Monthly Archives: June 2012

South Burlington or South Bronx?

According to the FreePress, a neighborhood near the airport might as well be in the South Bronx as in South Burlington.  

Having already suffered the indignity of being judged expendable in the name of progress and security, the fragmented community has also now been targeted for urban assault games.  

Few details seem to be available as to which law enforcement bodies are involved or who called open-season on the devastated neighborhood, other than that permission for the use appears to have been granted by Airport management.  Maybe gunfire and explosions are expected to condition local ears to receive the roar of F-35’s without a whimper.  

South Burlington Police Chief Trevor Whipple says it wasn’t his force disturbing the peace.

He said the South Burlington police haven’t used the empty houses for training and added he is unclear which agencies have.

Beyond the obvious insensitivity, it seems astonishingly unprofessional and dangerous to conduct such exercises without a great deal of prior public notice and some opportunity for public comment.

We all recognize the need for police services, just as we accept the need for some amount of military capability; but lately in the Green Mountain State, the line between the two is beginning to blur as communities get themselves equipped with tanks, and Tasers become the accepted means to control drunks and unruly kids.

I don’t really understand this push.  

On the one-hand you have the argument that the state’s population is aging out; that there aren’t many young people left and we need to grow the economy to attract them back again.  On the other, is the fact that the larger the population in our towns and cities, the more policing services and equipment we seem to need; and the greater the opportunity for criminal enterprise to find a toe-hold as well.

We already have an inordinately large prison population; so large in fact, that we have to export it.  It’s a well-known fact that that burgeoning prison population is largely the result of unrealistic drug laws and a broken approach to mental health and addiction at the state and national level.

How can we be so anxious to “grow” our towns and cities without first fixing those population-related vulnerabilities?  

It seems that the popular wisdom holds that we should invite Walmart and other cheap employers to invade local economies, expand our vulnerable populations, and, at the same time, attract the parasitic criminals who feed on their poverty and our enabling drug laws.

This, in turn, forces an expansion of police presence and provides a golden opportunity for armaments makers to expand beyond the profits they have enjoyed during our interminable modern wars.

Is it any surprise that people…neighbors, actually…have come to be largely beside the point when our growing need for security must be satisfied at any cost?

The final candidate list is out

Er, that’s about it. For those who love to pore over long lists of names in tiny print, the Secretary of State’s office has released the Draft Candidate List. Available as a downloadable PDF here.

I did a quick count of Republican candidates for the Legislature, and came up with 79 for the House and 18 for the Senate. (Might be off by one or two.) A bit more respectable than we initially thought, but it still means that the GOP won’t compete for nearly half the seats in the Legislature.

Otherwise, have at it. If you spot something interesting, by all means note it in the Comments below or write a separate diary.  

Tonight: Residents Poised to Tell Burlington City Council “Vermont Can’t Afford Lockheed’s F-35”

Tonight at 7pm Burlington has a historic opportunity to speak out in City Council and ask our local government reject Lockheed’s F-35 fighter plane.

City Council meets at Contois Auditorium on the second floor of City Hall 149 Church St in Burlington

To be part of the speak out you need to sign up at the table to the far left when you enter the auditorium

Please RSVP and invite your friends: https://www.facebook.com/event…

Some of the Many Reasons for Rejecting the F-35



Jobs:

The same number of Vermont tax dollars spent on education, health care, mass transit, or construction, creates many more jobs than military spending like the F-35. This according to 2007 and 2011 studies from the Economics Department at the University of Massachusetts. Twice as many jobs, at higher average pay, are created by spending money on education than on defense. The F-35 program sucks our Federal money away and employs fewer people. And more people will be left unemployed.

http://www.peri.umass.edu/file…

Noise:

Sound level, sound intensity, and loudness are explained in the Air Force draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The bottom line is, according to figures in the EIS, the maximum loudness of the F-35 is more than four times louder than the the maximum loudness of the F-16 both at takeoff and landing.

According to South Burlington City Council President and retired Air Force Colonel, Rosanne Greco in a must read Burlington Free Press Op-Ed:

“Noise is causing the demolition of homes. For example, 1,578 homes are currently in the noise contour area. So far, 200 South Burlington homes have been identified for purchase and demolition. 1,366 more homes, for a total of 2,944 homes, would be in this noise area if the F-35As were based here. And, the FAA home buy-out money is not guaranteed; nor is the airport under any obligation to purchase homes. In fact, last week, the airport said they were not going to purchase any more homes.”

http://www.burlingtonfreepress…

See more about the neighborhood demolition here: http://7d.blogs.com/stuckinvt/…

Today’s Burlington Free Press describes the home demolition as having “turned a once-thriving neighborhood into a local Detroit of empty houses and empty lots by airport buyouts.”

http://www.burlingtonfreepress…

Precedent:

The South Burlington City Council and School Board, as well as the Winooski School Board, have all formally rejected the F-35 being based at Burlington International Airport.

