Scalia’s true nature

Cross-posted from Rational Resistance:

There are plenty of places you can read about the decision yesterday on the Affordable Care Act, but there's one observation worth making.

Over at Slate Matt Yglesias has a story about Scalia's dissent (my very favorite sentence to read: Scalia, J., dissenting) and how he arrives at the conclusion that a number of ancillary provisions, such as a provision deregulating dental services,in the Act are also unconstitutional.

Some provisions, such as requiring chain restaurants to display nutritional content, appear likely to operate as Congress intended, but they fail the second test for severability. There is no reason to believe that Congress would have enacted them independently. The Court has not previously had occasion to consider severability in the context of an omnibus enactment like the ACA, which includes not only many provisions that are ancillary to its central provisions but also many that are entirely unrelated—hitched on because it was a quick way to get them passed despite opposition, or because their proponents could exact their enactment as the quid pro quo for their needed support. When we are confronted with such a so called “Christmas tree,” a law to which many nongermane ornaments have been attached, we think the proper rule must be that when the tree no longer exists the ornaments are superfluous. We have no reliable basis for knowing which pieces of the Act would have passed on their own. It is certain that many of them would not have, and it is not a proper function of this Court to guess which.

This paragraph is simply more evidence that everything Scalia does is unhinged from the Constitution.

Many states have a legislative rule or constitutional provision known as the title-object rule, which generally says something like “Every bill must be directed to a single object, which shall be expressed in its title”. It is specifically intended to prevent Christmas tree legislation. Under this rule, legislators can be seen to adopt any legislative provision based on its own merits, not, as Scalia warns us, because they are “hitched” to another piece of legislation. You can agree or disagree that such a rule is a good idea, but it is beyond doubt that we have no such rule in the U.S. Constitution. Scalia is just making it up as a ruse to get rid of legislation he doesn't like.

As I say, unfettered by any pretense of constitutional reasoning.

Another union for Donovan, more olds for Sorrell

TJ Donovan has bagged another union endorsement in his bid for Attorney General, and it’s a big one: The Vermont State Employees’ Association (VSEA), which has more than 6,000 members.  And the endorsement came with a slap at incumbent Democrat Bill Sorrell:

“For too long Vermonters have gone without an Attorney General who understands what working and middle class Vermonters go through day in and day out, and who appreciates the essential role state workers play in our state,” said John Reese, President of VSEA.

As for Donovan, Reese portrayed him as “an unflinching supporter of worker’s rights; an active watchdog of government contractors; and a vocal advocate for the labor movement in an era of nationwide attacks on public employees and unions.”

For those keeping score, Donovan now has the backing of the Fire Fighters union, the state troopers’ union, the AFL-CIO, and the Building and Trades union. Plus the Vermont Sheriff’s Association. Total membership: 15,000. If the rank and file go along with leadership, Donovan has gone a long way toward winning the Democratic primary.

After the jump: Hey, Bill’s got some supporters too!

AG Sorrell has announced some endorsements of his own this week — basically continuing his parade of retirees. Per vtBuzz, the latest Sorrell backers include…

…former Burlington Police Chief/state Public Safety Commissioner Tom Tremblay, along with a string of other Vermont law enforcement types. Also on the list were A. James Walton, one of Tremblay’s predecessors as public safety commissioner, retired state police Col. John Sinclair and  Majors James Dimmick and Nick Ruggerio, former University of Vermont Police Chief  Gary Margolis and former Burlington deputy chiefs Steve Wark and John Sonnick.

Does it just seem like virtually all of Sorrell’s high-profile backers are people who used to be something? Of course, the senior vote is nothing to sneeze at in a Democratic primary. And hey, I’m AARP-eligible myself. But the list does have a distinct air of ex-ness about it.  

Obamacare: You can’t hurry love

Can I hear a Hoorah!?

We interrupt this program to crow briefly over the Supreme Court Decision on so-called “Obamacare;” and to point out that we should contain our enthusiasm, because it is still a long way from secure, and even further from perfect.  

