mug     

Please Donate To the Greater Falls Warming Shelter in Memory of Julie Waters



Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.




Give Me a Break.

by: Sue Prent

Thu Nov 18, 2010 at 10:00:00 AM EST


It's the usual suspects talking down Vermont while wheedling for a tax break.

A "study" conducted by Art Woolf on behalf of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce and an assortment of Vermont retail associations has concluded that the state's sales tax is driving eastern Vermont shoppers to New Hampshire.  Of course the "report" doesn't fail to take a swipe at other environmental initiatives practiced by Vermont:
The study acknowledges that other factors - Vermont's bottle deposit bill and strict land use provisions in Act 250 -may also be to blame, but it says sales tax disparity between the two has been the principal driver in the trend.

Of course no mention is made of the shared services enjoyed by all Vermonters that are funded through sales taxes; nor of that unquantifiable "quality of life" that most people seem to agree favorably distinguishes Vermont from New Hampshire.

But, what a coincidence!  Today was also the day that

state Attorney General William Sorrell is set to release the findings of a "healthy weight initiative" and is expected to recommend a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sugar-sweetened drinks...

Among the retail associations co-sponsoring Woolf's "study" are the Beverage Association of Vermont and the Vermont Wholesale Beverage Association.  These are the folks that make pretty darn sure that our kids never lack opportunities to hold up their end of that retail market.  Someone should ask these guys how they plan to offset the future tax burden represented by lost productivity and health issues as our sugar-addicted children grow into obese adults.

For me, the issue is not so much the regressive nature of any sales tax.  Personally, I'm all for raising income taxes on the top 1% of earners, since they are reaping the most benefits from all the consumption that goes on beneath them; and then raising the threshold for income tax liability considerably for everyone else who is stuck in the broad consumer class that supports the ultra-rich.

What gets me is the way the sugar industry (represented in this case by the Chamber and beverage associations) works both sides of the street so thoroughly, making out like bandits while conceivably doing more damage to our national health than alcohol and drugs combined.

Sue Prent :: Give Me a Break.
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Raise Your Voice!

Give Me a Break. | 10 comments
Taxes (0.00 / 0)
are regressive to 'the poor'. But later in life health care costs and obesity... are not. Society gets to pick up the tab because the costs are spread across a wide range of folks - from insurance premiums to medicare and on...

Of course, when insurance companies actively invest in fast food companies (PDF here: http://www.thebostonchannel.co... - they have a vested interest in making profits from visits to the doc.

If the $$ is so much greener over there in NH (and southern NH has become as much a suburb of Boston as parts of MA) - I'm wondering why these smart financial types aren't doing what all their studies suggest... they should be putting their $$ where their mouths are and packing it in. If it makes so much sense to operate like NH... one would think it would make sense to take their families, $$, houses, etc. and set up shop across the river.


Lost work, lost quality of life, etc. (4.00 / 1)
Are regressive to those suffering from the ill-health effects brought by poor nutrition as a result of the subsidies.

And I totally agree: if the other place is a shangri-la due to its tax policies, then why the heck are they choosing to live in a place that's supposedly so awful? Or perhaps there's more to life than the exact number of dollars you spend on a particular purchase? Maybe a decent education is important to parents? Maybe health insurance for kids, matters? Maybe they want to have their cake and eat it, too?

Yes, a free lunch is a nice idea, but the strings attached may be entirely unpalatable.


[ Parent ]
If your children are sugar addicted (0.00 / 0)
then perhaps your parenting skills need work.
I strongly oppose this beverage tax for any number of reasons, as detailed in my post from earlier today.
I'm not too worried about it, though: no one who wants to get re-elected will vote for it in the Legislature.

"San Francisco gives away clean syringes to heroin addicts but won't let your kid have a Buzz Lightyear with his Happy Meal because it sends the wrong message."

It's true.




"That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State ..."- Vermont Constitution Chapter 1, Article 16

Yeah, (4.00 / 1)
that Lewis Black bit is funny. But its not equivalent. Its comedy.

Kids are constantly fed messages of 'want' from the tube, peers, and all sorts of places where the marketers do their work. Slipping toys into poor food choices takes advantage of those kids - and parents who grew up on the crap that gets shoveled around as 'food'. Add in the cheap cost and its easy to see why one would choose to eat food like substances on the go. Add in a way to occupy your screaming, overweight, ADD, sugar riddled kid for a few minutes of peace on the drive home ... and its a no brainer for some parents.

With the needles - folks are addicted. Treatment requires dedication and participation. And $$$. A side effect of addiction is that the delivery method in the case mentioned spreads disease. Needles are cheap. Giving away needles slows disease spread (saving $$), and may just snare a few folks into a treatment program.

One is using a lure to snag kids (and parents) into supporting a wholly unhealthy (for many reasons) industry and eating habits.

The other is trying to combat disease spread with a cheap solution. Sort of like if a town offered to drive around and pick up used motor oil so folks don't dump it into the river.

Now, if San Fran was giving away needles to kids so they could pick up some drugs at the local drive thru... I could see where we could argue. Or if they were giving out free happy meals with those needles in some sort of incentive program... but they aren't.  


[ Parent ]
Um... (4.00 / 2)
Do I detect a little false-equivalency here?

Corporations are great at reinforcing their right to do wrong by playing the martyr for individual liberty card.


True enough (0.00 / 0)
but I'm not a corporation.

"That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State ..."- Vermont Constitution Chapter 1, Article 16

[ Parent ]
No, you aren't...and I do see your point. (4.00 / 4)
But this is a win-less situation for the poor, because to make their budget satisfy a houseful of bellies they have to go for the cheapest fillers, which Coca Cola and Frito-Lay are only too pleased to provide because their products represent all profit to virtually nothing in terms of nutritional investment; and the pay-off is the lifetime of repeat customers once all that subsidized sugar and corn hits the right chemical receptors in hungry brains.

[ Parent ]
And (4.00 / 2)
A nation full of folks who will need weight loss fads and programs, blood pressure meds, treatment for heart disease, and later in life 'care' - currently on a pay for fee service where physicians are rewarded for treating diseases, prescribing drugs, running test - and not helping to create healthy humans.


[ Parent ]
Damn (4.00 / 2)
I never thought of it that way.
I think I need a cigarette. :(

"That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State ..."- Vermont Constitution Chapter 1, Article 16

[ Parent ]
Thanks, I'm now in recovery (4.00 / 1)
I heard this story repeated over and over on the "news" - and became somewhat despondent. The Chamber of Commerce, for bejesus sakes, sponsored this so-called study -- the same folks who just Swift-Boated the President and the Democratic party in the November mid-term elections. Whoever wrote the story that went out for public consumption definitely had a point of view -- but they absolutely did not have any "news."

Give Me a Break. | 10 comments

GMD Links

Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
Tenselblog
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine




Specialized Feeds:

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Rojo
R|Mail
Add to Technorati Favorites!


RSS FEED


blog advertising is good for you
Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Follow us on Twitter! or Like us on Facebook!


Featured Stories
State and Local
National and International




Powered by: SoapBlox