Obie to leave house, appointed by Shumlin to Department of Buildings and General Services

I’m sort of in shock over this– Obie’s been my rep for most of the time I’ve lived in Vermont.  He’s one of my favorite members of the house– whenever I’d send him questions, he’d respond with depth and detail, even if the answer wasn’t what I wanted to hear.  I’ve got an immense amount of respect for the man, and figured he’d be my rep forever.  Here’s the message from Shumlin:

…Rep. Michael Obuchowski to serve as Commissioner of the Department of Buildings and General Services. The department employs more than 350 people and oversees construction, renovation, maintenance and other services — including security — related to state buildings and grounds. The department also manages the state’s vehicle fleet and coordinates worker compensation claims.

I’ve no idea who Shumlin plans to appoint to replace him, but, just… wow.  I’m kind of stunned.

Presenting the Fourth Annual ‘Skeeter Bites Awards for the Most Outrageous People of 2010

In the Tradition of the Razzie Awards for the Worst Films of the Year, The ‘Skeeter Bites Report Presents its ‘Dishonors’ for the People Who Have Had the Most Outrageous Impact on Politics, Society and Culture in America — and the World — in the Year Now (Mercifully) Ending

ALL RIGHT, MY LITTLE WINGED VAMPIRES — It’s that time of the year once again to really put the bite on those individuals who have done more than anyone else to make life difficult, if not miserable, for Americans and for humanity in general — or, alternatively, to make utter fools of themselves. So who are the fortunate — or unfortunate, depending on your point of view — recipients of the ‘Skeeter Bites Awards for 2010? Read on. . . (Image courtesy ShowMeJoe.com)

(Posted 5:30 a.m EST Tuesday, December 28, 2010)

By SKEETER SANDERS

As the year 2010 draws to a close (Did you start saying twenty-ten instead of two-thousand-ten?) it’s that time again to take a look back at some of what’s transpired over the past 12 months, make resolutions for 2011 (Yes, twenty-eleven, because two-thousand-eleven sounds really weird) — and, of course, cast an eye on the crystal ball and predict who’ll win what in the upcoming awards season.

From time immemorial, it seems, we mark the early months of each new year by bestowing awards to honor the best among us — the Golden Globes, the Grammys, the Oscars, the Tonys and the Emmys — and to dishonor the worst among us as well, such as the late Mr. Blackwell’s annual “Worst-Dressed Women” list and the Golden Raspberry Awards — better known as the Razzies — for the worst movies of the year.

In 2007, The ‘Skeeter Bites Report chose to join in the awards-giving parade, but in the tradition of Mr. Blackwell and the Razzies, we chose to join in the bestowing of “dishonors” to the most richly deserving crooks, liars, power-mad despots and others who’ve made life a lot more complicated for Americans and the world at large — and, in some cases, even the “dishonorees” themselves — in the previous 12 months.

Not surprisingly, the list of nominees for 2010 was longer than in previous years, making the selection of the “winners” more challenging — at least in some categories. In other categories, the selection was a no-brainer. But, here goes . . .



THE MACHIAVELLI ‘ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS’ AWARD: MITCH MCCONNELL

The 15th-century Italian philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli is perhaps best known as the one of the main founders of modern political science. His most famous book, The Prince, is a manual to acquiring and keeping political power. But Machiavelli is perhaps more infamous for his belief that morally wrong actions are sometimes necessary to achieve morally right outcomes; that actions can only be considered morally right or wrong by virtue of the morality of the outcome.

In other words, “The ends justifies the means.”

If there’s anyone more deserving of this year’s Machiavelli Award, it’s Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), the Senate minority leader, for his public declaration on the day after Republicans took back control of the House and gained six seats in the Senate in the November midterm elections that his top priority for the next two years is for he and his fellow Republicans in the next Congress to render President Obama so politically impotent as to doom his chances to win re-election in 2012.