There are still many, many battles ahead on the federal and state level before we have truly universal healthcare. But it’s worth the struggle because

“Healthcare is a human right.”

What the hell… “HOO-rah!”  

Kestrel, cue the Supremes.

Things just got worse for VPIRG

It’s an oft-repeated rule of life in the age of e-mail, text and Twitter: Don’t press SEND unless you’re really, really sure. Don’t post something online or in an e-mail that you wouldn’t mind seeing on a billboard.

Well, Paul Burns blew it bigtime. The Executive Director of VPIRG sent an overheated e-mail to the VPIRG board shortly after learning that his employee, Cassandra Gekas, was running for Lieutenant Governor. And yup, the e-mail was leaked to the media — Seven Days and the Vermont Press Bureau, at least.

In it, he blasts Governor Shumlin for enticing Gekas into her candidacy, and depicts Gekas as a dupe for taking Shumlin’s bait.

Oops.  

In his e-mail, he says this about Shumlin:

I believe that Cass was talked into this by the governor and others.  He should be ashamed of himself. …He deserves to hear from others who don’t appreciate this self-serving political move.

And on Gekas’ decision he says “I know it sounds absurd but it’s true… I hope [Gov. Shumlin] has a nice job waiting for her after she loses a race for which she is completely unprepared, but it’s no excuse.”

Hmm. If I were Gekas, I’d be a tad insulted. And if I were another VPIRG employee, I’d wonder what Paul Burns really thinks of me.

Elsewhere in the e-mail he characterizes Gekas’ departure as “doing great damage to VPIRG” and says “I let her know how important her leadership was in the office.” There’s a bit of cognitive dissonance: is Gekas vital to VPIRG’s work, or is she a chump? She can’t be both, can she?

So far, Burns has refused to comment on the e-mail. I’ll bet. The fact that he sent it, even in the heat of the moment, doesn’t reflect well on his leadership qualities. A manager has to manage him- or herself as well as the staff, and he failed.

Indeed, he may be the one “doing great damage to VPIRG,” having made some harsh accusations against the Governor. It also may indicate some internal problems at VPIRG; somebody leaked that e-mail, knowing what damage it would do to Burns. As Seven Days’ Paul Heintz noted, the VPIRG Board “includes a number of prominent Shumlin supporters and donors.”

Do you think those “prominent Shumlin supporters” were happy to receive that e-mail from Burns? Do you think that one of them might be the source of the leak?

As I wrote previously, Gekas is not without fault, and Burns has reason to feel aggrieved. She gave him almost no notice of her candidacy, and that was wrong. But Burns made a royal mess of things. Here, free of charge, is a little management advice for the next time a valued employee/chump decides to run for Lieutenant Governor:

Remain calm. Discuss a mutually agreeable departure. Notify the staff and Board in a non-inflammatory way. Release a public statement lamenting her departure from VPIRG and praising her public service. If you have to vent your real feelings, do it verbally with someone you trust. Otherwise, keep your trap shut and DON’T PRESS SEND. Go home and have a stiff drink.  

On Jack McMullen and the Ghost of Fred Tuttle

Whoever wins the Democratic primary for attorney general will face wealthy businessman and Republican (long-shot) candidate Jack McMullen. Famously, McMullen lost the Republican senate primary race to Fred Tuttle in 1998 and an actual senate race in 2004. In 1998 Tunbridge farmer Fred Tuttle mocked McMullen’s lack of knowledge about local place names and cow anatomy. The thing was Tuttle hardly had to actually do anything special, McMullen’s humorless sense of entitlement to a US Senate seat from Vermont shined through. It was there for all to see with or without “Tuttling”. Judging from an interview in Vtdigger.com it seems he may have missed the lesson and just wants it all forgotten.

McMullen recalls 1998:“A good laugh was had at the time.” He continues,

“What better human interest story than a recent full-time arrival – Harvard educated – versus a lifelong farmer Vermonter dropout from high school.”

It wasn’t just a human interest story or about teats or how to say Calais, but about his failure to skillfully address the carpetbagger issue.

