Right in character: F-35 fails latest test

Look up in the sky! It is a bird or even superman —  but not an F-35. The troubled new jet fighter scheduled to be deployed to Burlington International Airport in 2019 continued right in character — performing poorly.f35csmp1

“The Air Force attempted two alert launch procedures during the Mountain Home deployment, where multiple F-35A aircraft were preflighted and prepared for a rapid launch, but only one of the six aircraft was able to complete the alert launch sequence and successfully takeoff,” the Pentagon’s top weapons tester disclosed in written testimony to Congress on 26 April.

Under development for 15 years the F-35 program has set records burning through $400 billion of our tax dollars. Currently the cost per aircraft is estimated to be of $412 million. And after all that time and money, the results of the recent deployment test are probably the last thing supporters of deployment to Vermont –notably Senators Leahy and Sanders, Rep. Peter Welch, Gov. Shumlin, and Mayor Miro Weinberger — want to hear.

Glitches that required system and/or aircraft shutdown and restarts that prevented launches were blamed on “immature software.”

For now at least, the F-35 is a fully mature employment program for some defense contractors. Currently these aircraft at one base require 60-90 industry tech reps per squadron. And in Senate testimony just last week Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan said the program needs about 2,600 people to oversee it at a cost of $70 million per year. One Senator said he had numbers indicating it was nearly 3,000 people and $300 million a year.

Now, seven years since its first flight hour, the F-35 has reached the 50,000 flight hours mark.  Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, F-35 Joint Program Executive Officer: “The next 50,000 hours will be achieved much quicker as we double the size of the F-35 fleet worldwide in the next three years alone.”

The 50,000 flight hours are comprised of two categories: System Development and Demonstration flights (SDD)  test hours (12,050) and Operational flying hours (37,950).  Therefore, the total for Operational flight hours is only 37,950 hours-about a quarter less than the total flight hours of 50,000.

When he was defending the safety of deployment to Vermont in 2013, Lt. Col. Chris Caputo said the new fighter would have 750,000 flight hours before it comes to Burlington in 2019. A lot more F-35’s will have to be flying  and an awful lot of Operational flight time (700,000) will have to be logged in three years if the Vermont Air Guard is  to receive a plane that meets that goal.

Another question for the brass hats — and the F-35 cheerleaders –how realistic (or affordable) is reaching that goal in three years considering all the “glitches” and “bugs” haunting the aircraft?

A GMD bonus fun-fact:

Lockheed Martin was the biggest federal contract in 2014, Lockheed’s Pentagon contracts alone are worth more than the federal government provides in grants to the state governments of North Dakota, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Vermont, Delaware, Wyoming, Montana, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Idaho, and Alaska combined.

6 thoughts on “Right in character: F-35 fails latest test

  1. Large portions of crow should be required on Vermont’s political table as this mistake rolls out over coming decades. Of course those pols who spoke out in favor of the F-35 will be long gone before they are delivered to BTV.

    John McCain called the F-35 a scandal and a tragedy. He “called the cost overruns “disgraceful” and noted that the F-35 program had originally promised 1,013 fighters by fiscal year 2016 but had only delivered 179.

    McCain added that the plane’s delays meant that “the last F-35 will be delivered in 2040,” and given that potential adversaries like China and Russia were investing in modern aircraft technology, he said he “cannot fathom how this strategy makes any sense. He made the comments while chairing a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the F-35.”

    The F-35 never passed most Vermonters’ Smell Test… same with Stenger-Quiros claims, and so many other misguided boondogles dismissed early on by the rank-and-file but fed to us as if they were good medicine.

    1. The argument made by Senator Sanders that the F-35 program is underway, a fact and therefore should be based in Vermont as opposed to South Carolina or Florida kind of rings hollow if the over budget aircraft keeps failing to perform.
      The argument is fast becoming one about wasted spending on military flights of fancy.

      1. I agree.

        The position of Sanders and Leahy, plus the Democratic mayor of Burlington and our Democratic governor gave me great pain.

        Locating this hazardous boondoggle in Burlington only worsens matters.

      2. The real problem for Vermont is not even the outrageous costs, but the safety of placing this damn plane in the middle of the most densely populated area of our state. How our politicians can support this move is incomprehensible. Clearly they all, Leahy, Sanders, Welch, Shumlin and others, are much more concerned about the industrial/military/political games than the citizens of Vermont who live in the area surrounding the airport. The whole thing is disgusting!

  2. This is so damn maddening. From the right comes constant and loud barking about the cost of education, the greedy NEA, the lazy poor on welfare, the waste of healthcare. Yet not a damn word about the huge truck backing up to the treasury and the driver promising a dazzling but broken toy plane that will never be work or be worth the expense. It’s a dog chasing squirrels when the barbarians truly are at the gate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *