IBM, thoroughly lousy corporate citizen

Oh, here we go. IBM was legally required to tell the state how many employees were laid off in the latest round of job cuts at Essex Junction. And it did so.

But it doesn’t want you to find out.

IBM has provided the state with details about the number of jobs cut at its Essex Junction plant, but it wants the state to keep the information from the public.

The company claims that releasing the number could harm it.

Aww, poor widdle IBM. If we find out how many people lost their jobs in Vermont, the competitive position of a global behemoth will somehow be harmed. The potential injury is so huge that IBM’s claiming an exemption from the Vermont Public Records Act.

Yeah, I don’t buy it. This is just a continuation of IBM’s nondisclosure policy, intended to minimize the PR impact of domestic job cuts.

Sounds like the state’s not buying it either:

[Labor Commissioner Annie Noonan] says the state isn’t convinced the law applies to the job cuts number and citing requests to make the figure public, the department is telling IBM it needs to make a stronger case for withholding it.

Let’s see if Big Blue can come up with a more compelling pretext. As for the truth, we turn to the union that’s been watchdogging IBM’s reign of terror:

Lee Conrad, national coordinator of Alliance@IBM, said Tuesday IBM has been “stonewalling” on job cut numbers nationwide for years.

“They’ve not been transparent at all,” Conrad said. “They don’t release the U.S. figures any more. Frankly this doesn’t surprise me. The citizens of Vermont should be outraged that IBM is thumbing their nose at them, saying ‘We’re not going to tell you our figures.'”

We don’t know exactly how many people still work at Essex. But it’s estimated that employment has fallen from 8,500 in 2001 to less than 4,000 today. Probably a lot less, according to this comment from a laid-off IBMer, posted on the Freeploid’s website:

Not surprised at all about the IBM moves to keep the numbers confidential; they are much bigger than expected and Big Blew doesn’t want the folks to know that the end of this plant is near. My estimate… is greater than 600. Of course us older folks that were “pushed” to retire will not be in the final released number even though we were really layer off (sic). That coming from a company that is wondering why there is distrust.

If that estimate is correct — 600 layoffs plus forced “retirements” — then the workforce at Essex Junction is not much more than 3,000. And, per industry insider Robert X. Cringely, IBM will continue to aggressively downsize its American operations for at least two more years.

And given IBM’s recent track record of corporate citizenship, I won’t be sorry to see them go. I’m very sorry that we’ve already lost the IBM that used to be, but that ship sailed long ago. The current IBM isn’t worth the trouble.  

6 thoughts on “IBM, thoroughly lousy corporate citizen

  1. Just like every other manufacturer. No surprises here, folks.

    IBM is leaving Vermont, the sooner the Gov and the Capitol figure out how to deal with this, the easier the transition will be. IBM is taking millions of dollars out of the Vermont economy and moving it to Communist China because slaves to need to be paid.

  2. …hemp, AND Pot.  BIG MARIHUANA is coming.  A guy who used to work for Microsoft out in Seattle has already started on the ‘business’ of medical marihuana and ‘personal use’ marihuana with Colorado and Washington state.  His theory is that Marihuana will become as BIG as the computer industry and he wants in at the start before the big Wall St companies can get laws passed about which companies can ‘control’ this cash crop.

    Why the Hell doesn’t this ‘green’ state get off its ass about hemp and pot?  We’re losing not only IBM, but also ski business.  What?  We’re going to wait and hand over our hemp and pot to Monsanto down the line?  

Comments are closed.