Category Archives: National

2019: Minting the New Year

 

At last 2018 is about to crawl away into history and settle into a dark corner of its own. One thing swept along with it into that corner is the majority the GOP has held in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2011. The NYTimes.com has a heart-rending story about the soon-to-be in the minority GOP Reps and the fate they now face as the Democrats take control.

shadenmitzAbout two-thirds of Republicans returning to the House for the 116th Congress this week have never experienced the exquisite pain of being on the outs in an institution where the party in charge is totally in charge. Majority control runs the gamut from determining the floor agenda to determining access to the prime meeting space. It will be a rude awakening for many who have known only their exalted majority status.

So, they are in for “a rude awakening.”  I’m certainly not crying for them — eh, or laughing … too much. It’s hard not to feel a little bit of the old schadenfreude. After all it is the outgoing 115th Congress that was so dominated by Ollie North’s NRA gun lobby that voted down any meaningful gun restrictions and introduced, by one count, 75 different bills that would have gutted the Endangered Species Act and undercut or removed federal protections from specific species. And they continued legislative moves to undermine and generally sabotage the Affordable Health Care Act making it harder and more expensive for American families to receive medical treatment and stay healthy. And that’s just two of the strikes against them.

The arrival of a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives will bring dramatic demographic changes to the House on January 3rd. The 116th Congress will be the most diverse in history — more women, people of color, LGBTQ, and many younger members: a new generation. Businessinsider.com found: The 115th House was one of the oldest in history, but 2018 midterms also ushered in a wave of younger Gen X’ers and Millennials elected to Congress. Come January, the average age of a member of the House will decrease a full decade from 57 to 47.

2019 horeps1

The Democratic take-over of the house helps us start 2019 with  more hope than 2018; change is afoot — with a lot more needed. It would be foolish to either over-estimate the advantage a new majority in the House means or to under-estimate the damage the GOP minority can still do. Republicans control the Senate, and there’s Trump’s ongoing  incompetence and corruption scandal that hovers over the country and is likely break next year.

But it’s no small thing being in the minority:  commenting on being in the House minority next year GOP Representative Peter “only two immigrant children have died” King (NY) said, “You control nothing.” Rep. King and  many other GOP Congressmen are going find themselves with a lot less power in the newly minted Congress starting January 3rd,  and they will  “experience the exquisite pain of being on the outs”

So, why not have a new mint? Could be refreshing! Happy New Year — the glass might be half full!

Off to Davos: Trump’s Dirty Dozen head out of town

December is only just drawing to a close, and the Trump gang has almost already done a winter’s worth of damage to the less fortunate.  Donald shut down the federal government in a temper tantrum over funding for his “great, beautiful” border wall, while his DHS secretary continued to oversee the separation of a record number of migrant families forcing the children into unsafe facilities and tent camps. And in a sort of bizarro holiday “gift” Trump took moves to add work requirements to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), reversing just-added protections passed in a bipartisan Congressional farm bill potentially denying 755,000 people SNAP food & nutrition benefits by his action .

So, with all that work done … all that “winning” under their belts, in late January some select Team Trump members and Donald himself will pack their bags and fly off (at U.S. taxpayers expense) to Davos, a luxurious mountain resort in Switzerland to attend the World Economic Forum. The forum is a gathering of the world’s international economic movers & shakers: powerful heads of state, CEO’s, the mega-wealthy, and royalty discuss how to best shape global, regional, and industry agendas for themselves.davosdozen2

Trump and roughly a dozen other White House officials will head to Switzerland for the conference, which will bring together powerful political and business leaders from Jan. 22-25.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will lead the U.S. delegation, which will also include Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao [wife of Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell], Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen [rumored to be leaving in Feb.], Small Business Administrator Linda McMahon and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.

White House advisers Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump and Chris Liddell [White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Coordination] will also attend.

Govexec.com looked at the planned expenses for the trip as of December and found that hotel costs have already reached $2.9 million. The costs already obligated include $600,000 for the State Department to lease a small apartment building, $142,000 for miscellaneous staff apartments and $230,000 for “POTUS Functional Space” at the Intercontinental Hotel, where Trump stayed last year.

Not included in these early cost figures is approximately $2.2 million for Air Force One to haul Trump there and back or Marine One helicopter to scuttle him from Zurich airport to Davos and around those environs once he arrives in Switzerland.