“Over the past week, some have said it was indelicate of me to suggest that our top political priority over the next two years should be to deny President Obama a second term in office,” McConnell said in a November 4 speech to the conservative Heritage Foundation. “But the fact is, if our primary legislative goals are to repeal and replace the health spending bill, to end the bailouts, cut spending and shrink the size and scope of government, the only way to do all these things is to put someone in the White House who won’t veto any of these things.

“We can hope the president will start listening to the electorate after Tuesday’s election,”McConnell continued. “But we can’t plan on it.”

The fact is, McConnell has been working to render Obama politically irrelevant from the day the president took office. Under McConnell’s leadership, Senate Republicans have imposed an unprecedented — and unconstitutional — tyranny of the minority in the Senate, in which Republicans require a 60-vote “super-majority” for passage of legislation.

That the 60-vote requirement is not supported by the Constitution — nowhere does the nation’s supreme law gives the minority party the authority to tie up all legislation by requiring a “super-majority” for passage — doesn’t bother McConnell.

But it now appears that McConnell’s iron grip on the Senate Republican caucus may be slipping. Not only did 13 Republicans break from McConnell and vote with the majority Democrats to ratify the new START arms-control treaty with Russia — as well as six GOP senators who voted to repeal the ban on gays and lesbians serving in the armed forces “out of the closet” — but he faces a class of Tea Party-backed GOP freshmen who’ve made it clear they won’t bow to the party leadership when it comes to reducing spending.



THE PINK FLOYD ‘BRICK WALL’ AWARD: JOHN MCCAIN

Speaking of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” (DADT) — the final repeal of the 17-year-old law was a long-overdue righting of a wrong in which President Bill Clinton, in one of his earliest acts after taking office in 1993, sought to end through an executive order the military’s outright ban on gay men and lesbians serving in the military, only to be overruled by Congress when it passed DADT, a “compromise” measure that allowed gays and lesbians to serve — but only if they “stay in the closet” and keep their sexual orientation a secret.

President Obama vowed during the 2008 campaign to repeal DADT. it took him nearly two years to do it, but he finally signed the repeal bill into law on December 22.

Passage of the DADT repeal measure by a 65-31 vote in the Senate was greeted with both celebration and relief by gay-rights advocates. But they were stunned and angered by the fierce opposition to the repeal by Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) — even in the face of a study released by the Pentagon that found that 70 percent of armed forces personnel said that allowing gay and lesbian service members to finally “come out” posed little risk to military cohesion.

McCain, however, would not be swayed. In unusually caustic remarks on the Senate floor, the Arizona Republican — who ironically was elected to the Senate seat once held by the conservative icon Barry Goldwater, who famously said that “You don’t need to be straight to fight and die for your country. You just need to shoot straight” — blamed “elite liberals with no military experience” for “pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.

“[Our soldiers] will do what is asked of them,” McCain said. “But don’t think there won’t be a great cost [by allowing gays to serve openly].”

That McCain remained steadfast in his opposition to repealing DADT, even in the face of the Pentagon study, revealed that persuading him to change his mind was akin to talking to a brick wall — which makes McCain, who now must struggle to live down accusations that he’s homophobic, this year’s shoo-in winner of the Pink Floyd Brick Wall Award, named in honor of the British rock band’s song from their now-iconic album 1980 album, “The Wall.”



THE DARTH VADER ‘DARK SIDE’ AWARD: KIM JONG-IL

Each year, one ‘Skeeter Bites Award is reserved for a foreign leader whose actions outrage the world. For 2010, that foreign leader is North Korea’s Kim Jong-il. He richly deserves this year’s Darth Vader Award for his country’s November 23 attack on South Korea’s Yeonpyeong Island, which lies off the west coast of the divided peninsula near a disputed maritime border.

The North Korean barrage of artillery shells that killed to South Korean soldiers and sent hundreds of the island’s residents scrambling for cover was the first direct military attack by the North on the South in nearly a half-century, since the 1950-53 Korean War.

