Vermont Entergy Partnership?

Per Chris Garofolo / Brattleboro Reformer:

Representatives from Associated Industries of Vermont, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the Vermont Energy Partnership released an open letter to the governor to express their concern about the closing window of opportunity to allow the PSB to complete its docket on Yankee’s continued operations.

So sure– these groups are free to issue their opinions and present their side of the case, and they’re free to work for or against the continued operations of Vermont Yankee as they see fit.

What they are not, however, free to do is to do so without it being pointed out that Entergy Louisiana, the company that owns Vermont Yankee is a member of the Vermont Energy Partnership.  

So perhaps it can be forgiven this caused my eyebrows to raise just ever so slightly (again, per the Reformer)…

On the same afternoon the letter was released, Yankee owner Entergy Corp. announced that its charitable contributions committee agreed to funding requests from more than 100 local organizations in 2010, totaling more than $300,000.

But, of course, I could just be paranoid.  It’s not as though there could possibly be any sort of coordinated PR campaign between Entergy Louisiana and the Vermont Energy Partnership.  It’s just pure coincidence at work.  

Government, in action is a great replacement for governmental inaction

Per VPR / Bob Kinzel:

Governor Peter Shumlin has released a jobs bill that he says will put Vermont in an excellent position to create new employment opportunities in the next year.

The plan calls on several agencies of state government to better coordinate their efforts to expand manufacturing and agricultural-based jobs.

[…]

The plan creates tax credits for companies that hire veterans, it includes an additional million dollars to help dairy farmers diversify their operations and it offers financial incentives to businesses that hire new graduates in various scientific fields. Shumlin is asking lawmakers to pass the bill this year.

The plan is geared towards putting people to work, subsidizing business hiring as opposed to just giving business a tax break.  Even if you don’t fit into the above categories of people, this decreases competition for jobs overall as well.  

It’s about time we had government that wanted to do something beyond complaining about what we can’t afford to do.

ANESU Teachers may strike next week

The Addison Northeast teachers Association and School Boards failed to come to an agreement during a 5 hour negotiating meeting last night.  The Boards had imposed a contract on the teachers in January.  The teachers voted to strike by next Wednesday, February 9th if an agreement is not hammered out by then.  This was the first meeting where School Board Members spoke directly to teachers.  Previously, all communications were made via the Boards’ lawyer.      

    The Boards returned to the table after saying they were done talking.  Some in the  community are taking sides.  It seems that most community members want the sides to keep talking.    There remain 6 days in which an agreement can be made before the strike date.  No further negotiation meetings have been set as of Thursday afternoon.  The two sides seem farthest apart on salary increases, the amount teachers pay for health insurance, and step increases continuing beyond the end of contracts when no new contract has been agreed upon.  

    It is hard to gauge what the effect on the 5 towns of Bristol, Monkton, Starksboro, New Haven and Lincoln will be if there is a strike, but emotions are already high on some fronts. Chittenden South School Boards voted not to impose earlier this week, and in September, the Winooski Board called in a Federal Mediator and a strike was averted in the early morning hours a strike was set to occur there.  Here is the information each side has shared regarding the impasse.

Statement from the teacher’s Association:

The Teacher’s Association continues to remain ready and able to return to the table and negotiate a contract.  

We urge the boards to do the same.

Statement from the ANESU School District:

Addison Northeast Supervisory Union

15 Orchard Terrace, Suite 10

Bristol, VT 05443

(802) 453-3657 ~ www.mtabe.k12.vt.us/anesu

MT. ABRAHAM UNION MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL ~ BRISTOL ~ LINCOLN ~ MONKTON ~ NEW HAVEN ~ STARKSBORO

PRESS RELEASE – February 3, 2011

The Bargaining Committee for the Addison Northeast School Boards met with the Teachers’ Union Bargaining Committee for over five hours Wednesday night. Various school board members spoke directly with the teachers at length to explain the reasons for their proposals.

The School Boards offered to rescind the one year imposed contract, but only if they were able to reach agreement over a three year contract. In hopes of reaching a three year contract the Boards offered the following:

1st Year (2010-11)

Salary – 2.52% for each teacher (the same as the Union’s proposal).

Insurance – Increase teacher contribution by 1% (to 11%) beginning March 1st (the same as the Union’s proposal).

Personal/Emergency Leave – Modify as proposed by the Union.

After School Meeting Time – Add an additional ½ hour per week.

Automatic Step Increases – Eliminate automatic step increases after the contract expires.

