| So let's talk about the things to look out for:
When the nomination was undecided for President in 2008, there was a concerted effort on the part of Republicans to sow discord and disarray among Democrats, exploiting anger between the groups. I don't need to tell anyone this, but sometimes we need reminders.
Expect this. Expect a media narrative that this is bad for Democrats. It doesn't matter whether you agree with it or if it's right. This narrative would have come no matter the situation, no matter the outcome. Expect people to come to groups such as ours, pretending to be Democrats, trying to make us fight one another.
But also expect real Democrats with real anger over this to be coming here to have their say about this as well and expect to have difficulty telling the difference.
All of that is okay. What, however, is dangerous is turning it into an opportunity for the rest of us to start bashing our candidates in the process. There is potential for harm in this, because it does sow discord, whether intentional or not.
I say this and some of you will use this as an opportunity to vent anger. Do that or not, but keep in mind the bigger picture. We have a Democrat to elect in November.
In the meantime, those of us who do not have an axe to grind over this have an obligation to speak with kindness and clarity, without attacking one another. We can disagree without fighting. We can dissent without dismissing. We can discuss without damage.
When this is all over, we will have one of three outcomes. Either Shumlin will win, Racine will win or, in a move that will completely amaze everyone, Markowitz will win.
In any case, some people will be disappointed, but they'll have felt at the end of this that their voice was heard and know their vote was counted. They'll end up as supporters of the final winner if we can keep the campaigns as cordial as they have been prior to the vote.
This means not rising to bait. This means thinking about what we post-- not self-censorship but just thinking of intent. When we post something that's an attack on a candidate or his or her supporters, are we doing so to validate or own egos? Are we doing so to be defensive and/or aggressive? Or, instead, are we doing so to benefit the campaigns? Again, I'm not saying what people should or should not do except to say that we need to be conscious of what we are doing and think about it clearly.
I say all this because I've already seen hostile comments from supporters of both Racine and Shumlin, about each candidate and/or his supporters. These have come up here and on the candidates' Facebook pages.
All I'm really asking is "what's the point?" As I said, the campaign is over. Arguing the relative merits of a Shumlin vs. Racine choice is no longer of value. In any case, 3/4ths of the Democratic electorate refused to support your candidate and they had reasons for making the choice they did. Whoever comes out on top here, doesn't just want that other 75%. She or he desperately needs it.
So this is what can happen in the meantime:
The candidates themselves can reach out to one another. They can work together and with their own supporters to encourage them to support the winner. They can show great respect for one another throughout the process. And they can agree as a group to go after Brian Dubie.
One vulnerability that exists right now is that if any of the candidates goes after Dubie directly, taking the fight to him, it will seem presumptuous, like they're declaring victory before it's over.
You need to be presumptuous to run for Governor. You need to be a little arrogant. It's okay.
So let's have them all do it, hammering him constantly over the next three weeks. And I don't just mean Shumlin and Racine. I mean Markowitz, Dunne and Bartlett. I mean they need to be playing up why Dubie is bad for Vermont. If all five are doing it, there is no room for anyone to look presumptuous. And if they all do a great job of it, we'll all be more comfortable with who the nominee is, even it wasn't our first (or 3rd choice).
But we need to be doing this too. And we're especially poised to do this because we have nothing to lose and, quite frankly, we can be mean in ways the candidates never can.
We can muckrake. We talk about this:
MONTPELIER - Lt. Gov. Brian Dubie received a helping hand in his gubernatorial bid from Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell Monday, who hosted a major fundraiser for the Vermont Republican in Washington, D.C.
He also got a barrage of criticism from Democrats for appearing with a man who once said that working women and feminists are "detrimental" to families and has recently rescinded a state policy against discriminating against gays and lesbians.
"It's not suprising that one of the most conservative governors in America is helping out Brian Dubie," said Alex MacLean, the campaign manager for Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin. "Brian Dubie is far too conservative for Vermont."
in ways that are far less polite than our candidates need to be.
So here's my question, to every one reading this:
What are you going to do next that increases the chances that we end up with a Democrat in the Governor's office come November? |
250-1
75-1
