mug     

Please Donate To the Greater Falls Warming Shelter in Memory of Julie Waters



Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.




It was efficiency vs. democracy

by: Jack McCullough

Mon May 03, 2010 at 06:00:00 AM EDT


And this time democracy won.

As a member of Montpelier's Board of Civil Authority I have to go out and work every election day, doing various tasks connected with counting ballots. One of our tasks is to record and count the write-ins, and there are often a lot. We don't count votes for obviously fictitious characters, like Mickey Mouse or Eric Cartman (an actual write-in this year), but we do count votes for everyone else.

Sometimes it actually makes a difference, especially for the down-ticket offices, and on rare occasion an organized write-in campaign gets someone elected, but ordinarily the write-in is probably a protest vote or a friendly gesture to someone the voter likes and thinks might get a kick out of getting a vote or two.

Counting the write-ins can be time-consuming because even in towns with machine counting the write-ins must be recorded and counted by hand. It would be a misstatement to say that the election officials are always happy to deal with them.

A couple of weeks ago, in the context of some legislation pertaining to recounts, the House Gov Ops Committee got the idea to squelch the curse of write-ins once and for all. Here's the amendment they proposed:

Jack McCullough :: It was efficiency vs. democracy

Sec. 3. 17 V.S.A. § 2414 is added to read:
§ 2414. WRITE-IN CANDIDATES; DECLARATION OF CANDIDACY
(a) A person who has not been nominated by any other procedure set forth n this chapter and whose name will not appear on the ballot for a particular office may be written in on a ballot for any office in a primary, general, or pecial election. However, a “write-in” candidate shall file a declaration of andidacy for an office with the office of the secretary of state not later than 5 p.m. on the Friday preceding the election if the candidate wishes to have the votes cast for his or her name counted by name for that office. The secretary

FRIDAY, APRIL 23, 2010 1089
of state shall prepare and make available a declaration of candidacy form to be ompleted, signed, and filed by a “write-in candidate” before the deadline.
(b) The secretary of state shall notify all town clerks of each write-in andidate who has filed a declaration of candidacy prior to the deadline. Each andidate who has filed a declaration of candidacy shall have votes cast ecorded next to his or her write-in name in the vote counting process and shall ave his or her votes reported by name on the official return of votes. If a eclaration of candidacy has not been filed, the name of the write-in candidate hall not be recorded, but the vote cast shall be recorded as a “scattered rite-in” on all counting forms and on the official return of votes.

Get it? It doesn't matter who you wanted to vote for as a write-in, if they didn't file a candidate declaration it's just as though you hadn't cast a vote.

 I just think this is wrong. Democracy means you get to vote for whoever you want to vote for. That's partly why I don't like term limits.

I'm happy to say, this didn't stand up for long. Special appreciation goes to a tripartisan array of opponents: Reps. Anne Donahue, Sandy Haas, Willem Jewett, and Tom Koch, who vociferously opposed this proposal and got the committee to drop it.

Remember: it's your vote, so use it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Raise Your Voice!

There's another word involved here ... (4.00 / 1)
"Efficacy" (n) the ability to produce a desired or intended result (per Oxford/American dictionary)

When we define systems by efficacy and not efficiency we end up with different results.

I've done vote counting. It certainly can be very inefficient when write-ins are counted because write-ins don't win except in extremely rare circumstances and counting write-ins slows and complicates the vote counting process.

But, as Jack points out, democracy isn't about how efficient we are: democracy is about a desired result ... or efficacy.

A highly efficient elections system would provide us with one candidate and ballots already checked for that one candidate. Oh ... you mean despotic pretenders to democracy have already been doing that?

It's over at http://ramabahama.net ... only it's still under construction (but so is the rest of my life)



GMD Links

Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
Tenselblog
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine




Specialized Feeds:

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL
Subscribe in Rojo
R|Mail
Add to Technorati Favorites!


RSS FEED


blog advertising is good for you
Event Calendar
May 2012
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 * *
<< (add event) >>

Follow us on Twitter! or Like us on Facebook!


Featured Stories
State and Local
National and International




Powered by: SoapBlox