Tag Archives: County Courier

The Enigma of GOP outrage

local/regional, , , , , , ,

A campaign flunky for Don Turner has turned his righteous indignation toward the least likely senate candidate from Franklin County. Talk about choosing a soft target!

Isn’t it interesting that, attached as he is to the campaign of proud Donald Trump supporter and candidate for Lieut. Gov, Don Turner, Shayne Spence somehow managed to muster outrage over a tasteless joke made several years ago by Franklin County senate candidate Dustin Tanner. The fact that Mr. Spence proudly boasts of going to great lengths to ferret out a questionable tidbit speaks volumes about Mr. Spence’s own rather icky character, but that is beside the point.

What surprises me is that Mr. Turner’s prospects apparently are so dim that his campaign staff has nothing better to do than waste time “getting something” on a Franklin County novice who hasn’t a snowball’s chance in hell against the Franklin County Republican Machine, oiled as it is with outside donations from the likes of “hate donors” like Carol and Tom Breuer and the bashful Ms. Lenore Broughton.

The County Courier, predictably a water carrier for the GOP, leapt on the meager “scandal” like a starving dog on a rubber chicken, gleefully embroidering the story with feigned outrage. I can’t share a link to the mighty Courier’s two full pages of coverage, because there is none, but we’re talking molehill-to-mountain proportions. Slow news days can stretch into months for the Courier.

This leads me inevitably to ask, where was the outrage when disgraced Senator Norm McAllister stood credibly accused of multiple acts of sexual assault, including violation of a minor? Surely The VGOP and the County Courier could have mustered a little more sensitivity for the victims, all of whom were not only dependent on him for their economic survival, but also politically dependent on him as his constituents. Surely the weak exploited by the powerful makes for greater indignation than a sophmoric standup routine.

Republicans try desperately to avoid responsibility for their own all too frequent acts of gross misogyny, but whenever someone from the other side of the aisle transgresses, they are all over the outrage even as Democrats are manning up and taking their medicine.

Now repeat after me, Mr. Spence:

“Hey-hey. Ho-ho. Kavanaugh has got to go!”

Bias at the Franklin County Courier

local/regional, , , , , ,

I am generally a big supporter of local independent newspapers, but John Walters’ article in Seven Days raises a longtime issue many of us have had with the (Franklin) County Courier over political bias that extends to its editorial policies. 

Walters’ piece discusses this bias as it specifically impacts Cindy Weed (P-Enosburg Falls), who is defending her seat against Republican  Felisha Leffler.  Besides being a Republican challenger to Weed, Ms. Leffler is the girlfriend of Gregory Lamoureux, the paper’s owner, publisher and chief reporter.    

As custodian of his little corner of the Fourth Estate, Mr. Lamoureaux should bend over backwards to avoid the appearance of bias, especially when it comes so close to home.

Weed is quick to point out that she was not the aggrieved candidate who apparently contacted Walters with the current complaint of bias against the Courier.   While she has had an ongoing struggle with the Courier just to get them to print her letters as Representative for the district, as well as those of others who support her positions; she is not the only one to remark on the Courier’s biased editorial policies, but rather one of many  unhappy locals.

Mr. Walters may have focussed on Cindy Weed due to a similarity in the bias issue involving Mr. Lamoureaux and his relationship to candidate Leffler to a bias controversy weathered a few years ago by publisher and co-editor of Seven Days, Paula Routly, who is the domestic partner of Tim Ashe (D/P Chittenden).  The circumstances at Seven Days had one notable difference: there was little indication that any conflict of interest had actually affected editorial policy at Seven Days.  The same cannot be said for Mr. Lamoureaux’ stewardship of the County Courier. 
If Mr. Lamoureaux’ excuse for the appearance of political bias is that he can’t afford a bigger staff in order to distance himself from occasion for bias,  he should know that he does himself and the Courier no favors with this argument.  I have friends who have cancelled their subscriptions to the Courier due to the peculiarly unwelcoming policies it practices with regard to letters-to-the-editor, especially when they fall outside the political views of Mr. Lamoureaux.
As Walters mentions in his article, the St. Albans Messenger has a policy of printing virtually every letter to the editor that it receives, without alteration.  This is just smart business practice as it provides a kind of “buy in” from the community, encourages subscriptions and makes for a much livelier read.  It isn’t as if there is so much more pressing news in Franklin County that the Courier can’t find room for commentary from all corners of the political spectrum; and the more the merrier.
If anyone, but particularly an elected representative, takes the trouble to compose a letter to the editor, it is a wise publisher who recognizes this for the gift it represents to a free and fair press…not something to be undervalued in these uncertain times. 

County Courier called out for bias

Uncategorized, ,

Here in Franklin County, many people rely on the County Courier to provide weekly perspective on regional, and some national, news.

Lately, many readers have been disappointed to find more and more articles gleaned from national right wing sources creeping into the pages of the Courier, generally without vetting or balance, and  occasionally without complete disclosure of the source.

The latest salvo in this partisan information attack came in the form of a new policy by the Courier concerning “Letters to the Editor” in advance of the 2016 elections. Only letters from incumbent legislators  will be allowed unlimited inclusion in the paper.  Anyone else writing about the election, including opposition candidates, will be limited to a single letter of 100 words or less.  That leaves incumbents with plenty of opportunity to attack their opponents and the opponents almost none for setting the record straight.

Of course, since 10 out of the twelve incumbent legislators are Republican, it’s pretty clear which party this policy is designed to favor.

I hope our own readers will consider adding their voices to the protests against this biased policy.  Here at GMD, we are an unashamedly biased source of opinion, as befits a blog; but the Courier claims to be a newspaper and should limit its bias  to clearly identified editorial content.

Here is the Courier’s email contact:   countycourier@gmail.com

And here follows my own letter to the editor:

Years back, I would routinely pick-up a copy of the Courier because I appreciated the depth of its coverage of local news. Those days are long gone, and the Courier has evolved into an organ of right-wing propaganda, reproducing nationally generated material of questionable accuracy and decided bias without appropriate disclaimers.

That transition is now complete with the announcement of the Courier’s new policy on letters concerning the 2016 election campaign. While challenging candidates and their supporters are limited to one letter of 100 words for the duration of the campaign, incumbent candidates  are allowed virtually unlimited access to the forum.

Given that the Franklin County delegation is almost entirely Republican, as of now, the opposition voice is effectively repressed by your policy. This is a disservice to your readers and to County interests in general.

Consider, in contrast, the habits of the St. Albans Messenger, which prints virtually all letters that are minimally civil, no matter what the point of view. The Messenger is fulfilling its vital traditional role as a community forum, choosing only to limit letters in the last week of an election campaign, when the volume threatens to overwhelm other content. At that point, they simply give a cut-off date for new submissions related to the election. No preference is given to incumbents and their supporters.

Please recommit to your obligation toward the public good and restore the integrity of our County Courier.