If McMullen understood how this issue may linger he might have said something different along these lines: “We did have good laugh back then, at my expense, but in the past 16 years I have grown to feel Vermont is truly my home, although I’ll never be a natural Vermonter as Fred Tuttle was. I still hope to serve my adopted state.” [No reason not to lay it on thick!]  He did nothing of the sort, but briefly notes that he now knows how to say “Calais” and how many teats a cow has. “Ha, ha harrumph …yup all behind me now …quite a colorful local character that Fred Tuttle”…subject changed, he pivots awkwardly to hit Sorrell/Donovan on a couple issues.

Surprisingly McMullen does kind of channel the spirit of Calvin Coolidge’s tight lipped style when responding about his familiarity with legal issues and why he never became a member of the Vermont bar. “I was busy”, says Jack McMullen.

“I’m not a member in Vermont because when I came here it required an apprenticeship and I was busy…”

Although he has a law degree from Harvard, McMullen is not an attorney here in Vermont and doesn’t have to be for the AG office.

Agri-Mark/Cabot Piss Mister PeteySweety Off

Now, Mister PeteySweety’s Neighborhood is something I’ve been doing on Facebook for a while.  All this nostalgia for Mister Rogers, and remembering Eddie Murphey’s brilliant Mister Robinson’s Neighborhood on SNL.  Mister PeteySweety can’t wait til late July and early August for the primary bullshit.  Can you say, kiddies: BILL SORRELL SUCKS?  I knew you could.  But this one is about Agri-Mark shitting on Vermont (“…our friendly farmers in New York and New England”  Fuckers!)  Also, a little friendly fun with Michael Colby, who exposed Cabot a long time ago (1995) on BGH.  Can you say:  LIBERAL FUCKS?  I knew you could.



MISTER PETEYSWEETY’S NEIGHBORHOOD


(With ‘special’ guests Larry, his brother Darryl, and his other brother Darryl to talk about their new line of Vermont Cheeses.  And ‘special’ thanks to Mister Michael Colby, mentioned below, repeatedly, for helping and inspiring Mister PeteySweety in his pursuit of truth and justice for young kiddies up to age 10, and especially truth and justice for young kiddies with older sisters.)

Hi kiddies.  I have something really special for you today because Mister PeteySweety’s got a special hair up his asshole today.  It’s a special show.  Because Mister PeteySweety thinks you’re special.  And Mister PeteySweety wants you to write another special letter today after we’re done with our special guests.  That’s right.  It’s going to be Letter Day again.  Yes.  Can you say:  AGRI-MARK IS A NAZI DOUCHE-BAG COMPANY THAT SHOULD PUT ‘WE FUCK VERMONT FARMERS’ AS A LABEL ON ALL ITS SHIT?  That’s right.  Mister PeteySweety is some wicked pissed, kiddies, about those mo’fuckers at Agri-Mark taking the Vermont logo off their Cabot Cheese products.  Listen to this shit, kiddies.  The dildo-dipshit-asshole fuckers say it’s because they’re complying with Vermont’s Truth In Labeling law, but Mister PeteySweety knows the real reason.  Can you say that special word Mister PeteySweety taught you our first time together?  That’s it–CONSPIRACY!  I knew you’d remember, cause you know Mister PeteySweety really likes that word.  And you kiddies should too.  It covers a lot of bases.  Like when your mommy and daddy tell you that you can’t get a handgun for Christmas, you say to them:  “What the fuck kind of CONSPIRACY is this, fucking mommy and daddy?  You’re violating my Second Amendment rights!  I WANT THAT FUCKING GUN IN CASE THE NAZIS COME FOR ME!!!  See.  It’s that easy.  You can do it.

So today, Mister PeteySweety says to Agri-Mark:  “We don’t need your steeenking cheeses.  Mister PeteySweety has some special friends who are making REAL Vermont Cheese.”  Come on out here guys.”

“Hi, kiddies.  I’m Larry.  This is my brother, Darryl.  And this is my other brother, Darryl.  Mister PeteySweety brought us here so we could tell you about the new All Native Vermont and Specially Aged Cheeses we’ve been making out in the woods, and hope to sell across the country, since Cabot is no longer officially a Vermont Cheese.  Hold up the first sample, Darryl.

