mug     

Please Donate To the Greater Falls Warming Shelter in Memory of Julie Waters



Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.




The Half-Empty Cup

by: Sue Prent

Mon Jan 23, 2012 at 09:58:13 AM EST


When I entered the workforce as a callow teen, in the summer of 1966, I received my first minimum wage paycheck of roughly fifty dollars as if it was gold-plated.  Babysitting had only netted me .75 per hour, so $1.25 represented a huge raise for me.

A quick look at prices in that forgotten era tells me more about the actual value of that $1.25  wage.

A gallon of milk was .99.  A gallon of gas was .32.  First-class postage cost a nickel, and the average cost of a new house was around $15,000.   A brand new car was in the $2,600. range.

1966 was also the year in which, under a federal mandate from the Johnson administration, the University of Wisconsin created its "Institute on Poverty Research."  Just three years later a social conscience was not yet unfashionable, and childhood poverty rates reached their lowest level ever, when only  14% of children lived in poverty.  That figure is now at roughly 22%.

In 1966, most qualified students could attend a public university for next to nothing, and even "Ivy League" privates charged only about $3,000. per year.

Just as today, we had an unpopular war in a strange foreign land; but we also were still a manufacturing powerhouse then, and upward mobility was an achievable goal.  Our cup was at least half-full.

So what exactly does the new minimum wage for Vermont, at $8.46 per hour (the third highest in the land) puchase in 2012's economy?

It would buy you a lot more milk than it did in 1966, at an average price of $3.76 per gallon in 2011; but only a little more than two gallons of high-test as opposed to three in '66.    Of course bizarre price-fixing schemes that profit everyone but the small, responsible farmer and the independent gas station account for the relatively low cost of food and fuel in today's economy.  

The more substantial costs of living, like housing, education and transportation tell quite a different story.

Sue Prent :: The Half-Empty Cup
A minimum wage earner in 1966 would make, from a 40-hour work-week, an annual salary of $2,600. Nonetheless, the average income in 1966 was $6,900 and significantly more low-wage earners could count on a full forty hours of work every week  while union membership and influence was at its strongest.  

In 2011 the average income was $26,364.  A single year of education at even a mid-tier private college or University  costs this much or more.  Even at an average public college, the average cost of four years for in-state students comes to more than $30,000.

AAA estimates that the average cost per year to own and operate a car in 2012 is $8,588, a cost that would consume fully half of a Vermont minimum wage earner's annual salary, even if he or she were so lucky as to work a full 40-hour week.  

It's no wonder that, in communities underserved by public transportation, some Vermonters are forced to choose between a roof over their heads and the car necessary to get them to their minimum wage job.


The VHFA found that affording a "modest" two-bedroom apartment in Vermont requires a household income of $39,595-more than twice the state's minimum wage at full-time employment. And while some households have more than one wage earner, nearly two-thirds have only one or fewer.

So, while Vermont's minimum wage increase is certainly better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick (or the federal minimum wage of $7.25), and will be welcome to the folks previously locked into $8.15 per hour, it won't move anyone out of dire poverty.  

And you can bet there will be a fair number of crepe-hangers complaining that it disadvantages small businesses and the "job creators" they imagine to be lurking somewhere in the luxury shadows, just waiting for us to tempt them into action.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Raise Your Voice!

It's not just for kids anymore (4.00 / 2)
Regular hikes in the min. wage may be even more needed as the hard/painful/tough budget choices lawmakers often speak about bite even more into programs for retired workers. The Free Press today features a 71 year old man who has worked six years as a custodian to supplement his retirement. He earns $8.50 per hour after starting at $7.25.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress...

American 'Exceptionalism' (4.00 / 1)
Perhaps they mean, by that phrase, that it is 'exceptional' that Americans put up with the kind of shit we've been getting since Reagan.  Or, like a pro-boxer, we can keep taking a beating and still get up again on every 9-count.

I'd like to see a Reality TV show about average Americans called VICTIM instead of Survivor.


a minor point (0.00 / 0)
"childhood poverty rates reached their lowest level ever, when only  14% of children lived in poverty.  That figure is now at roughly 22%."

i don't know the figures, but i do know that middle and upper income people have a lot fewer children than 40 years ago.  This would account for some of this increase.


You may be correct, (0.00 / 0)
but I'd have to see the statistical evidence.

I think there is a danger of minimizing the significance of a 22% poverty rate among children when one goes down this road, though.

It kind of plays to the time-honored Republican rationalization that the poor are only poor because they make poor choices.  As if.


[ Parent ]
i don't have the stats (0.00 / 0)
but i remember enough anecdotal news stories to know this is true.  I remember a story about the declining birth rate in Germany.  The comment "Germans want vacations and Porsches instead of children" sticks in my mind.

My point was not to minimize the plight or extent of child poverty.  My point is that middle and upper income people do not have as many children as they used to.  This skews the average.  

I agree that not all poor people are poor because of bad choices.  BUT some of them are.  


And some people get cancer due to lifestyle "choices" (0.00 / 0)
but that doesn't mean we simply assume that when a person gets sick it's their own fault.

[ Parent ]

GMD Links

Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
Tenselblog
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine




Specialized Feeds:

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Rojo
R|Mail
Add to Technorati Favorites!


RSS FEED


blog advertising is good for you
Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Follow us on Twitter! or Like us on Facebook!


Featured Stories
State and Local
National and International




Powered by: SoapBlox