governor called for disciplinary action to be taken against Bardwell, “including the revoking of his license.”

As it turned out, however, the heat got to be too much for Bardwell. He resigned on November 4 after McKay and Humphrey filed a federal discrimination lawsuit against him on October 20. Bardwell said he tendered his resignation to the Louisiana Secretary of State’s office after being advised “that I needed to step down because they was going to take me to court, and I was going to lose.”

Indeed, Bardwell didn’t stand a chance of winning in court. But he has won the 2009 David Duke Bigot of the Year Award — named for fellow Louisiana resident and former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, now a Louisiana state representative.

You’ll recall that Duke embarrassed the national Republican Party leadership in 1991 when he unsuccessfully ran for the GOP presidential nomination. Duke remains a self-proclaimed “white nationalist.”

THE JERRY SPRINGER ‘NAUGHTY-NAUGHTY’ AWARD: (TIE) — MARK SANFORD AND TIGER WOODS

For the first time in the history of the ‘Skeeter Bites Awards, there is not one, but two winners of this year’s Jerry Springer Naughty-Naughty Award for bad personal behavior.

Named in honor of the ringmaster of the daily circus in which guests bare all their dirtiest personal laundry before a national TV audience, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford had for months been a shoo-in to win it by himself. But then on the day after Thanksgiving, Tiger Woods crashed his SUV into a tree near his Florida mansion. The billionaire golfer’s life would never be the same after that.

More on Woods later.

Sanford was a rising Republican star — especially after his highly publicized opposition to President Obama’s economic stimulus package. For months, Sanford refused to accept some $700 million in federal stimulus money for his state. Supporters of the stimulus package sued and the South Carolina Supreme Court in June ordered the governor to accept the funds.

But things started to unravel later that summer. Sanford mysteriously dropped out of public view, his whereabouts unknown. It later turned out that the state’s first lady, Jenny Sanford, found a love letter the governor wrote to his mistress and demanded the relationship end. But Sanford fled the state — to Argentina, to be precise — leading his staff to believe he had gone on a hike along the Appalachian Trail.

After a growing furor over his whereabouts, Sanford returned to South Carolina and held an emotional news conference in which he acknowledged that he had carried on an affair with an Argentine woman in Buenos Aires. In subsequent interviews with the Associated Press, Sanford identified his mistress as Maria Belen Chapur, whom the governor said was his his “soul mate.”

Sanford survived an attempt by his fellow Republicans to impeach him, but his marriage will not survive; two weeks ago, Jenny Sanford filed for divorce. The governor still faces a formal rebuke from the South Carolina legislature and possible fines resulting from a state ethics investigation into his travel and campaign finances.

Tiger Woods, on the other hand, is the last person one would expect to become embroiled in an infidelity scandal. The world’s number-one professional golfer had spent years cultivating an image as a stand-up guy and as an inspiration for millions of young people.

So when the news broke on the day after Thanksgiving that Woods had crashed his SUV less than a mile from his Florida mansion, this writer immediately thought, “Oh, no! I hope it’s not a DWI!”

But as the days and weeks passed, with Woods refusing to talk to the media, all hell broke loose, with the tabloids printing lurid stories about Woods having affairs with several women. Woods, who married Elin Nordegren, a Swedish former model, in 2007, was ultimately linked to as many as 40 women — one of whom, New York club hostess Rachel Uchitel, is reportedly pregnant by him.

That was shocking enough. Now there are reports that Woods may soon find himself embroiled in an even worse scandal: alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported Sunday that Keith Kleven, Woods’ longtime trainer, has come under scrutiny in the wake of a joint U.S.-Canadian investigation of a Canadian doctor who treated the world’s top golfer.

The FBI was called in after Dr. Anthony Galea was arrested October 15 in Toronto. Galea had earlier been stopped at the U.S.-Canada border, where U.S. Customs agents found human growth hormone and Actovegin, a drug extracted from calf’s blood, in his car.

Meanwhile, the New York Daily News reported Saturday that Kleven’s silence “has done little to stop the speculation about the dramatic changes in Woods’ body beginning around 2004, the same year other Kleven clients began noticing Woods’ regular appearances in the Kleven Institute and peaking around 2006 or 2007.”

Say it ain’t so, Tiger.

