mug     



Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.



Follow us on Twitter! or join our Facebook group!

Get ready for the whitewash

by: Jack McCullough

Wed Jul 07, 2010 at 07:47:23 AM EDT


UPDATE: According to the Times Argus, he is planning on suing the city.

 

We know what to expect, don't we?

Once again, the Barre Police have assaulted a harmless, unarmed person with their Tasers, this time in the context of what they referred to, apparently without embarrassment, as a "welfare check".

I guess they determined that the welfare of a human being is adversely affected by the introduction of 50,000 volts.

Then, once they took the guy down using their Tasers they did what any self-respecting police department would do: they arrested him and charged him with disorderly conduct. After all, the police would never let someone get away with being assaulted and injured by the police without charging him with something, right?

This time the judge wouldn't hear of it. At a preliminary hearing this week district Judge Brian Grearson threw out the charges, concluding that there was no evidence that the injured victim's behavior amounted to disorderly conduct, even though State's Attorney Tom Kelly argued valiantly that yelling was enough.

Grearson listened carefully as States Attorney Tom Kelly repeatedly attempted to make the case that Magoon engaged in either "violent, threatening, or tumultuous behavior" during a brief confrontation that stemmed from a report he was carrying a knife and might be suicidal.

Although Kelly conceded that Magoon complied with a police request that he drop the backpack he was carrying at the time and never actually threatened any of the three officers on the scene, he insisted there were grounds for the criminal charge

"At the very least his behavior was tumultuous," Kelly said, suggesting Magoon's alleged shouting in a public place was enough to clear that bar.

Not according to Grearson.

"Anything other than yelling?" the judge asked.

 What comes next? Well, now that the charges have been dismissed the victim's lawyer indicates that he is likely to sue the Barre police.

In addition, as with the incident earlier this year, we can expect that the Barre Police Department will conduct an investigation and conclude that its officers were blameless and acted in conformity with the Taser policy.

But what about this: How about taking these deadly weapons away from the police? they've already shown that they can't be trusted with them.

Jack McCullough :: Get ready for the whitewash
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Raise Your Voice!
"Tumultuous" ... (4.00 / 2)
when I read that line in the paper about shouting being a valid reason to subject someone to a life threatening assault (use of a taser) ... all I could think was "holy shit!"

So the question arises: where do our esteemed gubernatorial wannabes stand on all this? And I'm not asking rhetorically.

It's over at http://ramabahama.net ... only it's still under construction (but so is the rest of my life)


- (0.00 / 0)
As long as you don't shout, "Holy Shit" in the presence of a Barre police officer you should be safe.

[ Parent ]
Shift to the Police State (4.00 / 3)
Judge Grearson is deserving of many kudos for using his common sense of justice to control police tactic abuses.

I have been reading too many articles that went the other way from police tasering 86 year old bedridden ladies, 8 year old children having tantrums, epileptics and diabetics having seizures, a man who fell off a bridge and was hurt, and people of color walking home from the grocery store.
This is the first time I've heard that the police were not exonerated of a sociopathic attack against the public.

I have been despairing of our police remembering who they are supposed to 'protect and serve' !
Especially after the G20 and G8, meetings, and national party conventions in Denver, Seattle, St. Paul, London, and most recently Toronto.

I've also noticed a concerted attack on the press from the coverage of the meetings and conventions mentioned above to the gulf oil spill and spraying of Corexit by BP and our own Coast Guard.

We're watching the dissolution of our society.... and I am grateful for Judge Grearson putting a stop to it in one corner of Vermont.

But he should watch his back from political retaliation.... and we should watch his for him too !


Relatively? (3.00 / 1)
Since obtaining Tasers nearly a year ago, police officers in Barre have used them relatively sparingly.
according to the reporter
Considering Barre PD has had Tasers for less than a year and used them three(?)times what would be considered excessive use by the reporter?

   


Yup (3.00 / 1)
Tasers were supposedly introduced as an alternative to deadly force- so in each incidence the Barre Police (or any other police force) use a taser, the immediate assumption/question that should be asked is "if they didn't have a taser on hand, would they have shot this person?"

I'd like to see how the papers would cover a story about the BPD shooting a man for yelling in a park.

"GMD's once proud libertarian-socialist"


[ Parent ]
One of the (4.00 / 1)
newer rationales is that using tasers will protect the PD officers from injuries and associates costs.
Even if that were proven so any savings could rapidly be exceeded by legal fees in lawsuits in other cases.
The State of Vermont quietly shelled out $40,000 last Thanksgiving eve in an out of court tasering case settlement.
http://www.greenmountaindaily....


[ Parent ]
Yeah (0.00 / 0)
I think we should be weary anytime someone (especially the State or police) says it's doing one thing for one reason, and then when questioned about the illogic/inconsistencies of that reasoning, comes up with a new reasoning.... I mean, are these the police or 4 year olds we're talking about?

"GMD's once proud libertarian-socialist"

[ Parent ]
When Tasers were introduced nationally, (4.00 / 2)
a great deal of PR was devoted to convincing everyone that they were a safe tool for law-enforcement.  They oversold that very questionable attribute and laid the groundwork for all of the abuse that followed.  It would be very interesting to  obtain records of the developers' early sales efforts, PR planning etc.

