mug     

Please Donate To the Greater Falls Warming Shelter in Memory of Julie Waters



Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.




Campbell's decision to scuttle union bill driven by pride, rather than smarts

by: odum

Thu Feb 09, 2012 at 10:48:39 AM EST


So Senate President Pro Tem John Campbell has declared H.97 - the bill passed last session by the House that would provide limited collective bargaining rights to home-based child care workers (and a bill I did some work on) - dead. He does not intent to let it come out of committee. Barring some last minute intervention from the Governor, it's likely to stay dead (and Shumlin has already picked his controversies for this election year... this bill is not on the list).

It should never have come to this, and has because of self-destructive behavior on both sides.

On the union's side, it's no secret in the Statehouse that AFT has continued to wield a strategic sledgehammer, even those times when finesse has been called for. Vermont legislators are more prickly than most on that regard.

On Campbell's end, it seems to be simply about pique. He's not able to see beyond some of that strategic clumsiness to judge the issue on its merits, simply because bill proponents have dared to cross him. And when you dare to cross Campbell, apparently, political reality becomes an afterthought.

Putting aside the ethics of the bill and the right to collective bargaining - a right Democrats are supposed to stand for - consider the more politically crass implications. Campbell is assumed to be eyeing higher office - possibly the governorship after Shumlin moves on. He'll inevitably face a primary, and this move won't play well in that arena.

But more than that - consider the general election. In its earliest form, this bill could have unionized 8,000 low-income Vermonters, mostly women. That's 8000 union members who would get mailings endorsing candidates - and most of those would be Democrats.

This is why I have little doubt that Republican insiders are laughing their butts off at Campbell's decision to let his personal pride overcome his common sense.

odum :: Campbell's decision to scuttle union bill driven by pride, rather than smarts
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Raise Your Voice!

Spot-on, John (0.00 / 0)
It has been the case over the years that Vt. Legislators get annoyed with political activist groups and sometimes take it out on the issue--which is, taking it out on the people.  Politics sometimes gets personal.  But, our elected officials know this when they run for office.  And boy, 8000 votes is something that should put your personal annoyance on the back burner.

much more complicated (0.00 / 0)
and more investigation is necessary.  This bill smelled funny last year and probably did this year also.   A union does not have owners of centers along with their employees.  

[ Parent ]
Theres (0.00 / 0)
There's plenty of room to debate what a union is, isn't, or could be (I love those kinds of conversations)- but this Bill does not include centers at all, their workers or their owners.

"GMD's once proud libertarian-socialist"

[ Parent ]
but (0.00 / 0)
it did in first form and that is a significant part of the power play  game plan or whatever that fouled the water from day one with many potential allies.  There are a lot of groups on the sideline for this one that normally would be strongly supporting the movement.  AFT made the mistake of showing too much of the iceberg to early in the  game on this one, and their staff went way over the top on power grabs and stepped on a lot of feet.  The one person responsible for the sledgehammer should also take the responsibility for this fiasco and do the right thing.  

The initial representation, to unionize childcare providers was a great idea.  It turned out that the objective and financial reward of the legislative play was well beyond that.


[ Parent ]
Depressing (4.00 / 1)
to see a Vt.Democrat hand one to the Republicans.
With all the beatings the unions are taking nationally from Republicans in Indiana,Arizona,Wisconsin,Utah and so on they don't need any "friendly fire".

Yup (4.00 / 1)
I largely agree, although I'm a bit skeptical to see it framed that "the union" has acted in a self-destructive manner.  By this, are we talking about providers (primarily low-income women) contacting their elected "leaders" to demand fair treatment and a mere seat at the table with the decisions that effect their livelihoods?  Seems to me that democracy should be more about issues and process than petty "I don't like your style" personality questions.  That's how anti-union folks always frame the issues...

"GMD's once proud libertarian-socialist"

Heh (0.00 / 0)
You know me, I parsed that very carefully ;)

"on the union side" contextualizes the next statement, "AFT has continued to..." makes the criticism at a specific target. I agree there is a distinction, especially when we're talking about a unrecognized union.

The line between "the union side" and "AFT" is subtle, but it's meaningful IMHO.

Nullius perfectus est


[ Parent ]
Yes--'Decorum' (0.00 / 0)
"Hey, hey you!  Where do you think you're going?"

"Up to see my state rep and state senators"

"Not with that button on!"

"OK.  Here...I'm taking it off.  Thanks..."

"Hey...Hey...Hey!  Not with that cap on!"

"OK.  Caps coming off.  Thanks..."

"Hey!  The T-Shirt."

"But this is my only shirt."

"OFF!"

"OK, OK...jeez.  It's off."

"What's that tattoo?"

"First Gulf War.  Can I go now?"

"Of course not.  We have a dress code here.  This is the State Capital!"

"Well, do you have a coat I can borrow?"

"Wait a minute...OK, here.  But bring it back."

"Thanks.  Can I go now?"

"Go ahead."

"Thanks"  (and up the stairs he goes)

"Pzzzzzttt...Yeah Mike, there's some clown on his way up with a big long coat on.  Yeah...see if you can hold him there.  I'll call for back up."


[ Parent ]
The bottom line is that (4.00 / 2)
a lot of overworked and underpaid Vermonters, mostly women, who want to improve not only their own circumstances but also the standard of care their charges receive, are left powerless once again.

I heard the campaign promises and thought we were heading into a more enlightened era when we would do better than this in Vermont.  I thought, even if the rest of the country makes war on education, at least here we've got our priorities straight.

I was wrong.



GMD Links

Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
Tenselblog
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine




Specialized Feeds:

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Rojo
R|Mail
Add to Technorati Favorites!


RSS FEED


blog advertising is good for you
Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Follow us on Twitter! or Like us on Facebook!


Featured Stories
State and Local
National and International




Powered by: SoapBlox