Trump and entourage will get to schmooze with all their Russian counterparts: the oligarchs. A problem and threatened boycott by Russian president Putin was settled after a last minute deal was worked out with forum organizers to allow certain Russian oligarchs under sanction to attend. Ever willing to help them, Trump pitched right in and thoughtfully removed sanctions from one Russian magnate’s businesses.

So the Russians are coming to Davos, and Donald may even get to enjoy some quiet time with his handler Vladimir Putin, all courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers. Happy New Year.

Trump, the right & wrong side of history or “whatever” Updated

[Update 12/21/19: Donald Trump’s ‘moral disaster’: AP reveals scope of migrant kids program

As the year draws to a close, about 5,400 detained migrant children in the U.S. are sleeping in shelters with more than 1,000 other children. Some 9,800 are in facilities with 100-plus total kids, according to confidential government data obtained and cross-checked by The Associated Press.

That’s a huge shift from just three months after President Donald Trump took office, when the same federal program had 2,720 migrant youth in its care; most were in shelters with a few dozen kids or in foster programs.]


 

Last July 4th Therese Patricia Okoumou climbed up the base of the Statue of Liberty to protest against Trump’s migrant family separation policy. solclimberSeven other people protesting had been arrested that day on Ellis Island but Okoumou, a naturalized US citizen who lives in Staten Island, made the headlines by climbing onto the base of the statue (approximately 10 stories  high) and holding a tee shirt with the slogan “Rise and Resist.” She was eventually removed hours later by police and arrested.

On Monday  the Guardian.com reported Patricia Okuomou’s trial for climbing the Statue of Liberty ended. She was found guilty of trespassing and interfering with government agency functions, as well as disorderly conduct-charges that in total could carry a sentence of 18 month in prison.

Outside the courthouse she remained committed to stopping the Trump administration family separation policy: “We stand on the right side of the history. I am not discouraged,” she said.

“While migrant children who simply came to this country, like our ancestors did, to seek happiness, freedom and liberation. Instead of welcoming them like Lady Liberty symbolizes, instead of treating them with kindness, what we showed them is cages. So if I go in a cage with them, I am on the right side of history.”

And what’s it look like on the wrong side of history?

Well the Trump administration was ordered to halt the separations but one way and another it has continued in an alarming fashion. Last week a seven year old Guatemalan girl, Jakelin Caal Maquin, died in custody of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers. She was with her father when he was arrested after crossing the U.S. border. The CBP’s reports say she died from dehydration and shock but this description is disputed by her father, Nery Gilberto Caal Cruz.

Even more questions over this child’s death were raised when it was reported that, astoundingly, CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan knew about the death of the child in its custody before his congressional testimony earlier but he failed even to mention it.

And the cost in dollars for Trump’s cruel policy to date is sizable as of last month, the NYTimes.com reported it was as much as $80 million and rapidly growing.

The lack of preparation and condition of mass housing shelters (many of them contracted out and privately run) provided for separated children have potential for major problems. Govexec.com reports: The tent city, built on a patch of federal land near the border in El Paso County, has been a focal point of criticism and controversy as the number of children housed there has ballooned in recent months to about 2,800.

Late last month, as part of a larger investigation into child safety at the shelters, the inspector general for the Department of Health and Human Services warned that the Trump administration had waived FBI fingerprint background checks for employees at the emergency tent shelter and had hired “dangerously” few mental health counselors.

To handle any potential crimes at the tent city, the government has assigned the largely obscure Federal Protective Service.

The chief mission of the FPS is to protect federal buildings, such as the Census Bureau and the Social Security Administration, which it mostly does through its force of 13,500 private security guards.

And to the administration “whatever” looks like the following.

A couple months before Okuomou climbed the Statue of Liberty and about the time images of detained children in cages became public, John Kelly, who was then Trump’s Chief of Staff (once DHS head), was asked by NPR about the cruel implications of separating families and holding them in custody.  Kelly dismissively remarked: “The children will be taken care of — put into foster care or whatever,”

Many people demonstrated last July, and since then protests continue against the cruelty of Trump’s migrant family detention policy, but the administration carries on with it and their reaction to the suffering they inflict seems to be “whatever.”