Now this, kiddies, is our special Larry, Darryl & Darryl Aged In The Woods Vermont Cheddar.  Made from pure Vermont milk from pure Vermont cows we milk ourselves when the farmer in question is sleeping off his drunk after finding out he’s even more in debt than he thought.  We drive our truck all around Vermont.  The cows have gotten to know us, and the way we feel and smell.  Now, our cheese making process still has to be patented, but Mister PeteySweety here has graciously offered to get Mister Michael Colby of FOOD AND WATER to help us on that.  And Mister PeteySweety says that Mister Michael Colby will change the name of his national not-for-profit farm advocacy organization to FOOD AND WATER AND LARRY, DARRYL & DARRYL.  And change the name of its blogsite accordingly.  And also change the name of his other blogsite, BROADSIDES and also the name of his other other blogsite, SNARKY BOY.  So, Darryl, Darryl and I decided to dedicate this cheese to him.  We’re re-naming it Aged In The Woods  EXTRA SNARKY SHARP.  It’s been out there under the trees for a while and I’ll tell you, kiddies, this is the cheese folks are going to talk about.  Because not only will it make your home smell like Vermont, but Darryl says it gives your breath special aphrodisiastical powers. Darryl said he tried it in Downtown Barre last Saturday and all the women there fell all over him as he walked by.

Now, this other one we want to show you is…Darryl!  Quit feeding the cheese to your pet fisher!  Hold it up!  Thank you.

This is our Special & Aged CURED ROADKILL AND NATIVE VERMONT CANNABIS MILD & MELLOW VERMONT CHEDDAR.  We expect this one to be a big hit with the yuppies and twenty-something crowd and the candidates running for office this year.  And we’re going to send some to President Obama and Michelle cause we think they need to eat more and stop worrying about becoming obese cause my other brother Darryl said he heard that Mitt Romney and his Party and all his rich friends like black people who are somewhat fat cause they can’t run so fast.

So, kiddies, tell your mommies and daddies and all your friends and teachers and the guys who drive the Casella’s trucks to look for LARRY, DARRYL & DARRYL AGED & AROMATIC NATIVE VERMONT CHEESES, coming soon to independent corner stores all across America, and to that other place, Washington D.C., too.  Thank you, Mister PeteySweety for having us here today.  And Darryl and Darryl each have a big burlap bag for you.  One has our new FIDDLEHEAD CHEESE and the other one a big bundle of that other special stuff we grow in the woods that you like so much.  We’re hoping, Mister PeteySweety, if you can get rid of that Mister Bill Sorrell and get somebody who will help make a special Vermont law, we can attach some of this other special stuff to our cheeses.  Cause it really gives you the super munchies.  Bye, kiddies.  And my brother Darryl says bye, and my other brother Darryl says bye too.”

All right!  Wasn’t that special, kiddies?  Can you say LARRY, DARRYL & DARRYL AND MISTER MICHAEL COLBY ARE RIGHTEOUS FUCKING DUDES?  I knew you could.  Now, it’s Letter Time.  I want you to get out the colored construction paper, but NOT the colored crayons.  This letter has to be written in BLOOD.  You’ve got a pet at home, right?  Mister PeteySweety will wait while you kill it.  And for you kiddies who don’t have a pet, you can use red crayon, or go get mommy’s red yuppie lipstick.  But add a few drops of your own blood just to make it special.  Use that very sharp kitchen knife.  Yes.  I knew you could do it.  That didn’t hurt, did it?  Oops…if you cut too deep, kiddies, use daddy’s Red Sox t-shirt for a compress.  That’s good.  You’re so smart.  And so so good.  Mister PeteySweety loves you so much.  Are we having fun?  Are we all ready to write?  Good.  Write this:

