Entergy and the NRC are downplaying yet another radioactive leak at Vermont Yankee that occurred last weekend but is only now reaching the press>
The loss of 2,700 gallons of “mildly ” radioactive waste water Sunday from the pool, which holds thousands of Yankee’s old, highly radioactive fuel rods, was caught in a radioactive waste tank, according to Entergy Nuclear spokesman Robert Williams.
The incident is being blamed on procedural error on the part of an employee. Though Williams would not say if the employee is new to the job, the procedural error, which involved the misalignment of valves, suggests that the employee who made the error may have been lacking in experience and supervision.
Water drained from the pool for thirty minutes before the problem was discovered. What might have happened had the leak remained undetected and the 300,000-gallon tank continued to drain for hours is very troubling indeed!
That Entergy does not seem to fully appreciate this potential is betrayed by Mr. Williams characterization of the water as “mildly” radioactive. Is that anything like being a little bit pregnant?
Susan Smallheer of the Rutland Herald quotes Fairewinds Assoc. Arnie Gundersen as saying the mistake was not insignificant.
“That’s a gross procedural breakdown,” said Gundersen, who said the Public Oversight Panel had been very concerned about similar employee errors as the experienced staff at Yankee leave or retire.
And, while we’re on the subject, I took a look at Meredith Angwyn’s fanpage for Vermont Yankee, Yes VY, and besides a rather personal screed against Mr. Gundersen, I found her complaining about the very nerve of the Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel to be asking Entergy whether it was making changes in light of lessons learned at Fukushima.
She seems to be under the impression that, even though Vermont Yankee continues to operate on Vermont soil, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s preemption on safety issues extends so far as to mean the state can’t even ask questions about safety.
What is the concern here? That the people of Vermont might actually learn something about how prepared or unprepared VY is for an emergency?
Ms. Angwyn’s railing that the State Nuclear Advisory Panel should not even discuss safety issues is reminiscent of the idiot legislature of North Carolina which is considering prohibiting government agencies from even considering the potential three-foot rise in sea level, due to climate change, over the remainder of the century.
Does she think that just by talking about safety concerns, the Advisory Panel is affecting VY’s operating license?
If she is suggesting that the state doesn’t even have the right to think about evacuation concerns and other possible collateral safety issues in the event of a disaster at VY, she has lost all grip on reality.