The attack — and the subsequent heightening of tension on the Korean Peninsula — was the latest of a series of belligerent North Korean action in recent years. Now, according to secret U.S. diplomatic cables made public by the whistleblowing Web site WikiLeaks, even China — North Korea’s longtime ally — is “fed up” with with the regime in Pyongyang, with senior Chinese officials quoted as derisively branding North Korea “a spoiled child.”

The cables reveal China’s mounting private frustration with North Korea in the four years since Pyongyang’s provocative underground nuclear tests and test firings of its long-range Taepodong-2 ballistic missiles.

In a February 17 cable, South Korea’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Chun Yung-woo, told Kathleen Stephens, the U.S. Ambassador to South Korea, that senior Chinese officials told him that Beijing “is fed up with the North Korean regime’s behavior and would not oppose” the unification of the Korean peninsula under South Korean control.

When even China says it’s fed up with North Korea’s bellicosity, there’s got to be something seriously wrong going on in Pyongyang. And since Kim Jong-il is the undisputed leader of North Korea, it is he who must bear responsibility for what actions his country takes. Which is why Kim Jong-il — whom Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels civilian anti-crime patrol and now a New York radio talk-show host, derisively calls “Kim Jong Mentally Ill” — is the 2010 winner of the Darth Vader Award.



THE HUNTER S. THOMPSON MEMORIAL ‘FEAR AND LOATHING’ AWARD: WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH

Last year’s winner of this award — named in memory of the late “gonzo” journalist Hunter S. Thompson’s magnum opus, “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” — was Fox News host Glenn Beck. Who would have thought that someone would rise to the occasion and outdo Beck in instilling the kind of fear and loathing — with the emphasis on loathing — that Thompson talked about in his novel?

But someone has indeed “stepped up to the plate” — actually several someones. Most of those someones bear the surname Phelps and all are members of a gay-hating cult that’s outraged America for their protests at the funerals of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The father of one such soldier has taken that gay-hating cult to court, accusing the Topeka, Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church of inflicting emotional distress upon himself and his family as a result of its protests. The case has gone all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is expected to issue its closely-watched ruling by spring.

As issue in the case, Snyder v. Phelps, is: Where does the First Amendment right of free speech end and where does defamation of character begin?  

Make no mistake: Westboro has succeeded in making enemies of just about everybody, regardless of political leanings, with their protests at military funerals drawing sharp condemnation from across the political and social spectrum. Everything Westboro does is motivated by the sect’s extreme hatred of homosexuality.

In short, Westboro — whose members are almost exclusively relatives and in-laws of its iron-fisted leader, Fred Phelps — is an extremely paranoid hate cult. Aside from its hatred of homosexuality, Westboro has a dirty secret it doesn’t want the world to know: That Fred Phelps has a history of alcohol and drug abuse and of physically abusing his wife and children — a history that The ‘Skeeter Bites Report brought out in 2006 and repeated in 2009.

Talk about generating fear and loathing. Nobody does it better than Westboro.



THE DAVID DUKE ‘BIGOT OF THE YEAR’ AWARD: MARK WILLIAMS

A close second to Westboro in generating fear and loathing, however, is former Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams, who made headlines in May with his highly inflammatory anti-Muslim remarks and his fierce opposition to the construction of an Islamic cultural center and mosque in New York near the site of the destroyed twin towers of the World Trade Center.

The New York Daily News, citing a blog posting on his MarkTalk.com Web site, reported that Williams branded the project “a monument to the 9/11 terrorists” and wrote that Muslims “worship the terrorists’ monkey-god.”

The 13-story glass-and-steel building, which includes a 500-seat theater and athletic center, is under construction just two blocks from where the twin towers  were destroyed on September 11, 2001, when two hijacked California-bound jetliners crashed into them and exploded in massive fireballs.

Williams has also made inflammatory anti-Muslim remarks about Obama — despite all evidence that the president is a Christian — calling Obama “an Indonesian Muslim-turned-welfare thug” and a “racist-in-chief.”

