Tag Archives: Vermont ACCD

Free Flannel & Half-truths: Vt Commerce and Community Development Fall Foliage Guide:

VTDigger.com has partnered with politifact.com and are now using their honesty lantern to check the state’s facts. In their latest fact-check, looked into a statement made by Agency of Commerce and Community Development Secretary Michael Schirling (formerly Burlington’s top cop) in response to a Saturday Night Live TV comedy sketch that parodied Vermont as “a Caucasian paradise.”  In his press release to Boston.com about the skit, Schirling said: “We invite SNL viewers to Vermont to see all that we have to offer, including our increasingly diverse communities and wide array of tourist destinations including the African American Heritage Trail.

Now is a perfect time to visit or to consider a move here. The leaves are changing and so is Vermont,” he said.leavesRturning

He also noted it was true “we do lack a good hip-hop channel,” plugged real Vermont maple syrup, and even generously sent a free (tax-payer-funded) load of Vermont flannel shirts to the cast of the NYC-based show.

Vtdigger.com dug into that response: The statement that Vermont is becoming increasingly diverse needs further clarification. Schirling does not explain that the increase in Vermont’s racially diverse populations is slight.

[…] The U.S Census information Shirling used showed that Vermont as of 2017 was 94.2 percent white [while] it had been 95 percent white in 2013. Vtdigger explained: From 2013 to 2017, the increase in the African-American population from 1.1 percent to 1.3 percent was not statistically significant. But the percent change in the Asian and Hispanic populations was: Asians went from 1.2 percent of the Vermont population to 1.8 percent, a 0.6 percentage point increase; Hispanics went from 1.5 percent to 1.9 percent, a 0.4 percentage point increase.

They rate his statement Half True.

One commenter on Vtdigger.com’s fact check  wondered:  Who really cares what SNL spoofs? […] It’s a C-O-M-E-D-Y show, too bad people feel the need to defend VT from a comedy skit.”

Good question. Well, I wonder if the administration’s sensitivity can be traced back to an opinion piece early this summer during Gov. Scott and Sec. Schirling’ splashy roll out of their $10,000 move-to-Vermont scheme. The plan, part of Scott’s Stay to stay and Think!Vermont  promotional programs, targeted young professional people and planned to pay them to move to Vermont and work remotely out of state.

Wall Street Journal columnist Jeff Yang wrote the following in a criticism of the scheme for CNN titled The Problem with Vermont’s bright idea: What’s ironic is how inside the box its “outside the box” thinking really is. Because while Vermont could be taking this moment to bring new diversity to a state that’s the second-whitest in the United States, it’s instead investing in initiatives that could easily end up maintaining the state’s culturally monolithic status. If Vermont had aimed this policy at explicitly encouraging new Americans to migrate to the state (the policy does not), it would be redressing a significant shortfall in the state’s demographics.” [added emphasis]

Sure seems like the SNL joke touched a nerve in the image-conscious Scott administration over their expensive glossy promotional schemes. But if they are still into giving out free flannel shirts — I could use a couple, size large please — I’ll stay right here in Vermont.

Post-apocalyptic video game tourism promo: “A great way to remind people of West Virginia.”

Here’s one for the what-won’t-a-state-do-to-promote-itself file. A soon-to-be-released post-apocalyptic video role-playing game called Fallout 76 by Bethesda Softworks uses images of rural West Virginia locations. The game will reportedly feature scenic vistas that hint at the state’s real-life pre-apocalyptic beauty. It was these images that caught the attention of the state’s tourism department prompting the state to join in on promoting the game. wvfallout

The Wheeling News Register reports: There are the remains of a ski resort near what was Elkins. The Moundsville Penitentiary still stands. Harpers Ferry, located near bombed out D.C., still exists. You can even fight monsters, such as the Mothman and the Flatwoods Monster. You’re free to see and experience it all in the game.

[Notably West Virginia really is the location of formerly secret Cold War era underground bunkers built for federal government office holders, officials, and their families. See “Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government’s Secret Plan to Save Itself — While the Rest of Us Die,” by Garrett Graff, who was briefly a candidate for Vermont Lt. Gov until tripped up by a residency clause.]

The Fallout 76 trailer opens with John Denver’s Take Me Home, Country Roads song playing over views of West Virginia back roads. There are also monsters, including a huge winged beast inspired from local folklore. The players acquire nuclear launch codes and can use nuclear weapons to reshape the game world. Players then explore the West Virginia-inspired irradiated areas to find rare weapons, gear, and survival items, and then battle powerful enemy inhabitants.