AND FOR 2010 . . . WHO KNOWS?

Of course, there a lot of other notorious names that I left out, particularly Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke — named Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” for 2009. On the one hand, he paid far closer attention to Wall Street than he did to Main Street, but on the other hand, he did take measures that, by all accounts, prevented the severe recession — the worst in 30 years —  from plunging headlong into the Second Great Depression. The jury is still out on Bernanke.

Of course, if I included everyone deserving of this year’s awards, this article would run far too long for anyone to read. Suffice it to say that 2009 was a strange year. One can only hope that 2010 will finally see the light at the end of the tunnel.

Happy New Year!

# # #

Copyright 2009, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.

Ribbon cutting gone terribly wrong-

-or honest symbolism for Douglas’ tenure?  

Gov.Jim Douglas will have the “honor”of pushing the button that will blow up a wonderful landmark bridge. The bridge has fallen into disrepair as a result of government policies of poor planning and deferred maintenance. See the Richmond St. Bridge here in Vermont or check out Vermont State (pdf) bridge condition list.

— Gov. Jim Douglas will push the detonator buttons at 10 a.m. Monday that will bring down the Lake Champlain Bridge in two, closely timed explosions. The Governor's Office announced the ceremonial detonation Saturday in a news release.

The Crown Point Bridge, a structure that was inspected “rigorously” but these inspections failed to notice that concrete footings had deteriorated rapidly enough for an emergency closing.  

No doubt Douglas will talk about moving forward and new beginnings  rather than note that this bridge demolition is a symbol of  the pattern of neglected maintenance of our highways and bridges. Hundreds of people and businesses are burdened by the policies that lead to this closing. It’s a symbol of decline and failure, treating the bridge demolition as species of ribbon cutting is tone deaf.

Lowe’s a No-go in St. Albans

Christmas Eve brought good news to many concerned Franklin County residents, when it was announced in the St. Albans Messenger that Lowe’s will not, after all, be seeking a permit to build in St. Albans.  Being a member of the Northwest Citizens for Responsible Growth, I can’t help celebrating this as a victory for advocates of smart growth practices.

The merchandising  giant had been seeking a preliminary decision from the St. Albans Town Development Review Board for a 122,000-sq. ft. retail facility to be located on open land behind the Price Chopper on Route 7 in St. Albans.  The location of the project would have impacted both wetlands and prime agricultural soils.  There were many reasons to challenge the project, including environmental and traffic issues, and the significant impact the store could reasonably be expected to have on the local economy where this retail sector’s customers already had many local businesses supplying their needs.

Even though the project had already secured a stormwater permit from the Agency of Natural Resources, an  earlier permit application had been withdrawn in 2004 because of a  moratorium established by the Town, temporarily limiting new store construction to 50,000-sq. ft. per project.  After that moratorium was ultimately lifted, Lowe’s returned to the permit process, presenting economic arguments at a DRB hearing in September 2009.   A second hearing to address traffic concerns was postponed several times before Thursday’s announcement that the project had been cancelled entirely.

According to the Messenger,

The company sent a one sentence letter to the town requesting withdrawal of its application to build…signed by Rob Jess, who declined comment, referring questions to the company’s public relations department, none of whom were available.

In the absence of an explanation, I can only speculate on the reason for this abrupt cancellation.  At the September hearing, the Northwest Citizens for Responsible Growth had submitted a petition for interested party status that was immediately denied by the St. Albans Town DRB; however, an unrelated group of local opponents was rumored to have submitted a second petition for status that may have been under consideration by the DRB.

The project was to have been located in one of two areas designated by the Town Planning Commission and endorsed by the Northwest Regional Planning Commission as “growth centers”  but never submitted to the State for formal approval.  The two “designated growth centers” are located in largely undeveloped areas at Exit 19 and Exit 20 of I-89, but the traditional center of the Town is at St. Albans Bay.  The first big box store to announce its intention to locate in the Exit 20 “growth center’ was the long contested JL Davis Walmart project.  That project received Act 250 approval some time ago, but appeals of that permit by several entities, including the NWCRG, are still under consideration by the Environmental Court.

Whatever the reason for the Lowe’s cancellation, we can only hope that the Town will take this opportunity to step back long enough to consider whether transformation of farmland near exit 19 to big box retail is really the best use of the area’s resources.