But Muslims weren’t the only targets of Williams’ bigoted screeds. In July, Williams  had the gall to accuse the NAACP — the nation’s oldest African-american civil rights organization — of being “professional race-baiters” after delegates to the NAACP’s annual convention in Kansas City passed a resolution condemning “extremist elements” within the Tea Party movement and calling on the movement’s leaders “to repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches.”

In an interview with NPR, Williams branded the NAACP “professional race-baiters . . . who make more money off of race than any slave trader ever. It’s time groups like the NAACP went to the trash heap of history where they belong with all the other vile racist groups that emerged in our history.”

That same day on CNN, Williams went further. Asked if the Tea Party movement should tell bigots that they’re not welcome, Williams replied, “Racists have their own movement — It’s called the NAACP! They’re a bunch of old fossils looking to make a buck off skin color!”

If Williams was trying to be cute, he failed miserably. He also failed in his apparent attempt to draw attention away from his own record of making highly inflammatory, bigoted remarks — a record that is well documented, despite his best efforts to sanitize it. He therefore is the 2010 recipient of the David Duke Bigot of the Year Award, named after the former Ku Klux Klan grand dragon and avowed “white nationalist.”



THE SAMANTHA STEPHENS MEMORIAL AWARD: CHRISTINE O’DONNELL

Those of you over a certain age will probably remember the TV sitcom, “Bewitched,” that starred the late actress Elizabeth Montgomery as Samantha Stephens, a typical 1960s-era suburban housewife — except that Samantha was a witch. Her advertising-executive (and mortal) husband, Darrin (played by Dick York and later by Dick Sargent), insisted that Samantha limit the use of her witch powers to the bare minimum (This was, remember, the pre-feminist ’60s).

As cliched as “Bewitched” was, the series was the first on television to portray witches in a positive light, if only to draw laughs. But the old stereotype of witches — real-life witches — being strange at best and evil at worst still persists even to this day. And Tea Party-backed U.S. Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell did nothing to dispel them.

Within hours of O’Donnell’s stunning upset victory over former Representative Mike Castle in the Delaware GOP Senate primary, O’Donnell’s past role as an arch-conservative social activist with ties to the Religious Right came back to haunt her — and to cause deep embarrassment for GOP leaders.  

Video clips quickly surfaced on the Internet and cable-news channels in which O’Donnell, who first gained national exposure in the mid-1980s as a spokeswoman for conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly’s Concerned Women for America, made a series of highly controversial statements on the use of condoms, the fight against AIDS and the role of women in the military.

But none drew more attention — and ridicule — than O’Donnell’s admission during a 1999 appearance on Bill Maher’s now-defunct ABC late-night talk show, “Politically Incorrect” that she “dabbled” into witchcraft.

“One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn’t know it,” O’Donnell said. “I mean, there’s a little blood there and stuff like that.” She insisted, however, that she never joined a coven.

Many voters dismissed O’Donnell as a kook, while members of the Wiccan community blasted her for perpetuating negative stereotypes of Wicca, a nature-based Pagan religion that is alternately known as the “Craft of the Wise.”

O’Donnell didn’t help herself when she put up her first TV ad of the fall campaign. The very first words she uttered in that ad were, “I’m not a witch.” O’Donnell’s attempt to dispel the witch controversy blew up in her face; instead, it haunted her for the rest of the campaign (Not to mention a controversy over alleged embellishments on her academic resume).

For this, Christine O’Donnell wins the Samantha Stephens Memorial Award.

AND FOR 2011 . . . WHO KNOWS?

Of course, there a lot of other notorious names that I left out, particularly Laurent Gbagdo (pronounced BAG-bo), the president of the West African country of Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) — who, after losing that country’s November 28 presidential election, has not only refused to concede defeat, but has clung tenaciously to power, with the support of the country’s military. Gbagdo’s refusal to step down threatens to plunge the country — once one of Africa’s most stable — into civil war.

Of course, if I included everyone deserving of this year’s awards, this article would run far too long for anyone to read. Suffice it to say that 2010 was a strange year. One can only hope that 2011 will finally see the light at the end of the tunnel for millions of unemployed Americans.