2nd Year (2011-12)

Salary – 1.5% increase for each teacher.

Insurance – 13% teacher contribution

3rd Year (2012-13)

Salary – 1.5% increase for each teacher

Insurance – 15% teacher contribution

The Board’s offer would increase teacher salaries by 5.5% over three years. It would also gradually phase in the 5% health insurance increases over three years.

The Union rejected the Boards’ last offer. The Union’s proposal is:

1st Year (2010-11)

Salary – 2.52% for each teacher (Board agrees)

Insurance – 11% teacher contribution beginning March 1st (Board agrees)

After School Meeting Time – Additional ½ hour 3 weeks/month.

2nd Year (2011-12)

Salary – 2.2% increase for each teacher

Insurance – 11.5% teacher contribution

3rd Year (2012-13)

Salary – 2.5% for each teacher

Insurance – 12% teacher contribution

The Unions proposal would increase teacher salaries by 7.2% over three years and would increase their share of health insurance by 2% over these three years. Also the Union refused to eliminate automatic step increases when the contract expires.

Even though the Union Bargaining Committee rejected the Boards’ proposal, the Boards asked them to present the Boards’ proposal to all the teachers. The Boards believe their proposal is realistic given the current economic conditions and school funding revenue reductions projected by the state. The Boards hope the teachers will recognize that the Boards tried very hard to compromise. For the sake of the students, families and taxpayers of our communities, the Boards sincerely hope the teachers will accept the three year proposal offered by the Boards.

Salmon’s Campaign Poem

(Cairo Bluesnow playing at the Langdon St. Cafe)

    AS THE WORLD TURNS

the people get angry in Cairo

and UFOs hover over Jerusalem

how does this effect my stocks?

not to mention the Super Bowl

a day the Earth stood still online

atwitter with the new fashion:

the Egypt look

20-somethings’ pyramid parties

and no work today in the event

of all-out nuclear war

but I thought this was for my

entertainment

are these people serious?

they want food and jobs and rights

while the price of Sweetums’ puppy treats

just jumped 29 cents?

what we need is a candidate who will

put a stop to all this foolishness before

it lands in my back yard

I will watch old re-runs of Maude

and like Tiananmen Square

by remote control I will make

all this to be resumed at a later date

that’s what all these sci-fi gadgets are for

right?

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, Vt.

Bare roads, bare cupboards

Now comes “a small group of House Republicans,” according to the Freeps, calling for better plowing of state roads and highways. “Our goal should be bare roads,” says House Minority Leader Don Turner. Vermont has had a safe-roads-at-safe-speeds standard since 1981.

Hmmm. A couple things cross my mind. First, I don’t remember hearing any of this talk from Republicans when they actually had administrative responsibility for road maintenance. Now, safely in the minority and having no actual power to adopt a new standard, they can freely demagogue the issue on the day of a 12-inch snowdump.

And second, of course, aren’t we in the middle of a budget crisis requiring deep cuts in state spending? Turner has an eminently helpful suggestion about that, according to the Freeps story:

Turner said he wasn’t asking for the state to spend more money overall, but to reprioritize spending to put more toward clearing roads. He said he did not have specifics that he would cut in place of plowing, but he would expect that to come out of legislative discussions.

All righty then. According to Deputy Transportation Commissioner Sue Minter, adopting a bare-roads standard would require doubling the state’s snowplow fleet, and nearly doubling the annual cost of snow removal.

Deeper cuts to social services, anyone?  Yeah, it might be painful, but we gotta make the roads safe for drivers to go 70 mph year-round, don’t we?  

ACTION: NTodd says “single payer is inevitable,” Public comment period on Hsiao Report ending!

ACTION ITEM: February 3 is the last day of Public Comment on the Hsiao report on Health care reform in Vermont. The email address you can send your thoughts and concerns to is:

comments@vermontact128study.com

It seems fitting open with an action item to introduce this interview with NTodd Pritsky of Dohiyi Mir. Whether it’s on the West Bank or right back home running for State Representative, NTodd’s blogging is representative of action. Here he gives a great recap of Dr. Hsiao’s report to the State Legislature.

If you haven’t checked out NTodd’s writing, I think this interview captures the enthused hopeful wit you will find in his posts. He is also on top of things in a way that I greatly appreciate. Right after I mailed him the DVD of our interview, he had the whole thing up on Youtube, so a complete conversation is available online.