Dear Scumbags At Cabot Cheeses And Agri-Mark,

Just so you’ll know, I don’t want the Vermont logo on your shit anymore.  Our teacher told us you put poison in your cheeses just like you put poison in the groundwater around Cabot and that little kiddies like me are disappearing all over the country after they eat your poisoned cheese because they walk around all poisoned-up and then Cabot Creamery or Agri-Mark trucks come and round them up for you to make them into cheese.  And Mister Michael Colby visited my class and told us that the kiddies you don’t make into cheese you sell to Saudi Arabian Sheiks as sex slaves.  That’s not very nice and I’m writing to President Obama on you.  I’m also going to tell Ellen DeGeneres.  So FUCK YOU Cabot Cheese and Agri-Mark!  I’m going to get mommy and daddy to buy Larry, Darryl & Darryl Cheeses.  Mommy and daddy will do what I tell them to do because Mister Michael Colby told me that if the word CONSPIRACY doesn’t work to just call mommy and daddy LIBERAL FUCKS and that will make them ashamed and they’ll feed all your poisoned cheese to rabid Republican dogs and cats and skunks.  Good Fucking Luck without VERMONT on your shit.  I guess now only the Frogs in France and the dumb Polacks will be eating your goddamn cheeses.  That is until they all die from it.  And FUCK YOUR WIVES AND GIRLFRIENDS TOO!  They’ll have to all get abortions now after eating your cheese and Mister Rush Limbaugh will call them all whores and sluts and prostitutes and that C word I hear daddy use sometimes when he’s talking on the phone to the people from Mitt Romney’s headquarters.

Drop DEAD AND DIE SLOW!

Joey or Suzy, little kiddie

There.  That was soooo good!  Wasn’t this a good day, kiddies, my little special friends?  Yes, it was.  Mister PeteySweety has to go now, but he’ll be back tomorrow, because…

…Tomorrow, tomorrow

Mister PeteySweety can’t wait

For tomorrow

Cause it will be a new day

And he’ll have something new to say

About NAZIS and CONSPIRACIES and YOU

Bye, kiddies.  God Bless You!  And God Bless Mister PeteySweety and Mister Michael Colby and Larry and his brother Darryl and his other brother Darryl!  Hey that reminds me, kiddies.  Where’s that sack?  Oh, there.  Good.  Wow, look at all those big buds, kiddies.  And this smells like primo shit too.  Well, Mister PeteySweety has his work cut out for him, doesn’t he?  AAaaahh…urrrrRRRRmmmmm…’cough’…whew.  Bastard…’cough’…you know, kiddies, Junior over at Charlie Os is going to think Mister PeteySweety’s been cheating on her at another bar when he comes in there all zoned-out today.  Ah, what the Hell…uUUUrrrRRRRRRRMMMmmmmmm…phewww …’cough, cough’…whewwww…aaaahhhh…yes.

Oh, it’s a beau-ti-ful day in this neighborhood, a beau-ti-ful day to light up a jay, and it’s all mine, yes it’s all mine.  It’s a neighborly day to sit on a bench, and look at the ladies and make them all tense, when I say WOULD YOU BE MINE?  COULD YOU BE MINE?  ‘Ere…errrhhmmmoooff  …whew…I have always wanted to have a lady just like you, I’ve always wanted to live with a lady who has a good job and gives me money too, so…rrrhhhmmmMMMMmmmmm…aahhhh…let’s make the most of this beautiful day, you take me to Charlie Os and to Junior you’ll say: “Give him a scotch, give Mister PeteySweety a scotch, and make sure you make it a double.”

Yes, kiddies.  Mister PeteySweety’s really ripped.  Can you say  SHOTGUN IT, MISTER PETEYSWEETY?  I knew you could.



Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, Vt.

The American People Are Angry

The American people are angry.  They are angry that they are being forced to live through the worst recession in our lifetimes – with sky-high unemployment, with millions of people losing their homes and their life savings.  They are angry that they will not have a decent retirement, that they can’t afford to send their children to college, that they can’t afford health insurance and that, in some cases, they can’t even buy the food they need to adequately feed their families.  