Happy New Year!

# # #

Copyright 2010, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.

Your Vermont tax dollars at work?

I just received a phone call from the Vermont Department of Health, and the woman said it was a health-care survey.

Yes, for many today is a business day, and for me it is also a family day was our adult children are visiting from DC and SC, so I wanted to just hang up and say that I was not available.  But, I’m a sucker for open and transparent government and imagined that this call must have some lofty purpose of generating information for universal health care.  OK, I’ll do it.

The entire survey was about smoking habits in Vermont!

What a waste of taxpayer money.  I was asked six different times via the telephone surveyor it we had smokers in the house.  Several of the questions were worded so strangely that I had to ask to have them reread once or twice!  The questions were worded so strangely that it was easy to give the wrong answer without having the questions reread two or three times.  I told the surveyor that we were a household of non-smokers.  There was no easy short form to allow the surveyor to move on to another call.  Instead we went through the whole kit-n-caboodle.

• What will our the state department of health do with such a survey?

• How will the information be used?

• Who wrote such a poorly worded survey?

• Was it some type of push poll attempting to validate money spent by the state on an anti-smoking campaign?

• Is this a valid use of limited state funds and state employee time, or was this an outsourced contractual survey, and if so who was paid to do it right now and why?

Hey, who owns this nuclear dump?

It may come to pass that Vermont Yankee’s nuclear waste will ultimately end up on the Texas-New Mexico border in a privately owned  1,338 acre waste site.

Vermont’s partner in Texas is Waste Control Specialists, a nuclear waste disposal site owned by Texas billionaire Harold Simmons. A Texas news magazine calls Simmons the “King of Superfund Sites,” and notes an example of his genius:

[Simmons] has figured out a way to clean up a radioactive mess one of his companies made in Ohio by—according to some experts—creating another radioactive mess in West Texas. The best part: he’s gotten the folks in West Texas to support the plan and the federal government to pay for it.

Harold Simmons “King of the Superfund” may also benefit from two of Vermont Gov. Douglas’ appointed officials that voted against what some see as the state’s interest. In November Vermont state nuclear engineer Uldis Vanags and Steven Wark director of consumer affairs and public information for the Vermont Department of Public Service as members of the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact Commission voted preliminary approval to allow the Texas nuclear waste site to accept waste from other states. Vtdigger.com reports that:

In audio testimony, Vanags and Wark voted against amendments to the proposed rules that would have given Compact members first dibs to the landfill and also that would have delayed action and allowed the Texas and Vermont legislatures an opportunity to weigh in on the matter.

This will end Vermont’s exclusive deal with Simmons’ Waste Control Specialties and expand its potential profit base. Wark and Vanags  rationale was that this would lower costs for Vermont. Governor elect Peter Shumlin immediately raised concerns that opening up the site might limit space and thus the access needed for VY’s waste. “It’s a race for space,” Shumlin told The New York Times. “When push comes to shove, the first waste that arrives is the waste that gets in.”

The waste compact will meet on January 4 to make the decision on how much low level waste can be processed.  

Earlier legislative changes in Texas and national reclassification of nuclear waste types made Simmons’ private nuclear waste site possible. In a 2006 interview he explained:    

“It took us six years to get legislation on this passed in Austin, but now we’ve got it all passed. We first had to change the law to where a private company can own a license [to handle radioactive waste], and we did that. Then we got another law passed that said they can only issue one license. Of course, we were the only ones that applied.

 

Among Harold Simmons’ many civic minded philanthropies he also donates heavily to conservative Republican causes. He is one of Texas governor Rick Perry’s biggest contributors, partly funded Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads against John Kerry and paid for anti-Obama ads.  

A Visit to New Mexico

I love Vermont.  It’s one of my favorite places in New England.  It’s even one of my favorite places in the country.  But there are other places with colors and patterns we pretty much never see here and from time to time it’s worth a visit.  

