The only way to close the revolving prison door is to open another one.
- Senator Joe Biden
While I am quite tired of the "War on [insert social problem]" formulation, it's still good to see the governor working on an issue he spoke about on the campaign trail:
Shumlin joined lawmakers and judicial branch officials to highlight efforts to lower the number of people who return to prison after being released by stepping up addiction treatment, mental health counseling and other services for nonviolent offenders.
Shumlin's opponent last election tried to demagogue on this, and barely failed to scare enough Vermonters overall though he handily won our county, where there is a correctional facility, by roughly 2:1. I appreciated the governor's not-entirely-original idea to reduce costs in corrections by reducing the nonviolent offender population and reinvesting savings in early education.
Reducing recidivism saves us a great deal of money in the short- and long-term. As the Freep article I link to notes, it costs about $48k/yr to incarcerate versus $6500 for supervision. Fiscally-responsible governance demands we do all we can to keep offenders from returning to prison.
And from a moral and security perspective, it also makes a great deal of sense. How can any citizen exercise their full measure of human rights if we set them up to fail after releasing them? And how can our communities be safe if we have ticking timebombs wandering around with no moderating, mitigating forces to help them walk the straight and narrow?