South Burlington School Board’s Statement:

http://sbsd.schoolfusion.us/mo…

CCTV footage of South Burlington’s City Council rejecting the F-35 can be viewed here: http://www.stopthef35.com/node/93

Lockheed’s weapons yield austerity for Vermonters:



The logic of military weapon’s systems like the F-35 can be best explained by former President Dwight D. Eisenhower: “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed.”

The University of New Hampshire Carsey Institute reported in 2007 that over the last 15 years Vermont ranked second among all the states for fastest growth in income inequality. http://www.bos.frb.org/commdev…

Burlington’s middle class is “shrinking faster than almost anywhere else in the country” according to US Census data reported in a BFP cover story.

http://www.feedingchittenden.o…

Meanwhile our tax dollars are being diverted away from meeting our communities fundamental needs and towards $160 million per plane weapons systems we can ill afford.

Lockheed’s “F-35 was intended to be an “affordable” fighter-bomber (at roughly $50 million per copy), a perfect complement to the much more expensive F-22 “air superiority” Raptor. But the usual delays, cost overruns, technical glitches and changes in requirements have driven the price tag of the F-35 up to $160 million per plane, assuming the US military persists in its plans to buy 2,400 of them. (If the Pentagon decides to buy fewer, the cost-per-plane will soar into the F-22 range.) By recent estimates the F-35 will now cost US taxpayers (you and me, that is) at least $382 billion for its development and production run. Such a sum for a single weapons system is vast enough to be hard to fathom. It would, for instance, easily fund all federal government spending on education for the next five years.The escalating cost of the F-35 recalls the most famous of Norman Augustine’s irreverent laws: “In the year 2054,” he wrote back in the early 1980s, “the entire defense budget will [suffice to] purchase just one aircraft.” But the deeper question is whether our military even needs the F-35, a question that’s rarely asked and never seriously entertained, at least by Congress, whose philosophy on weaponry is much like King Lear’s: “O, reason not the need.” www.thenation.com/article/165832/confessions-recovering-weapons-addict

Dems in Burlington have given up a seat in Chittenden 6-3: Not!!

Update: Terje was kind enough to correct my mistake. The list I have linked to was incomplete and the Secretary of State will have an updated list and should have 2 Democratic candidates represented in Chittenden 6-3. My bad.

 

Vermont Digger finally has the complete list of candidates who have filed to run for office in Vermont. I happened to notice that for the two seats in Chittenden 6-3, represented now by Jill Krowinski and Jason Lorber, has 4 candidates, 2 Progressives, 1 Independent and 1 Democrat. Krowinski is running for reelection. Lorber is not. It was mentioned in the Seven Days blog, Blurt on June 8th, about a week before the filing deadline.

I was surprised that the Dems hadn't filed two candidates for this district because they pretty much have a lock on it at the state level. However, with Lorber's late announcement, either no one was interested or the local Dems were caught unexpectedly by Lorber's announcement. I would think that Lorber would have had the foresight to tell local Democratic leaders that he wouldn't run again so that they could have time to draft somebody else to run and get the necessary signatures to run for the seat, and would have had a good chance at being elected, considering Obama is at the top of the ticket this November. 

The Democrats aren't in any danger of losing control of the Vermont House this November, but carelessness like this, combined with the not giving a damn about his House seat  Lorber, does them no favors as well. I thinks it is akin to shooting yourself in the foot for no reason whatsoever. One must concede that a Progressive would have a very similar voting record to a Democrat, if not even more leftist at that, but I think this is a stupid mistake to make under any circumstances. It might be more Lorber's fault or the local Dems, I'm not sure, but it would be nice if they paid more attention to such details. The only way to remedy it would be to draft somebody as a write-in, although that would be hard to do. If anyone can shed light on this issue and why such a mistake took place, I would be glad to know and be enlightened about it. 

Independence From Entergy July 1st Rally & Action

People from across Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire will declare independence from the Entergy Corporation (ENR) during a July 1st rally and non-violent act of civil disobedience

Contact: Chad Simmons, 262.215.0259 (cell), cbtossin@yahoo.com

Deb Katz, 413.339.5781, deb@nukebusters.org

Debra Stollerof, 802.476.3154, debra@vtlink.net

What:   The People Declare Independence From Entergy Vermont Yankee

When:   Sunday, July 1st

Where: 10:00 AM rally at the Brattleboro Common (Park Pl. between Hwy 5/Putney Rd and Hwy 30/Linden St)

12:00 PM nonviolent direct action at the gates of Vermont Yankee (546 Governor Hunt Rd. in Vernon, VT)