Now imagine a pregnant-out-of-wedlock Maria with her fiance Joseph, arriving at the border. And you may have guessed there is no room at the asylum-processing centers. They move along the border, are detained, separated, and Maria gives birth behind razor-wire-topped fences. She calls the infant Esperanza, hope. But they are given no water, food or “whatever”, and the infant dies.

What would Trump say, “Feliz Navidad!” or “whatever” ?

First Step Act: CoreCivic & GEO Group’s prison break? Updated

[Update 12/19:  The First Step Act made it through the Senate with support from the leadership of both parties. The vote for the bill which will affect one tenth of the federal prison population was 87 yeas to 12 nays – all from Republican senators.

Steve Benen at the Maddow Blog speculated on why Donald Trump championed the bill: As for why Donald “tough on crime” Trump would endorse such a package, that’s a little tougher to explain. My best guess is that the president has no idea what’s in the bill, but he likes the idea of signing bipartisan legislation on an important national issue.

Trump may not know the details but he and certainly son-in-law Jared Kushner are aware of the benefits their friends in the for profit prison business are expecting to see.]

Somehow between negotiating a peace settlement in the mid-east, defending his friend Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman the accused murderer of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi Trump’s utility man, son-in-law Jared Kushner, has also been the administration’s driving force” behind The First Step Act, a criminal justice reform bill that will be voted on in Congress next week according to the NYTimes.com.

The bill’s advocates say Mr. Kushner’s efforts were part of the reason Mr. McConnell reversed course, announcing that the Senate would vote on the bill next week. But even more important was his ability, over a course of years, to make Mr. Trump comfortable with the need for criminal justice overhaul in the first place.

“The bipartisan coalition was there before Jared showed up,” said Ronald A. Klain, a former senior official in the Obama and Clinton administrations.“The Koch brothers deserve credit for that. But if Jared got the president to be for it, that is a key part of getting it done, and he does deserve credit for that.”corebreak1

Criminal justice and the federal prison system desperately need reform, and parts of this bill may help but don’t be too quick to think good thoughts about Trump and the GOP efforts. It appears for all the world as if private prison corporations such as GEO Group and CoreCivic (big GOP donors) will be getting a helping hand as federal policy emphasis shifts from their bread and butter incarceration business to  treatment/care franchising.

Oh, and… here in Vermont Gov. Phil Scott and CoreCivic cozied up together on a plan for building a giant 925-bed prison/treatment complex in northern Vermont’s Franklin County. Negative feedback from the public and virtually every Vt. public official and legislator, regardless of political affiliation, landed the project in limbo for the time being.

CoreCivic has invested donations directly in Governor Scott’s election campaigns and indirectly through their contributions to the  Republican Governors Association which funded Scott ‘s  TV adverting during the recent campaign.

Nationally after losing federal contracts under the Obama administration and opposing reforms, for-profit prison interests threw their lot ($$$) in with Trump and the GOP when it became clear reform was likely to happen.

The Tampa Bay Times reports: For their part, GEO Group and CoreCivic have closely aligned themselves with Trump. Each donated $250,000 to Trump’s inaugural fund. Last year GEO Group moved its annual leadership conference from a venue near its Boca Raton headquarters to a Trump-owned Miami-area golf resort, the Washington Post reported last year.

GEO has hired lobbyists close to the president including influential Florida powerbroker Brian Ballard. It heavily supported Trump ally Gov. Rick Scott in his race for U.S. Senate. The company, which operates five facilities in Florida, and its CEO George Zoley donated $414,000 to [Rick] Scott’s campaign and various related committees, more than it gave any other candidate.

Trump and for-profit prisons are again in lockstep on the FIRST STEP Act.

Hopefully there’s some smidgen of actual reform in this bill, but pardon me if I  believe the first step Trump, Kushner and the GOP take is to give their prison corporation buddies a break.

“Very surprising that we all could see the plot and claimed that we could not…”

lightlyTrump1The latest revelations from the Mueller investigation showing criminal activity by those surrounding then candidate Donald Trump, and even potential felonies (an impeachable offense) perpetrated by the Donald himself have brought on a strong wave of nostalgia for an earlier constitutional crisis.

And I don’t mean the GOP’s failed Clinton impeachment but wait for it  Watergate.