Silly people, the police are already all over this... (4.00 / 2)
... they're pushing hard to outlaw anyone who photographs the police in the act of using excessive force. Aided by over-zealous state attorneys, they're trying to kill the messengers who document the atrocities and hold them accountable.

Odd, really, that on the one hand law enforcement will insist that when they taser random people for no apparent reason they're justified in doing so, and yet on the other hand they lash out furiously whenever someone happens to be in the right place at the right time to catch their actions on video or has the audacity to complain about their treatment at the hands of the police.

Why... it's almost as if, deep down, the cops know they're doing something wrong, but instead of refraining from doing it, they're more interested in stopping anyone from knowing about it or daring to complain about it. Remind me again who pays their salaries and who is supposed to be comforted by their presence in our midst?  


- (0.00 / 0)
Isn't the whole point of becoming a cop is to have cover for your love of being violent to strangers?

I know one resident in my town who is a Border Patrol agent in Newport.  He said that the reason he became a Border agent was specifically so he could go through people's belongings without cause or warrant.  He said that being a regular cop sucked because of the Constitution's 4th Amendment.  


[ Parent ]
Bullshit hyperbole. (4.00 / 2)
I know and have great respect for many in law enforcement. Using isolated instances of abuse to malign "cops" is a very bad practice. While there are those who may fit your mold, the majority do not. There are more people in law enforcement that are protecting and serving us each day with honor and dignity than there are bad cops. This cop-bashing crap has got to stop.

[ Parent ]
Most, if not all, of it has nothing to do with "cop-bashing" (4.00 / 1)
From my personal discussions, experiences and reading I've become sick and tired of this concept that being brutalized by or collateral damage to police work is just fine.

Really freakin' sick and tired of it ...

And I think it's about time all those well meaning police and our politicians take tangible steps to protect us from over-zealous or criminal police work.

It's over at http://ramabahama.net ... only it's still under construction (but so is the rest of my life)


[ Parent ]
Really? (0.00 / 0)
I'll never defend police brutality or collateral damage, but how do you defend this:

Isn't the whole point of becoming a cop is to have cover for your love of being violent to strangers?

That's what I call "cop bashing" and it's what I was calling bullshit on.

But, to your point:

And I think it's about time all those well meaning police and our politicians take tangible steps to protect us from over-zealous or criminal police work.

Didn't the system in this case work? The judge intervened and protected the rights of the citizen when the State's Attorney and members of the Barre Police department were found to be on the wrong side of the law. The charges have been dismissed the victim's lawyer indicates that he is likely to sue the Barre police.


[ Parent ]
Well now let us count ... (3.67 / 3)
1) The "system" allowed for the victim to be rather brutally assaulted with the known possible consequence of death by taser.

2) The "system" will not hold the police responsible for their assault in the same manner the "system" would have held you or I accountable for similar actions.

3) The "system" intervened AFTER the fact. That's not working, that's merely keeping the issue from getting worse then it already is.

I guess I say bullshit.

The "system" should have seen the police act reasonably and responsibly. If there is any true justice, the "system" will prosecute these police for their criminal behavior.

But won't happen ... because the "system" didn't work.

It's over at http://ramabahama.net ... only it's still under construction (but so is the rest of my life)


[ Parent ]
Hardwick (4.00 / 1)
Hardwick Police announced at the July 1 Select Board meeting that they have bought tasers and are going to begin training with them.

The police chief is from North Miami Beach, Florida.


Force vs. respect (3.75 / 4)
The police have two major types of power. One is force: the gun, the pepper spray, the taser, the physical training, the backup at the other end of the radio. The other is respect: people's respect for the law, the justice system, and the police.

I'd propose that respect is the more potent of the two. A police officer who commands respect can deal with a hundred people, easily, and without violence. It is the idea in the minds of the people that they and the police are on the same side, promoting the same values, and subject to the same laws, that give the cop power. Cooperation might be grudging ("Time to quiet down and go home, folks!" "F___ing buzzkill, man.") but people understand, deep down, that a cop is the personal manifestation of the community will.

A cop with a gun but no respect is just another gangbanger in a fight.

If I were a cop I'd be angry at officers who misuse their authority. They are a danger to other police officers, taking away their most potent professional tool - the idea in the minds of the people that cops are the good guys.

More specifically the police need, at the very least, the same kind of strict rules of force applied to tasers as they have for firearms. Same internal investigation when used, same reporting, same penalties. The only place I see the taser as being appropriate is when the officer or someone else is being threatened with immediate physical harm with a non-projectile weapon such as a knife or club. Otherwise, no weapon = no weapon.  


Minor Heretic
"Damned for 25% of eternity"



GMD Links

Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
Tenselblog
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine




Specialized Feeds:

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Rojo
R|Mail
Add to Technorati Favorites!


RSS FEED

250-1

55-1


blog advertising is good for you
Event Calendar
February 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 * * *
<< (add event) >>



Featured Stories
State and Local
National and International




Powered by: SoapBlox