 “Some people have been surprised given the post-nuclear setting, but we see it as an opportunity,” said Chelsea Ruby, the state’s tourism commissioner. “There are going to be millions of people exposed to our state and to the theme song of our campaign through this game, and given the way that the state’s beauty is portrayed in this, we just see it as a great way to remind people of West Virginia.”

The bulk of the campaign will kick off after the game’s release and will include promotions, targeted advertising and official travel itineraries and tour opportunities for Fallout fans who’d like to see the real-life inspirations behind the places featured in the virtual world.

Eight locations from the trailer are outlined on the state’s tourism website, with sliding images that allow users to toggle between the real-life and post-apocalyptic versions of each site.

Although many US states spend big bucks to promote themselves, it is difficult to accurately track the effectiveness of these expensive ad campaigns. Here in Vermont  we have been spared — at least so far — from spending our tax dollars hyping post-apocalyptic video games. Our  so-called “out of box,” attention-grabbing tax-payer funded promotion efforts have included dangling a $10,000 check to select people who agree to move here (as long as they e-commute out of state), regional Stay to Stay  weekend sales-promo pitches to “captive tourist audiences,”  and a pop-up lemonade stand stunt on a state hiking trail sponsored by an out-of-state outdoor-apparel manufacturer. The Scott administration, in 2016, even hired a Pennsylvania company for $1.58 million to create videos and glossy marketing materials to “rebrand” UVM to attract out-of-state applicants.

I suppose if offered the chance, Governor Scott’s Dept. of Commerce would jump to get a piece of post-apocalypse marketing. “Oh look, that’s where the Vermont state house once stood, it was such a brave little state!”

Could Vermont’s EB-5 Regional Center wither away?

Of course it’s hard to match the impact of the original headlines from Stenger & Quiros’ Jay Peak EB-5 scandal — but two resulting events, largely unnoticed by comparison, will soon impact Vermont’s EB-5 Regional Center.

buriedEB5 3The first change was set underway when, to prevent future “Ponzi-style” EB-5 scandals, Vermont shifted financial oversight responsibility from the Agency of Commerce and Community Development (ACCD)  to the Department of Financial Regulation (DFR). The focus jumped from wooing overseas investors with almost full-time EB-5 boosterism to tightening up financial oversight.

Along with this shift came legislative adjustments allowing the DFR to control charges and enact new fees for those participants in the Vermont EB-5 Regional Center. Additionally the DFR was given authority to invoice EB-5 developers for its oversight and regulation. Moves were also made to rein in the ACCD’s taxpayer support for advertising, out-of-state  travel, and other promotional work through the Regional Center on behalf of EB-5 developers.

And recently Peak Resorts /Mt. Snow surprised top state officials  by announcing the formation of their own independent EB-5 center. The resort had to struggle with waiting on a payment for an ongoing project from their EB-5 investor funds held in escrow by the state as a guarantee.

By setting up their own EB-5 program, the out-of-state resort owners can happily gather-up their foreign funds through the investment-for-visa immigration program, independent of the Vermont-run EB-5 Regional Center with whom they formerly were partnered.

In fact, Mt. Snow Resorts probably has an inside track on this approach, should it become a trend for other EB-5 developers here in Vermont. In 2015 they hired the director of the Vermont EB-5 Regional Center — grabbing Brent Raymond directly out of the revolving door. As director, Raymond’s duties for the state included both promotional activities and monitoring EB-5 program compliance under state and federal financial regulations. Quite the catch.

So, the Jay Peak financial scandal has forced Vermont’s Regional Center EB-5 Program to change their regulatory responsibilities and funding — and perhaps most importantly, the state-run monopoly on EB-5 regulation and oversight is now threatened. It might even spell extinction rather than evolution for the Vermont ACCD’s Regional Center.

However, here and nationally, independent EB-5 foreign investment-for-visa programs are bound to stick around. Even in the midst of the new President’s immigration crackdowns, access to large chunks of quickly attainable legal foreign investment money is tough for any developer to deny themselves. You could even say it is almost impossible to resist — one New York finance broker said the EB-5 immigrant money racket was so good “[It] sounds like legalized crack cocaine.”

After all, even Donald Trump is tapping EB-5 funds for one or more of his gang’s projects. If it’s good for the President, it must be good for the country, right? … Right? … Amiright?