Christmas Day Open Thread

Star tunnel.

We’ve had some fairly major arguments here lately and find ourselves collectively on multiple sides of a complex issue that many of us take personally.  

So I just want to be clear about something: I really do love this blog and I love that we can take such strong positions in opposition to one another without forgetting that we have a lot of common causes and, in many cases, common respect.

So this is a Christmas day, not at all about politics, but about whatever is going on in our lives.  After the fold, a little fun stuff.

Light drawing: tunnel effect using color-changing Christmas tree star.

Cenk Uygur frames the progressive dynamic – including Obama, Dean, Sanders – perfectly

Cenk Uygur has written what may be the most important piece currently out there on the interwebs for progressives to read. It ends up optimistic, although considering the article’s almost behavioralist slant, its hard to get very excited.

On Obama:

I’m sure Obama is a progressive that would help the average American if he thought he could. But apparently he thinks he can’t. He can only bring them a small amount of change because of what he thinks the system will allow.

You can criticize him for lack of imagination, duplicity during the campaign, lack of spine and political miscalculation. And you might be right about some or all of that, but all of those aren’t the essence of Obama. The core of Obama is a man who is a cautious politician. That is what he is at his center. He can’t help himself.

[…] so why did Obama drop the progressive reformer angle and go toward the right and corporate America? Because his field changed. He went from campaigning all across the country to being in the middle of Washington, DC. The center of Washington is very different than the center of the country.

[…] Right now, Obama perceives the center of the country to be somewhere between Dick Cheney and Harry Reid. Do you know where that leaves him? Joe Lieberman. That’s why we’re in the sorry shape we’re in now.

On Dean:

The reality is that Howard Dean is a moderate. Progressives in Vermont were upset with him when he was governor because they thought he was too far right. I just heard from someone who was on a cruise that The Nation organized and that Howard Dean spoke at. The crowd on the cruise nearly booed him when he spoke because they thought he was far too moderate.

If you look at Dean’s policies, they are right down the middle of the country. That’s part of the reason his 50 state strategy worked so well. But the establishment media hate him. Why? Because he points out when they’re doing something wrong – and he winds up being proven right in the end. There’s nothing that irritates the establishment more than that.

On Bernie:

As things stand, Howard Dean is perceived to be to the left of all of the Democratic senators in Washington (not because he’s more liberal than Bernie Sanders or Harry Reid; it’s because unlike them, he’s willing to fight for his positions (sorry Bernie, at this point, it’s true)). That’s unconscionable. Washington has shifted so far right that Dean is considered some sort of wild-eyed liberal. We have to move it back if we are to have any hope that Obama will move further left (and much closer to the true center of the country).

On what’s next:

It’s not pretty, but it’s necessary. We have to attack Obama relentlessly from the left. Right now he is a giant that is unmoved by anything in his left flank, he keeps looking to his right and ducking and worrying and moving to accommodate them. They are so loud and so visible. It’s hard to miss them. We have to make him look left. We have to shake him off his foundation.

Rahm Emanuel gave a wonderfully condescending interview to the Wall Street Journal where he explained that the White House has nothing to worry about from the left. That’s exactly what we have to change. Unfortunately, the only way to capture their attention and make them accommodate us rather than Fox News Channel is to hurt them. When we can put on the same kind of pain and pressure on the Obama White House as Fox does, that’s when they’ll have to move, at least to get out of the way.

You inflict political pain by voting things down. So far progressives have been completely unwilling to do this. They got rolled on healthcare because they had no intention of putting their foot down – and everyone knew it.

For my part, I’ll be honest. It’s been a while since I felt this beat up, exhausted, and discouraged. Even cynicism takes a certain amount of energy, and I’m out.

But I suppose tomorrow is another day. Heck, its Christmas. Happy (?) Holidays.

Senate health bill passes with 60 votes

We could be in for a rough few years, both electorally and in terms of the costs of health care, unless the House can stand up to the Senate bullies and change it…

And its come clear that Rahm Emanuel had every reason to blow off the left. Smart man.

The Washington Post: “Death Panel” only a controversy

The Washington Post and zombie Death Panel lies.The newspaper offers a stark reminder of the media landscape and political atmosphere that this crummy health care bill was born into. This highlights the problems for implementation and promised future upgrades to the legislation, should they actually ever be attempted.