H2Ogate Blues

And the poem is called “H2O-G-A-T-E Blues”
And if H2O is still water, and G-A-T-E is still gate
What we’re getting ready to deal on is the Watergate Blues
(Rated X!)  

Let me see if I can dial this number right quick
*Click! Whirrr! Click!*
“I’m sorry, the government you have elected is inoperative
Click. Inoperative”                 

[Verse 2:]
Just how blind will America be? (There ain’t no telling)
The world is on the edge of its seat
Defeat on the horizon. Very surprising that we all
Could see the plot and claimed that we could not… (Alright)

Gil Scott-Heron/ Brian Jackson

Yeah, the real old days way, way back to the 1970’s when articles of impeachment against President Nixon passed with bipartisan support in the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. Nixon, widely believed to be guilty of various crimes, resigned some say to save the nation suffering a trial. He was quickly pardoned of all crimes by President Gerald Ford.

Any bets on how current events will fit the Watergate rhyme?

 

 

Trump-proofing U.S. Democracy

With the Southern District of New York essentially confirming that we have a felon for a president, the focus of pundits seems to be evolving rather quickly from can he or can’t he be indicted to what the hell happens AFTER Donald Trump.

I read an interesting, if depressing piece shared by Will Martin on Business Insider, predicting that U.S. capitalism and, more importantly, the institutions of its democracy, might be forever changed by the spreading corruption of Donald Trump.

Others are speculating that, despite Trump being exposed as the most dishonest and corrupt American president in modern history,  Democrats might actually find it difficult to unseat him should his presidency survive to 2020 for a second go-round.  Some say that the only way to defeat him is with a candidate that exceeds or at least duplicates his savage populist style.

I’ve gotta say that, if that is the case, maybe the U.S. no longer deserves democracy.

The shameless Republican Party, with one foot in the Third Reich,  has somehow succeeded in redefining basic democratic aspirations like a living wage, universal healthcare and education as “far left” pipe dreams to which only a fool would give allegiance. Why do we let tham do that?

Objectively, they haven’t a leg to stand on, having surrendered every remaining ounce of integrity in the service of the Emperor Who Wears No Clothes.  Somehow, though, our tradition of fair play, maintained only on the left, gives the toxic claims of the GOP-in-denial, equal time before the media court of public opinion.  

With an entire television outlet (Fox News) and innumerable right-wing tabloids and websites slavishly devoted to defending and promulgating even Trump’s most conspicuously false statements, why does the rest of the media even give GOP talking heads the time of day?

How is it that in the face of multiple ongoing scandals of treasonous portent, and having made innumerable xenophobic and unsavory comments, Donald Trump somehow still enjoys close to 40% approval? 

Has our national character descended so far since wartime audiences embraced “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington?”

Instead of asking the question, how can we defeat Donald Trump in 2020, we should be asking the question, how do we defeat him for all-time?

When the GOP began its assault on public education and cultural institutions, we should have paid closer attention.  We kind of let that slide.  The end result is that we have a population that is progressing toward greater ignorance, which makes them more pliant to populist extremism.

The only insurance against ignorance and lies laying waste to our democracy is a rigorous and liberal education for all.  Beyond that, we have some serious fence-repair to do in the legal framework of the presidency.

Even China has recognized the importance of education and made great strides in raising its population from poverty, so that it is now evolving into a technology giant.   

We have been doing the opposite.  There will ultimately be an overall economic price to pay for concentrating public policy on further enriching the top 1% earners at the expense of better educating the masses and elevating an informed electorate.

Banana Republic or Docent of Democracy?  The choice is ours alone to make.

The RGA bought Phil Scott’s TV campaign ads but who bought him flowers?

Today WCAX’s Neal Goswami re-tweeted Governor Scott’s message to Vermonters about the upcoming Montpelier tree lightingand he suggests the flowering poinsettia “looks like it was from Arizona.”RGAsflowering gov

Scott’s message was likely sent from Arizona where the Vermont re-elected governor flew to attend the post-election gathering of the Republican Governors Association (RGA). Although the RGA invested less in the Scott campaign this year — it contributed almost $3 million in 2016 for his first successful race for governorthe GOP organization still spent a bundle. According to Seven Days, the conservative-funded super PAC spent $826,366 on Scott’s re-election advertisingmore than any other single group, the bulk of it on pro-Scott television ads.