New Mexico is one such place, and specifically Bosque Del Apache.


The trip to New Mexico didn’t go exactly as planned.  Our original plan involved going north before going down to Bosque, but a fairly major snowstorm came in.  Bandolier National Monument may happen eventually, but it wasn’t going to be on this trip.   I even tried to go east of Albuquerque to the foothills going to look for Pinyon Jays and Juniper Titmouse, but snow ruled that out, too.  So, on Friday, a day before planning to go to Bosque, I decided to go ahead and swing down there for the day to check it out and get the lay of the land for the weekend.  If I’d known how bad the Thursday weather was going to be, I probably would have gone down to Bosque then, too, but by the time I’d figured it out, it was a little late.

But either way, the extra trip was worth it.  Over the course of those three days I had some amazingly close looks at familiar birds as well as some fairly unusual birds (at least where I come from) as well as a few life birds and some extraordinary views of things that didn’t involve birds at all (and one that involved one bird in a very unfortunate fashion.

I’ll start with the familiar ones:

American Coots

Pied-Billed Grebe

Northern Shovelers


 

Merlin

Northern Pintail

And perhaps some of the best photos of a Northern Harrier I’ve ever had:


Other birds I’ve seen before, but not in New England:

Last time we visited New Mexico, I got a Black Phoebe at percha dam, but not close.  This one pretty much posed for me.

Similarly, Gambel’s Quail did their best to thwart me last time, but this time one just popped up on top of a feeder at the Bosque visitor’s center:

        Chihuahuan Raven’s are cool to look at — similar to our Northern Ravens, but a little smaller and more willing to interact with crows– they are not as skittish of humans as the common ravens we get in New England:

The only previous photo I’ve had of a White-Winged Dove was pretty awful, so it was awesome to get this outside our Bread and Breakfast in San Antonio:



       

This Eurasian Collared Dove was the last bird photo I took before we headed out Sunday morning:

       

               It was taken at sunrise, right around the same time I took this photo:

   

       At Percha Dam last time around, we got Ladder Backed Woodpecker, but not this nicely and not at the refuge itself:

        Ladder-Backed Woodpecker

          Last time, I got one photo of a Pyrrhuloxia, but it was obscured by trees and only a partial.  This time, I got a bit luckier:


I never get decent photos of Eastern Meadowlarks.  I have a couple spectacularly bad ones.  Western Meadowlarks, however?  Both visits to Bosuqe presented amazing opportunities to photograph them, but I never quite expected something this nice:

One of the things I regretted last time we went to New Mexico is that I didn’t attempt any night photography.  This time I took some evening time to get outside for a bit.  The first shot is of a church in San Antonion I photographed last time, but in the morning.  I particularly like this shot– it’s almost exactly what I was looking to do but actually a little better.  The second shot is not at all what I expected, but I still love it.  It’s 38 minutes of eposure time.  During that time, there were cranes and snow geese nearby and I could hear them constantly.  At one point, a train went by, and the birds all flew.  I could see snow geese flying against the clouds illumated by the full moon, though I knew there was no possible way to capture that in photograph.  


        Speaking of cranes and snow geese:








Of course, with such numbers, there are always predators:


And some of the scenery was incredible.  This is a photostich photo– several photos merged into a single one to get the whole scene together in once from the canyon trail:

And some of the non-bird wildlife was pretty cool as well:





Mule Deer

Random Fish (I have no idea how I got this photo)


           And though red-tails are common, I’ve never seen a Harlan’s before:

And I think this is also a red-tailed, but the marking on the back of its head is very odd to me:

  So now– a question to western birders.  These birds?   Verdins?  Bushtits?

(and if they’re verdins, did I mislabel this image from my last visit?)