The Death Panels were and are simply lies and the Washington Post article fails to mention that fact, instead referring to them only as controversial. The Pulitzer Prize winning non-partisan Politifact.com Truth-O-Meter run by the St. Petersburg Times awarded Sarah Plain’s death panel assertion its online biggest political lie of the year. Of all the falsehoods and distortions in the political discourse this year, one stood out from the rest: Sarah Palin’s Death Panel lie.  But  some prominent Republicans (including Vermont Gov. Douglas) didn’t clearly reject the death panel claim.

The Post’s Shailagh Murray reported on the Senate passage of the Health care bill which passed 60-39, not one Republican voted in favor.In her summary of why no Republican supported the bill:

Murray says One of the toughest critics, as the debate drew to a close, was Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who last summer had spent months trying to craft a bipartisan reform package with Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (Mont.).  Grassley abandoned the quest after the "death panel" controversy erupted in August and the debate took a sharply ideological turn. The Iowa Republican said Wednesday that he concluded that Democrats were ceding too much authority over health care to the federal government, while failing to aggressively contain costs.

 

This August, the Washington Post’s own editorial page lambasted the Republicans’ Death Panel foolishness, not as a controversy to be debated but as the distorted interpretation it is. 'Death Panel' Sideshow Demagoguery obscures the value of end-of-life planning.

THE debate over health reform has veered into a peripheral and misleading discussion of whether it includes a scheme to pressure senior citizens into pulling the plug. The most extreme misrepresentation has "death panels," as former Alaska governor Sarah Palin colorfully put it, deciding who is too old or too disabled to merit treatment. This is a distorted interpretation, to say the least. The debate threatens sensible policy on end-of-life discussions and in the separate realm of reforming the health-care system.

 A recent GMD diary made note of VPR’s Cokie Roberts contribution to promulgating of the death panel lie.

Senator Sanders – Please Protect Health Care, Not Insurance Companies

We thought Bernie Sanders would be a Senator with more bite than bark on health care reform.

Vermont’s democratic socialist nearly exploded on the Senate floor last week as Republican Senator Tom Coburn forced a reading of his 700-odd page Single Payer amendment, effectively killing its chances of inclusion in the bill.  As he stood there, shouting a laundry list of harrowing statistics regarding the state of America’s health care system, we thought he recognized the imperative of bringing sustainable coverage to a growing number of vulnerable Americans.

So why is he going to support the Senate bill, which promises so much less?  A great deal of voices have made it clear that they’ve bought the prevailing argument: “any bill is better than no bill at all– it should be passed and built upon later.”

That would be fine if the bill at least addressed the insurance industry’s strangle hold on the American people.  The fact is, as Jane and the rest of the FDL team have shown us time and time again, there’s just too much wrong with this bill to make it a viable starting place for reform.

We sent this e-mail to Vermonters yesterday:

“The Senate is trying to force a dangerous health care bill to passage by Christmas.  Some of our strongest allies — statesmen who touted the progressive line aggressively at first — have definitively turned their backs on us.

Bernie Sanders is the latest “progressive” to fall in line as a supporter.”

If you’re from Vermont, sign our petition to Bernie Sanders: You were elected based on your progressive values.  Kill the Senate bill.

Vermonters, you continue to put Senator Sanders in office to cast tough votes in favor of your progressive values and convictions.  Considering that Senator Sanders will move to support this ugly piece of legislation, you’ve got to wonder if he’s doing the job you hired him to do.

And Sanders knows he’s screwing up.  To help the good people of Vermont stomach the bitter medicine of this Senate bill, Sanders secured additional health care funding to establish dozens of clinics across the state.  According to a press release from Dec. 19th, these clinics would be “open to everyone, […] care for patients covered by Medicaid, Medicare and private insurance as well as those who have no insurance.”

While this is of undeniable value to the people of Vermont, it’s no excuse for supporting this legislative monstrosity.  Sanders needs to spend less time trying to cover up his mistakes with pork for Vermonters transferring the wages of one set of workers to the health care of another group of Vermonters [ed.] and invest his energy in fighting for true reform that will reach all Americans instead.