So while it isn’t clear if those really are flowering Arizona poinsettias, Governor Scott is posing next to, we do know who is behind the RGA and what they bought: almost all of  Scott’s blooming television campaign advertising.

Here’s Seven Days list from the IRS of the conservative donors to the RGA bundle spent on Phil Scott’s 2018 campaign ads:RGA$

No agendas here to worry about, amiright? You know the Koch Brothers,CEO prison corp. and buddies are  just kicking in a few hundred thousand here and there to keep Phil Scott’s poinsettias blooming. No strings attached, obviously.

Problem Solvers Caucus creates problem for Nancy Pelosi

A bipartisan Congressional group co-founded by Vermont’s lone Congressman Peter Welch that says its members are dedicated to “getting things done” is giving a big headache to Nancy Pelosi. For now these Democrats are opposing her bid to become Speaker of the House in the next session when the new Democratic majority takes control.

In a statement to thehill.com, nine Democratic Problem Solver Caucus members vowed to withhold their votes for Pelosi as Speaker unless she agrees to their rule changes. The rule change dispute, according to thehill.com, involves: [A] package of 10 proposals designed to empower individual members and grease the skids for passage of popular bipartisan bills that, in recent years, have frequently been ignored.

[According to Problem Solver Rep. Tom Reed’s (R-NY) press release this will give fast-track priority consideration to bipartisan legislation and guarantees markups on bipartisan legislation from every Member of Congress].

Central to their reforms is a proposal requiring a supermajority vote — three-fifths of the House — to pass any legislation brought to the floor under a closed rule, and another ensuring fast-track consideration of any bill co-sponsored by at least two-thirds of the chamber.

It also proposes changes designed to prevent a small group of hard-liners from using threats to “vacate the chair” as a bludgeon to keep certain legislation off the floor, as the far-right Freedom Caucus has done in recent years.

The rule changes, ironically enough, appear to make it more difficult for the new Democratic majority to actually pass legislation by requiring more than a majority of votes on specific bills.

The Democrats who signed onto the statement are Reps. Josh Gottheimer (N.J.), Jim Costa (Calif.), Tom O’Halleran (Ariz.), Kurt Schrader (Ore.), Tom Suozzi (N.Y.), Daniel Lipinski (Ill.), Stephanie Murphy (Fla.), Vicente González (Texas) and Darren Soto (Fla.). Vermont Rep. Peter Welch did not sign on to this statement but has declared he is withholding his support for Pelosi.

U.S. Representative elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York City’s 14th district tweeted her dismay over the problem the “Problem Solvers” are creating.tweetACO

Are the Problem Solvers Caucus just a Blue Dog cover band?  The Washington Post noted that the group actually solves few problems, along with a major Democratic criticism of them: Democrats in particular say that by supporting the group, members of their own party have given political cover to lawmakers with conservative voting records without forcing those same lawmakers to take concrete action to stall Republican legislation on health care or taxes. The caucus’s Republican members have on average voted in line with the White House’s position 93 percent of the time, according to calculations based on FiveThirtyEight’s vote tracker, with at least nine Republicans in the group doing so more than 95 percent of the time.

None of today’s accounts of the Problem Solvers’ threatened stalemate include any specific comment from  Rep. Welch a Problem Solver Caucus co-founder. Welch, who voted for Pelosi in the past, has withheld any declaration of support of current minority leader Pelosi for Speaker this time. Recently Welch, who will now serve in a Democratic  House majority for the first time in eight years, said to SevenDays.com: “too much power has landed in the speaker’s office,” and he expressed a desire to decentralize power and responsibility to committees. After talking generally about  House “rule changes” quite a bit during the campaign he sure is staying in the shadows now that the caucus he’s a big part of  makes their big play.

According to the report from thehill.com, after meeting with the Problem Caucus last week Pelosi agreed to some of the group’s desired changes.

But the Democrats say they have yet to receive any specific commitments, calling the situation a “stalemate.” They had initially requested a response by last Friday but agreed to give the California Democrat a few more days.

“While we appreciate Leader Pelosi’s broad commitment to our effort, we have yet to receive specific commitments to our proposed rules changes that would help ‘Break the Gridlock’ and allow for true bipartisan governing in this new era of divided government,” the Democrats said in a statement provided to The Hill.