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: the Middle East

Part 3: Tuscon

Part 4: The Campaign

Part 5: Healthcare Reform

NTodd’s recent post assessing his campaign for Franklin-2’s Vermont House seat is a great example of his open approach to politics and writing. His announced candidacy for that Franklin-2 seat in 2012, this time as a Democrat, holds much promise.  The people of Franklin-2 are lucky to have the opportunity to send him to the State House, and the Legislature will be enriched by his contributions.

And don’t forget to spend some time with the report and respond to:

comments@vermontact128study.com

Help Wanted

“Wow,” I thought, as I read the Messenger piece about Roger Stockham, who is accused of plotting to blow-up a Michigan mosque.  “This guy used to live in my neighborhood.”  He might have been any one of the angry eccentrics who wander muttering but unmolested through small towns and big cities on any given day in America; but apparently he was one of our own.

Now a California resident, Stockham resided on Congress St. in St. Albans in 2002 when he was charged with making threats against the president and against veterans’ facilities at Fort Ethan Allen.  Diagnosed with bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and personality disorder, he appears to have led a life of violent delusion ever since returning as a veteran from Viet Nam.  Despite repeated scrapes with the law for his erratic and threatening behavior, Stockham seems to have been sort of  a catch-and-release project, his dangerous profile never engaging the system long enough in any one place to defuse the ticking time-bomb in his mind.

I’ll admit it was the local connection that caught my attention and caused me to think a little deeper about the system’s persistent failure to effectively deal with Mr. Stockham’s disease.  His is just one particularly sensational story among who knows how many tens-of-thousands of troubled individuals who have fallen through the cracks of a seriously under-valued and under-funded public mental health system.  And the incidence of “Roger Stockhams” in this country’s future is likely to grow exponentially over the coming decades.

It has been estimated that one in eight  soldiers suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder; and I remember reading anecdotally that perhaps as many as one in five returning veterans from the Middle East wars will manifest some form of mental trauma in the years following their return home.  As those wars and “engagements” drag on, year after year, the potential grows for a true mental health crisis in the coming years.

Add to the ranks of mentally battered soldiers the vast number of adults beaten down and ravaged by our disabled economy, and the children who inevitably suffer abuse and neglect under the pressures of that same broken economy.  We are facing a future in which mental illness could very well become the number one health issue in this country; and because the existing infrastructure for serving public mental health needs is primarily reactive rather than proactive, we cannot even trust the statistical evidence to predict how great our future need may be.

The survival of our democracy depends as much on our ability to keep its citizens mentally fit as it does on defense of the Bill of Rights, to which we devote so much high-minded rhetoric.  When will we finally give mental healthcare the public priority it so urgently demands?  

Good for Governor Shumlin: for recognizing that warehousing substance-abusers and the mentally ill in prisons does not serve the best interests of the state, both from economic and social standpoints. Good for him for championing universal healthcare and for promising a new state hospital to serve Vermont’s mental health needs.  But a word of caution goes out to the well-intentioned new governor:  don’t underestimate what those needs may be.  We’re going to have to do a whole lot better than just treading water on mental health if we truly want to provide a better future for the next generation of Vermonters.

Salmon patois

Vermont’s own Auditor Tom Salmon got a little mention outside of Vermont on Politico.com the other day and, what the heck, I may as well share it here.  

Remarking to Politico.com on his impending decision to challenge US Senator Bernie Sanders, Salmon explained that he is 65% in.

"Right now, I am 65 percent in. When I hit 75 percent it will commence exploratory.”

 He continued attempting to clarify his position:

I am not attached to the 2012 outcome, my odds, or my political career. I don't need to be senator, or governor, or stay put as state auditor — I need to be an authentic self-utilizing power along the lines of excellence. I am deeply concerned that we address risks of economic, political and spiritual significance through a new brand of leaders that communicate effectively from the sincere center.

That 68-word quote from Politico.com was picked up at Slate by David Weigel, who carefully lays out the daunting practical challenges Salmon might face, then throws it aside and says:

But let's ignore all that. Let's focus on Salmon's completely incomprehensible quote. It sounds like a No Labels manifesto translated into Laotian and back into English.

He declares Salmon’s quest The most doomed campaign of 2012.

I might differ only with Weigel’s English-to-Laotian-to-English theory. I think Salmon’s phrase “I need to be an authentic self-utilizing power along the lines of excellence” reads more like self-help-comic-super-hero-patois. Commence exploratory! Kapow!

Go for it!

Is he getting better and better or what?  