Aside from those guys, I managed to get a few other life birds during the trip: Boat Tailed Grackles (hanging out on a wire outside a power station)


Western Grebes (very distant view– I’m amazed these photos worked at all)

Yellow-Headed Blackbirds, mixed in with a larger flock of red-winged.  I didn’t know I’d photogaphed these at the time.  I was just getting the flock as a whole, but looking at the photos later, I spotted the yellow-headed in the mix:

And finally, while we were eating lunch, this Curve-Billed Thrasher just sort of popped its head up so I stalked it for a bit:


        All in all, it was a wonderful trip.  Not sure when we’ll be able to get out West again, but I think that if we go to New Mexico again, we’ll put more effort into heading north towards Taos and Bandolier National Monument.  I’ve loved our time at Bosque, and it is an amazing place, but there are birds we’ll never get at its relatively low elevations.  The sweetie was there a few days before me (for work) and she found black-billed magpies, a ferrunginous hawk and golden eagles in the north end, and I’d love to investigate that area some.

As I write this, I’m sitting in the in-laws place in upstate New York, looking out at their feeders.  There are goldfinches, black-capped chickadees, titmouses, downy and hairy woodpeckers, tree sparrows, red-breasted nuthatches, juncos, blue jays and a red-bellied woodpecker coming back and forth to the feeders.  New Mexico was awesome, but I love the Northeast.  

As usual, these are not the only photos I got.  I didn’t see a way to fit 160 photos into Dawn Chorus (I probably have overdone it as is).  The whole set of New Mexico photos (including a bit more landscape work and a lot more photos of the birds, including Spotted Towhee, Say’s Phoebe, Ring-Necked Duck, Canvasback — another life bird for me–, Kestrels, Eagles, White-Crowned Sparrow, Northern Flicker,) is on my web site via the New Mexico keyword.

An addendum: among the Christmas gifts I do not desreve, but somehow received nontheless, is a new lens: it’s a relatively low end 800mm mirror lens from Opteka.  I’ll be playing with it to get more distant birds and shots of the moon and other astronomical phenomenon.  I’m hoping that combining it with a 1.4x converter (making for a 1120mm equivalent) will produce some very nice results.  This may or may not improve the sort of photographs I get, but it will be fun to experiment 🙂

Also, as I’ve mentioned before, I sell prints and I design web pages.  If anyone’s interested in either, please feel free to touch base with me.  I also have a 2011 Calendar of Birding for sale:




I obviously didn’t include everything, so here’s a quick text link to thumbnails of pretty much every photo I took this trip:

I also put together this video slideshow covering a lot of the trip:

Christmas Open Thread

I’m going to do something a little different for a holiday open thread.

Christmas, of course, has a complicated history, and a sometimes-complicated role in our society. For many it is a religious holiday, for many others in is a cultural/secular holiday, and for still others it lies somewhere in between. It’s history is also a bit convoluted, as the celebration of Jesus’s birth was timed in such a way to easily absorb seasonal pagan celebrations and rituals.

But Christianity still walks side-by-side with Christmas. I myself am not a religious person, and regular readers don’t have to be told that this is hardly a religious blog. Still, for whatever reason this year, I’m feeling moved to commemorate the day with a sacred text.

Christ’s Sermon on the Mount is, in many ways, the very heart and soul of the Christian religions. Sure there’re things in there that make me wince, a couple others that might make me wince or might make me want to cheer, depending on how I choose to read them – but also a whole truckload of really, really good things that seem every bit as meaningful today – if not moreso – as they were at the time.

So after the flip, join me for the words of the big J himself. If you’re a Christian sort, you can read it religiously. If not, you can join me in a secular appreciation…


<< Matthew 5 >>

New American Standard Bible

The Sermon on the Mount; The Beatitudes

     1When Jesus saw the crowds, He went up on the mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him. 2He opened His mouth and began to teach them, saying,

     3″Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

     4″Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

     5″Blessed are the gentle, for they shall inherit the earth.

     6″Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.

     7″Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

     8″Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

     9″Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

     10″Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

     11″Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. 12″Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Disciples and the World

     13″You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled under foot by men.

     14″You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden; 15nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. 16″Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven.