Pelosi has faced down earlier opposition to her return to Speaker from her fellow Democrats “with honey not vinegar.” Maybe that’ll be the problem solver with this House caucus that declares it is dedicated not to obstruction but to (ahem) getting things done.

But somehow I suspect that the people back home who voted in the Blue Wave are going to feel swamped if Rep. Pelosi doesn’t offer more than a sand castle easily destroyed by beach-blanket bullies stomping through it. Pelosi was re-elected to the House to return Democrats to effective power, not to give that power away.

 

 

Waging minimum parity

Nationally one thing became clear in last Tuesday’s election: when a minimum wage hike is on the ballot, even red state voters can pass it — often overwhelmingly.

In Missouri and Arkansas an increase to the minimum wage was on the ballot, and although aggressively opposed by state GOP leaders and big money business groups, it passed overwhelmingly in both red states. Voters passed measures that will raise those states’ minimum wages almost immediately, and thereafter increase it at regular intervals — over years it’ll be edging up substantially. In Arkansas the minimum wage measure passed with 68 percent in voting in favor.builtonwages

If red state voters can accomplish such a feat for low-wage earners can blue Vermont do more?

Regionally pressure to raise the minimum wage is increasing. New York is phasing in a $15.00 minimum, and Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island have proposals in their legislatures to reach a $15.00 minimum. It isn’t too far-fetched that even traditionally low-minimum-wage New Hampshire might experience some pressure, now that the last election gave both houses in the state legislature a Democratic blue majority. And at NH’s current $7.50 per hour minimum, who can afford to work there if they can earn significantly more in a nearby state?

Vermont’s current minimum wage is $10.50, goes up to $10.80 in January 2019, and to $12.16 by 2024. Now Vermont doesn’t have ballot measures but a plan to increase the planned minimum was passed during the 2018 legislative session.

The 2018 legislative bill would have hiked our minimum to $15 per hour by 2024. It is estimated by the Economic Policy Institute that to meet basic housing, food, and transportation needs, a single full-time worker in rural Vermont needs to earn at least $15.00 per hour. However our GOP Governor Scott vetoed the increase which (along with a vetoed paid family-leave bill) would have made life in the state more affordable for actual working class families.

Maybe the new bluer so-called “super” majority of Democrats and Progressives in the Vermont legislature will decide to give Republican Scott a second chance at doing the minimum: making the lives of low-wage earners more affordable.

How bad is it?

 America, checks with top advisers:

Q.) U.S A. : How fucked am I?

A.) First adviser: Well, you look awful, you look terrible. I mean, you often look quite bad, but…

Q.) U.S.A.: In terms of basic functional health of our federal government on the fuck-o-meter, where am I?

A.) Second Adviser: Oh, 12.

 A.) First adviser: Yeah. 12, say.

Q.) U.S. A.: Out of what?

 A.) Second Adviser: Er… 50.

 A.) First adviser: Oh. Mine was out of ten.

U.S. A.: Right, (to Second Adviser) so I’m 24% fucked according to you, (to First Adviser) but according to you I’m 120% fucked? *

Two years of Trump & GOP rule and now post-election the prognosis may be a little better. The Democrats did take control of the house. “So for the first time in two years, there is an institution of the government that is neither afraid of, nor controlled by, the president”. Women candidates running for office made huge gains. From the NYTimes.com: There will be at least 100 women in the House next year — the largest number in U.S. history.  And Democrats gained in state legislatures, CBS news reports: […] as well as obtaining governorships in seven formerly Republican-held states. Additionally, the majority of state attorneys general will be Democrats come January. 

The glimmer of light at the end of the Trump/GOP tunnel is a little brighter.

unclesamgreenBut the GOP in the Senate still has Trump’s back covered. And at two post-election press conferences  Donald more than demonstrated his continuing contempt for normal rules of behavior. Not only did he escalate his attacks on the media and revoke a CNN reporter’s White House press credentials but he threatened more reporters with the same. He topped off his belligerent performances by firing Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Then by placing a complete GOP hack with questionable ethics as acting Attorney General he put the Mueller investigation in real jeopardy.

I’m an optimist today so let’s say we’re at 24% on the “f” meter.

*Apologies to Armando Iannucci and The Thick of It.