Shumlin establishes Vermont Yankee Oversight Reliability Panel

(A follow-up on the brief teaser piece I posted yesterday.  Thanks for writing this up. – promoted by JulieWaters)

Governor Peter Shumlin, expressing concerns about the continued lack of transparency at Vermont Yankee the aging & troubled nuclear plant, as well as the continuing discovery of additional problems including more radioactive waste contamination discussed these issues Tuesday.

The new contamination has been found in a different location than the leak which occured @ the same time just a year ago prompting concerns that there is a new leak at Vermont Yankee.

On Tuesday, in a morning press conference at the statehouse in Montpelier he addressed these ongoing problems at Vermont Yankee.

VT Digger’s Anne Galloway: “In the wake of new tests that show elevated levels of tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, in two monitoring wells at Vermont Yankee, Gov. Peter Shumlin announced on Tuesday that the state will create an oversight panel to keep tabs on Entergy Corporation’s management of the plant.”

Once again reiterating a sentiment expressed last year during the tritium leak, as well as a comment made during his gubernatorial bid, that “Entergy Louisiana does not do business the way we do business in VT.”

Shumlin mandated DPS chief Liz Miller to establish a new committee to provide oversight and expertise on the plant’s condition for the state of VT,  information regarding the problems at Vermont Yankee, including preparation plans for its closure and decommissioning in 2012. This panel would be named the Vermont Yankee Reliability Oversight Panel.

According to the Rutland Herald, Liz Miller, stated that though Uldis Vanags, the state’s nuclear  engineer, is not a nuclear engineer but a health physicist, he would continue to remain as part of the team.

On the Texas-Vermont Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Commission, Governor Shumlin also replaces Steve Wark and Uldis Vanags with Peter Bradford, adjunct professor at Vermont Law School, member of Vermont Yankee Public Oversight Panel and former NRC Commissioner, and  Richard Saudek, Montpeleir lawyer,former VT PSB chairman as well as former DPS commissioner.

More:

Gov’s presser on video: Shumlin announces plans for oversight panel to keep tabs on management of VT Yankee

By Anne Galloway on February 2, 2011

http://vtdigger.org/2011/02/02…

Mubarak Vows He Won’t Seek Re-Election, But Obama Calls For ‘Peaceful Transition Now’

82-Year-Old Egyptian President, in TV Speech to Nation, Declares He Won’t Run for a Sixth Term After 30 Years in Power, But Protesters Vow They Won’t Give Up Until He Resigns — and Obama Makes Clear That ‘Orderly Transition’ to New Government ‘Must Begin Now’

‘I WON’T RUN FOR ANOTHER TERM, BUT I WON’T QUIT, EITHER’ — That was the message that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak issued during a televised address to his nation Tuesday night, an announcement that did not sit well with the tens of thousands of Egyptians demonstrating in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, with the vast majority of them vowing to continue their nine-day-old protests around the clock until Mubarak resigns. Within hours of Mubarak’s speech, President Obama told reporters at a White House news conference that it was time for an “orderly” and “peaceful” transition to a new, post-Mubarak government and that “it must begin now.” (Photo Courtesy Sydney Morning Herald)

(Posted 5:30 a.m. EST Wednesday, February 2, 2011)

======================

WEDNESDAY NEWS EXTRA

======================

By JIM LOBE

Inter-Press Service

WASHINGTON — Hours after Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak vowed to stay in place until September’s elections, the Obama administration sent its strongest signal yet that the aging autocrat and one-time staunch U.S. ally must relinquish his hold on power sooner rather than later.

“I believe that an orderly transition must be meaningful, it must be peaceful and it must begin now,” President Obama declared at a White House press conference Tuesday night, following the eighth day of mass protests across Egypt.

“The process must include a broad spectrum of Egyptian voices and opposition parties,” he said. “It should lead to elections that are free and fair. And it should result in a government that’s not only grounded in democratic principles, but is also responsive to the aspirations of the Egyptian people.”

“After his speech tonight, I spoke directly to President Mubarak,” Obama said. “He recognizes that the status quo is not sustainable and that a change must take place.”

BIG QUESTION REMAINS: WHO WOULD TAKE OVER FROM MUBARAK — AND HOW?

However, the form and depth of that change remain uncertain. Washington is clearly concerned that Mubarak’s pledge not to run for re-election — the most important concession he offered to the hundreds of thousands of protesters who again took to the streets in Cairo and other cities Tuesday — will prove too little too late for an increasingly restive public.

Officials here were telling reporters on background as it became known Tuesday afternoon that Mubarak had no intention of resigning that they were disappointed that he had not heeded increasingly strong — if still gentle — hints by the administration since last Friday that he should bow out now, or very soon.