They are angry because they know that this recession was not caused by the middle class and working families of this country. It was not caused by the teachers, firefighters and police officers and their unions who are under attack all over the country. It was not caused by construction workers, factory workers, nurses or childcare workers.  

This recession was caused by the greed, recklessness, and illegal behavior on Wall Street.  And, what makes people furious is that Wall Street still has not learned its lessons.  Instead of investing in the job-creating productive economy providing affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses, the CEOs of the largest financial institutions in this country have created the largest gambling casino in the history of the world.

Four years ago, after spending billions of dollars to successfully fight for the deregulation of Wall Street, the CEOs of the big banks – JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and the others – went on a losing streak.  The enormous bets they made on worthless, complex, and exotic financial instruments went bad, and they stuck the American people with the bill.

Wall Street received the largest taxpayer bailout in the history of the world.  But it was not just the $700 billion that Congress approved through the TARP program.  As a result of an independent audit that I requested in the Dodd-Frank bill by the non-partisan Government Accountability Office, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided a jaw-dropping $16 trillion in virtually zero-interest loans to every major financial institution in this country, large corporations, foreign central banks throughout the world, and some of the wealthiest people in this country.

And, instead of using this money to provide affordable loans to small businesses, instead of putting this money back into the job-creating productive economy, what have they done?  They have gone back to their days of running the largest gambling casino in the world.  In other words, they have learned nothing.

The American people are angry because they see the great middle class of this country collapsing, poverty increasing and the gap between the very rich and everyone else grow wider.  They are angry because they see this great country, which so many of our veterans fought for and died for, becoming an oligarchy – a nation where our economic and political life are controlled by a handful of billionaire families.  

In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s.  Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America – 150 million people.  

Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top 1 percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom 60 percent owns less than 2 percent.  Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 0.3 percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007 to 2010.  That’s the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse.  If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy.  If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need?  There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy.  We need to put income into the hands of working families.    

A lot of my friends in the Senate talk a whole lot about our $15.8 trillion national debt and our $1.3 trillion deficit.  In fact, deficit reduction is a very serious issue and will be one of the major issues of this campaign.  Unfortunately, many of my colleagues forget to discuss how we got into this deficit situation in the first place, and how we went from a healthy surplus under President Clinton to record-breaking deficits under Bush.  

When we talk about the national debt and the deficit, let us never forget that the current deficit was primarily caused by Bush’s unpaid-for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.   Imagine that!  President Bush and his deficit hawks forgot to pay for two wars which will end up costing us trillions of dollars.  It just plain slipped their minds.  On top of that, for the first time in American history Bush and his Republican friends decided, during a war, to give out huge tax breaks – including massive benefits for millionaires and billionaires.  Even more importantly, the deficit is the result of a major decline in federal tax revenue because of the high unemployment and business losses that we are experiencing as a result of this recession – caused by the greed and recklessness of Wall Street.  Revenue as a percentage of GDP, at 15.2%, is the lowest in more than 60 years.

Despite the causes of the deficit, our Republican (and some Democratic) friends have decided that the best way forward toward deficit reduction is to cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, education, food stamps and virtually every other programs of importance to low and moderate income families.  We must not allow that to happen.  

If we are serious about dealing with the deficit and creating jobs in America, the wealthy are going to have to start paying their fair share of taxes.  We also have to end the massive tax loopholes and subsidies that exist for major corporations.  (In that regard, Rep. Keith Ellison from Minnesota and I recently introduced legislation that would end all tax breaks and subsidies for the fossil fuel industry).  At a time when the United States now spends more money on defense than the rest of the world combined, we also have to cut back on military spending.  

Yes, we should deal with the deficit.  But not on the backs of the elderly, the children, the sick and the poor!  

Most importantly, when we talk about what’s happening in America, we have to address the unemployment crisis in this country which now finds 23 million Americans without jobs or who are under-employed.  And we know how to do that.  

We know that the fastest way to create decent-paying jobs is rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure (roads, bridges, rail, airports, water systems, wastewater plants, deteriorating schools, etc.)  We also know that we can create a great deal of employment by transforming our energy system away from foreign oil and coal and into energy efficiency and such sustainable energies as wind, solar, geo-thermal, bio-mass and other clean technologies.  We also know that, as our country fights fierce global competition, it is absurd to be laying-off educators and making college unaffordable.

