Yesterday, while environmentalists were focused on the much trumpeted Keystone XL decision, the White House apparently held a stealth ‘Summit on Nuclear Energy’ to which only proponents appear to have been invited. The upshot is an administration commitment to greater reliance on nuclear energy. There appears to have been no interest spent on the toxic stockpiling of nuclear waste that will be our nuclear legacy.
This is a variation on the ol’ bait and switch move: using the Keystone XL decision as protective cover for a decidedly less attractive agenda. ___________________________________________________________________
We can’t let this day pass without commenting on President Obama’s announcement that he is rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline on behalf of the American people.
For all of my differences with Mr. Obama’s foreign policy decisions, I have nothing but respect for this further demonstration of his determination to reclaim a bit of the progressive mantle in his final two years as president. No ’lame duck’ he!
In the long run, it is quite possible that this will become the most important decision of his presidency.
Deprived of this cheap form of transport through the U.S., and in combination with plummeting oil prices, will tar sands oil deposits become less attractive for exploitation? It is just possible that failure of the pipeline will have an inhibiting effect on the industry; long enough, one might hope, for Canada to come to its senses about the environmental calamity the practice represents.
It’s a small climate victory, but the President’s framing of the decision gives one hope that we can look forward to more progress on climate change initiatives.
I was disappointed to read that none of Vermont’s gubernatorial candidates will support carbon tax legislation. I think that is a real shame. It would take courage to do so, but I, for one, would have supported the brave candidate who stepped up to that responsibility.