     17″Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. 18″For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19″Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

     20″For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Personal Relationships

     21″You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT MURDER’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.’ 22″But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell. 23″Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering. 25″Make friends quickly with your opponent at law while you are with him on the way, so that your opponent may not hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the officer, and you be thrown into prison. 26″Truly I say to you, you will not come out of there until you have paid up the last cent.

     27″You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY’; 28but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29″If your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30″If your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to go into hell.

     31″It was said, ‘WHOEVER SENDS HIS WIFE AWAY, LET HIM GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE’; 32but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of unchastity, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

     33″Again, you have heard that the ancients were told, ‘YOU SHALL NOT MAKE FALSE VOWS, BUT SHALL FULFILL YOUR VOWS TO THE LORD.’ 34″But I say to you, make no oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35or by the earth, for it is the footstool of His feet, or by Jerusalem, for it is THE CITY OF THE GREAT KING. 36″Nor shall you make an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37″But let your statement be, ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘No, no’; anything beyond these is of evil.

     38″You have heard that it was said, ‘AN EYE FOR AN EYE, AND A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH.’ 39″But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40″If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat also. 41″Whoever forces you to go one mile, go with him two. 42″Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.

     43″You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR and hate your enemy.’ 44″But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46″For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47″If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48″Therefore you are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Good News for Vermont

There has been much hand-wringing in the media about the results of the U.S. census that show Vermont’s population growth slowing.  Some, like Douglas spokesman Jim Coriell, choose to receive the statistics as validation of Jim Douglas’ doom and gloom prognostication for “business unfriendly” Vermont:

Coriell pointed to Vermont’s relatively high taxes and cost of living as key factors in limiting growth. “The numbers do reflect the need for a continued focus on these issues,” he said.

We know that whole song and dance pretty well at this point, as it has largely driven the out-going administration’s arguments for gutting environmental regulation as well. But at least one group of Vermonters is not embracing the census results as representative of a half-empty cup for the state.

George Plumb, director of a group called Vermonters for a Sustainable Population, saw some hope in the state’s slow population growth. He said ultimately, a steady population would help the state avoid over-using resources and help Vermont plan for future problems, such as the effects of global warming or environmental damage due to expanding land use.

Well finally!  Given the lack of media interest in this extremely valid viewpoint, I was pleasantly surprised to see at least a nodding recognition of its existence in the Free Press.

What Vermonters for a Sustainable Population have hit upon is the rational argument that “growth,” as the generally accepted model for success, carries a huge and erroneous assumption about the world we live in and the extent of its ability to support perpetual enlargement.  It is this model that drives American business, and makes her success dependent on ever greater consumption by ever greater numbers of people.  We have only to look at other places in the world where population growth has already outpaced the ability of resource renewal to accommodate it, to see where this model will inevitably lead if left unchecked or accelerated.

As Plumb points out, Vermont doesn’t need to have a continually growing population to ensure economic prosperity; and he cites, as an example, the fact that the state’s unemployment rate is significantly less than the national average.  What is needed is a fresh, positive perspective on what the demands of the current population are and will be; and how those can best be served by a Vermont workforce.  If the population is demographically older, healthcare supplies and services should join energy efficiency products, green technology and local foods as high on our “to do” list. Coupled with the stimulus provided by “green” enterprises, high quality jobs and education in healthcare and related services to the elderly will inevitably attract enough younger workers to replenish and rebalance the population without overtaxing our resources.

One can only hope that the Shumlin administration will not be seduced by the same faulty arguments of the “growth lobby” (read: big business) that compelled Jim Douglas to overlook the opportunities inherent in a stable population of local consumers, no matter what its median age.

Christmas Eve, 2010

we got here at last

that time of year

they cannot ruin

even though

they will try

they must pause now

in the midst of toasts

to worry some

that we celebrate

love and joy

in spite of their hate

that people have

this in them

a power beyond

their grasp

they have taken

all the money

and still they feel

no love nor joy

god bless us everyone

yes even them

haunted this eve

by the ghosts

they have made

of their lives

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, Vt