While we continue to do everything we can during the next six months to defeat Republican right-wing extremism, it is also important that we never lose sight of the progressive vision that we are fighting for. If we don’t know where we want to go, it will be impossible to get there. Some of the issues that I intend to raise are the following:

Not only must we resist cuts in Social Security, we must lift the cap on taxing higher incomes so that Social Security will be strong for the next 75 years.

Not only must we oppose cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, we must see health care as a right of all and continue the fight for a Medicare for All Single Payer health care system.

Not only must we oppose placing the burden of deficit reduction on the backs of working families, we must demand a progressive tax system in which the wealthy and large corporations start paying their fair share of taxes.

Not only must we oppose cuts in unemployment compensation, we must fight for a jobs program that creates the many millions of jobs our country desperately needs.

Not only must we fight to end disastrous unfettered free trade agreements with China, Mexico, and other low wage countries, we must fight to fundamentally re-write our trade agreements so that American products, not jobs, are our number one export.

And, not only must we vigorously oppose the war against women, we must fight to end all forms of discrimination and prejudice in this country.

The struggle we are engaged in right now is of pivotal importance for this country. Whether we win or lose will determine the future of America. That struggle is not just for our lives, but more importantly it is for our children and our grandchildren.

Despair is not an option. I know people get angry, I know they get frustrated, I know they get disgusted. But we don’t have the right to give up and turn our backs on our children and grandchildren.

Our job is to simply bring to fruition what the overwhelming majority of the American people want. They want an economy that works for the middle class and working families and not just for the rich. They want everybody in this country to have health care as a right. They want to protect Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They want to move away from these gross inequalities in income and wealth.

We have the people behind us. They have the money. And at the end of the day, the people will be stronger than the money.

Circular firing squads: a left-wing specialty

One of my least favorite things about left/liberal politics is the tendency to wage self-destructive internal battles. I’ve got two examples today. First, VPIRG firing Cassandra Gekas when she decided to run for Lieutenant Governor; second, the hostility (by some) toward a new deep-pocketed advocacy group working in favor of single-payer healthcare.

Gekas gets the ziggy. This story from Paul Heintz, the newly-minted Fair Game columnist for Seven Days. (Andy Bromage has been promoted to News Editor.) Gekas was VPIRG’s health care advocate when she made a last-minute decision to run for Lite Gov.

The move, apparently, also came as a surprise to her employer. When she informed VPIRG executive director Paul Burns of her plans to run for office, Gekas says she was fired on the spot. “He just said, ‘Collect your things, leave immediately, and don’t come back,'” Gekas recounts.

Now, in addition to launching a statewide campaign, the 30-year-old Montpelier resident needs a new job so she can make her student-loan, car and rent payments.

Gekas could have handled the situation better. She didn’t tell Burns about her intentions until the day of the filing deadline. I realize her candidacy was a sudden thing, but she should have tried to notify Burns earlier.  

However, to fire her on the spot seems awfully harsh — particularly for an organization that promotes social justice. Giving her an unpaid leave, with some sort of severance deal, would seem more appropriate. I won’t tell anyone else what to do, but I’ll remember this the next time I get a fundraising call from VPIRG.

SEIU launches Vermont advocacy group.  Today’s Rutland Herald/Times Argus (paywalled, available here if you subscribe) has the story of a large national labor union setting up a 501c4 group in support of single-payer health care in Vermont. The Service Employees International Union says Vermont is on the cutting edge of health care reform, and it wants to ensure that Vermont stays there, providing an example for others to follow.

SEIU’s group, “Vermont Leads,” will benefit from the union’s deep pockets and connections to liberal donors across the country. But not everyone is happy about its entry.  

Sen. Anthony Pollina, a Progressive Party stalwart and early proponent of the single-payer concept, said Vermont Leads could trigger a big-money ad war that turns Vermonters off to health care reform.