The People Declare Independence From Entergy Vermont Yankee

People from across Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire will declare independence from the Entergy Corporation (ENR) during a July 1st rally and non-violent act of civil disobedience. Organizers plan a 10:00 AM rally with short speeches and performances taking place at the Brattleboro Common, Brattleboro, VT. This will be followed by a bicycle procession to Vernon, VT and nonviolent direct action at the gates of the Vermont Yankee nuclear reactor. The action will involve an elaborate entrance and “gift” presented to the corporation, a sight surely not to be missed. Participants risking arrest will be trained in nonviolence and part of an affinity group. Organized by the SAGE Alliance. For details and updates, go to www.sagealliance.net or www.facebook/shutdownvermontyankee

                                    ##

Behold the Lord High Executioner

Or so Vince Illuzzi pictures himself, upon the throne of the Auditor General: A personage of noble rank and file, a dignified and potent officer, whose functions are particularly vital.

Yesterday, I wrote about an Illuzzi comment that seemed to take a rather expansive view of the Auditor’s office: “It really is about looking at programs to see if they are performing as envisioned by the general assembly and as expected by the public…”

That, it seemed to me, outlined a policy-oversight dimension to the job that’s, ahem, missing from the actual job description.

Well, more evidence of the same from the Vermont Press Bureau (behind the Herald/TA paywall, as far as I can tell):

During a news conference at the Secretary of State’s office, the 58-year-old Illuzzi said he would bring to the auditor’s office a legislative track record of challenging establishment policy positions pushed by governors, powerful lawmakers and industry leaders. The most recent example, Illuzzi said, was his fight against aspects of the proposed merger of the state’s two largest electric utilities, Central Vermont Public Service and Green Mountain Power. 



“You need an independent voice who is willing to respectfully and constructively stand up to the establishment and question certain policies and programs, and I think I’ve done that,” said Illuzzi.

He seems to believe that he’d be judge, jury, and Executioner, dispensing his wisdom on questions of finance, policy, and politics alike. Moreover, he seems to see himself as being uniquely qualified to take on this responsibility.

Quite an ego there.

We’ll see how the race plays out — Illuzzi promises specific proposals when he formally launches his campaign — but the way it looks right now, if you want an Auditor, you’d best vote for Doug Hoffer. If you want a loose cannon, then by all means vote for Vince Illuzzi.

Defer, defer,

to the Lord High Executioner!

Bow down, bow down,

to the Lord High Executioner!

2012 Hamburg Summit – Saturday, July 21

Come to North Beach on Saturday July 21 and join Philip Baruth and the cast and crew of Green Mountain Daily for our annual tribute to incinerated food.

In an election year, you’re bound to meet a number of statewide Democratic candidates who know that the Summit is a great place to meet the best informed (and most opinionated) voters in the state!

GMD has experienced some changes over the past year.  We have lost a couple of invaluable front pagers and brought on new talent.

We hope you’ll plan to join us and get re-acquainted.  

Here’s a memory from the 2010 Summit!

Green Mountain Daily,GMD,Vermont Daily Briefing,VDB,Hamburg Summit

No Republican War on Women?

As soon as Democrats started talking about the Republican war on women the Republicans trotted out their counter-meme that not only are the Republicans not engaged in a war on women but that is the Democrats, by advocating for women's equality and autonomy, are.

 

 I know, it's absurd on the face of it, but that's what they claim. But if it's not a war against women, what do you call what happened in Michigan this week?

 

  Michigan House Republicans blocked a state representative from speaking on the floor on Thursday after she referenced certain parts of female anatomy in a speech on an abortion bill.

 

 That's right. The House of Representatives in Michigan was debating yet another bill to cut back on women's abortion rights and a woman, Rep. Lisa Brown, dared to say: “Finally, Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but ‘no’ means ‘no,’”

 

 For that she was barred from speaking on a subsequent piece of legislation.

 

 Probably my favorite comment in the whole debate was this, from a Republican House member:

 

  “It was so offensive, I don’t even want to say it in front of women,” one state representative said. “I would not say that in mixed company.”

 

 So yes, just to recap: we have a Republican dominated legislative body, debating what women can do with their own bodies, punishing a woman for mentioning her own body.

 

 Is there anything else we need to do to prove that this is a war on women?

The Tide is Turning

This is very unusual.

've sued the government a lot of times, but I've never had this happen.

From the Chicago Tribune:

The Cook County State’s Attorney’s office concedes in a court filing today that the state’s ban on same-sex marriages is unconstitutional, according to a spokeswoman.

Two recent lawsuits against Cook County Clerk David Orr claim that not issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Illinois Constitution.

The state’s attorney’s response, filed today, agrees with that claim.

The government pretty much always defends its practices. This is a big deal.