“People are sending a clear message it is time for Mubarak to step aside,” CNN quoted one unnamed official as saying just before the 82-year-old president’s appearance.

U.S. SENDS SPECIAL ENVOY TO URGE MUBARAK TO STEP DOWN

Indeed, Washington had sent a special envoy, Frank Wisner, a former ambassador to Egypt who has enjoyed a close relationship with Mubarak, to Cairo Sunday to urge him in that direction. Wisner, who returned home Tuesday, met with the Egyptian president but was reportedly told by him that he would not leave office before the end of his term in October.

“I think they must be surprised and disappointed by how stubborn [Mubarak] is,” said one Egypt expert who attended a White House meeting Monday with senior national security staff. “The message we got was in the meeting was Mubarak’s staying on was not going to be helpful to the kind of ‘orderly transition’ they’re calling for.”

While no official was willing to go on the record immediately after Mubarak’s televised midnight statement, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, who has often acted on behalf the administration’s behalf, tried to put the best gloss on the situation.

“This was an important announcement by President Mubarak to bring his presidency to an end and pledge that free and fair elections will be held,” Kerry said in a written statement sent to reporters. “I believe that President Mubarak should now work with the military and civil society to establish an interim caretaker government.”

“It remains to be seen whether this is enough to satisfy the demands of the Egyptian people for change,” he added, expressing the big question that is official Washington and informed analysts are asking at the moment.

MUBARAK BALKS AT NAMING INTERIM GOVERNMENT

On that question, however, there is considerable doubt here.

“The government of Egypt has historically said nice things about its intentions to reform with little follow-through,” said Joel Rubin, chief operating officer of the National Security Network, whose served for several years as a U.S. diplomat in Egypt.

“This is a step in the right direction, but actions are what needs to be seen, and immediately. If there’s nothing tomorrow that shows he’s serious about reform, it’s going to require additional pressure, and, frankly, there will still the question whether the kind of reforms that are necessary can be done with Mubarak as president.”

While Mubarak pledged not to seek re-election and oversee free elections, he did not indicate that he was prepared to appoint a new caretaker government — as suggested by Obama and Kerry — that might include representatives of the opposition, such as the new coalition headed by former International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

MUBARAK SPEECH FAILS TO STEM PROTESTERS’ ANGER; FEARS OF RADICALIZATION MOUNT

The initial reaction to Mubarak’s statement among demonstrators in Cairo’s Tahrir Square was clearly negative, as the hundreds of thousands of people who had gathered there throughout the day chanted “Leave, leave!”

A subsequent attack by baton-wielding mobs chanting in support of the president on demonstrators in Alexandria was considered a particularly ominous sign that the eight-day-old political crisis could be headed toward serious violence, despite the army’s apparently successful efforts to separate the two sides.

“Chaos will reign in Egypt unless Mubarak leaves the country and, from an American standpoint, this will empower more radical elements in society to rally against Mubarak,” worried Michael Rubin, a Mideast specialist at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute, who also noted that Tuesday marked the 32nd anniversary of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s return to Iran from exile in France, a key event in moving Tehran from a staunch U.S. ally under the Shah to its regional nemesis for more than 30 years.

“Most people making dark allusions to Iran [with respect to the current crisis in Egypt] forget that more than nine months passed between Khomeini’s return and the seizure of the U.S. Embassy,” he noted. “The question then becomes, what grievances can the Muslim Brotherhood or other anti- Western forces manufacture in those nine months to try to appeal beyond their natural constituency of perhaps 25 percent?”

Indeed, the biggest concern within and outside the administration is that Mubarak’s refusal to resign — particularly if it is coupled with a violent crackdown by the regime’s security forces — will strengthen Islamist elements, including the Brotherhood which has so far declined to play a prominent role in the protests.

“In an ideal world, it would be good if Mubarak could remain as head of a caretaker government and allow for an extended period of preparation for a truly free and fair election [because] you can’t just stand up workable parties and a free media overnight, and figuring out how to create proper democratic institutions takes some time,” according to Stephen Walt, who teaches international relations at Harvard University.

“The problem is that nobody in Egypt would trust Mubarak not have his thumb on the scale. So the demonstrators won’t be mollified a bit by this speech, for good and obvious reasons,” he added.

# # #

Special Report Copyright 2011, Inter-Press Service. Republished under Creative Commons License 3.0.

The ‘Skeeter Bites Report Copyright 2011, Skeeter Sanders. All rights reserved.