The good Senator is looking a gift horse in the mouth. I don’t think SEIU, all by its lonesome, is going to trigger an HCR ad war. Citizens United took care of that. We’re likely to see big-money ad wars on HCR no matter what, and I’m glad to see that we’ve got at least one major organization on the good guys’ side.

There’s also an intra-labor aspect to this. The Vermont AFL-CIO is lukewarm about SEIU’s entry, because the two unions are both trying to organize home-care workers in Vermont. (AFL-CIO through its subsidiary, AFSCME.) One AFL-CIO official, Traven Leyshon, fears that the formation of Vermont Leads is an attempt “to curry political favor with Governor Shumlin,” rather than a sincere effort to bolster health care reform.

As far as I’m concerned, AFL-CIO seems more concerned about turf battles than major political issues. And as SEIU’s Matt McDonald points out, “there is absolutely nothing within the powers of this governor to advantage SEIU over AFSCME.”

In this case, I agree with Dr. Deb Richter of Vermont for Single Payer:

“The point is that people who tend to benefit from single-payer don’t have billions of dollars in their pockets,” Richter said. “We’re lucky to have this union recognize that if one state gets single-payer, then it’s likely to spread and be beneficial to the whole country.”

F-35’s in VT: What’s wrong with this picture?

I called it here on GMD, two years ago, when we first learned of the potential F-35 location in Vermont.  I said that Burlington sounds like exactly the wrong place to locate such a facility.  

Playing off of a VPR quote from Lt. Col. Chris Caputo that was intended to downplay the potential sound impact of the jets on the region but mentioned the possibility of “variables,” I had this observation:

…That got me to thinking about the “variables.”  I’m no scientist, but it occurs to me that the topography, geology and other factors, which are specific to the region over which the F-35’s are to be deployed, might have a critical relationship to how the decibel level might play out in that region.  

So I had a look at the general land features of Edwards Air Force Base which yielded the more benign test results favored by Caputo.  That Air Force Base is located on the edge of a great salt desert; hardly similar to the land features surrounding Burlington.  Then, too, neither Airforce base is in the civilian center of the busiest city of the state.

Now, it seems that the recommendation of Burlington as a “preferred alternative” location for the siting may at last be destined for greater scrutiny.

Roseanne Greco of the South Burlington City Council, herself a retired Air Force Col., says it is as plain as the nose on your face.  She says it is obvious that “grave mistakes” were made somehow in the scoring process that identified the city as being environmentally suitable to host the jets.  The environmental suitability of the location was apparently the one scoring factor that put South Burlington at the top of the Air Force’s list of potential sites.

Ms. Greco, who bravely persists at spitting in the wind,  points out how obviously absurd that finding was.  Pointing to the fact that local opposition to the the F-35 siting is running fairly high, she suggests that it may be time to examine the scoring process more closely.

All we’re asking is ‘show us the data.’

‘Sounds like a pretty reasonable request.

Press conference on Taser use in Vermont

What: Press conference on Taser use in Vermont

When: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM

Where: Cedar Creek Room, Vermont State House, State Street, Montpelier, Vermont

Advisory:

Advocates to Call for Taser Moratorium

Mental health and civil rights advocates will hold a press conference Wednesday, June 27, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. in the Cedar Creek Room of the Statehouse in Montpelier. The topic is Taser use in Vermont.

The coalition of groups and individuals will propose a moratorium on Taser use in the state until comprehensive, updated statewide standards of use are developed and training on the standards is implemented and until all officers have also received specialized training in dealing with persons suffering from a mental health crisis.

This press conference is being held a week to the day of the Tasering of Macadam Mason by Vermont State Police with death resulting.

If you are concerned about Taser use within Vermont and find yourself agreeing in principle with the moratorium on Taser use being called for by mental health as well as civil rights advocates:

If you are in the Montpelier area this morning (Wednesday, June 27th) and are able to join us in order to show support by providing a presence of concerned advocates, activists, professionals as well as members of the general public who are taking a stand along with those making the call for such, please consider doing so.