We want to let Senator Sanders know that he’s headed down a path with serious ramifications – particularly Vermonter’s long-term access to health care they can afford

Vermonters know that Sanders considered himself somewhat of a foil to “centrist” former Governor Howard Dean.  For those of you who voted for him with this in mind, does it make you uneasy that Sanders now supports the bill while Dean opposes it?  If Sanders really wanted to bring accessible, affordable health care to the millions of Americans who are currently without, why would he support a bill that forces those same Americans to purchase expensive health insurance from private companies or face penalties from the IRS?

Senator Sanders earned his seat to stand up for the progressive values of his constituents.  Don’t let him get away with compromising those values and succumbing to the pressures of the Senate.

Sign our letter to Senator Sanders, reminding him that Vermont voters will not forget this, and will hold him accountable for whatever his final action is at the ballot box.

Disclosure: I work for Firedoglake’s FDL Action PAC

Mexican Farm Worker Dies in Vermont

I’m keeping this short and as much to the point as I can.  It was reported in today’s Messenger that a Mexican farm worker, employed died yesterday in an accident on a Franklin County Farm:

Vermont State Polic Det. Sgt. Jim Claremont said the death occured at a Howrigan farm on Paradee Road at about 4 PM…The victim was a young man from southern Mexico, between 16 and 20 years old.

 As of press time today, the victim had not yet been identified.

I will add a link to the story later, but just learned that Vermont Workers Center will hold a candlelight vigil in the young man’s memory this evening, between 5 and 6:00 PM, followed by a procession, at the Worker’s Center 294 North Winooski Ave. in Burlington.  I will paste the announcement from the Worker’s Center below the fold.

Vermonters Grieve “Invisible Life and Death” of Migrant Farm Worker Killed in Tragic Farming Accident.

Candle Light Vigil remembers and mourns “Invisible Life and Death” of Oveth Santis Cruz and calls for Immediate Immigrant Rights in Vermont.

Wednesday, December 23rd

5pm-6pm, followed by procession

Vermont Workers’ Center, 294 North Winooski Avenue, Burlington

On December 22, 2009 on a bone chilling winter afternoon in Fairfield, Vermont on Howrigan dairy farm 17 year old Oveth Santis Cruz from the town of Las Margaritas, Chiapas, Mexico was killed in a tragic farming accident. The death was confirmed by his co-workers and family members last night as concern and sadness spread throughout the migrant farm worker community mourning the young migrant farm workers’ death. Oveth is survived by roughly 80 extended family and community members who currently live and work on Vermont dairy farms.

Although, Oveth Santis Cruz’s family members might like to gather together as a family and community here in Vermont to mourn this tragic death they expressed fears that doing so would mean risking deportation – they are not free to do so. As Vermont resident Brendan O’Neill, a family friend, migrant farm worker advocate, ESL teacher, and member of the VT Workers’ Center, who was in touch last night with relatives who survive Oveth, commented, “Sadly, here in Vermont and throughout the United States migrant farm workers cannot even gather as a community and mourn family members deaths without fearing deportation. Family members have expressed concern to ensure that Oveth?s body is respectfully and swiftly returned to his family in Chiapas, Mexico.”

Today, Wednesday December 23, 2009 Vermonters are invited to gather for a silent and solemn candle light vigil organized by O’Neill and hosted by the Vermont Workers’ Center that will begin at 5 p.m at 294 N. Winooski Avenue in Burlington at the Vermont Workers Center to honor the hard work, sacrifice and tragic death of migrant farm worker Oveth Santis Cruz. The candlelight vigil procession will leave from the VT Workers’ Center at 6pm and make its way through the streets of Burlington to continue the vigil in front of the UU Church on Church St. O’Neill adds, “Oveth Santis Cruz is one of approximately 2,000 migrant farm workers who have come to the aid of our Vermont Dairy Farms in crisis and yet despite their essential contributions to Vermont due to an unjust, broken and oppressive U.S. immigration system they are forced to live and in this case die in fear, silence and in the shadows.” He added, “In the state of Vermont and throughout the United States the invisible hands that milk so many of our cows and pick so many of our vegetables, which literally puts the food on the table, live and die invisibly without the dignity and respect that all human beings deserve.”

The vigil is dedicated to the life of Oveth Santis Cruz and calls upon Vermonters to commit themselves to work for real immigration reform that recognizes and respects the basic needs, dignity and human rights of all immigrants.